Judge orders Walker to hold special elections

[ptbw forever]

Both Parties abuse Gerrymandering.

go find a thread about it

this one is about the koch industries manager in wisconsin getting his dick slammed in a window for refusing to hold lawful special elections

we'll call you if we need you, though

Because the Tech Giants don't contribute to, and manipulate, Democrats.
You're idiocy has been confirmed.

Every post these people make confirms their idiocy.

 

[Indeependent]

Both Parties abuse Gerrymandering.

I'm sorry. Did someone say they didn't?

You constantly infer that Democrats are more upstanding than Republicans.
That, my dear, is horseshit.

Have you taken a recent look at your leadership? In oh, I wanna say the past year or so?

Have you taken a recent look at yours?
They're one year short of legalizing post birth abortion and bestiality.

Oh, I'm definitely going to need citations for those allegations.

Simple...Take your head out of your DailyKos ass and try reading the Facebook pages of Democrats.
Every fucking Blue Dog Democrat has been become a Progressive.

And you still own me the Link that is supposed to prove Trump is guilty of some Russian Collusion.
At least until I informed you of my IT experience.
So where's the Link?

 

[busybee01]

Oh, darn. He's being forced to abide by the law. And by a judge of his own choosing, of all things.

Judge orders Walker to hold special elections

“Despite liberal rhetoric, [Wisconsin] law does not allow me to call a special election now until after 4/3/2018,” Walker tweeted earlier this month. “The state Legislature is done by then & nominations papers for fall elections are out on 4/15/2018. Ex of liberal misinformation campaign.”

Reynolds, who was appointed by Walker, rejected that argument. State law requires the governor to call an election to fill a vacancy that occurs before the second Tuesday in May of an election year.

“This is an important victory for the impacted citizens of Wisconsin who have gone without representation because of Governor Walker’s refusal to call special elections,” Holder said in a statement Thursday. “One of our most basic rights as American citizens is that we get to vote and have representation in our legislatures. Governor Walker’s actions have undermined that right and it never should have taken legal action to force him to do his job.”

Thanks be to Eric Holder, champion of voting rights! Working in tandem with Barack Obama, because fuck if we have all Not had ENOUGH of these bullshit reindeer games.

Eric Holder to Lead Democrats’ Attack on Republican Gerrymandering

Thwarted for much of his term by a confrontational Republican Congress, and criticized by his fellow Democrats for not devoting sufficient attention to their down-ballot candidates, Mr. Obama has decided to make the byzantine process of legislative redistricting a central political priority in his first years after the presidency.

Emerging as Mr. Obama’s chief collaborator and proxy is Eric H. Holder Jr., the former attorney general of the United States and a personal friend of the president. He has signed on to lead the National Democratic Redistricting Committee, a newly formed political group aimed at untangling the creatively drawn districts that have helped cement the Republican Party in power in Washington and many state capitals.

In an interview this week at Covington & Burling, the Washington law firm where he is now in private practice, Mr. Holder, 65, said that he and Mr. Obama believe Republicans have undermined the political system by creating a patchwork of legislative maps — at both the state and federal levels — that are designed to stifle the will of voters.

Holder's racist ass is going to be shut down once he refuses to address the thousands of Democrat gerrymandered districts.

OMG. Too funny. Too, too funny. Because - how did you get the House then?

I mean seriously. Find an insult that isn't rubber/glue.

When the gerrymandering stops, we'll see who wins what elections, but until then, you're the party currently and obviously holding the gerrymandered-to-within-an-inch-of-its-life bag.

Math professor takes on gerrymandering

“Gerrymandering is the process of redrawing district lines to the advantage of a party or to ensure that the current number of majority-minority districts are represented. So it’s basically partisan or racial gerrymandering,” said Keesha Middlemass, associate professor of political science.

The process has become so extreme that parties have begun to use it to prevent the opposing side from receiving an equal chance at elections or to prevent minority groups from having any block voting power.

