Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
You keep pretending that your parasitism and anti-Americanism isn't a thing. Unfortunately, this can't be skirted with a simple "whatever".
And yet these fake news organizations obsess about Trump having two sips of water. Even worse, two cones of ice cream.
Too much time on their hands. This can only mean, it's time to learn to code.
Okay, I know you guys need to pretend that Trump's craziness isn't a thing, and he's the victim. Whatever.
Oh! Look in the back left row! All the way to the left!
View attachment 243394
And yet these fake news organizations obsess about Trump having two sips of water. Even worse, two cones of ice cream.
Too much time on their hands. This can only mean, it's time to learn to code.
Okay, I know you guys need to pretend that Trump's craziness isn't a thing, and he's the victim. Whatever.
Oh! Look in the back left row! All the way to the left!
View attachment 243394
Wow, you spent time putting that together... that's kind of... sad.
You keep pretending that your parasitism and anti-Americanism isn't a thing. Unfortunately, this can't be skirted with a simple "whatever".
Uh, guy, i was in the army for 11 years... as far as I'm concerned, the Country still owes me a few...
Recognizing our society's faults isn't "anti-Americanism". It's valid self-examination.
A country that can allow a buffoon like Trump to be president because he is famous, has serious issues. That's the kind of asshattery you see in the third world, not here.
Naw, dude,t hat was pathetic... Have that many people butt-hurt you here that you need to make a list? And I didn't even make the front row... I need to try harder.
You're so inept, you were an afterthought.
You're so inept, you were an afterthought.
Oh, really? So that's why you start flame zone threads about me, because I don't occupy space in your head rent free?
HuffPost and BuzzFeed are yellow press that in between fake stories, spam the internet with rumors and "who said what" on Twitter.
Um, yeah.. What Trump says on Twitter is news.. Sorry.
Actually, we could eliminate coal usage in a year or two... it's pretty much eliminating itself. But even when coal usage hit it's peak, the number of coal miners was still declining long before because they automated the process to the point where they just didn't need to send guys to dig for it.
What you are proposing is the worst kind of socialism... continuing to do something just to make work for people.
Left wing journalism has been going since Cronkite. They pushed the propaganda that still effects our psyche to this day about the Vietnam War.your constant bashing of my former profession is annoying.What do American patriots call the events?
A good start.
When American steel workers were getting fired as these journalists advanced globalism and the manufacturing industry being shipped to elsewhere, their response was to "cry more" and "learn to code".
Well that's it. Time to pick up the computers HuffPo feminists. I for one would seriously, seriously like to see these clueless morons attempt any logical activity - their brains will probably explode.
Here's the thing.. steelworkers lost their jobs because the processes became more automated.
I'm not sure i want "automated" journalism, even though we are there. One person writes the story and everyone else just copies his work verbatim? How does that advance the flow of information.
But you probably can't see beyond , "Journalists are better educated than I am, and they say mein Trumpenfuhrer bad! MAGA!!!!"
Was the process of exporting their jobs to China automated?
JoeB, it's time to learn to code. Trump waved the magic wand and suddenly the jobs are back.
Journalists do not even have an education, I have several master's degrees. Try again.
no education? enemy of the people? waved a magic wand? exported jobs to china?
man, you "sensationalize" headlines and statements as much as *they* do anymore.
The language you are responding to may be hyperbolic, but if you were an actual journalist, you should be the first to criticize the leftist media that works so deceptively to craft opinion instead of reporting as objectively as possible.
THe days of Walter Cronkite and Huntley/Brinkley are gone.
Sez the CNN parrot.Sorry not pressing your click bait...
But lets point out that you are proposing InfoWars over actual real Journalism... So you prefer to be lied and fed your ego rather than actually face the truth..
Pretty sad life you lead...
That's why you're too pussy to show?
I stated that we still need coal and coal miners, not just for energy, but for steel industry as well.
And coal miner is not just a guy with the shovel digging coal in some hole.
That's why you're too pussy to show?
Naw, just nothing there to discuss. I occupy space in your head rent free... Heh, heh, heh....
I stated that we still need coal and coal miners, not just for energy, but for steel industry as well.
And coal miner is not just a guy with the shovel digging coal in some hole.
Well, you can state that, but it's just not true. We could get rid of most coal usage... and we'd be better off for it.
That's why you're too pussy to show?
Naw, just nothing there to discuss. I occupy space in your head rent free... Heh, heh, heh....
I stated that we still need coal and coal miners, not just for energy, but for steel industry as well.
And coal miner is not just a guy with the shovel digging coal in some hole.
Well, you can state that, but it's just not true. We could get rid of most coal usage... and we'd be better off for it.
That's why you're too pussy to show?
Naw, just nothing there to discuss. I occupy space in your head rent free... Heh, heh, heh....
I stated that we still need coal and coal miners, not just for energy, but for steel industry as well.
And coal miner is not just a guy with the shovel digging coal in some hole.
Well, you can state that, but it's just not true. We could get rid of most coal usage... and we'd be better off for it.
You saying something is not true, doesn't make it not true.
The steel production, and cement production is heavily dependent on coal. Sure, heat can be generated also by natural gas, which is easier to transport and burn, but technology for consistent combustion is not there yet.
The steel and cement production require higher radiative heat transfer that coal provides. Natural gas simply doesn't have that because of sharper burning characteristics and also lacks dissipation of heat.
