Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
Wrong.Wrong on all counts. Please stop with the lies and misinformation. It doesn't work anymore. No one with a brain believes anything the CIA proclaims...particularly after they were instrumental in committing a coup d'etat in the USA.Oswald NEVER fired a gun that day. The evidence is overwhelming, but to government dupes like you, you can't see it.
Dupe Think::: I just shot the POTUS in broad daylight with a shitty mail order bolt action rifle that was misaligned, then I magically appear in the lunchroom several floors below within seconds of the shooting, casually drinking a soda. I then stroll outside and casually get a ride home. I am accused of killing a cop, that I would have had to be an Olympic sprinter or Indy race car driver to reach in the time allotted....then I casually go to the movie house. The acts of a presidential assassin, but only if you are a government dupe.
Wrong Oswald did fire three shots that day and overwhelming evidence proves he did.
I can cite evidence that he did. You can cite none whatsoever that he did not.
A shitty rifle is still a rifle and the rifle was capable of performing as it did. It was his rifle and found at the scene. All bullets and bullet fragments came from his rifle and only his rifle. The expended shells all came from his rifle. All the wounds came from above and behind which is consistent with his sniper nest and he was the last person seen on the sixth floor.
The rifle was not misaligned. The scope was misaligned but that is irrelevant as he did not need to use the scope and was more than capable of hitting the target with the iron sights.
HE had ample time to move from the sixth floor to the second after stashing the rifle. Endless people have retraced his steps and it is proven beyond question that he had enough time to do so.
He took the bus home he did not take a ride home. He did not have to run to reach the scene where he killed Tibbets. Once again that has been proven beyond question.
You have presented no evidence but I have.
You have failed to offer any evidence of any kind. Only your naive and gullible ramblings from a video.
Now cite some evidence as so far you have not and all the evidence proves you wrong.
The person who shot JFK from the TSBD (likely one of your buddies from Langley), no doubt was an expert marksman and could make the killing shot with a poor mail order rifle, if indeed he even used it.
Oswald could not have killed Tippit, who had questionable ties, because there was not enough time to get to the spot of the killing. This fact has been abundantly proven. Plus witnesses who saw the shooting identified two men, with neither looking anything like Oswald. I believe one of your fixers at the CIA murdered one of those witnesses, if I remember correctly. So many people with knowledge of the event were liquidated by CIA fixers, it is hard to keep track of them all.
You have offered no proof of your accusations, just more government lies and BS.
Again...how does the assassin of the POTUS get to the lunchroom in seconds, appear completely composed and relaxed, then causally take a stroll home and then to the movies? Anyone with a brain (not you) knows if you've just murdered the POTUS, you are getting out of town fast. Oswald had every opportunity to leave Dallas quickly, just as the CIA approved killers did.
when you say the person who shot jfk from the TSBD,I assume you are talking about the bullet would in the back the warren commission moved up to his neck?
as always,you OWN his sorry ass and shoot down his BS and as always,he has NO ANSWERS for the questions you asked? hee hee.
He got owned he owned no one.
He bot beaten down and proven a fool as you always do with every post.
Go whine somewhere else kiddoe.
All within the state, nothing outside the state, nothing against the state.
You would do well in Nazi Germany and Soviet Russia...now you and your kind want to replicate those horrors in the USA.
Read this book if you dare. It confirms everything I have told you...it is but one book of the many written, that exposes the numerous lies you and others have spewed about the Deep State's assassination of JFK. It was a coup d'etat...and you know it was.Wrong.Wrong on all counts. Please stop with the lies and misinformation. It doesn't work anymore. No one with a brain believes anything the CIA proclaims...particularly after they were instrumental in committing a coup d'etat in the USA.Wrong Oswald did fire three shots that day and overwhelming evidence proves he did.
I can cite evidence that he did. You can cite none whatsoever that he did not.
A shitty rifle is still a rifle and the rifle was capable of performing as it did. It was his rifle and found at the scene. All bullets and bullet fragments came from his rifle and only his rifle. The expended shells all came from his rifle. All the wounds came from above and behind which is consistent with his sniper nest and he was the last person seen on the sixth floor.
The rifle was not misaligned. The scope was misaligned but that is irrelevant as he did not need to use the scope and was more than capable of hitting the target with the iron sights.
HE had ample time to move from the sixth floor to the second after stashing the rifle. Endless people have retraced his steps and it is proven beyond question that he had enough time to do so.
He took the bus home he did not take a ride home. He did not have to run to reach the scene where he killed Tibbets. Once again that has been proven beyond question.
You have presented no evidence but I have.
You have failed to offer any evidence of any kind. Only your naive and gullible ramblings from a video.
Now cite some evidence as so far you have not and all the evidence proves you wrong.
The person who shot JFK from the TSBD (likely one of your buddies from Langley), no doubt was an expert marksman and could make the killing shot with a poor mail order rifle, if indeed he even used it.
Oswald could not have killed Tippit, who had questionable ties, because there was not enough time to get to the spot of the killing. This fact has been abundantly proven. Plus witnesses who saw the shooting identified two men, with neither looking anything like Oswald. I believe one of your fixers at the CIA murdered one of those witnesses, if I remember correctly. So many people with knowledge of the event were liquidated by CIA fixers, it is hard to keep track of them all.
You have offered no proof of your accusations, just more government lies and BS.
Again...how does the assassin of the POTUS get to the lunchroom in seconds, appear completely composed and relaxed, then causally take a stroll home and then to the movies? Anyone with a brain (not you) knows if you've just murdered the POTUS, you are getting out of town fast. Oswald had every opportunity to leave Dallas quickly, just as the CIA approved killers did.
when you say the person who shot jfk from the TSBD,I assume you are talking about the bullet would in the back the warren commission moved up to his neck?
as always,you OWN his sorry ass and shoot down his BS and as always,he has NO ANSWERS for the questions you asked? hee hee.
He got owned he owned no one.
He bot beaten down and proven a fool as you always do with every post.
Go whine somewhere else kiddoe.
All within the state, nothing outside the state, nothing against the state.
You would do well in Nazi Germany and Soviet Russia...now you and your kind want to replicate those horrors in the USA.
All within the evidence, Nothing unsupported by evidence and nothing contradictory to the evidence.
It has nothing to do with your ideology of hating the state you wither have evidence or you do not and you DO NOT.
Cite some evidence.
You are yeas behind the times. I read that book and it is in my collection it has also been massively debunked.Read this book if you dare. It confirms everything I have told you...it is but one book of the many written, that exposes the numerous lies you and others have spewed about the Deep State's assassination of JFK. It was a coup d'etat...and you know it was.Wrong.Wrong on all counts. Please stop with the lies and misinformation. It doesn't work anymore. No one with a brain believes anything the CIA proclaims...particularly after they were instrumental in committing a coup d'etat in the USA.
The person who shot JFK from the TSBD (likely one of your buddies from Langley), no doubt was an expert marksman and could make the killing shot with a poor mail order rifle, if indeed he even used it.
Oswald could not have killed Tippit, who had questionable ties, because there was not enough time to get to the spot of the killing. This fact has been abundantly proven. Plus witnesses who saw the shooting identified two men, with neither looking anything like Oswald. I believe one of your fixers at the CIA murdered one of those witnesses, if I remember correctly. So many people with knowledge of the event were liquidated by CIA fixers, it is hard to keep track of them all.