“The majority party will control both the redistricting process and all the election laws during their term in office. So they can cut the other party out and they can restructure the laws in such a way that will keep them in office longer,” said Henry Flores, professor of political science at St. Mary’s University. “Gerrymanderers will also use racial groups that have significant percentage of populations in districts and either chop them up and divide them into districts to bolster a party or individual or to keep that group from voting in any strength.”

Gerrymandering was invented by a Democrat, dipshit.

Your source even says that Democrats created the non-white districts through gerrymandering.

Holder is simply trying to disenfranchise majority white districts(including the Democrat ones) that have already been gerrymandered by Democrats and once he is exposed your entire party will be finished.

That is completely off-topic. The topic is Walker trying to ignore state law. On this Holder is right. The law clearly requires a special election and Walker refused to obey the law.

 

[theDoctorisIn]

Seriously dude. Stop digging.

 

[Witchit]

Seriously dude. Stop digging.

But he has that special shovel and everything!!

 

[del]

Both Parties abuse Gerrymandering.

I'm sorry. Did someone say they didn't?

You constantly infer that Democrats are more upstanding than Republicans.
That, my dear, is horseshit.

no, you constantly infer it; that, my dear, is literate english

 

[ptbw forever]

Both Parties abuse Gerrymandering.

I'm sorry. Did someone say they didn't?

You constantly infer that Democrats are more upstanding than Republicans.
That, my dear, is horseshit.

Have you taken a recent look at your leadership? In oh, I wanna say the past year or so?

Have you taken a recent look at yours?
They're one year short of legalizing post birth abortion and bestiality.

Oh, I'm definitely going to need citations for those allegations.

Oh, darn. He's being forced to abide by the law. And by a judge of his own choosing, of all things.

Judge orders Walker to hold special elections

“Despite liberal rhetoric, [Wisconsin] law does not allow me to call a special election now until after 4/3/2018,” Walker tweeted earlier this month. “The state Legislature is done by then & nominations papers for fall elections are out on 4/15/2018. Ex of liberal misinformation campaign.”

Reynolds, who was appointed by Walker, rejected that argument. State law requires the governor to call an election to fill a vacancy that occurs before the second Tuesday in May of an election year.

“This is an important victory for the impacted citizens of Wisconsin who have gone without representation because of Governor Walker’s refusal to call special elections,” Holder said in a statement Thursday. “One of our most basic rights as American citizens is that we get to vote and have representation in our legislatures. Governor Walker’s actions have undermined that right and it never should have taken legal action to force him to do his job.”

Thanks be to Eric Holder, champion of voting rights! Working in tandem with Barack Obama, because fuck if we have all Not had ENOUGH of these bullshit reindeer games.

Eric Holder to Lead Democrats’ Attack on Republican Gerrymandering

Thwarted for much of his term by a confrontational Republican Congress, and criticized by his fellow Democrats for not devoting sufficient attention to their down-ballot candidates, Mr. Obama has decided to make the byzantine process of legislative redistricting a central political priority in his first years after the presidency.

Emerging as Mr. Obama’s chief collaborator and proxy is Eric H. Holder Jr., the former attorney general of the United States and a personal friend of the president. He has signed on to lead the National Democratic Redistricting Committee, a newly formed political group aimed at untangling the creatively drawn districts that have helped cement the Republican Party in power in Washington and many state capitals.

In an interview this week at Covington & Burling, the Washington law firm where he is now in private practice, Mr. Holder, 65, said that he and Mr. Obama believe Republicans have undermined the political system by creating a patchwork of legislative maps — at both the state and federal levels — that are designed to stifle the will of voters.

Holder's racist ass is going to be shut down once he refuses to address the thousands of Democrat gerrymandered districts.

OMG. Too funny. Too, too funny. Because - how did you get the House then?

I mean seriously. Find an insult that isn't rubber/glue.

When the gerrymandering stops, we'll see who wins what elections, but until then, you're the party currently and obviously holding the gerrymandered-to-within-an-inch-of-its-life bag.

