Jews oppose Iran Nuclear deal 2 to 1

[Jroc]

No he doesn't the mullahs are good people

Why should Iran trust the United States? We have one of the most evil men who ever lived as our President. Do you trust Obama?

ignorant more than evil, and he'll be gone in 16 months. Do you like the mullahs?

You must love the mullahs...because if Congress somehow prevents America from participating in this deal, it will empower the mullahs and allow them to rally Iranians against America...

You really need to educate yourself about the Iranian people...

Iranian attitudes on nuclear negotiations

Iran’s Nuclear Program - A near-unanimous majority of Iranians say that it is necessary for Iran to have a nuclear energy program. Seven in ten say that the Iranian government’s purpose in expanding its nuclear capabilities is for peaceful nuclear energy, while one in five say it is also for developing nuclear weapons.

Iranians are divided about the likelihood of success in the negotiations over Iran’s nuclear program. A large majority say they would not fault Iranian officials if the talks fail to achieve an agreement.

Mistrust and Doubts about Whether Sanctions Would Be Removed - Iranians express high levels of mistrust in the P5+1 countries. More germane, Iranians express high levels of doubt that the United States would remove sanctions, even if Iran were to meet U.S. demands in regard to its nuclear program. Three quarters say that the United States would find some other reason to impose sanctions. This view is related to the perception—held by three in four—that the United States’ main reason for sanctioning Iran is not concern about nuclear weapons but some other motive. Asked what these other motives might be, the most common responses are that the United States seeks to dominate Iran or block its development. Feelings of mistrust and doubts are highly correlated with resistance to agreeing to confidence building measures in the nuclear negotiations.

Relations with U.S. - Views of the United States, especially the U.S. government, continue to be quite negative. These appear to be related to past and present U.S. policies toward Iran much more than to cultural and religious differences. Nonetheless, large majorities favor making efforts to mitigate the conflicts between Iran and the United States and support a variety of confidence building measures. A slight plurality has a positive view of the American people and people-to-people confidence building measures are viewed even more positively. A majority thinks that it possible for Islam and the West to find common ground.

You're an idiot, the Iranian people don't want the mullahs in power ..You're friken clueless, and weak- kneed. The islamonazis love people like you. They walk all over you, just like they do Obama "peace through strength" You don't get peace through ass kissing..unreal

The Iranians are the biggest fans of this deal. Even though Khamanei has already accused the US of violating it. They will be totally free to do whatever they want because inspections are a joke. And even if the inspection turns up something no one will dare say Iran violated the agreement and sanctions will be restored. In return for giving up nothing Iran gets over a billion dollars back, money they can support their proxies in Syria and Yemen with. It's a win win for them.

Over 100 billion dollars and 0ver 300 million a month in oil sales revenues. Wonder what they'll be using that money for?

 

[The Rabbi]

Why should Iran trust the United States? We have one of the most evil men who ever lived as our President. Do you trust Obama?

ignorant more than evil, and he'll be gone in 16 months. Do you like the mullahs?

You must love the mullahs...because if Congress somehow prevents America from participating in this deal, it will empower the mullahs and allow them to rally Iranians against America...

You really need to educate yourself about the Iranian people...

Iranian attitudes on nuclear negotiations

Iran’s Nuclear Program - A near-unanimous majority of Iranians say that it is necessary for Iran to have a nuclear energy program. Seven in ten say that the Iranian government’s purpose in expanding its nuclear capabilities is for peaceful nuclear energy, while one in five say it is also for developing nuclear weapons.

Iranians are divided about the likelihood of success in the negotiations over Iran’s nuclear program. A large majority say they would not fault Iranian officials if the talks fail to achieve an agreement.

Mistrust and Doubts about Whether Sanctions Would Be Removed - Iranians express high levels of mistrust in the P5+1 countries. More germane, Iranians express high levels of doubt that the United States would remove sanctions, even if Iran were to meet U.S. demands in regard to its nuclear program. Three quarters say that the United States would find some other reason to impose sanctions. This view is related to the perception—held by three in four—that the United States’ main reason for sanctioning Iran is not concern about nuclear weapons but some other motive. Asked what these other motives might be, the most common responses are that the United States seeks to dominate Iran or block its development. Feelings of mistrust and doubts are highly correlated with resistance to agreeing to confidence building measures in the nuclear negotiations.