You have offered no proof of your accusations, just more government lies and BS.
Again...how does the assassin of the POTUS get to the lunchroom in seconds, appear completely composed and relaxed, then causally take a stroll home and then to the movies? Anyone with a brain (not you) knows if you've just murdered the POTUS, you are getting out of town fast. Oswald had every opportunity to leave Dallas quickly, just as the CIA approved killers did.
when you say the person who shot jfk from the TSBD,I assume you are talking about the bullet would in the back the warren commission moved up to his neck?
as always,you OWN his sorry ass and shoot down his BS and as always,he has NO ANSWERS for the questions you asked? hee hee.
He got owned he owned no one.
He bot beaten down and proven a fool as you always do with every post.
Go whine somewhere else kiddoe.
All within the state, nothing outside the state, nothing against the state.
You would do well in Nazi Germany and Soviet Russia...now you and your kind want to replicate those horrors in the USA.
All within the evidence, Nothing unsupported by evidence and nothing contradictory to the evidence.
It has nothing to do with your ideology of hating the state you wither have evidence or you do not and you DO NOT.
Cite some evidence.
Here is a great review of the book, should you have a problem reading an entire book that blows up everything you believe.
JFK and the Unspeakable: Why He Died and Why It Matters
Review of James Douglass’ Book by Prof. Edward Curtin
---snip----
But who killed him?
Douglass presents a formidable amount of evidence, some old and some new, against the CIA and covert action agencies within the national security state, and does so in such a logical and persuasive way that any fair-minded reader cannot help but be taken aback; stunned, really. And he links this evidence directly to JFK’s actions on behalf of peace.
He knows, however, that to truly convince he must break a “conspiracy of silence that would envelop our government, our media, our academic institutions, and virtually our entire society from November 22, 1963, to the present.” [quote is from Chapter 6, Washington and Dallas, page 314, 2010 Simon & Schuster softcover edition] This “unspeakable,” this hypnotic “collective denial of the obvious,” is sustained by a mass-media whose repeated message is that the truth about such significant events is beyond our grasp, that we will have to drink the waters of uncertainty forever. As for those who don’t, they are relegated to the status of conspiracy nuts.
Fear and uncertainty block a true appraisal of the assassination—that plus the thought that it no longer matters.
It matters. For we know that no president since JFK has dared to buck the military-intelligence-industrial complex. We know a Pax Americana has spread its tentacles across the globe with U.S. military in over 130 countries on 750 plus bases. We know that the amount of blood and money spent on wars and war preparations has risen astronomically.
There is a great deal we know and even more that we don’t want to know, or at the very least, investigate.
If Lee Harvey Oswald was connected to the intelligence community, the FBI and the CIA, then we can logically conclude that he was not “a lone-nut” assassin. Douglass marshals a wealth of evidence to show how from the very start Oswald was moved around the globe like a pawn in a game, and when the game was done, the pawn was eliminated in the Dallas police headquarters.
As he begins to trace Oswald’s path, Douglass asks this question: “Why was Lee Harvey Oswald so tolerated and supported by the government he betrayed?” After serving as a U.S. Marine at the CIA’s U-2 spy plane operating base in Japan with a Crypto clearance (higher than top secret but a fact suppressed by the Warren Commission), Oswald left the Marines and defected to the Soviet Union.
After denouncing the U.S., working at a Soviet factory in Minsk, and taking a Russian wife—during which time Gary Powers’ U-2 spy plane is shot down over the Soviet Union—he returned to the U.S. with a loan from the American Embassy in Moscow, only to be met at the dock in Hoboken, New Jersey by a man, Spas T. Raikin, a prominent anti-communist with extensive intelligence connections, recommended by the State Department.
He passed through immigration with no trouble, was not prosecuted, moved to Fort Worth, Texas where, at the suggestion of the Dallas CIA Domestic Contacts Service chief, he was met and befriended by George de Mohrenschildt, an anti-communist Russian, who was a CIA asset. De Mohrenschildt got him a job four days later at a graphic arts company that worked on maps for the U.S. Army Map Service related to U-2 spy missions over Cuba.
Oswald was then shepherded around the Dallas area by de Mohrenschildt who, in 1977, on the day he revealed he had contacted Oswald for the CIA and was to meet with the House Select Committee on Assassinations’ Gaeton Fonzi, allegedly committed suicide.
Oswald then moved to New Orleans in April 1963 where got a job at the Reilly Coffee Company owned by CIA-affiliated William Reilly. The Reilly Coffee Company was located in close vicinity to the FBI, CIA, Secret Service, and Office of Naval Intelligence offices and a stone’s throw from the office of Guy Bannister, a former Special Agent in Charge of the FBI’s Chicago Bureau, who worked as a covert action coordinator for the intelligence services, supplying and training anti-Castro paramilitaries meant to ensnare Kennedy. Oswald then went to work with Bannister and the CIA paramilitaries.
During this time up until the assassination Oswald engaged in all sorts of contradictory activities, one day portraying himself as pro-Castro, the next day as anti-Castro, many of these theatrical performances being directed from Bannister’s office. It was as though Oswald, on the orders of his puppet masters, was enacting multiple and antithetical roles in order to confound anyone intent on deciphering the purposes behind his actions and to set him up as a future “assassin.” Douglass persuasively argues that Oswald “seems to have been working with both the CIA and FBI,” as a provocateur for the former and an informant for the latter. Jim and Elsie Wilcott, who worked at the CIA Tokyo Station from 1960-64, in a 1978 interview with the San Francisco Chronicle, said, “It was common knowledge in the Tokyo CIA station that Oswald worked for the agency.”
When Oswald moved to New Orleans in April 1963, de Mohrenschildt exited the picture, having asked the CIA for and been indirectly given a $285,000 contract to do a geological survey for Haitian dictator “Papa Doc” Duvalier, which he never did, but for which he was paid. Ruth and Michael Paine then entered the picture on cue. Douglass illuminatingly traces in their intelligence connections. Ruth later was the Warren Commission’s chief witness. She had been introduced to Oswald by de Mohrenschildt. In September 1963 Ruth Paine drove from her sister’s house in Virginia to New Orleans to pick up Marina Oswald and bring her to her house in Dallas to live with her. Thirty years after the assassination a document was declassified showing Paine’s sister Sylvia worked for the CIA. Her father traveled throughout Latin America on an Agency for International Development (notorious for CIA front activities) contract and filed reports that went to the CIA. Her husband Michael’s step-father, Arthur Young, was the inventor of the Bell helicopter and Michael’s job there gave him a security clearance. Her mother was related to the Forbes family of Boston and her lifelong friend, Mary Bancroft, worked as a WW II spy with Allen Dulles and was his mistress. Afterwards, Dulles questioned the Paines in front of the Warren Commission, studiously avoiding any revealing questions. Back in Dallas, Ruth Paine conveniently got Oswald a job in the Texas Book Depository where he began work on October 16, 1963.
