Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
Your belief that Trump knew the personal histories of all 20 people is absurd. At worst, his question was in-artful. If this is the only basis for claiming he's a racist, you aren't making your point. All you're doing is proving that you're a sleazy douchebag.Sorry, but ignorance demonstrates absolutely nothing. You have no basis for claiming indifference. Fucking Christ, he invited her to the Whitehouse. That seems like the opposite of indifference to me.What, did he shift his eyebrows the wrong way? What do you imagine that video demonstrates?What "disrespect?" You really are a total douchebag. Ya know it?Watch how Trump reacts to Nadia Murad's harrowing survival of ISIS captivity - CNN VideoWhat "disrespect?" You really are a total douchebag. Ya know it?It demonstrates how racism is a bedrock character issue with Trump, one that supersedes and informs many others just as his sexism and xenophobia does.What, did he shift his eyebrows the wrong way? What do you imagine that video demonstrates?
Opinion | The Rot You Smell Is a Racist Potus
His ignorance of Nadia's ordeal and his indifference to the deaths of her seven family members ("where are they now") reveals again the wisdom in Martin Luther King, Jr's words: "In the final analysis, racism is evil because its ultimate logic is genocide."
That an arrogant, ignorant racist like Trump was unaware of the Yazidi exterminations prove only that "the mouth that demeans may not always be attached to the hand that destroys, but they are assuredly connected in spirit and in spite."
You're a fucking moron. You keep pursuing this meme even though there isn't a single fact to support it.He asked her where her dead family member were now.Sorry, but ignorance demonstrates absolutely nothing. You have no basis for claiming indifference. Fucking Christ, he invited her to the Whitehouse. That seems like the opposite of indifference to me.
Is that an example of presidential who's dialed in to what's happening?
Donald Trump's Ignorance Won't Silence Nadia Murad
"Nadia Murad—one of thousands of Yazidi women and children who face kidnapping, human trafficking, rape and torture as forms of religious prosecution—has been making her voice heard since 2014, when she miraculously escaped after being held captive by ISIS for three months. Murad’s outspoken bravery has reached international attention and won her the Nobel Peace Prize in 2018.
"Last week, on International Justice Day, along with over 20 victims of religious persecution, Murad visited the White House.
"As the famed activist asked the President to intervene in some way to help her community—facing violence and disappearances since 2003—he appeared both unfamiliar with her story and uninterested in learning more..."
"Trump claimed to know the area she is speaking about 'very well' and shifted to the subject of her receiving the Nobel Prize. After congratulating her, he asked, 'They gave it to you for what reason, if you can explain?'"
Can you explain why any POTUS would be ignorant/indifferent enough to ask Murad why she won the Nobel Prize?
Racism was progressive at the turn of the century, shit for brains. It's only since WW II that Dims have come out against racism. However, they still support antisemitism.Wilson was a racist and a Democrat. He may have been born in Virginia, but he graduated from John Hopkins University, was president of Princeton University, and he was the governor of New Jersey. He spent spent the whole of his adult life in the North rubbing shoulders with progressive Democrats like Margaret Sanger. He was a typical progressive Democrat.Horseshit. There's nothing left or right about racism. Woodrow Wilson was a big exponent of eugenics. A lot of Dims were in those days, especially Margret Sanger. FDR was a big anti-Semit, and he put Asian Americans in concentration camps.White supremacy is a conservative doctrine regardless of partisan affiliation.
Conservatives are in denial about white supremacy
Your belief that Dims have clean hands is totally at variance with the facts.You're conflating Democrats with progressive racial values.Horseshit. There's nothing left or right about racism. Woodrow Wilson was a big exponent of eugenics. A lot of Dims were in those days, especially Margret Sanger. FDR was a big anti-Semit, and he put Asian Americans in concentration camps.
There was nothing progressive about Wilson's bigotry:
"Wilson was the first Southerner to be elected president since Zachary Taylor in 1848, and his ascension to the presidency was celebrated by Southern segregationists.
"Several historians have spotlighted consistent examples in the public record of Wilson's overtly racist policies and political appointments, such as segregationists he placed in his Cabinet.[303][304][305][306][307]"
Woodrow Wilson - Wikipedia
Eugene V. Debs was the progressive candidate on race relations in 1912.
"IN THE wake of the 1917 Russian Revolution, the Workers Party--as the Communist Party in the U.S. was known during the mid-1920s--initiated a set of anti-racist and internationalist policies and practices aimed at fighting for African American equality at home and opposing U.S. intervention abroad.
"These actions marked a breakthrough in the socialist movement, ending a long period of relative indifference to the fight against racism."
Toward an anti-racist practiceThere was nothing progressive about Wilson's and his party's view about race relations:Wilson was a racist and a Democrat. He may have been born in Virginia, but he graduated from John Hopkins University, was president of Princeton University, and he was the governor of New Jersey. He spent spent the whole of his adult life in the North rubbing shoulders with progressive Democrats like Margaret Sanger. He was a typical progressive Democrat.
Woodrow Wilson - Wikipedia
"Wilson continued to appoint African Americans to positions that had traditionally been filled by blacks, overcoming opposition from many Southern senators.[311]
"However, the Wilson administration escalated the discriminatory hiring policies and segregation of government offices that had begun under President Theodore Roosevelt, and had continued under President Taft.[312]
"In Wilson's first month in office, Postmaster General Albert S. Burleson urged the president to establish segregated government offices.[313]
"Wilson did not adopt Burleson's proposal to segregate all government departments, but he allowed Cabinet members to segregate their respective departments.[314]
"By the end of 1913, many departments, including the Navy, had segregated work spaces, restrooms, and cafeterias.[313]
"Wilson's African-American supporters, who had crossed party lines to vote for him in 1912, were bitterly disappointed, and they and Northern leaders protested the changes.[313]
"Wilson defended his administration's segregation policy in a July 1913 letter responding to civil rights activist Oswald Garrison Villard, arguing that segregation removed 'friction' between the races."
Supporting racial discrimination was never a progressive tenet; it has always been a principle of regressive white conservatives regardless of partisan propaganda.Racism was progressive at the turn of the century, shit for brains. It's only since WW II that Dims have come out against racism. However, they still support antisemitism.