Relations with U.S. - Views of the United States, especially the U.S. government, continue to be quite negative. These appear to be related to past and present U.S. policies toward Iran much more than to cultural and religious differences. Nonetheless, large majorities favor making efforts to mitigate the conflicts between Iran and the United States and support a variety of confidence building measures. A slight plurality has a positive view of the American people and people-to-people confidence building measures are viewed even more positively. A majority thinks that it possible for Islam and the West to find common ground.

You're an idiot, the Iranian people don't want the mullahs in power ..You're friken clueless, and weak- kneed. The islamonazis love people like you. They walk all over you, just like they do Obama "peace through strength" You don't get peace through ass kissing..unreal

The Iranians are the biggest fans of this deal. Even though Khamanei has already accused the US of violating it. They will be totally free to do whatever they want because inspections are a joke. And even if the inspection turns up something no one will dare say Iran violated the agreement and sanctions will be restored. In return for giving up nothing Iran gets over a billion dollars back, money they can support their proxies in Syria and Yemen with. It's a win win for them.

Over 100 billion dollars and 0ver 300 million a month in oil sales revenues. Wonder what they'll be using that money for?

Promoting gay rights, no doubt.

 

[PaintMyHouse]

Over 100 billion dollars and 0ver 300 million a month in oil sales revenues. Wonder what they'll be using that money for?

None of your fucking business eh?

 

[PaintMyHouse]

Unable to read pea brain?

Re-post for the retard...

• Iran will give up about 14,000 of its 20,000 centrifuges.
• Iran will give up all but its most rudimentary, outdated centrifuges: Its first-generation IR-1s, knockoffs of 1970s European models, are all it gets to keep. It will not be allowed to build or develop newer models.
• Iran will give up 97 percent of its enriched uranium; it will hold on to only 300 kilograms of its 10,000-kilogram stockpile in its current form.
• Iran will destroy or export the core of its plutonium plant at Arak, and replace it with a new core that cannot produce weapons-grade plutonium. It will ship out all spent nuclear fuel.

Iran would simply not have much of its nuclear program left after all this.

You understand they've lied and cheated at every stage, right? Why are they suddenly going to go straight?

No he doesn't the mullahs are good people

Why should Iran trust the United States? We have one of the most evil men who ever lived as our President. Do you trust Obama?

I suspect it has much more to do with the fact that we overthrew their elected government, installed a US-backed police state, and fought proxy-wars against them. Iran should fuck the US, no rational person could blame them.

You'd be an apologist for a nuclear holocaust ....You're a joke

You are a Zionist Chicken Little. The only nation crazy enough to ever use nukes was the US.

 

[Jroc]

You understand they've lied and cheated at every stage, right? Why are they suddenly going to go straight?

No he doesn't the mullahs are good people

Why should Iran trust the United States? We have one of the most evil men who ever lived as our President. Do you trust Obama?

I suspect it has much more to do with the fact that we overthrew their elected government, installed a US-backed police state, and fought proxy-wars against them. Iran should fuck the US, no rational person could blame them.

You'd be an apologist for a nuclear holocaust ....You're a joke

You are a Zionist Chicken Little. The only nation crazy enough to ever use nukes was the US.

The U.S. is no better than Iran... How about you move there and report back from your prison cell..LOL

 

[PaintMyHouse]

No he doesn't the mullahs are good people

Why should Iran trust the United States? We have one of the most evil men who ever lived as our President. Do you trust Obama?

I suspect it has much more to do with the fact that we overthrew their elected government, installed a US-backed police state, and fought proxy-wars against them. Iran should fuck the US, no rational person could blame them.

You'd be an apologist for a nuclear holocaust ....You're a joke

You are a Zionist Chicken Little. The only nation crazy enough to ever use nukes was the US.

The U.S. is no better than Iran... How about you move there and report back from your prison cell..LOL

No, you miss the point, on this the US is worse. And last I checked Iran hadn't overthrown our elected government like we overthrew theirs...

 

[Jroc]

Why should Iran trust the United States? We have one of the most evil men who ever lived as our President. Do you trust Obama?

I suspect it has much more to do with the fact that we overthrew their elected government, installed a US-backed police state, and fought proxy-wars against them. Iran should fuck the US, no rational person could blame them.

You'd be an apologist for a nuclear holocaust ....You're a joke

You are a Zionist Chicken Little. The only nation crazy enough to ever use nukes was the US.

The U.S. is no better than Iran... How about you move there and report back from your prison cell..LOL

No, you miss the point, on this the US is worse. And last I check Iran hadn't overthrown our elected government like we overthrew theirs...