From late September until November 22, various Oswalds are later reported to have simultaneously been seen from Dallas to Mexico City. Two Oswalds were arrested in the Texas Theatre, the real one taken out the front door and an impostor out the back. As Douglas says, “There were more Oswalds providing evidence against Lee Harvey Oswald than the Warren Report could use or even explain.” Even J. Edgar Hoover knew that Oswald impostors were used, as he told LBJ concerning Oswald’s alleged visit to the Soviet Embassy in Mexico City. He later called this CIA ploy, “the false story re Oswald’s trip to Mexico...their ( CIA’s) double-dealing,” something that he couldn’t forget. It was apparent that a very intricate and deadly game was being played out at high levels in the shadows.
We know Oswald was blamed for the President’s murder. But if one fairly follows the trail of the crime it becomes blatantly obvious that government forces were at work. Douglass adds layer upon layer of evidence to show how this had to be so. Oswald, the mafia, anti-Castro Cubans could not have withdrawn most of the security that day. The Sheriff Bill Decker withdrew all police protection. The Secret Service withdrew the police motorcycle escorts from beside the president’s car where they had been the day before in Houston; took agents off the back of the car where they were normally stationed to obstruct gunfire. They approved the fateful, dogleg turn (on a dry run on November 18) where the car came, almost to a halt, a clear security violation. The House Select Committee on Assassinations concluded this, not some conspiracy nut.
snip-----
Prof Ed Curtin review: "JFK and the Unspeakable," 11-25-09
Yeah..I know you have nothing but lies and bull shit. Just accept it...Oswald was one of your own.You are yeas behind the times. I read that book and it is in my collection it has also been massively debunked.Read this book if you dare. It confirms everything I have told you...it is but one book of the many written, that exposes the numerous lies you and others have spewed about the Deep State's assassination of JFK. It was a coup d'etat...and you know it was.Wrong.when you say the person who shot jfk from the TSBD,I assume you are talking about the bullet would in the back the warren commission moved up to his neck?
as always,you OWN his sorry ass and shoot down his BS and as always,he has NO ANSWERS for the questions you asked? hee hee.
He got owned he owned no one.
He bot beaten down and proven a fool as you always do with every post.
Go whine somewhere else kiddoe.
All within the state, nothing outside the state, nothing against the state.
You would do well in Nazi Germany and Soviet Russia...now you and your kind want to replicate those horrors in the USA.
All within the evidence, Nothing unsupported by evidence and nothing contradictory to the evidence.
It has nothing to do with your ideology of hating the state you wither have evidence or you do not and you DO NOT.
Cite some evidence.
Here is a great review of the book, should you have a problem reading an entire book that blows up everything you believe.
JFK and the Unspeakable: Why He Died and Why It Matters
Review of James Douglass’ Book by Prof. Edward Curtin
---snip----
But who killed him?
Douglass presents a formidable amount of evidence, some old and some new, against the CIA and covert action agencies within the national security state, and does so in such a logical and persuasive way that any fair-minded reader cannot help but be taken aback; stunned, really. And he links this evidence directly to JFK’s actions on behalf of peace.
He knows, however, that to truly convince he must break a “conspiracy of silence that would envelop our government, our media, our academic institutions, and virtually our entire society from November 22, 1963, to the present.” [quote is from Chapter 6, Washington and Dallas, page 314, 2010 Simon & Schuster softcover edition] This “unspeakable,” this hypnotic “collective denial of the obvious,” is sustained by a mass-media whose repeated message is that the truth about such significant events is beyond our grasp, that we will have to drink the waters of uncertainty forever. As for those who don’t, they are relegated to the status of conspiracy nuts.
Fear and uncertainty block a true appraisal of the assassination—that plus the thought that it no longer matters.
It matters. For we know that no president since JFK has dared to buck the military-intelligence-industrial complex. We know a Pax Americana has spread its tentacles across the globe with U.S. military in over 130 countries on 750 plus bases. We know that the amount of blood and money spent on wars and war preparations has risen astronomically.
There is a great deal we know and even more that we don’t want to know, or at the very least, investigate.
If Lee Harvey Oswald was connected to the intelligence community, the FBI and the CIA, then we can logically conclude that he was not “a lone-nut” assassin. Douglass marshals a wealth of evidence to show how from the very start Oswald was moved around the globe like a pawn in a game, and when the game was done, the pawn was eliminated in the Dallas police headquarters.
As he begins to trace Oswald’s path, Douglass asks this question: “Why was Lee Harvey Oswald so tolerated and supported by the government he betrayed?” After serving as a U.S. Marine at the CIA’s U-2 spy plane operating base in Japan with a Crypto clearance (higher than top secret but a fact suppressed by the Warren Commission), Oswald left the Marines and defected to the Soviet Union.
After denouncing the U.S., working at a Soviet factory in Minsk, and taking a Russian wife—during which time Gary Powers’ U-2 spy plane is shot down over the Soviet Union—he returned to the U.S. with a loan from the American Embassy in Moscow, only to be met at the dock in Hoboken, New Jersey by a man, Spas T. Raikin, a prominent anti-communist with extensive intelligence connections, recommended by the State Department.
He passed through immigration with no trouble, was not prosecuted, moved to Fort Worth, Texas where, at the suggestion of the Dallas CIA Domestic Contacts Service chief, he was met and befriended by George de Mohrenschildt, an anti-communist Russian, who was a CIA asset. De Mohrenschildt got him a job four days later at a graphic arts company that worked on maps for the U.S. Army Map Service related to U-2 spy missions over Cuba.
Oswald was then shepherded around the Dallas area by de Mohrenschildt who, in 1977, on the day he revealed he had contacted Oswald for the CIA and was to meet with the House Select Committee on Assassinations’ Gaeton Fonzi, allegedly committed suicide.
Oswald then moved to New Orleans in April 1963 where got a job at the Reilly Coffee Company owned by CIA-affiliated William Reilly. The Reilly Coffee Company was located in close vicinity to the FBI, CIA, Secret Service, and Office of Naval Intelligence offices and a stone’s throw from the office of Guy Bannister, a former Special Agent in Charge of the FBI’s Chicago Bureau, who worked as a covert action coordinator for the intelligence services, supplying and training anti-Castro paramilitaries meant to ensnare Kennedy. Oswald then went to work with Bannister and the CIA paramilitaries.
During this time up until the assassination Oswald engaged in all sorts of contradictory activities, one day portraying himself as pro-Castro, the next day as anti-Castro, many of these theatrical performances being directed from Bannister’s office. It was as though Oswald, on the orders of his puppet masters, was enacting multiple and antithetical roles in order to confound anyone intent on deciphering the purposes behind his actions and to set him up as a future “assassin.” Douglass persuasively argues that Oswald “seems to have been working with both the CIA and FBI,” as a provocateur for the former and an informant for the latter. Jim and Elsie Wilcott, who worked at the CIA Tokyo Station from 1960-64, in a 1978 interview with the San Francisco Chronicle, said, “It was common knowledge in the Tokyo CIA station that Oswald worked for the agency.”