Your belief that Trump knew the personal histories of all 20 people is absurd. At worst, his question was in-artful. If this is the only basis for claiming he's a racist, you aren't making your point. All you're doing is proving that you're a sleazy douchebag.Sorry, but ignorance demonstrates absolutely nothing. You have no basis for claiming indifference. Fucking Christ, he invited her to the Whitehouse. That seems like the opposite of indifference to me.What, did he shift his eyebrows the wrong way? What do you imagine that video demonstrates?It demonstrates how racism is a bedrock character issue with Trump, one that supersedes and informs many others just as his sexism and xenophobia does.What, did he shift his eyebrows the wrong way? What do you imagine that video demonstrates?
Opinion | The Rot You Smell Is a Racist Potus
His ignorance of Nadia's ordeal and his indifference to the deaths of her seven family members ("where are they now") reveals again the wisdom in Martin Luther King, Jr's words: "In the final analysis, racism is evil because its ultimate logic is genocide."
That an arrogant, ignorant racist like Trump was unaware of the Yazidi exterminations prove only that "the mouth that demeans may not always be attached to the hand that destroys, but they are assuredly connected in spirit and in spite."
You're a fucking moron. You keep pursuing this meme even though there isn't a single fact to support it.He asked her where her dead family member were now.Sorry, but ignorance demonstrates absolutely nothing. You have no basis for claiming indifference. Fucking Christ, he invited her to the Whitehouse. That seems like the opposite of indifference to me.
Is that an example of presidential who's dialed in to what's happening?
Donald Trump's Ignorance Won't Silence Nadia Murad
"Nadia Murad—one of thousands of Yazidi women and children who face kidnapping, human trafficking, rape and torture as forms of religious prosecution—has been making her voice heard since 2014, when she miraculously escaped after being held captive by ISIS for three months. Murad’s outspoken bravery has reached international attention and won her the Nobel Peace Prize in 2018.
"Last week, on International Justice Day, along with over 20 victims of religious persecution, Murad visited the White House.
"As the famed activist asked the President to intervene in some way to help her community—facing violence and disappearances since 2003—he appeared both unfamiliar with her story and uninterested in learning more..."
"Trump claimed to know the area she is speaking about 'very well' and shifted to the subject of her receiving the Nobel Prize. After congratulating her, he asked, 'They gave it to you for what reason, if you can explain?'"
Can you explain why any POTUS would be ignorant/indifferent enough to ask Murad why she won the Nobel Prize?
Trump is a nasty, thin-skinned racist fraud too stupid and ignorant to warrant being POTUS; obviously, his fellow travelers have much to admire.Your belief that Trump knew the personal histories of all 20 people is absurd. At worst, his question was in-artful. If this is the only basis for claiming he's a racist, you aren't making your point. All you're doing is proving that you're a sleazy douchebag.
Wrong. Many progressives supported racial discrimination and even eugenics. Today many self-styled "progressives" have made their hatred of Jews quite obvious.Racism was progressive at the turn of the century, shit for brains. It's only since WW II that Dims have come out against racism. However, they still support antisemitism.Wilson was a racist and a Democrat. He may have been born in Virginia, but he graduated from John Hopkins University, was president of Princeton University, and he was the governor of New Jersey. He spent spent the whole of his adult life in the North rubbing shoulders with progressive Democrats like Margaret Sanger. He was a typical progressive Democrat.Horseshit. There's nothing left or right about racism. Woodrow Wilson was a big exponent of eugenics. A lot of Dims were in those days, especially Margret Sanger. FDR was a big anti-Semit, and he put Asian Americans in concentration camps.
Your belief that Dims have clean hands is totally at variance with the facts.You're conflating Democrats with progressive racial values.Horseshit. There's nothing left or right about racism. Woodrow Wilson was a big exponent of eugenics. A lot of Dims were in those days, especially Margret Sanger. FDR was a big anti-Semit, and he put Asian Americans in concentration camps.
There was nothing progressive about Wilson's bigotry:
"Wilson was the first Southerner to be elected president since Zachary Taylor in 1848, and his ascension to the presidency was celebrated by Southern segregationists.
"Several historians have spotlighted consistent examples in the public record of Wilson's overtly racist policies and political appointments, such as segregationists he placed in his Cabinet.[303][304][305][306][307]"
Woodrow Wilson - Wikipedia
Eugene V. Debs was the progressive candidate on race relations in 1912.
"IN THE wake of the 1917 Russian Revolution, the Workers Party--as the Communist Party in the U.S. was known during the mid-1920s--initiated a set of anti-racist and internationalist policies and practices aimed at fighting for African American equality at home and opposing U.S. intervention abroad.
"These actions marked a breakthrough in the socialist movement, ending a long period of relative indifference to the fight against racism."
Toward an anti-racist practiceThere was nothing progressive about Wilson's and his party's view about race relations:Wilson was a racist and a Democrat. He may have been born in Virginia, but he graduated from John Hopkins University, was president of Princeton University, and he was the governor of New Jersey. He spent spent the whole of his adult life in the North rubbing shoulders with progressive Democrats like Margaret Sanger. He was a typical progressive Democrat.
Woodrow Wilson - Wikipedia
"Wilson continued to appoint African Americans to positions that had traditionally been filled by blacks, overcoming opposition from many Southern senators.[311]
"However, the Wilson administration escalated the discriminatory hiring policies and segregation of government offices that had begun under President Theodore Roosevelt, and had continued under President Taft.[312]
"In Wilson's first month in office, Postmaster General Albert S. Burleson urged the president to establish segregated government offices.[313]
"Wilson did not adopt Burleson's proposal to segregate all government departments, but he allowed Cabinet members to segregate their respective departments.[314]
"By the end of 1913, many departments, including the Navy, had segregated work spaces, restrooms, and cafeterias.[313]
"Wilson's African-American supporters, who had crossed party lines to vote for him in 1912, were bitterly disappointed, and they and Northern leaders protested the changes.[313]
"Wilson defended his administration's segregation policy in a July 1913 letter responding to civil rights activist Oswald Garrison Villard, arguing that segregation removed 'friction' between the races."
Supporting racial discrimination was never a progressive tenet; it has always been a principle of regressive white conservatives regardless of partisan propaganda.Racism was progressive at the turn of the century, shit for brains. It's only since WW II that Dims have come out against racism. However, they still support antisemitism.