I can't wait for you to report back once you leave this wretched place

 

[Bfgrn]

But there are sanctions.
With a deal there are still zero meaningful inspections and no sanctions.
Take your pick.

Bullshit as usual...let's look at FACTS...

FACTS

Below are the key parameters of a Joint Comprehensive Plan of Action (JCPOA) regarding the Islamic Republic of Iran’s nuclear program that were decided in Lausanne, Switzerland. These elements form the foundation upon which the final text of the JCPOA will be written between now and June 30, and reflect the significant progress that has been made in discussions between the P5+1, the European Union, and Iran. Important implementation details are still subject to negotiation, and nothing is agreed until everything is agreed. We will work to conclude the JCPOA based on these parameters over the coming months.

Enrichment

• Iran has agreed to reduce by approximately two-thirds its installed centrifuges. Iran will go from having about 19,000 installed today to 6,104 installed under the deal, with only 5,060 of these enriching uranium for 10 years. All 6,104 centrifuges will be IR-1s, Iran’s first-generation centrifuge.
  
• Iran has agreed to not enrich uranium over 3.67 percent for at least 15 years.
  
• Iran has agreed to reduce its current stockpile of about 10,000 kg of low-enriched uranium (LEU) to 300 kg of 3.67 percent LEU for 15 years.
  
• All excess centrifuges and enrichment infrastructure will be placed in IAEA monitored storage and will be used only as replacements for operating centrifuges and equipment.
  
• Iran has agreed to not build any new facilities for the purpose of enriching uranium for 15 years.
  
• Iran’s breakout timeline – the time that it would take for Iran to acquire enough fissile material for one weapon – is currently assessed to be 2 to 3 months. That timeline will be extended to at least one year, for a duration of at least ten years, under this framework.

Iran will convert its facility at Fordow so that it is no longer used to enrich uranium

• Iran has agreed to not enrich uranium at its Fordow facility for at least 15 years.
  
• Iran has agreed to convert its Fordow facility so that it is used for peaceful purposes only – into a nuclear, physics, technology, research center.
  
• Iran has agreed to not conduct research and development associated with uranium enrichment at Fordow for 15 years.
  
• Iran will not have any fissile material at Fordow for 15 years.
  
• Almost two-thirds of Fordow’s centrifuges and infrastructure will be removed. The remaining centrifuges will not enrich uranium. All centrifuges and related infrastructure will be placed under IAEA monitoring.

Iran will only enrich uranium at the Natanz facility, with only 5,060 IR-1 first-generation centrifuges for ten years.

• Iran has agreed to only enrich uranium using its first generation (IR-1 models) centrifuges at Natanz for ten years, removing its more advanced centrifuges.
  
• Iran will remove the 1,000 IR-2M centrifuges currently installed at Natanz and place them in IAEA monitored storage for ten years.
  
• Iran will not use its IR-2, IR-4, IR-5, IR-6, or IR-8 models to produce enriched uranium for at least ten years. Iran will engage in limited research and development with its advanced centrifuges, according to a schedule and parameters which have been agreed to by the P5+1.
  
• For ten years, enrichment and enrichment research and development will be limited to ensure a breakout timeline of at least 1 year. Beyond 10 years, Iran will abide by its enrichment and enrichment R&D plan submitted to the IAEA, and pursuant to the JCPOA, under the Additional Protocol resulting in certain limitations on enrichment capacity.

Inspections and Transparency

• The IAEA will have regular access to all of Iran’s nuclear facilities, including to Iran’s enrichment facility at Natanz and its former enrichment facility at Fordow, and including the use of the most up-to-date, modern monitoring technologies.
  
• Inspectors will have access to the supply chain that supports Iran’s nuclear program. The new transparency and inspections mechanisms will closely monitor materials and/or components to prevent diversion to a secret program.
  
• Inspectors will have access to uranium mines and continuous surveillance at uranium mills, where Iran produces yellowcake, for 25 years.
  
• Inspectors will have continuous surveillance of Iran’s centrifuge rotors and bellows production and storage facilities for 20 years. Iran’s centrifuge manufacturing base will be frozen and under continuous surveillance.
  
• All centrifuges and enrichment infrastructure removed from Fordow and Natanz will be placed under continuous monitoring by the IAEA.
  
• A dedicated procurement channel for Iran’s nuclear program will be established to monitor and approve, on a case by case basis, the supply, sale, or transfer to Iran of certain nuclear-related and dual use materials and technology – an additional transparency measure.
  