When Oswald moved to New Orleans in April 1963, de Mohrenschildt exited the picture, having asked the CIA for and been indirectly given a $285,000 contract to do a geological survey for Haitian dictator “Papa Doc” Duvalier, which he never did, but for which he was paid. Ruth and Michael Paine then entered the picture on cue. Douglass illuminatingly traces in their intelligence connections. Ruth later was the Warren Commission’s chief witness. She had been introduced to Oswald by de Mohrenschildt. In September 1963 Ruth Paine drove from her sister’s house in Virginia to New Orleans to pick up Marina Oswald and bring her to her house in Dallas to live with her. Thirty years after the assassination a document was declassified showing Paine’s sister Sylvia worked for the CIA. Her father traveled throughout Latin America on an Agency for International Development (notorious for CIA front activities) contract and filed reports that went to the CIA. Her husband Michael’s step-father, Arthur Young, was the inventor of the Bell helicopter and Michael’s job there gave him a security clearance. Her mother was related to the Forbes family of Boston and her lifelong friend, Mary Bancroft, worked as a WW II spy with Allen Dulles and was his mistress. Afterwards, Dulles questioned the Paines in front of the Warren Commission, studiously avoiding any revealing questions. Back in Dallas, Ruth Paine conveniently got Oswald a job in the Texas Book Depository where he began work on October 16, 1963.
From late September until November 22, various Oswalds are later reported to have simultaneously been seen from Dallas to Mexico City. Two Oswalds were arrested in the Texas Theatre, the real one taken out the front door and an impostor out the back. As Douglas says, “There were more Oswalds providing evidence against Lee Harvey Oswald than the Warren Report could use or even explain.” Even J. Edgar Hoover knew that Oswald impostors were used, as he told LBJ concerning Oswald’s alleged visit to the Soviet Embassy in Mexico City. He later called this CIA ploy, “the false story re Oswald’s trip to Mexico...their ( CIA’s) double-dealing,” something that he couldn’t forget. It was apparent that a very intricate and deadly game was being played out at high levels in the shadows.
We know Oswald was blamed for the President’s murder. But if one fairly follows the trail of the crime it becomes blatantly obvious that government forces were at work. Douglass adds layer upon layer of evidence to show how this had to be so. Oswald, the mafia, anti-Castro Cubans could not have withdrawn most of the security that day. The Sheriff Bill Decker withdrew all police protection. The Secret Service withdrew the police motorcycle escorts from beside the president’s car where they had been the day before in Houston; took agents off the back of the car where they were normally stationed to obstruct gunfire. They approved the fateful, dogleg turn (on a dry run on November 18) where the car came, almost to a halt, a clear security violation. The House Select Committee on Assassinations concluded this, not some conspiracy nut.
snip-----
Prof Ed Curtin review: "JFK and the Unspeakable," 11-25-09
He presents no evidence but just a lot of whining about peace and the CIA.
Much like you his problem is ideological. He has no evidence but like you he desperately WANTS to believes.
Oswald was not connected to the CIA or any intelligence agency. Marines typically do get moved around the world. Moving around does not indicate evidence of CIA or intelligence connections.
Oswald did not have a high clearance at all and did not work at a U2 spy plane base. He served in a massive ( Osaka ) air base shared by all branches of the military and which had an off limits secure CIA compound which Oswald never came close to. The claim that the Warren commission suppressed evidence of such a clearance is simply a lie as Douglas made that part up out of thin air\ and presents no evidence which could have been suppressed.
He did not betray any military secrets and had none to betray. His limited technical knowledge of air traffic control radar could have been found in any number of open published sources.
He was met by no one when he returned to the US which is yet another lie by Douglas. Gaeton Fonzi is a nobody with no credibility and never revealed anything at all.
Oswald never worked with Bannister or any covert agencies in New Orleans. Douglas attempts to claim he did so based on two inferences. One is proximity which means nothing and two was the movie JFK which was fictional,
Multiple Oswald sightings would be expected and such things are normal in any high level crime but mean nothing and actually refute a conspiracy.
SO once again cite some evidence not a weak and debunked book with no evidence.
Wrong on all counts. Please stop with the lies and misinformation. It doesn't work anymore. No one with a brain believes anything the CIA proclaims...particularly after they were instrumental in committing a coup d'etat in the USA.Oswald NEVER fired a gun that day. The evidence is overwhelming, but to government dupes like you, you can't see it.
Dupe Think::: I just shot the POTUS in broad daylight with a shitty mail order bolt action rifle that was misaligned, then I magically appear in the lunchroom several floors below within seconds of the shooting, casually drinking a soda. I then stroll outside and casually get a ride home. I am accused of killing a cop, that I would have had to be an Olympic sprinter or Indy race car driver to reach in the time allotted....then I casually go to the movie house. The acts of a presidential assassin, but only if you are a government dupe.
Wrong Oswald did fire three shots that day and overwhelming evidence proves he did.
I can cite evidence that he did. You can cite none whatsoever that he did not.
A shitty rifle is still a rifle and the rifle was capable of performing as it did. It was his rifle and found at the scene. All bullets and bullet fragments came from his rifle and only his rifle. The expended shells all came from his rifle. All the wounds came from above and behind which is consistent with his sniper nest and he was the last person seen on the sixth floor.
The rifle was not misaligned. The scope was misaligned but that is irrelevant as he did not need to use the scope and was more than capable of hitting the target with the iron sights.
HE had ample time to move from the sixth floor to the second after stashing the rifle. Endless people have retraced his steps and it is proven beyond question that he had enough time to do so.
He took the bus home he did not take a ride home. He did not have to run to reach the scene where he killed Tibbets. Once again that has been proven beyond question.
You have presented no evidence but I have.
You have failed to offer any evidence of any kind. Only your naive and gullible ramblings from a video.
Now cite some evidence as so far you have not and all the evidence proves you wrong.
The person who shot JFK from the TSBD (likely one of your buddies from Langley), no doubt was an expert marksman and could make the killing shot with a poor mail order rifle, if indeed he even used it.
Oswald could not have killed Tippit, who had questionable ties, because there was not enough time to get to the spot of the killing. This fact has been abundantly proven. Plus witnesses who saw the shooting identified two men, with neither looking anything like Oswald. I believe one of your fixers at the CIA murdered one of those witnesses, if I remember correctly. So many people with knowledge of the event were liquidated by CIA fixers, it is hard to keep track of them all.
You have offered no proof of your accusations, just more government lies and BS.
Again...how does the assassin of the POTUS get to the lunchroom in seconds, appear completely composed and relaxed, then causally take a stroll home and then to the movies? Anyone with a brain (not you) knows if you've just murdered the POTUS, you are getting out of town fast. Oswald had every opportunity to leave Dallas quickly, just as the CIA approved killers did.
when you say the person who shot jfk from the TSBD,I assume you are talking about the bullet would in the back the warren commission moved up to his neck?
as always,you OWN his sorry ass and shoot down his BS and as always,he has NO ANSWERS for the questions you asked? hee hee.
He got owned he owned no one.
He bot beaten down and proven a fool as you always do with every post.
Go whine somewhere else kiddoe.
All within the state, nothing outside the state, nothing against the state.
You would do well in Nazi Germany and Soviet Russia...now you and your kind want to replicate those horrors in the USA.
Read this book if you dare. It confirms everything I have told you...it is but one book of the many written, that exposes the numerous lies you and others have spewed about the Deep State's assassination of JFK. It was a coup d'etat...and you know it was.Wrong.Wrong on all counts. Please stop with the lies and misinformation. It doesn't work anymore. No one with a brain believes anything the CIA proclaims...particularly after they were instrumental in committing a coup d'etat in the USA.