Math professor takes on gerrymandering

“Gerrymandering is the process of redrawing district lines to the advantage of a party or to ensure that the current number of majority-minority districts are represented. So it’s basically partisan or racial gerrymandering,” said Keesha Middlemass, associate professor of political science.

The process has become so extreme that parties have begun to use it to prevent the opposing side from receiving an equal chance at elections or to prevent minority groups from having any block voting power.

“The majority party will control both the redistricting process and all the election laws during their term in office. So they can cut the other party out and they can restructure the laws in such a way that will keep them in office longer,” said Henry Flores, professor of political science at St. Mary’s University. “Gerrymanderers will also use racial groups that have significant percentage of populations in districts and either chop them up and divide them into districts to bolster a party or individual or to keep that group from voting in any strength.”

Gerrymandering was invented by a Democrat, dipshit.

Your source even says that Democrats created the non-white districts through gerrymandering.

Holder is simply trying to disenfranchise majority white districts(including the Democrat ones) that have already been gerrymandered by Democrats and once he is exposed your entire party will be finished.

That is completely off-topic. The topic is Walker trying to ignore state law. On this Holder is right. The law clearly requires a special election and Walker refused to obey the law.

Tell Witchit that, moron.

 

[del]

^
upset because the nobel committee still hasn't called

 

[Indeependent]

Both Parties abuse Gerrymandering.

I'm sorry. Did someone say they didn't?

You constantly infer that Democrats are more upstanding than Republicans.
That, my dear, is horseshit.

no, you constantly infer it; that, my dear, is literate english

Attacking only one Party on a consistent basis creates Confirmation Bias.

 

[del]

Both Parties abuse Gerrymandering.

I'm sorry. Did someone say they didn't?

You constantly infer that Democrats are more upstanding than Republicans.
That, my dear, is horseshit.

no, you constantly infer it; that, my dear, is literate english

Attacking only one Party on a consistent basis creates Confirmation Bias.

and using infer when imply is the proper usage creates a distinct lack of interest in anything else you may have to say.

good evening

 

[Indeependent]

Both Parties abuse Gerrymandering.

I'm sorry. Did someone say they didn't?

You constantly infer that Democrats are more upstanding than Republicans.
That, my dear, is horseshit.

no, you constantly infer it; that, my dear, is literate english

Attacking only one Party on a consistent basis creates Confirmation Bias.

and using infer when imply is the proper usage creates a distinct lack of interest in anything else you may have to say.

good evening

I used the word correctly and you're still an idiot.

 

[del]

I'm sorry. Did someone say they didn't?

You constantly infer that Democrats are more upstanding than Republicans.
That, my dear, is horseshit.

no, you constantly infer it; that, my dear, is literate english

Attacking only one Party on a consistent basis creates Confirmation Bias.

and using infer when imply is the proper usage creates a distinct lack of interest in anything else you may have to say.

good evening

I used the word correctly and you're still an idiot.

no, you used it completely and totally incorrectly. you have no way of knowing what she may or may not infer in any event

you may some day be an idiot, but right now you fall woefully short.

 

[Indeependent]

You constantly infer that Democrats are more upstanding than Republicans.
That, my dear, is horseshit.

no, you constantly infer it; that, my dear, is literate english

Attacking only one Party on a consistent basis creates Confirmation Bias.

and using infer when imply is the proper usage creates a distinct lack of interest in anything else you may have to say.

good evening

I used the word correctly and you're still an idiot.

no, you used it completely and totally incorrectly. you have no way of knowing what she may or may not infer in any event

you may some day be an idiot, but right now you fall woefully short.

I wasn't being sarcastic...you really are an idiot.
Maybe your mom thinks you're a great poster...but you're an idiot.
Try reading your posts...you're an idiot.

And there was zero incorrect in this sentence...
"You constantly infer that Democrats are more upstanding than Republicans."
But then again...you're an idiot.

 

[theDoctorisIn]

I'm sorry. Did someone say they didn't?