• Iran has agreed to implement the Additional Protocol of the IAEA, providing the IAEA much greater access and information regarding Iran’s nuclear program, including both declared and undeclared facilities.
  
• Iran will be required to grant access to the IAEA to investigate suspicious sites or allegations of a covert enrichment facility, conversion facility, centrifuge production facility, or yellowcake production facility anywhere in the country.
  
• Iran has agreed to implement Modified Code 3.1 requiring early notification of construction of new facilities.
  
• Iran will implement an agreed set of measures to address the IAEA’s concerns regarding the Possible Military Dimensions (PMD) of its program.

Reactors and Reprocessing

• Iran has agreed to redesign and rebuild a heavy water research reactor in Arak, based on a design that is agreed to by the P5+1, which will not produce weapons grade plutonium, and which will support peaceful nuclear research and radioisotope production.
  
• The original core of the reactor, which would have enabled the production of significant quantities of weapons-grade plutonium, will be destroyed or removed from the country.
  
• Iran will ship all of its spent fuel from the reactor out of the country for the reactor’s lifetime.
  
• Iran has committed indefinitely to not conduct reprocessing or reprocessing research and development on spent nuclear fuel.
  
• Iran will not accumulate heavy water in excess of the needs of the modified Arak reactor, and will sell any remaining heavy water on the international market for 15 years.
  
• Iran will not build any additional heavy water reactors for 15 years.

Sanctions

• Iran will receive sanctions relief, if it verifiably abides by its commitments.
  
• U.S. and E.U. nuclear-related sanctions will be suspended after the IAEA has verified that Iran has taken all of its key nuclear-related steps. If at any time Iran fails to fulfill its commitments, these sanctions will snap back into place.
  
• The architecture of U.S. nuclear-related sanctions on Iran will be retained for much of the duration of the deal and allow for snap-back of sanctions in the event of significant non-performance.
  
• All past UN Security Council resolutions on the Iran nuclear issue will be lifted simultaneous with the completion, by Iran, of nuclear-related actions addressing all key concerns (enrichment, Fordow, Arak, PMD, and transparency).
  
• However, core provisions in the UN Security Council resolutions – those that deal with transfers of sensitive technologies and activities – will be re-established by a new UN Security Council resolution that will endorse the JCPOA and urge its full implementation. It will also create the procurement channel mentioned above, which will serve as a key transparency measure. Important restrictions on conventional arms and ballistic missiles, as well as provisions that allow for related cargo inspections and asset freezes, will also be incorporated by this new resolution.
  
• A dispute resolution process will be specified, which enables any JCPOA participant, to seek to resolve disagreements about the performance of JCPOA commitments.
  
• If an issue of significant non-performance cannot be resolved through that process, then all previous UN sanctions could be re-imposed.
  
• U.S. sanctions on Iran for terrorism, human rights abuses, and ballistic missiles will remain in place under the deal.

Phasing

• For ten years, Iran will limit domestic enrichment capacity and research and development – ensuring a breakout timeline of at least one year. Beyond that, Iran will be bound by its longer-term enrichment and enrichment research and development plan it shared with the P5+1.
  
• For fifteen years, Iran will limit additional elements of its program. For instance, Iran will not build new enrichment facilities or heavy water reactors and will limit its stockpile of enriched uranium and accept enhanced transparency procedures.
  
• Important inspections and transparency measures will continue well beyond 15 years. Iran’s adherence to the Additional Protocol of the IAEA is permanent, including its significant access and transparency obligations. The robust inspections of Iran’s uranium supply chain will last for 25 years.
  
• Even after the period of the most stringent limitations on Iran’s nuclear program, Iran will remain a party to the Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty (NPT), which prohibits Iran’s development or acquisition of nuclear weapons and requires IAEA safeguards on its nuclear program.

 

[JoeB131]

AIPAC is hardly a right wing group,but they are gathering their forces to oppose the Iran deal

Okay. Let's say the Zionist Lobby gets its way.

So what.

What you Zionuts don't seem to get is that this is a Six Party Treaty, and the other FIVE countries involved don't let the Zionists tell them what to do.

SO we don't approve a treaty THEY all negotiated in good faith, do you think those other five countries are going to say, "Hey, Washington, we are totally going to continue sanctions and not trade with Iran because you can't stand up to the whims of 3% of your population!"

Hell, no.

 

[JoeB131]

Over 100 billion dollars and 0ver 300 million a month in oil sales revenues. Wonder what they'll be using that money for?

Whatever the hell they feel like.

It's THEIR money. Not yours.