The person who shot JFK from the TSBD (likely one of your buddies from Langley), no doubt was an expert marksman and could make the killing shot with a poor mail order rifle, if indeed he even used it.
Oswald could not have killed Tippit, who had questionable ties, because there was not enough time to get to the spot of the killing. This fact has been abundantly proven. Plus witnesses who saw the shooting identified two men, with neither looking anything like Oswald. I believe one of your fixers at the CIA murdered one of those witnesses, if I remember correctly. So many people with knowledge of the event were liquidated by CIA fixers, it is hard to keep track of them all.
You have offered no proof of your accusations, just more government lies and BS.
Again...how does the assassin of the POTUS get to the lunchroom in seconds, appear completely composed and relaxed, then causally take a stroll home and then to the movies? Anyone with a brain (not you) knows if you've just murdered the POTUS, you are getting out of town fast. Oswald had every opportunity to leave Dallas quickly, just as the CIA approved killers did.
when you say the person who shot jfk from the TSBD,I assume you are talking about the bullet would in the back the warren commission moved up to his neck?
as always,you OWN his sorry ass and shoot down his BS and as always,he has NO ANSWERS for the questions you asked? hee hee.
He got owned he owned no one.
He bot beaten down and proven a fool as you always do with every post.
Go whine somewhere else kiddoe.
All within the state, nothing outside the state, nothing against the state.
You would do well in Nazi Germany and Soviet Russia...now you and your kind want to replicate those horrors in the USA.
All within the evidence, Nothing unsupported by evidence and nothing contradictory to the evidence.
It has nothing to do with your ideology of hating the state you wither have evidence or you do not and you DO NOT.
Cite some evidence.
Here is a great review of the book, should you have a problem reading an entire book that blows up everything you believe.
JFK and the Unspeakable: Why He Died and Why It Matters
Review of James Douglass’ Book by Prof. Edward Curtin
---snip----
But who killed him?
Douglass presents a formidable amount of evidence, some old and some new, against the CIA and covert action agencies within the national security state, and does so in such a logical and persuasive way that any fair-minded reader cannot help but be taken aback; stunned, really. And he links this evidence directly to JFK’s actions on behalf of peace.
He knows, however, that to truly convince he must break a “conspiracy of silence that would envelop our government, our media, our academic institutions, and virtually our entire society from November 22, 1963, to the present.” [quote is from Chapter 6, Washington and Dallas, page 314, 2010 Simon & Schuster softcover edition] This “unspeakable,” this hypnotic “collective denial of the obvious,” is sustained by a mass-media whose repeated message is that the truth about such significant events is beyond our grasp, that we will have to drink the waters of uncertainty forever. As for those who don’t, they are relegated to the status of conspiracy nuts.
Fear and uncertainty block a true appraisal of the assassination—that plus the thought that it no longer matters.
It matters. For we know that no president since JFK has dared to buck the military-intelligence-industrial complex. We know a Pax Americana has spread its tentacles across the globe with U.S. military in over 130 countries on 750 plus bases. We know that the amount of blood and money spent on wars and war preparations has risen astronomically.
There is a great deal we know and even more that we don’t want to know, or at the very least, investigate.
If Lee Harvey Oswald was connected to the intelligence community, the FBI and the CIA, then we can logically conclude that he was not “a lone-nut” assassin. Douglass marshals a wealth of evidence to show how from the very start Oswald was moved around the globe like a pawn in a game, and when the game was done, the pawn was eliminated in the Dallas police headquarters.
As he begins to trace Oswald’s path, Douglass asks this question: “Why was Lee Harvey Oswald so tolerated and supported by the government he betrayed?” After serving as a U.S. Marine at the CIA’s U-2 spy plane operating base in Japan with a Crypto clearance (higher than top secret but a fact suppressed by the Warren Commission), Oswald left the Marines and defected to the Soviet Union.
After denouncing the U.S., working at a Soviet factory in Minsk, and taking a Russian wife—during which time Gary Powers’ U-2 spy plane is shot down over the Soviet Union—he returned to the U.S. with a loan from the American Embassy in Moscow, only to be met at the dock in Hoboken, New Jersey by a man, Spas T. Raikin, a prominent anti-communist with extensive intelligence connections, recommended by the State Department.
He passed through immigration with no trouble, was not prosecuted, moved to Fort Worth, Texas where, at the suggestion of the Dallas CIA Domestic Contacts Service chief, he was met and befriended by George de Mohrenschildt, an anti-communist Russian, who was a CIA asset. De Mohrenschildt got him a job four days later at a graphic arts company that worked on maps for the U.S. Army Map Service related to U-2 spy missions over Cuba.
Oswald was then shepherded around the Dallas area by de Mohrenschildt who, in 1977, on the day he revealed he had contacted Oswald for the CIA and was to meet with the House Select Committee on Assassinations’ Gaeton Fonzi, allegedly committed suicide.
Oswald then moved to New Orleans in April 1963 where got a job at the Reilly Coffee Company owned by CIA-affiliated William Reilly. The Reilly Coffee Company was located in close vicinity to the FBI, CIA, Secret Service, and Office of Naval Intelligence offices and a stone’s throw from the office of Guy Bannister, a former Special Agent in Charge of the FBI’s Chicago Bureau, who worked as a covert action coordinator for the intelligence services, supplying and training anti-Castro paramilitaries meant to ensnare Kennedy. Oswald then went to work with Bannister and the CIA paramilitaries.
During this time up until the assassination Oswald engaged in all sorts of contradictory activities, one day portraying himself as pro-Castro, the next day as anti-Castro, many of these theatrical performances being directed from Bannister’s office. It was as though Oswald, on the orders of his puppet masters, was enacting multiple and antithetical roles in order to confound anyone intent on deciphering the purposes behind his actions and to set him up as a future “assassin.” Douglass persuasively argues that Oswald “seems to have been working with both the CIA and FBI,” as a provocateur for the former and an informant for the latter. Jim and Elsie Wilcott, who worked at the CIA Tokyo Station from 1960-64, in a 1978 interview with the San Francisco Chronicle, said, “It was common knowledge in the Tokyo CIA station that Oswald worked for the agency.”
When Oswald moved to New Orleans in April 1963, de Mohrenschildt exited the picture, having asked the CIA for and been indirectly given a $285,000 contract to do a geological survey for Haitian dictator “Papa Doc” Duvalier, which he never did, but for which he was paid. Ruth and Michael Paine then entered the picture on cue. Douglass illuminatingly traces in their intelligence connections. Ruth later was the Warren Commission’s chief witness. She had been introduced to Oswald by de Mohrenschildt. In September 1963 Ruth Paine drove from her sister’s house in Virginia to New Orleans to pick up Marina Oswald and bring her to her house in Dallas to live with her. Thirty years after the assassination a document was declassified showing Paine’s sister Sylvia worked for the CIA. Her father traveled throughout Latin America on an Agency for International Development (notorious for CIA front activities) contract and filed reports that went to the CIA. Her husband Michael’s step-father, Arthur Young, was the inventor of the Bell helicopter and Michael’s job there gave him a security clearance. Her mother was related to the Forbes family of Boston and her lifelong friend, Mary Bancroft, worked as a WW II spy with Allen Dulles and was his mistress. Afterwards, Dulles questioned the Paines in front of the Warren Commission, studiously avoiding any revealing questions. Back in Dallas, Ruth Paine conveniently got Oswald a job in the Texas Book Depository where he began work on October 16, 1963.