You constantly infer that Democrats are more upstanding than Republicans.
That, my dear, is horseshit.

no, you constantly infer it; that, my dear, is literate english

Attacking only one Party on a consistent basis creates Confirmation Bias.

and using infer when imply is the proper usage creates a distinct lack of interest in anything else you may have to say.

good evening

I used the word correctly and you're still an idiot.

No, you really didn't.

 

[Indeependent]

You constantly infer that Democrats are more upstanding than Republicans.
That, my dear, is horseshit.

no, you constantly infer it; that, my dear, is literate english

Attacking only one Party on a consistent basis creates Confirmation Bias.

and using infer when imply is the proper usage creates a distinct lack of interest in anything else you may have to say.

good evening

I used the word correctly and you're still an idiot.

No, you really didn't.

You're also an idiot?
Pull out a grammar book and let's discuss.

 

[del]

no, you constantly infer it; that, my dear, is literate english

Attacking only one Party on a consistent basis creates Confirmation Bias.

and using infer when imply is the proper usage creates a distinct lack of interest in anything else you may have to say.

good evening

I used the word correctly and you're still an idiot.

No, you really didn't.

You're also an idiot?
Pull out a grammar book and let's discuss.

a dictionary is what you need, forrest, not a *grammar book*

im·ply
imˈplī/
verb
verb: imply; 3rd person present: implies; past tense: implied; past participle: implied; gerund or present participle: implying

1. strongly suggest the truth or existence of (something not expressly stated).
   "the salesmen who uses jargon to imply his superior knowledge"
   synonyms: insinuate, suggest, hint (at), intimate, say indirectly, indicate, give someone to understand, convey the impression, signal
   "are you implying he is mad?"
   • (of a fact or occurrence) suggest (something) as a logical consequence.
     "the forecasted traffic increase implied more roads and more air pollution"
     synonyms: involve, entail; More
     mean, point to, signify, indicate, signal, connote, denote;
     necessitate, require, presuppose
     "the forecasted traffic increase implies more roads"
   in·fer
   inˈfər/
   verb
   verb: infer; 3rd person present: infers; past tense: inferred; past participle: inferred; gerund or present participle: inferring
   1. deduce or conclude (information) from evidence and reasoning rather than from explicit statements.
      "from these facts we can infer that crime has been increasing"
      synonyms: deduce, conclude, conjecture, surmise, reason, interpret; More
      gather, understand, presume, assume, take it, extrapolate;
      read between the lines, figure (out);
      informalreckon
      "is it really possible to infer that a crime was committed, given this flimsy evidence?"

let me give you an example.

if i say, "that indeependent doesn't have the brains god gave a fucking pigeon", i am implying that you are a fucking moron.

if i say, "i've taken dumps with a higher iq than that flaming fuckwit indeependent.", you could reasonably infer that i hold you in something less than the highest regard intellectually.

i hope this helps

 

[Indeependent]

Attacking only one Party on a consistent basis creates Confirmation Bias.

and using infer when imply is the proper usage creates a distinct lack of interest in anything else you may have to say.

good evening

I used the word correctly and you're still an idiot.

No, you really didn't.

You're also an idiot?
Pull out a grammar book and let's discuss.

a dictionary is what you need, forrest, not a *grammar book*

im·ply
imˈplī/
verb
verb: imply; 3rd person present: implies; past tense: implied; past participle: implied; gerund or present participle: implying