Something to Offer
ROFL! What you hate about Trump is that he tells the truth about your ilk and he doesn't sugar coat it. I do admire him, because he isn't a panty waist like most Republicans.Your belief that Trump knew the personal histories of all 20 people is absurd. At worst, his question was in-artful. If this is the only basis for claiming he's a racist, you aren't making your point. All you're doing is proving that you're a sleazy douchebag.Sorry, but ignorance demonstrates absolutely nothing. You have no basis for claiming indifference. Fucking Christ, he invited her to the Whitehouse. That seems like the opposite of indifference to me.What, did he shift his eyebrows the wrong way? What do you imagine that video demonstrates?It demonstrates how racism is a bedrock character issue with Trump, one that supersedes and informs many others just as his sexism and xenophobia does.What, did he shift his eyebrows the wrong way? What do you imagine that video demonstrates?
Opinion | The Rot You Smell Is a Racist Potus
His ignorance of Nadia's ordeal and his indifference to the deaths of her seven family members ("where are they now") reveals again the wisdom in Martin Luther King, Jr's words: "In the final analysis, racism is evil because its ultimate logic is genocide."
That an arrogant, ignorant racist like Trump was unaware of the Yazidi exterminations prove only that "the mouth that demeans may not always be attached to the hand that destroys, but they are assuredly connected in spirit and in spite."
You're a fucking moron. You keep pursuing this meme even though there isn't a single fact to support it.He asked her where her dead family member were now.Sorry, but ignorance demonstrates absolutely nothing. You have no basis for claiming indifference. Fucking Christ, he invited her to the Whitehouse. That seems like the opposite of indifference to me.
Is that an example of presidential who's dialed in to what's happening?
Donald Trump's Ignorance Won't Silence Nadia Murad
"Nadia Murad—one of thousands of Yazidi women and children who face kidnapping, human trafficking, rape and torture as forms of religious prosecution—has been making her voice heard since 2014, when she miraculously escaped after being held captive by ISIS for three months. Murad’s outspoken bravery has reached international attention and won her the Nobel Peace Prize in 2018.
"Last week, on International Justice Day, along with over 20 victims of religious persecution, Murad visited the White House.
"As the famed activist asked the President to intervene in some way to help her community—facing violence and disappearances since 2003—he appeared both unfamiliar with her story and uninterested in learning more..."
"Trump claimed to know the area she is speaking about 'very well' and shifted to the subject of her receiving the Nobel Prize. After congratulating her, he asked, 'They gave it to you for what reason, if you can explain?'"
Can you explain why any POTUS would be ignorant/indifferent enough to ask Murad why she won the Nobel Prize?Trump is a nasty, thin-skinned racist fraud too stupid and ignorant to warrant being POTUS; obviously, his fellow travelers have much to admire.Your belief that Trump knew the personal histories of all 20 people is absurd. At worst, his question was in-artful. If this is the only basis for claiming he's a racist, you aren't making your point. All you're doing is proving that you're a sleazy douchebag.
conservatives: white supremacists are idiots, they have no power, and there's only a few of themHow is that any different from liberals' white supremacy, that says black people aren't smart and good enough to succeed on their own, and must have help from white liberals?AND I forgot to mention:"The rage that drives black riots today comes from a hundred years of chattel slavery followed by another century of Jim Crow and redlining."
Yeah, it'd have been a lot better if Democrats hadn't done all that.Conservative Democrats."The rage that drives black riots today comes from a hundred years of chattel slavery followed by another century of Jim Crow and redlining."
Yeah, it'd have been a lot better if Democrats hadn't done all that.
"Jim Crow laws were state and local laws that enforced racial segregation in the Southern United States.[1] All were enacted in the late 19th and early 20th centuries by white far-right Democratic-dominated state legislatures after the Reconstruction period.[2] The laws were enforced until 1965."
What happened after 1965?
Jim Crow laws - Wikipedia
blacks commit murder at FOUR times the rate of whites
hate crimes TWICE the rate
rape TWICE the rate
understand?? no, you don't do you?
they all crosscheck each otherAND I forgot to mention:
blacks commit murder at FOUR times the rate of whites
hate crimes TWICE the rate
rape TWICE the rate
understand?? no, you don't do you?
they all crosscheck each other
"White supremacy was dominant in the United States both before and after the American Civil War, and it also persisted for decades after the Reconstruction Era.[4]
"In the antebellum South, this included the holding of African Americans in chattel slavery, in which four million of them were denied freedom.[5]
"The outbreak of the Civil War saw the desire to uphold white supremacy being cited as a cause for state secession[6]and the formation of the Confederate States of America.[7]
"In an editorial about Native Americans in 1890, author L. Frank Baum wrote: 'The Whites, by law of conquest, by justice of civilization, are masters of the American continent, and the best safety of the frontier settlements will be secured by the total annihilation of the few remaining Indians.'[8]"
White supremacy - Wikipedia
Conservatives believe everyone can succeed.
Liberals are white supremacists.White supremacy is a conservative doctrine regardless of partisan affiliation.How is that any different from liberals' white supremacy, that says black people aren't smart and good enough to succeed on their own, and must have help from white liberals?
Conservatives believe everyone can succeed.
Liberals are white supremacists.
Conservatives are in denial about white supremacy
You're just flinging poo, seeing what sticks.[citation needed]a violent crime is a violent crime and should be treated as such...so what?....a violent crime is a violent crime and should be treated as such.....Allowing courts to consider motive when sentencing a criminal diminishes the harm society experiences from bias-motivated assaults:so what?....a violent crime is a violent crime and should be treated as such.....
Hate crime - Wikipedia
"Justifications for harsher punishments for hate crimes focus on the notion that hate crimes cause greater individual and societal harm.[citation needed]
"It is said[117] that, when the core of a person's identity is attacked, the degradation and dehumanization is especially severe, and additional emotional and physiological problems are likely to result.
"Society then, in turn, can suffer from the disempowerment of a group of people.[citation needed]
"Furthermore, it is asserted that the chances for retaliatory crimes are greater when a hate crime has been committed.