 

[blastoff]

I'll judge where Jews stand on the issue after the '16 election.

 

[JoeB131]

I'll judge where Jews stand on the issue after the '16 election.

they'll still end up voting about 65-70% for the Democrat.

 

[Jroc]

But there are sanctions.
With a deal there are still zero meaningful inspections and no sanctions.
Take your pick.

Bullshit as usual...let's look at FACTS...

FACTS

Below are the key parameters of a Joint Comprehensive Plan of Action (JCPOA) regarding the Islamic Republic of Iran’s nuclear program that were decided in Lausanne, Switzerland. These elements form the foundation upon which the final text of the JCPOA will be written between now and June 30, and reflect the significant progress that has been made in discussions between the P5+1, the European Union, and Iran. Important implementation details are still subject to negotiation, and nothing is agreed until everything is agreed. We will work to conclude the JCPOA based on these parameters over the coming months.

Enrichment

• Iran has agreed to reduce by approximately two-thirds its installed centrifuges. Iran will go from having about 19,000 installed today to 6,104 installed under the deal, with only 5,060 of these enriching uranium for 10 years. All 6,104 centrifuges will be IR-1s, Iran’s first-generation centrifuge.
  
• Iran has agreed to not enrich uranium over 3.67 percent for at least 15 years.
  
• Iran has agreed to reduce its current stockpile of about 10,000 kg of low-enriched uranium (LEU) to 300 kg of 3.67 percent LEU for 15 years.
  
• All excess centrifuges and enrichment infrastructure will be placed in IAEA monitored storage and will be used only as replacements for operating centrifuges and equipment.
  
• Iran has agreed to not build any new facilities for the purpose of enriching uranium for 15 years.
  
• Iran’s breakout timeline – the time that it would take for Iran to acquire enough fissile material for one weapon – is currently assessed to be 2 to 3 months. That timeline will be extended to at least one year, for a duration of at least ten years, under this framework.

Iran will convert its facility at Fordow so that it is no longer used to enrich uranium

• Iran has agreed to not enrich uranium at its Fordow facility for at least 15 years.
  
• Iran has agreed to convert its Fordow facility so that it is used for peaceful purposes only – into a nuclear, physics, technology, research center.
  
• Iran has agreed to not conduct research and development associated with uranium enrichment at Fordow for 15 years.
  
• Iran will not have any fissile material at Fordow for 15 years.
  
• Almost two-thirds of Fordow’s centrifuges and infrastructure will be removed. The remaining centrifuges will not enrich uranium. All centrifuges and related infrastructure will be placed under IAEA monitoring.

Iran will only enrich uranium at the Natanz facility, with only 5,060 IR-1 first-generation centrifuges for ten years.

• Iran has agreed to only enrich uranium using its first generation (IR-1 models) centrifuges at Natanz for ten years, removing its more advanced centrifuges.
  
• Iran will remove the 1,000 IR-2M centrifuges currently installed at Natanz and place them in IAEA monitored storage for ten years.
  
• Iran will not use its IR-2, IR-4, IR-5, IR-6, or IR-8 models to produce enriched uranium for at least ten years. Iran will engage in limited research and development with its advanced centrifuges, according to a schedule and parameters which have been agreed to by the P5+1.
  
• For ten years, enrichment and enrichment research and development will be limited to ensure a breakout timeline of at least 1 year. Beyond 10 years, Iran will abide by its enrichment and enrichment R&D plan submitted to the IAEA, and pursuant to the JCPOA, under the Additional Protocol resulting in certain limitations on enrichment capacity.

Inspections and Transparency

• The IAEA will have regular access to all of Iran’s nuclear facilities, including to Iran’s enrichment facility at Natanz and its former enrichment facility at Fordow, and including the use of the most up-to-date, modern monitoring technologies.
  
• Inspectors will have access to the supply chain that supports Iran’s nuclear program. The new transparency and inspections mechanisms will closely monitor materials and/or components to prevent diversion to a secret program.
  
• Inspectors will have access to uranium mines and continuous surveillance at uranium mills, where Iran produces yellowcake, for 25 years.
  
• Inspectors will have continuous surveillance of Iran’s centrifuge rotors and bellows production and storage facilities for 20 years. Iran’s centrifuge manufacturing base will be frozen and under continuous surveillance.
  
• All centrifuges and enrichment infrastructure removed from Fordow and Natanz will be placed under continuous monitoring by the IAEA.
  