1. strongly suggest the truth or existence of (something not expressly stated).
   "the salesmen who uses jargon to imply his superior knowledge"
   synonyms: insinuate, suggest, hint (at), intimate, say indirectly, indicate, give someone to understand, convey the impression, signal
   "are you implying he is mad?"
   • (of a fact or occurrence) suggest (something) as a logical consequence.
     "the forecasted traffic increase implied more roads and more air pollution"
     synonyms: involve, entail; More
     mean, point to, signify, indicate, signal, connote, denote;
     necessitate, require, presuppose
     "the forecasted traffic increase implies more roads"
   in·fer
   inˈfər/
   verb
   verb: infer; 3rd person present: infers; past tense: inferred; past participle: inferred; gerund or present participle: inferring
   1. deduce or conclude (information) from evidence and reasoning rather than from explicit statements.
      "from these facts we can infer that crime has been increasing"
      synonyms: deduce, conclude, conjecture, surmise, reason, interpret; More
      gather, understand, presume, assume, take it, extrapolate;
      read between the lines, figure (out);
      informalreckon
      "is it really possible to infer that a crime was committed, given this flimsy evidence?"

let me give you an example.

if i say, "that indeependent doesn't have the brains god gave a fucking pigeon", i am implying that you are a fucking moron.

if i say, "i've taken dumps with a higher iq than that flaming fuckwit indeependent.", you could reasonably infer that i hold you in something less than the highest regard intellectually.

i hope this helps

As I see it regarding political ideology...
Imply is too weak a word for what you guys do.
You are not implying anything regarding an object because there's zero reference to that object.
Inference is assumed by lack of information between 2 fixed objects when all statements regard only one object and never the other object.
Thus, you are making an inference, not an implication.

 

[del]

and using infer when imply is the proper usage creates a distinct lack of interest in anything else you may have to say.

good evening

I used the word correctly and you're still an idiot.

No, you really didn't.

You're also an idiot?
Pull out a grammar book and let's discuss.

a dictionary is what you need, forrest, not a *grammar book*

im·ply
imˈplī/
verb
verb: imply; 3rd person present: implies; past tense: implied; past participle: implied; gerund or present participle: implying

1. strongly suggest the truth or existence of (something not expressly stated).
   "the salesmen who uses jargon to imply his superior knowledge"
   synonyms: insinuate, suggest, hint (at), intimate, say indirectly, indicate, give someone to understand, convey the impression, signal
   "are you implying he is mad?"
   • (of a fact or occurrence) suggest (something) as a logical consequence.
     "the forecasted traffic increase implied more roads and more air pollution"
     synonyms: involve, entail; More
     mean, point to, signify, indicate, signal, connote, denote;
     necessitate, require, presuppose
     "the forecasted traffic increase implies more roads"
   in·fer
   inˈfər/
   verb
   verb: infer; 3rd person present: infers; past tense: inferred; past participle: inferred; gerund or present participle: inferring
   1. deduce or conclude (information) from evidence and reasoning rather than from explicit statements.
      "from these facts we can infer that crime has been increasing"
      synonyms: deduce, conclude, conjecture, surmise, reason, interpret; More
      gather, understand, presume, assume, take it, extrapolate;
      read between the lines, figure (out);
      informalreckon
      "is it really possible to infer that a crime was committed, given this flimsy evidence?"

let me give you an example.

if i say, "that indeependent doesn't have the brains god gave a fucking pigeon", i am implying that you are a fucking moron.

if i say, "i've taken dumps with a higher iq than that flaming fuckwit indeependent.", you could reasonably infer that i hold you in something less than the highest regard intellectually.

i hope this helps

As I see it regarding political ideology...
Imply is too weak a word for what you guys do.
You are not implying anything regarding an object because there's zero reference to that object.
Inference is assumed by lack of information between 2 fixed objects when all statements regard only one object and never the other object.
Thus, you are making an inference, not an implication.

you are, by any objective standard, stupid.

carry on

 

[Indeependent]

I used the word correctly and you're still an idiot.

No, you really didn't.