"The riots in Los Angeles, California that followed the beating of Rodney King, a Black motorist, by a group of White police officers are cited as support for this argument.[12] The beating of white truck driver Reginald Denny by black rioters during the same riot is also an example that supports this argument."Some violent crimes damage society more than others.a violent crime is a violent crime and should be treated as such...
Hate crime - Wikipedia
"Justifications for harsher punishments for hate crimes focus on the notion that hate crimes cause greater individual and societal harm.[citation needed] It is said[117] that, when the core of a person's identity is attacked, the degradation and dehumanization is especially severe, and additional emotional and physiological problems are likely to result.
"Society then, in turn, can suffer from the disempowerment of a group of people.[citation needed]
"Furthermore, it is asserted that the chances for retaliatory crimes are greater when a hate crime has been committed.
"The riots in Los Angeles, California that followed the beating of Rodney King, a Black motorist, by a group of White police officers are cited as support for this argument.[12] The beating of white truck driver Reginald Denny by black rioters during the same riot is also an example that supports this argument."
White (male) supremacy was a guiding principle of this country for the first two centuries of its existence.
It's privileges extend to the Oval Office today.[citation needed]
"White supremacy was dominant in the United States both before and after the American Civil War, and it also persisted for decades after the Reconstruction Era.[4]
"In the antebellum South, this included the holding of African Americans in chattel slavery, in which four million of them were denied freedom.[5]
"The outbreak of the Civil War saw the desire to uphold white supremacy being cited as a cause for state secession[6] and the formation of the Confederate States of America.[7]
"In an editorial about Native Americans in 1890, author L. Frank Baum wrote: 'The Whites, by law of conquest, by justice of civilization, are masters of the American continent, and the best safety of the frontier settlements will be secured by the total annihilation of the few remaining Indians.'[8]"
White supremacy - Wikipedia
Yes, because supporting terrorist groups has NEVER had negative repercussions ever in history, has it?Wow, complete disavowal of reality by a leftist.Got any outrages committed this century?Sure.Got any outrages committed this century?
Opinion | Trump’s Inhumanity Before a Victim of Rape
"Still, I cannot forget Trump’s recent treatment of Nadia Murad, a Yazidi woman who won the Nobel Peace Prize last year for her campaign to end mass rape in war.
"The Islamic State, or ISIS, forced Murad into sexual slavery when it overran Yazidi villages in northern Iraq in 2014.
"Murad lost her mother and six brothers, slaughtered by ISIS.
"She now lives in Germany, and has been unable to return home, a point she made in her July 17 White House meeting with Trump. 'We cannot go back if we cannot protect our dignity, our family,' she said.
"Allow me to render the scene in the present tense. Trump sits there at his desk, an uncomprehending, unsympathetic, uninterested cardboard dummy.
"He looks straight ahead for much of the time, not at her, his chin jutting in his best effort at a Mussolini pose. He cannot heave his bulk from the chair for this brave young woman. He cannot look at her.
"Every now and again, in a disdainful manner, he swivels his head toward her and other survivors of religious persecution. When Murad says, 'They killed my mom, my six brothers,' Trump responds: 'Where are they now?'
MAGA moment?
Then Hillary and Obama shouldn't have supported ISIS, should they?
Wow, more half-truths, rumors, innuendos and outright lies by a trump supporter.
Hillary Admitted She And Obama Created ISIS – Caught on Tape!
Now you're going to screech about the source, or you're going to play The Democrat Didn't Say What She Said...or both.
You're such an asshole, intent (mens rea, "the intention or knowledge of wrongdoing that constitutes part of a crime, as opposed to the action or conduct of the accused") proves my point.
Your posts can never be trusted, they are either damn lies, or in this case a half-truth and an innuendo hoping to mislead the reader that she created ISIS intentionally, and see could see the future.
So, when are you giving your house to a minority?Advocating White Supremecy is a right. It's called the First Amendment.. Using violence against people has never been legal. Of course, what douchebags like you like to do is conflate the two things.Offer not available to whites, conservatives, or Christians.I'm sure it's just coincidence that the aforementioned groups are all liberal special interest groups.US residents who are victims of a prejudice-motivated crime based on their perceived sex, ethnicity, disability, language or nationality have the same human rights as bigoted blowhards in high places:I'm sure it's just coincidence that the aforementioned groups are all liberal special interest groups.
Opinion | Trump’s Inhumanity Before a Victim of Rape
"A hate crime (also known as a bias-motivated crime or bias crime[1]) is a prejudice-motivated crime which occurs when a perpetrator targets a victim because of their membership (or perceived membership) in a certain social group or race.
"Examples of such groups can include, and are almost exclusively limited to: sex, ethnicity, disability, language, nationality, physical appearance, religion, gender identity or sexual orientation.[2][3][4]
Hate crime - Wikipedia
You gotta read the fine print.White supremacy is NOT a right.Offer not available to whites, conservatives, or Christians.
You gotta read the fine print.
Hate crime - Wikipedia
"One of the largest waves of hate crimes in the United States took place during the civil rights movement in the 1960s. Both violence and threats of violence were common against African Americans, and hundreds of lives were lost due to such acts.
"Members of this social class faced violence from groups such as the Ku Klux Klan as well as violence from individuals who were committed to maintaining segregation.[85]
"At the time, civil rights leaders such as Martin Luther King Jr. and their supporters fought hard for the right of African Americans to vote as well as for equality in their everyday lives. African Americans have been the target of hate crimes since the Civil War,[86] and the humiliation of this social class was also desired by many Anti-black individuals.
"Other frequently reported bias motivations were bias against a religion, bias against a particular sexual orientation, and bias against a particular ethnicity/national origin.[87]
"At times, these bias motivations overlapped, because violence can be both anti-gay and anti-black, for example.[88]
"Analysts have compared groups in terms of the per capita rate of hate crimes committed against them, to allow for differing populations. Overall, the total number of hate crimes committed since the first hate crime bill was passed in 1997 is 86,582.[89]David Ray Hate Crimes Prevention Act"Profiting from white supremacy has been legal since the founding of this country. Most of the economic advantages white Americans enjoy today stems directly from chattel slavery providing two centuries of free labor and the systematic genocide of Native Americans providing all that free land. Your "free" market is a criminal enterprise that would never exist without conflating prosperity and profit. Trump is the living proof.Advocating White Supremecy is a right. It's called the First Amendment.. Using violence against people has never been legal. Of course, what douchebags like you like to do is conflate the two things.
