- Aug 16, 2011
- 128,233
- 24,222
- 2,180
Not you "can," you have to.I disagree. I can keyboard over 100 wpm and do most business and communications on the computer. I am pretty proficient using a smart phone and other electronic devices.
....
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
Not you "can," you have to.I disagree. I can keyboard over 100 wpm and do most business and communications on the computer. I am pretty proficient using a smart phone and other electronic devices.
....
.....
And I still think it important that people be able to read writing from the past in its original form instead of having to rely on others to represent that accurately and honestly.
I know a number of people who use neither a computer nor a smart phone. You don't 'have to.'Not you "can," you have to.
Actually I have read some of The Canterbury Tales in its original form. It isn't completely unreadable though many words then have fallen out of common usage just as much our our language will no doubt have greatly changed by the . English has changed a lot over the centuries but not so much it has become completely unrecognizable. In fact I once wrote a research paper on how 14th Century English evolved into 20th Century English and used Chaucer to partly illustrate it.Then go read The Canterbury Tales in its original form. Good luck.
The Constitution is NOT written in cursive. Look closer.
Many children no longer learn to write cursive in school, noted marketing consultant Laura Ries. People may recognize the signature, but they weren’t necessarily reading it, she said. The new logo, she said, is easier to process.
"Unintelligible" ol-timey squiggles based on founder James Wood Johnson's signature:
Dumbed down logo for today's yutes:
The joke is on them, oldsters can use use it for secret communiques in the nursing home when time comes.
Gee, what else is written in cursive that kids won't be able to read?
Shut your racist ass up!It is implied because the dumbass ghetto kids can't read cursive.
You have the right to be wrong.And that should change too. It should be so socially unacceptable to poorly parent children that it is only the very worse sort who do. Children should not be left with parents who cannot or will not feed them, provide them with basic necessities and those basic skills that parents traditionally have always taught their children, who will not set and enforce necessary rules. I'm not talking about parents going through a temporary bad patch but parents who are chronically unfit and unwilling to provide for and protect their children.
Toilet training was mandatory for first graders when I was in school.
And I still think teaching kids cursive is a good idea.
I disagree. I can keyboard over 100 wpm and do most business and communications on the computer. I am pretty proficient using a smart phone and other electronic devices.
But I still have lots of opportunities and needs to write something down and doing it via cursive is a LOT faster than punching it into my phone. I can write cursive almost twice as fast as I can print. (I've timed it.)
And I still think it important that people be able to read writing from the past in its original form instead of having to rely on others to represent that accurately and honestly.
As do you.You have the right to be wrong.
Correct. Ever tried reading a student's paper in cursive? It's damned difficult.As do you.
Yes, I have read many. And when the handwriting is unusually bad, it can be difficult. But that's the way it was done before students were allowed to use typewriters and eventually word processors/computers. But in public school we were often graded on penmanship as much as spelling, punctuation, capitalization, sentence structure, you know that problematic syntax, split infinitives and dangled participles and all that. I doubt students can diagram sentences anymore and I'm not sure that's a bad thing.Correct. Ever tried reading a student's paper in cursive? It's damned difficult.
And that should change too. It should be so socially unacceptable to poorly parent children that it is only the very worse sort who do. Children should not be left with parents who cannot or will not feed them, provide them with basic necessities and those basic skills that parents traditionally have always taught their children, who will not set and enforce necessary rules. I'm not talking about parents going through a temporary bad patch but parents who are chronically unfit and unwilling to provide for and protect their children.
Toilet training was mandatory for first graders when I was in school.
And I still think teaching kids cursive is a good idea.