I do automation and process control, and I've been involved with numerous projects of setting out automotive ovens, air supply houses, steel heat treatment processes, with experience that got me to one of four test projects (that are offered and I know of) in attempts to convert coal to natural gas. None of them proved consistent trend in production and wend back to design table.
But hey, what do I know, you... the expert, are saying it's not true.
That's why you're too pussy to show?
Naw, just nothing there to discuss. I occupy space in your head rent free... Heh, heh, heh....
I stated that we still need coal and coal miners, not just for energy, but for steel industry as well.
And coal miner is not just a guy with the shovel digging coal in some hole.
Well, you can state that, but it's just not true. We could get rid of most coal usage... and we'd be better off for it.
You saying something is not true, doesn't make it not true.
The steel production, and cement production is heavily dependent on coal. Sure, heat can be generated also by natural gas, which is easier to transport and burn, but technology for consistent combustion is not there yet.
The steel and cement production require higher radiative heat transfer that coal provides. Natural gas simply doesn't have that because of sharper burning characteristics and also lacks dissipation of heat.
I do automation and process control, and I've been involved with numerous projects of setting out automotive ovens, air supply houses, steel heat treatment processes, with experience that got me to one of four test projects (that are offered and I know of) in attempts to convert coal to natural gas. None of them proved consistent trend in production and wend back to design table.
But hey, what do I know, you... the expert, are saying it's not true.
How hot is needed for cement again? 30K degrees?
That's why you're too pussy to show?
Naw, just nothing there to discuss. I occupy space in your head rent free... Heh, heh, heh....
I stated that we still need coal and coal miners, not just for energy, but for steel industry as well.
And coal miner is not just a guy with the shovel digging coal in some hole.
Well, you can state that, but it's just not true. We could get rid of most coal usage... and we'd be better off for it.
You saying something is not true, doesn't make it not true.
The steel production, and cement production is heavily dependent on coal. Sure, heat can be generated also by natural gas, which is easier to transport and burn, but technology for consistent combustion is not there yet.
The steel and cement production require higher radiative heat transfer that coal provides. Natural gas simply doesn't have that because of sharper burning characteristics and also lacks dissipation of heat.
I do automation and process control, and I've been involved with numerous projects of setting out automotive ovens, air supply houses, steel heat treatment processes, with experience that got me to one of four test projects (that are offered and I know of) in attempts to convert coal to natural gas. None of them proved consistent trend in production and wend back to design table.
But hey, what do I know, you... the expert, are saying it's not true.
How hot is needed for cement again? 30K degrees?
I am not chemistry guy, I am an engineer.
Our goal was to provide heat consistency on 3000 deg Celsius, but I think kiln require to be heated to about half of that.
That's why you're too pussy to show?
Naw, just nothing there to discuss. I occupy space in your head rent free... Heh, heh, heh....
I stated that we still need coal and coal miners, not just for energy, but for steel industry as well.
And coal miner is not just a guy with the shovel digging coal in some hole.
Well, you can state that, but it's just not true. We could get rid of most coal usage... and we'd be better off for it.
You saying something is not true, doesn't make it not true.
The steel production, and cement production is heavily dependent on coal. Sure, heat can be generated also by natural gas, which is easier to transport and burn, but technology for consistent combustion is not there yet.
The steel and cement production require higher radiative heat transfer that coal provides. Natural gas simply doesn't have that because of sharper burning characteristics and also lacks dissipation of heat.
I do automation and process control, and I've been involved with numerous projects of setting out automotive ovens, air supply houses, steel heat treatment processes, with experience that got me to one of four test projects (that are offered and I know of) in attempts to convert coal to natural gas. None of them proved consistent trend in production and wend back to design table.
But hey, what do I know, you... the expert, are saying it's not true.
How hot is needed for cement again? 30K degrees?
I am not chemistry guy, I am an engineer.
Our goal was to provide heat consistency on 3000 deg Celsius, but I think kiln require to be heated to about half of that.
I just read 2700, but I think they go to 3000 here, makes it stronger.
Naw, just nothing there to discuss. I occupy space in your head rent free... Heh, heh, heh....
Well, you can state that, but it's just not true. We could get rid of most coal usage... and we'd be better off for it.
You saying something is not true, doesn't make it not true.
The steel production, and cement production is heavily dependent on coal. Sure, heat can be generated also by natural gas, which is easier to transport and burn, but technology for consistent combustion is not there yet.
The steel and cement production require higher radiative heat transfer that coal provides. Natural gas simply doesn't have that because of sharper burning characteristics and also lacks dissipation of heat.
I do automation and process control, and I've been involved with numerous projects of setting out automotive ovens, air supply houses, steel heat treatment processes, with experience that got me to one of four test projects (that are offered and I know of) in attempts to convert coal to natural gas. None of them proved consistent trend in production and wend back to design table.
But hey, what do I know, you... the expert, are saying it's not true.
How hot is needed for cement again? 30K degrees?
I am not chemistry guy, I am an engineer.
Our goal was to provide heat consistency on 3000 deg Celsius, but I think kiln require to be heated to about half of that.
I just read 2700, but I think they go to 3000 here, makes it stronger.
Thats about right, 3000 C is around 5400 F, take half from it...
Sorry not pressing your click bait...
But lets point out that you are proposing InfoWars over actual real Journalism... So you prefer to be lied and fed your ego rather than actually face the truth..
Pretty sad life you lead...