You simply can't answer a direct question, can you?Then Hillary and Obama shouldn't have supported ISIS, should they?They are illegal. They violate the First Amendment, no matter how "justified" you believe they may be. Your theories of justice and law enforcement are irrelevant. Those rules were decided 230 years ago.Was that when only white male property owners were granted the right to vote?They are illegal. They violate the First Amendment, no matter how "justified" you believe they may be. Your theories of justice and law enforcement are irrelevant. Those rules were decided 230 years ago
White supremacy - Wikipedia
"White supremacy was dominant in the United States both before and after the American Civil War, and it also persisted for decades after the Reconstruction Era.[4]
"In the antebellum South, this included the holding of African Americans in chattel slavery, in which four million of them were denied freedom.[5]
"The outbreak of the Civil War saw the desire to uphold white supremacy being cited as a cause for state secession[6]and the formation of the Confederate States of America.[7]
"In an editorial about Native Americans in 1890, author L. Frank Baum wrote: 'The Whites, by law of conquest, by justice of civilization, are masters of the American continent, and the best safety of the frontier settlements will be secured by the total annihilation of the few remaining Indians.'[8]"
Got any outrages committed this century?Sure.Got any outrages committed this century?
Opinion | Trump’s Inhumanity Before a Victim of Rape
"Still, I cannot forget Trump’s recent treatment of Nadia Murad, a Yazidi woman who won the Nobel Peace Prize last year for her campaign to end mass rape in war.
"The Islamic State, or ISIS, forced Murad into sexual slavery when it overran Yazidi villages in northern Iraq in 2014.
"Murad lost her mother and six brothers, slaughtered by ISIS.
"She now lives in Germany, and has been unable to return home, a point she made in her July 17 White House meeting with Trump. 'We cannot go back if we cannot protect our dignity, our family,' she said.
"Allow me to render the scene in the present tense. Trump sits there at his desk, an uncomprehending, unsympathetic, uninterested cardboard dummy.
"He looks straight ahead for much of the time, not at her, his chin jutting in his best effort at a Mussolini pose. He cannot heave his bulk from the chair for this brave young woman. He cannot look at her.
"Every now and again, in a disdainful manner, he swivels his head toward her and other survivors of religious persecution. When Murad says, 'They killed my mom, my six brothers,' Trump responds: 'Where are they now?'
MAGA moment?No more than Bush and Cheney should have invaded Iraq.Then Hillary and Obama shouldn't have supported ISIS, should they?
How does the conduct of those four war whores affect Trump's disrespect for a victim of mass rape?
Are you finally acknowledging modern Democrats' Communist roots?Horseshit. There's nothing left or right about racism. Woodrow Wilson was a big exponent of eugenics. A lot of Dims were in those days, especially Margret Sanger. FDR was a big anti-Semit, and he put Asian Americans in concentration camps.How is that any different from liberals' white supremacy, that says black people aren't smart and good enough to succeed on their own, and must have help from white liberals?AND I forgot to mention:
blacks commit murder at FOUR times the rate of whites
hate crimes TWICE the rate
rape TWICE the rate
understand?? no, you don't do you?
they all crosscheck each otherAND I forgot to mention:
blacks commit murder at FOUR times the rate of whites
hate crimes TWICE the rate
rape TWICE the rate
understand?? no, you don't do you?
they all crosscheck each other
"White supremacy was dominant in the United States both before and after the American Civil War, and it also persisted for decades after the Reconstruction Era.[4]
"In the antebellum South, this included the holding of African Americans in chattel slavery, in which four million of them were denied freedom.[5]
"The outbreak of the Civil War saw the desire to uphold white supremacy being cited as a cause for state secession[6]and the formation of the Confederate States of America.[7]
"In an editorial about Native Americans in 1890, author L. Frank Baum wrote: 'The Whites, by law of conquest, by justice of civilization, are masters of the American continent, and the best safety of the frontier settlements will be secured by the total annihilation of the few remaining Indians.'[8]"
White supremacy - Wikipedia
Conservatives believe everyone can succeed.
Liberals are white supremacists.White supremacy is a conservative doctrine regardless of partisan affiliation.How is that any different from liberals' white supremacy, that says black people aren't smart and good enough to succeed on their own, and must have help from white liberals?
Conservatives believe everyone can succeed.
Liberals are white supremacists.
Conservatives are in denial about white supremacy
Your belief that Dims have clean hands is totally at variance with the facts.You're conflating Democrats with progressive racial values.Horseshit. There's nothing left or right about racism. Woodrow Wilson was a big exponent of eugenics. A lot of Dims were in those days, especially Margret Sanger. FDR was a big anti-Semit, and he put Asian Americans in concentration camps.
There was nothing progressive about Wilson's bigotry:
"Wilson was the first Southerner to be elected president since Zachary Taylor in 1848, and his ascension to the presidency was celebrated by Southern segregationists.
"Several historians have spotlighted consistent examples in the public record of Wilson's overtly racist policies and political appointments, such as segregationists he placed in his Cabinet.[303][304][305][306][307]"
Woodrow Wilson - Wikipedia
Eugene V. Debs was the progressive candidate on race relations in 1912.
"IN THE wake of the 1917 Russian Revolution, the Workers Party--as the Communist Party in the U.S. was known during the mid-1920s--initiated a set of anti-racist and internationalist policies and practices aimed at fighting for African American equality at home and opposing U.S. intervention abroad.
"These actions marked a breakthrough in the socialist movement, ending a long period of relative indifference to the fight against racism."
Toward an anti-racist practice
Only because he was told to. George is obedient to his masters.Sorry, but ignorance demonstrates absolutely nothing. You have no basis for claiming indifference. Fucking Christ, he invited her to the Whitehouse. That seems like the opposite of indifference to me.What, did he shift his eyebrows the wrong way? What do you imagine that video demonstrates?What "disrespect?" You really are a total douchebag. Ya know it?No more than Bush and Cheney should have invaded Iraq.
How does the conduct of those four war whores affect Trump's disrespect for a victim of mass rape?Watch how Trump reacts to Nadia Murad's harrowing survival of ISIS captivity - CNN VideoWhat "disrespect?" You really are a total douchebag. Ya know it?It demonstrates how racism is a bedrock character issue with Trump, one that supersedes and informs many others just as his sexism and xenophobia does.What, did he shift his eyebrows the wrong way? What do you imagine that video demonstrates?