From late September until November 22, various Oswalds are later reported to have simultaneously been seen from Dallas to Mexico City. Two Oswalds were arrested in the Texas Theatre, the real one taken out the front door and an impostor out the back. As Douglas says, “There were more Oswalds providing evidence against Lee Harvey Oswald than the Warren Report could use or even explain.” Even J. Edgar Hoover knew that Oswald impostors were used, as he told LBJ concerning Oswald’s alleged visit to the Soviet Embassy in Mexico City. He later called this CIA ploy, “the false story re Oswald’s trip to Mexico...their ( CIA’s) double-dealing,” something that he couldn’t forget. It was apparent that a very intricate and deadly game was being played out at high levels in the shadows.
We know Oswald was blamed for the President’s murder. But if one fairly follows the trail of the crime it becomes blatantly obvious that government forces were at work. Douglass adds layer upon layer of evidence to show how this had to be so. Oswald, the mafia, anti-Castro Cubans could not have withdrawn most of the security that day. The Sheriff Bill Decker withdrew all police protection. The Secret Service withdrew the police motorcycle escorts from beside the president’s car where they had been the day before in Houston; took agents off the back of the car where they were normally stationed to obstruct gunfire. They approved the fateful, dogleg turn (on a dry run on November 18) where the car came, almost to a halt, a clear security violation. The House Select Committee on Assassinations concluded this, not some conspiracy nut.
snip-----
Prof Ed Curtin review: "JFK and the Unspeakable," 11-25-09
The socialists of America came to JFK and said, "since you anticommunist, we have a plan to take out Castro, you just have to commit to air support"
jFK was onboard.
The CIA through Alpha66 recruited patriotic Cubans living in America, with the promise of getting revenge on Castro.
When the operation started, JFK realized he had been fooled, and America would only be an unprovoked aggressor with response from the USSR
JFK had to refuse air support, and all the patriots were slaughtered by Castro.
JFK made his famous statement he'd like to destroy the CIA and scatter the pieces in the wind
Ok but none of this has anything to do with Oswald which is who shot kennedy
Oswald never fired a gun that fateful day. Being a long time CIA operative, he made the perfect patsy for the coup d'etat committed by your friends at Langley.
You must be so proud, yet you must also continue to promote the big lie.
Yeah..I know you have nothing but lies and bull shit. Just accept it...Oswald was one of your own.You are yeas behind the times. I read that book and it is in my collection it has also been massively debunked.Read this book if you dare. It confirms everything I have told you...it is but one book of the many written, that exposes the numerous lies you and others have spewed about the Deep State's assassination of JFK. It was a coup d'etat...and you know it was.Wrong.He got owned he owned no one.
He bot beaten down and proven a fool as you always do with every post.
Go whine somewhere else kiddoe.
All within the state, nothing outside the state, nothing against the state.
You would do well in Nazi Germany and Soviet Russia...now you and your kind want to replicate those horrors in the USA.
All within the evidence, Nothing unsupported by evidence and nothing contradictory to the evidence.
It has nothing to do with your ideology of hating the state you wither have evidence or you do not and you DO NOT.
Cite some evidence.
Here is a great review of the book, should you have a problem reading an entire book that blows up everything you believe.
JFK and the Unspeakable: Why He Died and Why It Matters
Review of James Douglass’ Book by Prof. Edward Curtin
---snip----
But who killed him?
Douglass presents a formidable amount of evidence, some old and some new, against the CIA and covert action agencies within the national security state, and does so in such a logical and persuasive way that any fair-minded reader cannot help but be taken aback; stunned, really. And he links this evidence directly to JFK’s actions on behalf of peace.
He knows, however, that to truly convince he must break a “conspiracy of silence that would envelop our government, our media, our academic institutions, and virtually our entire society from November 22, 1963, to the present.” [quote is from Chapter 6, Washington and Dallas, page 314, 2010 Simon & Schuster softcover edition] This “unspeakable,” this hypnotic “collective denial of the obvious,” is sustained by a mass-media whose repeated message is that the truth about such significant events is beyond our grasp, that we will have to drink the waters of uncertainty forever. As for those who don’t, they are relegated to the status of conspiracy nuts.
Fear and uncertainty block a true appraisal of the assassination—that plus the thought that it no longer matters.
It matters. For we know that no president since JFK has dared to buck the military-intelligence-industrial complex. We know a Pax Americana has spread its tentacles across the globe with U.S. military in over 130 countries on 750 plus bases. We know that the amount of blood and money spent on wars and war preparations has risen astronomically.
There is a great deal we know and even more that we don’t want to know, or at the very least, investigate.
If Lee Harvey Oswald was connected to the intelligence community, the FBI and the CIA, then we can logically conclude that he was not “a lone-nut” assassin. Douglass marshals a wealth of evidence to show how from the very start Oswald was moved around the globe like a pawn in a game, and when the game was done, the pawn was eliminated in the Dallas police headquarters.
As he begins to trace Oswald’s path, Douglass asks this question: “Why was Lee Harvey Oswald so tolerated and supported by the government he betrayed?” After serving as a U.S. Marine at the CIA’s U-2 spy plane operating base in Japan with a Crypto clearance (higher than top secret but a fact suppressed by the Warren Commission), Oswald left the Marines and defected to the Soviet Union.
After denouncing the U.S., working at a Soviet factory in Minsk, and taking a Russian wife—during which time Gary Powers’ U-2 spy plane is shot down over the Soviet Union—he returned to the U.S. with a loan from the American Embassy in Moscow, only to be met at the dock in Hoboken, New Jersey by a man, Spas T. Raikin, a prominent anti-communist with extensive intelligence connections, recommended by the State Department.
He passed through immigration with no trouble, was not prosecuted, moved to Fort Worth, Texas where, at the suggestion of the Dallas CIA Domestic Contacts Service chief, he was met and befriended by George de Mohrenschildt, an anti-communist Russian, who was a CIA asset. De Mohrenschildt got him a job four days later at a graphic arts company that worked on maps for the U.S. Army Map Service related to U-2 spy missions over Cuba.
Oswald was then shepherded around the Dallas area by de Mohrenschildt who, in 1977, on the day he revealed he had contacted Oswald for the CIA and was to meet with the House Select Committee on Assassinations’ Gaeton Fonzi, allegedly committed suicide.
Oswald then moved to New Orleans in April 1963 where got a job at the Reilly Coffee Company owned by CIA-affiliated William Reilly. The Reilly Coffee Company was located in close vicinity to the FBI, CIA, Secret Service, and Office of Naval Intelligence offices and a stone’s throw from the office of Guy Bannister, a former Special Agent in Charge of the FBI’s Chicago Bureau, who worked as a covert action coordinator for the intelligence services, supplying and training anti-Castro paramilitaries meant to ensnare Kennedy. Oswald then went to work with Bannister and the CIA paramilitaries.