You're also an idiot?
Pull out a grammar book and let's discuss.

a dictionary is what you need, forrest, not a *grammar book*

im·ply
imˈplī/
verb
verb: imply; 3rd person present: implies; past tense: implied; past participle: implied; gerund or present participle: implying

1. strongly suggest the truth or existence of (something not expressly stated).
   "the salesmen who uses jargon to imply his superior knowledge"
   synonyms: insinuate, suggest, hint (at), intimate, say indirectly, indicate, give someone to understand, convey the impression, signal
   "are you implying he is mad?"
   • (of a fact or occurrence) suggest (something) as a logical consequence.
     "the forecasted traffic increase implied more roads and more air pollution"
     synonyms: involve, entail; More
     mean, point to, signify, indicate, signal, connote, denote;
     necessitate, require, presuppose
     "the forecasted traffic increase implies more roads"
   in·fer
   inˈfər/
   verb
   verb: infer; 3rd person present: infers; past tense: inferred; past participle: inferred; gerund or present participle: inferring
   1. deduce or conclude (information) from evidence and reasoning rather than from explicit statements.
      "from these facts we can infer that crime has been increasing"
      synonyms: deduce, conclude, conjecture, surmise, reason, interpret; More
      gather, understand, presume, assume, take it, extrapolate;
      read between the lines, figure (out);
      informalreckon
      "is it really possible to infer that a crime was committed, given this flimsy evidence?"

let me give you an example.

if i say, "that indeependent doesn't have the brains god gave a fucking pigeon", i am implying that you are a fucking moron.

if i say, "i've taken dumps with a higher iq than that flaming fuckwit indeependent.", you could reasonably infer that i hold you in something less than the highest regard intellectually.

i hope this helps

As I see it regarding political ideology...
Imply is too weak a word for what you guys do.
You are not implying anything regarding an object because there's zero reference to that object.
Inference is assumed by lack of information between 2 fixed objects when all statements regard only one object and never the other object.
Thus, you are making an inference, not an implication.

you are, by any objective standard, stupid.

carry on

Yeah, I can tell by my Winners as opposed to yours.
You're not in my league...probably because your anger restricts the neurohumors in your tiny brain.

 

[del]

No, you really didn't.

You're also an idiot?
Pull out a grammar book and let's discuss.

a dictionary is what you need, forrest, not a *grammar book*

im·ply
imˈplī/
verb
verb: imply; 3rd person present: implies; past tense: implied; past participle: implied; gerund or present participle: implying

1. strongly suggest the truth or existence of (something not expressly stated).
   "the salesmen who uses jargon to imply his superior knowledge"
   synonyms: insinuate, suggest, hint (at), intimate, say indirectly, indicate, give someone to understand, convey the impression, signal
   "are you implying he is mad?"
   • (of a fact or occurrence) suggest (something) as a logical consequence.
     "the forecasted traffic increase implied more roads and more air pollution"
     synonyms: involve, entail; More
     mean, point to, signify, indicate, signal, connote, denote;
     necessitate, require, presuppose
     "the forecasted traffic increase implies more roads"
   in·fer
   inˈfər/
   verb
   verb: infer; 3rd person present: infers; past tense: inferred; past participle: inferred; gerund or present participle: inferring
   1. deduce or conclude (information) from evidence and reasoning rather than from explicit statements.
      "from these facts we can infer that crime has been increasing"
      synonyms: deduce, conclude, conjecture, surmise, reason, interpret; More
      gather, understand, presume, assume, take it, extrapolate;
      read between the lines, figure (out);
      informalreckon
      "is it really possible to infer that a crime was committed, given this flimsy evidence?"

let me give you an example.

if i say, "that indeependent doesn't have the brains god gave a fucking pigeon", i am implying that you are a fucking moron.

if i say, "i've taken dumps with a higher iq than that flaming fuckwit indeependent.", you could reasonably infer that i hold you in something less than the highest regard intellectually.

i hope this helps

As I see it regarding political ideology...
Imply is too weak a word for what you guys do.
You are not implying anything regarding an object because there's zero reference to that object.
Inference is assumed by lack of information between 2 fixed objects when all statements regard only one object and never the other object.
Thus, you are making an inference, not an implication.

you are, by any objective standard, stupid.

carry on

Yeah, I can tell by my Winners as opposed to yours.
You're not in my league...probably because your anger restricts the neurohumors in your tiny brain.

yes, the all important winners



you really are a dimwit.