Opinion | The Rot You Smell Is a Racist Potus
His ignorance of Nadia's ordeal and his indifference to the deaths of her seven family members ("where are they now") reveals again the wisdom in Martin Luther King, Jr's words: "In the final analysis, racism is evil because its ultimate logic is genocide."
That an arrogant, ignorant racist like Trump was unaware of the Yazidi exterminations prove only that "the mouth that demeans may not always be attached to the hand that destroys, but they are assuredly connected in spirit and in spite."
You're a fucking moron. You keep pursuing this meme even though there isn't a single fact to support it.
Oh, they're still racist. They don't believe black people can succeed without the help of white Democrats.Racism was progressive at the turn of the century, shit for brains. It's only since WW II that Dims have come out against racism. However, they still support antisemitism.Wilson was a racist and a Democrat. He may have been born in Virginia, but he graduated from John Hopkins University, was president of Princeton University, and he was the governor of New Jersey. He spent spent the whole of his adult life in the North rubbing shoulders with progressive Democrats like Margaret Sanger. He was a typical progressive Democrat.Horseshit. There's nothing left or right about racism. Woodrow Wilson was a big exponent of eugenics. A lot of Dims were in those days, especially Margret Sanger. FDR was a big anti-Semit, and he put Asian Americans in concentration camps.White supremacy is a conservative doctrine regardless of partisan affiliation.
Conservatives are in denial about white supremacy
Your belief that Dims have clean hands is totally at variance with the facts.You're conflating Democrats with progressive racial values.Horseshit. There's nothing left or right about racism. Woodrow Wilson was a big exponent of eugenics. A lot of Dims were in those days, especially Margret Sanger. FDR was a big anti-Semit, and he put Asian Americans in concentration camps.
There was nothing progressive about Wilson's bigotry:
"Wilson was the first Southerner to be elected president since Zachary Taylor in 1848, and his ascension to the presidency was celebrated by Southern segregationists.
"Several historians have spotlighted consistent examples in the public record of Wilson's overtly racist policies and political appointments, such as segregationists he placed in his Cabinet.[303][304][305][306][307]"
Woodrow Wilson - Wikipedia
Eugene V. Debs was the progressive candidate on race relations in 1912.
"IN THE wake of the 1917 Russian Revolution, the Workers Party--as the Communist Party in the U.S. was known during the mid-1920s--initiated a set of anti-racist and internationalist policies and practices aimed at fighting for African American equality at home and opposing U.S. intervention abroad.
"These actions marked a breakthrough in the socialist movement, ending a long period of relative indifference to the fight against racism."
Toward an anti-racist practiceThere was nothing progressive about Wilson's and his party's view about race relations:Wilson was a racist and a Democrat. He may have been born in Virginia, but he graduated from John Hopkins University, was president of Princeton University, and he was the governor of New Jersey. He spent spent the whole of his adult life in the North rubbing shoulders with progressive Democrats like Margaret Sanger. He was a typical progressive Democrat.
Woodrow Wilson - Wikipedia
"Wilson continued to appoint African Americans to positions that had traditionally been filled by blacks, overcoming opposition from many Southern senators.[311]
"However, the Wilson administration escalated the discriminatory hiring policies and segregation of government offices that had begun under President Theodore Roosevelt, and had continued under President Taft.[312]
"In Wilson's first month in office, Postmaster General Albert S. Burleson urged the president to establish segregated government offices.[313]
"Wilson did not adopt Burleson's proposal to segregate all government departments, but he allowed Cabinet members to segregate their respective departments.[314]
"By the end of 1913, many departments, including the Navy, had segregated work spaces, restrooms, and cafeterias.[313]
"Wilson's African-American supporters, who had crossed party lines to vote for him in 1912, were bitterly disappointed, and they and Northern leaders protested the changes.[313]
"Wilson defended his administration's segregation policy in a July 1913 letter responding to civil rights activist Oswald Garrison Villard, arguing that segregation removed 'friction' between the races."
Now you're claiming socialists are conservatives?Racism was progressive at the turn of the century, shit for brains. It's only since WW II that Dims have come out against racism. However, they still support antisemitism.Wilson was a racist and a Democrat. He may have been born in Virginia, but he graduated from John Hopkins University, was president of Princeton University, and he was the governor of New Jersey. He spent spent the whole of his adult life in the North rubbing shoulders with progressive Democrats like Margaret Sanger. He was a typical progressive Democrat.Horseshit. There's nothing left or right about racism. Woodrow Wilson was a big exponent of eugenics. A lot of Dims were in those days, especially Margret Sanger. FDR was a big anti-Semit, and he put Asian Americans in concentration camps.
Your belief that Dims have clean hands is totally at variance with the facts.You're conflating Democrats with progressive racial values.Horseshit. There's nothing left or right about racism. Woodrow Wilson was a big exponent of eugenics. A lot of Dims were in those days, especially Margret Sanger. FDR was a big anti-Semit, and he put Asian Americans in concentration camps.
There was nothing progressive about Wilson's bigotry:
"Wilson was the first Southerner to be elected president since Zachary Taylor in 1848, and his ascension to the presidency was celebrated by Southern segregationists.
"Several historians have spotlighted consistent examples in the public record of Wilson's overtly racist policies and political appointments, such as segregationists he placed in his Cabinet.[303][304][305][306][307]"
Woodrow Wilson - Wikipedia
Eugene V. Debs was the progressive candidate on race relations in 1912.
"IN THE wake of the 1917 Russian Revolution, the Workers Party--as the Communist Party in the U.S. was known during the mid-1920s--initiated a set of anti-racist and internationalist policies and practices aimed at fighting for African American equality at home and opposing U.S. intervention abroad.
"These actions marked a breakthrough in the socialist movement, ending a long period of relative indifference to the fight against racism."
Toward an anti-racist practiceThere was nothing progressive about Wilson's and his party's view about race relations:Wilson was a racist and a Democrat. He may have been born in Virginia, but he graduated from John Hopkins University, was president of Princeton University, and he was the governor of New Jersey. He spent spent the whole of his adult life in the North rubbing shoulders with progressive Democrats like Margaret Sanger. He was a typical progressive Democrat.