During this time up until the assassination Oswald engaged in all sorts of contradictory activities, one day portraying himself as pro-Castro, the next day as anti-Castro, many of these theatrical performances being directed from Bannister’s office. It was as though Oswald, on the orders of his puppet masters, was enacting multiple and antithetical roles in order to confound anyone intent on deciphering the purposes behind his actions and to set him up as a future “assassin.” Douglass persuasively argues that Oswald “seems to have been working with both the CIA and FBI,” as a provocateur for the former and an informant for the latter. Jim and Elsie Wilcott, who worked at the CIA Tokyo Station from 1960-64, in a 1978 interview with the San Francisco Chronicle, said, “It was common knowledge in the Tokyo CIA station that Oswald worked for the agency.”
When Oswald moved to New Orleans in April 1963, de Mohrenschildt exited the picture, having asked the CIA for and been indirectly given a $285,000 contract to do a geological survey for Haitian dictator “Papa Doc” Duvalier, which he never did, but for which he was paid. Ruth and Michael Paine then entered the picture on cue. Douglass illuminatingly traces in their intelligence connections. Ruth later was the Warren Commission’s chief witness. She had been introduced to Oswald by de Mohrenschildt. In September 1963 Ruth Paine drove from her sister’s house in Virginia to New Orleans to pick up Marina Oswald and bring her to her house in Dallas to live with her. Thirty years after the assassination a document was declassified showing Paine’s sister Sylvia worked for the CIA. Her father traveled throughout Latin America on an Agency for International Development (notorious for CIA front activities) contract and filed reports that went to the CIA. Her husband Michael’s step-father, Arthur Young, was the inventor of the Bell helicopter and Michael’s job there gave him a security clearance. Her mother was related to the Forbes family of Boston and her lifelong friend, Mary Bancroft, worked as a WW II spy with Allen Dulles and was his mistress. Afterwards, Dulles questioned the Paines in front of the Warren Commission, studiously avoiding any revealing questions. Back in Dallas, Ruth Paine conveniently got Oswald a job in the Texas Book Depository where he began work on October 16, 1963.
From late September until November 22, various Oswalds are later reported to have simultaneously been seen from Dallas to Mexico City. Two Oswalds were arrested in the Texas Theatre, the real one taken out the front door and an impostor out the back. As Douglas says, “There were more Oswalds providing evidence against Lee Harvey Oswald than the Warren Report could use or even explain.” Even J. Edgar Hoover knew that Oswald impostors were used, as he told LBJ concerning Oswald’s alleged visit to the Soviet Embassy in Mexico City. He later called this CIA ploy, “the false story re Oswald’s trip to Mexico...their ( CIA’s) double-dealing,” something that he couldn’t forget. It was apparent that a very intricate and deadly game was being played out at high levels in the shadows.
We know Oswald was blamed for the President’s murder. But if one fairly follows the trail of the crime it becomes blatantly obvious that government forces were at work. Douglass adds layer upon layer of evidence to show how this had to be so. Oswald, the mafia, anti-Castro Cubans could not have withdrawn most of the security that day. The Sheriff Bill Decker withdrew all police protection. The Secret Service withdrew the police motorcycle escorts from beside the president’s car where they had been the day before in Houston; took agents off the back of the car where they were normally stationed to obstruct gunfire. They approved the fateful, dogleg turn (on a dry run on November 18) where the car came, almost to a halt, a clear security violation. The House Select Committee on Assassinations concluded this, not some conspiracy nut.
snip-----
Prof Ed Curtin review: "JFK and the Unspeakable," 11-25-09
He presents no evidence but just a lot of whining about peace and the CIA.
Much like you his problem is ideological. He has no evidence but like you he desperately WANTS to believes.
Oswald was not connected to the CIA or any intelligence agency. Marines typically do get moved around the world. Moving around does not indicate evidence of CIA or intelligence connections.
Oswald did not have a high clearance at all and did not work at a U2 spy plane base. He served in a massive ( Osaka ) air base shared by all branches of the military and which had an off limits secure CIA compound which Oswald never came close to. The claim that the Warren commission suppressed evidence of such a clearance is simply a lie as Douglas made that part up out of thin air\ and presents no evidence which could have been suppressed.
He did not betray any military secrets and had none to betray. His limited technical knowledge of air traffic control radar could have been found in any number of open published sources.
He was met by no one when he returned to the US which is yet another lie by Douglas. Gaeton Fonzi is a nobody with no credibility and never revealed anything at all.
Oswald never worked with Bannister or any covert agencies in New Orleans. Douglas attempts to claim he did so based on two inferences. One is proximity which means nothing and two was the movie JFK which was fictional,
Multiple Oswald sightings would be expected and such things are normal in any high level crime but mean nothing and actually refute a conspiracy.
SO once again cite some evidence not a weak and debunked book with no evidence.
Here is more TRUTH for you to lie about...
We know Oswald was blamed for the President’s murder. But if one fairly follows the trail of the crime it becomes blatantly obvious that government forces were at work. Douglass adds layer upon layer of evidence to show how this had to be so. Oswald, the mafia, anti-Castro Cubans could not have withdrawn most of the security that day. The Sheriff Bill Decker withdrew all police protection. The Secret Service withdrew the police motorcycle escorts from beside the president’s car where they had been the day before in Houston; took agents off the back of the car where they were normally stationed to obstruct gunfire. They approved the fateful, dogleg turn (on a dry run on November 18) where the car came, almost to a halt, a clear security violation. The House Select Committee on Assassinations concluded this, not some conspiracy nut.
Who could have squelched the testimony of all the doctors and medical personnel who claimed the president had been shot from the front in his neck and head, testimony contradicting the official story? Who could have prosecuted and imprisoned Abraham Bolden, the first African-American Secret Service agent personally brought on to the White House detail by JFK, who warned that he feared the president was going to be assassinated? (Douglass interviewed Bolden seven times and his evidence on the aborted plot to kill JFK in Chicago on November 2—a story little known but extraordinary in its implications—is riveting.) The list of all the people who turned up dead, the evidence and events manipulated, the inquiry squelched, distorted, and twisted in an ex post facto cover-up—clearly point to forces within the government, not rogue actors without institutional support.
The evidence for a conspiracy organized at the deepest levels of the intelligence apparatus is overwhelming. James Douglass presents it in such depth and so logically that only one hardened to the truth would not be deeply moved and affected by his book.
He says it best: “The extent to which our national security state was systematically marshaled for the assassination of President John F. Kennedy remains incomprehensible to us. When we live in a system, we absorb and think in a system. We lack the independence needed to judge the system around us. Yet the evidence we have seen points toward our national security state, the systemic bubble in which we all live, as the source of Kennedy’s murder and immediate cover-up.”
Speaking to his friends Dave Powers and Ken O’Donnell about those who planned the Bay of Pigs invasion of Cuba, JFK said, “They couldn’t believe that a new president like me wouldn’t panic and try to save his own face. Well, they had me figured all wrong.”
Let’s hope for another president like that, but one that meets a different end.
The socialists of America came to JFK and said, "since you anticommunist, we have a plan to take out Castro, you just have to commit to air support"
jFK was onboard.
