Johnson Johnson "open" to carbon taxes?

Discussion in 'Gary Johnson' started by oldsoul, Aug 26, 2016.

  1. oldsoul
    Offline

    oldsoul Gold Member

    Joined:
    Oct 12, 2015
    Messages:
    2,550
    Thanks Received:
    382
    Trophy Points:
    140
    Location:
    East side of Spoon Lake
    Ratings:
    +1,329
    I saw a story stating that Johnson is "open" to the possibility of carbon taxes. Can anyone verify this? Has he made a public statement to that effect? If so, where? I am asking because I have been able to find very little on this. I am newly following Johnson and am not sure if I am looking in the "right" places to find credible stories on him.
     
  2. HenryBHough
    Offline

    HenryBHough Gold Member Supporting Member

    Joined:
    Jul 14, 2011
    Messages:
    24,948
    Thanks Received:
    4,180
    Trophy Points:
    290
    Location:
    Oak Grove, Massachusetts
    Ratings:
    +14,260
    Aw shucks....he's just pandering to the disaffected Sanders element that jones for higher taxes on everything that they don't personally buy.
     
    • Agree Agree x 1
  3. TNHarley
    Offline

    TNHarley Diamond Member

    Joined:
    Sep 27, 2012
    Messages:
    58,335
    Thanks Received:
    8,560
    Trophy Points:
    2,030
    Ratings:
    +58,404
    A few years ago he said no to it
    His campaign website pretty much implies he is against it
    :dunno:
     
    • Thank You! Thank You! x 1
  4. oldsoul
    Offline

    oldsoul Gold Member

    Joined:
    Oct 12, 2015
    Messages:
    2,550
    Thanks Received:
    382
    Trophy Points:
    140
    Location:
    East side of Spoon Lake
    Ratings:
    +1,329
    Thanks for the quick response. It would seem as though you do not take this as seriously as I. If this story is true, it may well cost him my vote, so I take it quite seriously.
     
  5. S.J.
    Offline

    S.J. Platinum Member

    Joined:
    Nov 28, 2012
    Messages:
    33,851
    Thanks Received:
    6,713
    Trophy Points:
    1,140
    Location:
    So. Cal.
    Ratings:
    +30,689
    Like he would ever get the chance to implement anything.
     
  6. oldsoul
    Offline

    oldsoul Gold Member

    Joined:
    Oct 12, 2015
    Messages:
    2,550
    Thanks Received:
    382
    Trophy Points:
    140
    Location:
    East side of Spoon Lake
    Ratings:
    +1,329
    Not the point, but thanks anyway.
     
  7. flacaltenn
    Offline

    flacaltenn Senior Mod Staff Member Senior USMB Moderator Gold Supporting Member

    Joined:
    Jun 9, 2011
    Messages:
    48,232
    Thanks Received:
    8,069
    Trophy Points:
    2,030
    Location:
    Hillbilly Hollywood, Tenn
    Ratings:
    +28,659
    There have been weasly statements that he wants a "fee" -- not a tax. Yeah right.

    He's confused on the topic. Thinks that you can "price" the damage from CO2 like was done for REAL pollution. So he's flirting with some kind of cap and trade. Won't work for CO2. Because you'd never get farmers and land developers, beer brewers, etc on that train. And DAMAGE can't be quantified within any realistic frame of time or extent.

    It's a bit disturbing -- but it's not a priority item of any type. You gotta answer EVERY question you get, (or just deflect). Johnson needs to have a couple meetings and get his answer to this straight.

    Starting with --- all initial predictions and projections have failed. The warming that is DUE to human CO2 is likely to be WAY SHORT of the early alarmist estimates --- etc, etc..
     
    • Thank You! Thank You! x 1

Share This Page