Woodrow Wilson - Wikipedia
"Wilson continued to appoint African Americans to positions that had traditionally been filled by blacks, overcoming opposition from many Southern senators.[311]
"However, the Wilson administration escalated the discriminatory hiring policies and segregation of government offices that had begun under President Theodore Roosevelt, and had continued under President Taft.[312]
"In Wilson's first month in office, Postmaster General Albert S. Burleson urged the president to establish segregated government offices.[313]
"Wilson did not adopt Burleson's proposal to segregate all government departments, but he allowed Cabinet members to segregate their respective departments.[314]
"By the end of 1913, many departments, including the Navy, had segregated work spaces, restrooms, and cafeterias.[313]
"Wilson's African-American supporters, who had crossed party lines to vote for him in 1912, were bitterly disappointed, and they and Northern leaders protested the changes.[313]
"Wilson defended his administration's segregation policy in a July 1913 letter responding to civil rights activist Oswald Garrison Villard, arguing that segregation removed 'friction' between the races."
Supporting racial discrimination was never a progressive tenet; it has always been a principle of regressive white conservatives regardless of partisan propaganda.Racism was progressive at the turn of the century, shit for brains. It's only since WW II that Dims have come out against racism. However, they still support antisemitism.
Something to Offer
Yes, because supporting terrorist groups has NEVER had negative repercussions ever in history, has it?Wow, complete disavowal of reality by a leftist.Sure.
Opinion | Trump’s Inhumanity Before a Victim of Rape
"Still, I cannot forget Trump’s recent treatment of Nadia Murad, a Yazidi woman who won the Nobel Peace Prize last year for her campaign to end mass rape in war.
"The Islamic State, or ISIS, forced Murad into sexual slavery when it overran Yazidi villages in northern Iraq in 2014.
"Murad lost her mother and six brothers, slaughtered by ISIS.
"She now lives in Germany, and has been unable to return home, a point she made in her July 17 White House meeting with Trump. 'We cannot go back if we cannot protect our dignity, our family,' she said.
"Allow me to render the scene in the present tense. Trump sits there at his desk, an uncomprehending, unsympathetic, uninterested cardboard dummy.
"He looks straight ahead for much of the time, not at her, his chin jutting in his best effort at a Mussolini pose. He cannot heave his bulk from the chair for this brave young woman. He cannot look at her.
"Every now and again, in a disdainful manner, he swivels his head toward her and other survivors of religious persecution. When Murad says, 'They killed my mom, my six brothers,' Trump responds: 'Where are they now?'
MAGA moment?
Then Hillary and Obama shouldn't have supported ISIS, should they?
Wow, more half-truths, rumors, innuendos and outright lies by a trump supporter.
Hillary Admitted She And Obama Created ISIS – Caught on Tape!
Now you're going to screech about the source, or you're going to play The Democrat Didn't Say What She Said...or both.
You're such an asshole, intent (mens rea, "the intention or knowledge of wrongdoing that constitutes part of a crime, as opposed to the action or conduct of the accused") proves my point.
Your posts can never be trusted, they are either damn lies, or in this case a half-truth and an innuendo hoping to mislead the reader that she created ISIS intentionally, and see could see the future.
I see you've chosen to play The Democrat Didn't Say What She Said. Hillary appreciates your passionate ass-licking, but it simply can't change the facts.
So, what does Hillary's ass taste like...Preparation H or Miralax?Yes, because supporting terrorist groups has NEVER had negative repercussions ever in history, has it?Wow, complete disavowal of reality by a leftist.Then Hillary and Obama shouldn't have supported ISIS, should they?
Wow, more half-truths, rumors, innuendos and outright lies by a trump supporter.
Hillary Admitted She And Obama Created ISIS – Caught on Tape!
Now you're going to screech about the source, or you're going to play The Democrat Didn't Say What She Said...or both.
You're such an asshole, intent (mens rea, "the intention or knowledge of wrongdoing that constitutes part of a crime, as opposed to the action or conduct of the accused") proves my point.
Your posts can never be trusted, they are either damn lies, or in this case a half-truth and an innuendo hoping to mislead the reader that she created ISIS intentionally, and see could see the future.
I see you've chosen to play The Democrat Didn't Say What She Said. Hillary appreciates your passionate ass-licking, but it simply can't change the facts.
You're correct, but your allegation that HRC Created ISIS is not credible; as I tried to explain, I guess I didn't dumb it down enough for you. I'm sure other readers knew it before I posted your hyperbole, half-truth and character assassination.
Now you're claiming socialists are conservatives?Racism was progressive at the turn of the century, shit for brains. It's only since WW II that Dims have come out against racism. However, they still support antisemitism.Wilson was a racist and a Democrat. He may have been born in Virginia, but he graduated from John Hopkins University, was president of Princeton University, and he was the governor of New Jersey. He spent spent the whole of his adult life in the North rubbing shoulders with progressive Democrats like Margaret Sanger. He was a typical progressive Democrat.You're conflating Democrats with progressive racial values.
There was nothing progressive about Wilson's bigotry:
"Wilson was the first Southerner to be elected president since Zachary Taylor in 1848, and his ascension to the presidency was celebrated by Southern segregationists.
"Several historians have spotlighted consistent examples in the public record of Wilson's overtly racist policies and political appointments, such as segregationists he placed in his Cabinet.[303][304][305][306][307]"
Woodrow Wilson - Wikipedia
Eugene V. Debs was the progressive candidate on race relations in 1912.
"IN THE wake of the 1917 Russian Revolution, the Workers Party--as the Communist Party in the U.S. was known during the mid-1920s--initiated a set of anti-racist and internationalist policies and practices aimed at fighting for African American equality at home and opposing U.S. intervention abroad.
"These actions marked a breakthrough in the socialist movement, ending a long period of relative indifference to the fight against racism."
Toward an anti-racist practiceThere was nothing progressive about Wilson's and his party's view about race relations:Wilson was a racist and a Democrat. He may have been born in Virginia, but he graduated from John Hopkins University, was president of Princeton University, and he was the governor of New Jersey. He spent spent the whole of his adult life in the North rubbing shoulders with progressive Democrats like Margaret Sanger. He was a typical progressive Democrat.