The CIA through Alpha66 recruited patriotic Cubans living in America, with the promise of getting revenge on Castro.
When the operation started, JFK realized he had been fooled, and America would only be an unprovoked aggressor with response from the USSR
JFK had to refuse air support, and all the patriots were slaughtered by Castro.
JFK made his famous statement he'd like to destroy the CIA and scatter the pieces in the wind
Ok but none of this has anything to do with Oswald which is who shot kennedy
Oswald never fired a gun that fateful day. Being a long time CIA operative, he made the perfect patsy for the coup d'etat committed by your friends at Langley.
You must be so proud, yet you must also continue to promote the big lie.
His co worker in the book depository heard him working the mechanism on the gun prior to firing each round. He may not have been the only one shooting at JFK that day buthe most certainly was one of them - the one that got caught and executed b4 he could spill the beans
But what else would we expect him to do? That is WHAT his boss at Langley pays him to do all the time here.
The socialists of America came to JFK and said, "since you anticommunist, we have a plan to take out Castro, you just have to commit to air support"
jFK was onboard.
The CIA through Alpha66 recruited patriotic Cubans living in America, with the promise of getting revenge on Castro.
When the operation started, JFK realized he had been fooled, and America would only be an unprovoked aggressor with response from the USSR
JFK had to refuse air support, and all the patriots were slaughtered by Castro.
JFK made his famous statement he'd like to destroy the CIA and scatter the pieces in the wind
Ok but none of this has anything to do with Oswald which is who shot kennedy
Oswald never fired a gun that fateful day. Being a long time CIA operative, he made the perfect patsy for the coup d'etat committed by your friends at Langley.
You must be so proud, yet you must also continue to promote the big lie.
His co worker in the book depository heard him working the mechanism on the gun prior to firing each round. He may not have been the only one shooting at JFK that day buthe most certainly was one of them - the one that got caught and executed b4 he could spill the beans
Okay since YOU are not a paid shill on the payroll of Langley like the evil NAZI paid shill and his bed buddie fellow shill SAYIT are,,I WILL take the time to educate YOU on this.
Uh dude,read post 32 here of Gippers.
JFK false flag victim
He took the evil nazi agent paid shill there to school and his bedlover sayit giving them a MAJOR ass beating they both suffered proving it was IMPOSSIBLE for oswald to have fired the shot.
I will ask you these questions that Gipper asked there since the NAZI agent and agent sayit just LIE all the time as they are paid to do when they cant refute the evidence and facts.
If YOU had just shot the president of the united states,would YOU risk running down the stairs passing by two fellow book depository employees who could identify you running down the stairs going to the breakroom and have a coke there and THEN walk out the FRONT door after that?
this is what me and gipper end up doing with the nazi paid shill and the other paid shill sayit when they play dodgeball with this evidence and never try and counter it.
this is all those two agents can do in defeat on these questions knowin they are cornered backed up to the wall with nowhere to run unable to get around these facts it was impossible for him to have pulled the trigger.
as far as his coworker you mentioned? He was pressured to lie.remember the cops just like the warren commission lawyers,harrassed many witnesses with threats to change their testimonys.a FACT that makes the NAZI agent shill cry in defeat all the time like the crybaby he is unable to admit defeat.
You mean the CIA that didn't even exist during WWII?Is it true that the CIA and the Nazis were best butt buddies?The socialists of America came to JFK and said, "since you anticommunist, we have a plan to take out Castro, you just have to commit to air support"
jFK was onboard.
The CIA through Alpha66 recruited patriotic Cubans living in America, with the promise of getting revenge on Castro.
When the operation started, JFK realized he had been fooled, and America would only be an unprovoked aggressor with response from the USSR
JFK had to refuse air support, and all the patriots were slaughtered by Castro.
JFK made his famous statement he'd like to destroy the CIA and scatter the pieces in the wind
Ok but none of this has anything to do with Oswald which is who shot kennedy
Oswald never fired a gun that fateful day. Being a long time CIA operative, he made the perfect patsy for the coup d'etat committed by your friends at Langley.
You must be so proud, yet you must also continue to promote the big lie.
Stop pretending you weren't destroyed on this subject in other threads.
There is no evidence he was CIA but overwhelming evidence exists that he shot Kennedy.
You have never been able to refute those facts.
You and others are simply gullible enough to believe fiction one man does not make a coup and he was not a patsy.
He acted alone deal with it
You mean the CIA that didn't even exist during WWII?Is it true that the CIA and the Nazis were best butt buddies?The socialists of America came to JFK and said, "since you anticommunist, we have a plan to take out Castro, you just have to commit to air support"
jFK was onboard.
The CIA through Alpha66 recruited patriotic Cubans living in America, with the promise of getting revenge on Castro.
When the operation started, JFK realized he had been fooled, and America would only be an unprovoked aggressor with response from the USSR
JFK had to refuse air support, and all the patriots were slaughtered by Castro.
JFK made his famous statement he'd like to destroy the CIA and scatter the pieces in the wind
Ok but none of this has anything to do with Oswald which is who shot kennedy
Oswald never fired a gun that fateful day. Being a long time CIA operative, he made the perfect patsy for the coup d'etat committed by your friends at Langley.
You must be so proud, yet you must also continue to promote the big lie.
Stop pretending you weren't destroyed on this subject in other threads.
There is no evidence he was CIA but overwhelming evidence exists that he shot Kennedy.
You have never been able to refute those facts.
You and others are simply gullible enough to believe fiction one man does not make a coup and he was not a patsy.
He acted alone deal with it
Nobody can put Oswald in that window at the time of the shooting and that’s the problem with the whole case. We know there was three shots all from the depository and that’s just about it.
Oswald acted aloneNobody can put Oswald in that window at the time of the shooting and that’s the problem with the whole case. We know there was three shots all from the depository and that’s just about it.
You nailed it.most likely the shots people thought came from the depository they are referring to here came from the dal tex building next to it. the back wound he got was more than likely the shot from the dal tex building.none from the depository.
Please name the commies Oswald knew.because the commies have killed a lot more people than the Klan have
Means nothing. Don’t be dumb... ops too late.You mean the CIA that didn't even exist during WWII?Is it true that the CIA and the Nazis were best butt buddies?The socialists of America came to JFK and said, "since you anticommunist, we have a plan to take out Castro, you just have to commit to air support"
jFK was onboard.
The CIA through Alpha66 recruited patriotic Cubans living in America, with the promise of getting revenge on Castro.
When the operation started, JFK realized he had been fooled, and America would only be an unprovoked aggressor with response from the USSR
JFK had to refuse air support, and all the patriots were slaughtered by Castro.
JFK made his famous statement he'd like to destroy the CIA and scatter the pieces in the wind
Ok but none of this has anything to do with Oswald which is who shot kennedy
Oswald never fired a gun that fateful day. Being a long time CIA operative, he made the perfect patsy for the coup d'etat committed by your friends at Langley.
You must be so proud, yet you must also continue to promote the big lie.
Stop pretending you weren't destroyed on this subject in other threads.
There is no evidence he was CIA but overwhelming evidence exists that he shot Kennedy.
You have never been able to refute those facts.
You and others are simply gullible enough to believe fiction one man does not make a coup and he was not a patsy.
He acted alone deal with it