Woodrow Wilson - Wikipedia
"Wilson continued to appoint African Americans to positions that had traditionally been filled by blacks, overcoming opposition from many Southern senators.[311]
"However, the Wilson administration escalated the discriminatory hiring policies and segregation of government offices that had begun under President Theodore Roosevelt, and had continued under President Taft.[312]
"In Wilson's first month in office, Postmaster General Albert S. Burleson urged the president to establish segregated government offices.[313]
"Wilson did not adopt Burleson's proposal to segregate all government departments, but he allowed Cabinet members to segregate their respective departments.[314]
"By the end of 1913, many departments, including the Navy, had segregated work spaces, restrooms, and cafeterias.[313]
"Wilson's African-American supporters, who had crossed party lines to vote for him in 1912, were bitterly disappointed, and they and Northern leaders protested the changes.[313]
"Wilson defended his administration's segregation policy in a July 1913 letter responding to civil rights activist Oswald Garrison Villard, arguing that segregation removed 'friction' between the races."
Supporting racial discrimination was never a progressive tenet; it has always been a principle of regressive white conservatives regardless of partisan propaganda.Racism was progressive at the turn of the century, shit for brains. It's only since WW II that Dims have come out against racism. However, they still support antisemitism.
Something to Offer
You're retarded
So, what does Hillary's ass taste like...Preparation H or Miralax?Yes, because supporting terrorist groups has NEVER had negative repercussions ever in history, has it?Wow, complete disavowal of reality by a leftist.Wow, more half-truths, rumors, innuendos and outright lies by a trump supporter.
Hillary Admitted She And Obama Created ISIS – Caught on Tape!
Now you're going to screech about the source, or you're going to play The Democrat Didn't Say What She Said...or both.
You're such an asshole, intent (mens rea, "the intention or knowledge of wrongdoing that constitutes part of a crime, as opposed to the action or conduct of the accused") proves my point.
Your posts can never be trusted, they are either damn lies, or in this case a half-truth and an innuendo hoping to mislead the reader that she created ISIS intentionally, and see could see the future.
I see you've chosen to play The Democrat Didn't Say What She Said. Hillary appreciates your passionate ass-licking, but it simply can't change the facts.
You're correct, but your allegation that HRC Created ISIS is not credible; as I tried to explain, I guess I didn't dumb it down enough for you. I'm sure other readers knew it before I posted your hyperbole, half-truth and character assassination.
I gotta give you credit, though -- it takes some doing to simultaneously be such a pompous blowhard and a simpering ass-kisser.
LOL! If socialism's so cool, and we ought to try it here, why are you so desperately trying to blame conservatives for it?Now you're claiming socialists are conservatives?Racism was progressive at the turn of the century, shit for brains. It's only since WW II that Dims have come out against racism. However, they still support antisemitism.Wilson was a racist and a Democrat. He may have been born in Virginia, but he graduated from John Hopkins University, was president of Princeton University, and he was the governor of New Jersey. He spent spent the whole of his adult life in the North rubbing shoulders with progressive Democrats like Margaret Sanger. He was a typical progressive Democrat.There was nothing progressive about Wilson's and his party's view about race relations:Wilson was a racist and a Democrat. He may have been born in Virginia, but he graduated from John Hopkins University, was president of Princeton University, and he was the governor of New Jersey. He spent spent the whole of his adult life in the North rubbing shoulders with progressive Democrats like Margaret Sanger. He was a typical progressive Democrat.
Woodrow Wilson - Wikipedia
"Wilson continued to appoint African Americans to positions that had traditionally been filled by blacks, overcoming opposition from many Southern senators.[311]
"However, the Wilson administration escalated the discriminatory hiring policies and segregation of government offices that had begun under President Theodore Roosevelt, and had continued under President Taft.[312]
"In Wilson's first month in office, Postmaster General Albert S. Burleson urged the president to establish segregated government offices.[313]
"Wilson did not adopt Burleson's proposal to segregate all government departments, but he allowed Cabinet members to segregate their respective departments.[314]
"By the end of 1913, many departments, including the Navy, had segregated work spaces, restrooms, and cafeterias.[313]
"Wilson's African-American supporters, who had crossed party lines to vote for him in 1912, were bitterly disappointed, and they and Northern leaders protested the changes.[313]
"Wilson defended his administration's segregation policy in a July 1913 letter responding to civil rights activist Oswald Garrison Villard, arguing that segregation removed 'friction' between the races."
Supporting racial discrimination was never a progressive tenet; it has always been a principle of regressive white conservatives regardless of partisan propaganda.Racism was progressive at the turn of the century, shit for brains. It's only since WW II that Dims have come out against racism. However, they still support antisemitism.
Something to Offer
You're retarded
Why can't a socialist also be a plutocrat, and thus a conservative?
Don't Plutocrats want to privatize all public services (police, prisons, military, public utilities, health care) for profit. That's a conservatives dream, isn't it? And, don't conservatives accept Medicare, medicaid, Social Security and unemployment insurance?
So, what does Hillary's ass taste like...Preparation H or Miralax?Yes, because supporting terrorist groups has NEVER had negative repercussions ever in history, has it?Wow, complete disavowal of reality by a leftist.
Hillary Admitted She And Obama Created ISIS – Caught on Tape!
Now you're going to screech about the source, or you're going to play The Democrat Didn't Say What She Said...or both.
You're such an asshole, intent (mens rea, "the intention or knowledge of wrongdoing that constitutes part of a crime, as opposed to the action or conduct of the accused") proves my point.
Your posts can never be trusted, they are either damn lies, or in this case a half-truth and an innuendo hoping to mislead the reader that she created ISIS intentionally, and see could see the future.
I see you've chosen to play The Democrat Didn't Say What She Said. Hillary appreciates your passionate ass-licking, but it simply can't change the facts.
You're correct, but your allegation that HRC Created ISIS is not credible; as I tried to explain, I guess I didn't dumb it down enough for you. I'm sure other readers knew it before I posted your hyperbole, half-truth and character assassination.
I gotta give you credit, though -- it takes some doing to simultaneously be such a pompous blowhard and a simpering ass-kisser.
You're a classic punk. Using fighting words while hiding behind a keyboard is the work of a coward.