• A dedicated procurement channel for Iran’s nuclear program will be established to monitor and approve, on a case by case basis, the supply, sale, or transfer to Iran of certain nuclear-related and dual use materials and technology – an additional transparency measure.
  
• Iran has agreed to implement the Additional Protocol of the IAEA, providing the IAEA much greater access and information regarding Iran’s nuclear program, including both declared and undeclared facilities.
  
• Iran will be required to grant access to the IAEA to investigate suspicious sites or allegations of a covert enrichment facility, conversion facility, centrifuge production facility, or yellowcake production facility anywhere in the country.
  
• Iran has agreed to implement Modified Code 3.1 requiring early notification of construction of new facilities.
  
• Iran will implement an agreed set of measures to address the IAEA’s concerns regarding the Possible Military Dimensions (PMD) of its program.

Reactors and Reprocessing

• Iran has agreed to redesign and rebuild a heavy water research reactor in Arak, based on a design that is agreed to by the P5+1, which will not produce weapons grade plutonium, and which will support peaceful nuclear research and radioisotope production.
  
• The original core of the reactor, which would have enabled the production of significant quantities of weapons-grade plutonium, will be destroyed or removed from the country.
  
• Iran will ship all of its spent fuel from the reactor out of the country for the reactor’s lifetime.
  
• Iran has committed indefinitely to not conduct reprocessing or reprocessing research and development on spent nuclear fuel.
  
• Iran will not accumulate heavy water in excess of the needs of the modified Arak reactor, and will sell any remaining heavy water on the international market for 15 years.
  
• Iran will not build any additional heavy water reactors for 15 years.

Sanctions

• Iran will receive sanctions relief, if it verifiably abides by its commitments.
  
• U.S. and E.U. nuclear-related sanctions will be suspended after the IAEA has verified that Iran has taken all of its key nuclear-related steps. If at any time Iran fails to fulfill its commitments, these sanctions will snap back into place.
  
• The architecture of U.S. nuclear-related sanctions on Iran will be retained for much of the duration of the deal and allow for snap-back of sanctions in the event of significant non-performance.
  
• All past UN Security Council resolutions on the Iran nuclear issue will be lifted simultaneous with the completion, by Iran, of nuclear-related actions addressing all key concerns (enrichment, Fordow, Arak, PMD, and transparency).
  
• However, core provisions in the UN Security Council resolutions – those that deal with transfers of sensitive technologies and activities – will be re-established by a new UN Security Council resolution that will endorse the JCPOA and urge its full implementation. It will also create the procurement channel mentioned above, which will serve as a key transparency measure. Important restrictions on conventional arms and ballistic missiles, as well as provisions that allow for related cargo inspections and asset freezes, will also be incorporated by this new resolution.
  
• A dispute resolution process will be specified, which enables any JCPOA participant, to seek to resolve disagreements about the performance of JCPOA commitments.
  
• If an issue of significant non-performance cannot be resolved through that process, then all previous UN sanctions could be re-imposed.
  
• U.S. sanctions on Iran for terrorism, human rights abuses, and ballistic missiles will remain in place under the deal.

Phasing

• For ten years, Iran will limit domestic enrichment capacity and research and development – ensuring a breakout timeline of at least one year. Beyond that, Iran will be bound by its longer-term enrichment and enrichment research and development plan it shared with the P5+1.
  
• For fifteen years, Iran will limit additional elements of its program. For instance, Iran will not build new enrichment facilities or heavy water reactors and will limit its stockpile of enriched uranium and accept enhanced transparency procedures.
  
• Important inspections and transparency measures will continue well beyond 15 years. Iran’s adherence to the Additional Protocol of the IAEA is permanent, including its significant access and transparency obligations. The robust inspections of Iran’s uranium supply chain will last for 25 years.
  
• Even after the period of the most stringent limitations on Iran’s nuclear program, Iran will remain a party to the Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty (NPT), which prohibits Iran’s development or acquisition of nuclear weapons and requires IAEA safeguards on its nuclear program.

outside of the talking points, the more we know, the worst this deal looks

Iran Deal Secrets Slowly Leaking Out

It was bad enough to read that Iran would have a minimumof 24 days notice before any inspections, enough time for the mullah’s to, in the words of Olli Heinonen, the former deputy Director-General of the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA), “sanitize the place, make new floors, new tiles on the wall, paint the ceiling and take out the ventilation.” It was likewise troubling to hear that the deal would leave 5,060 centrifuges at Natanz and another 1,000 at Fordow all operational, while placing no restrictions on Iran’s research and development of newer, faster machines. It was frightening, too, to see that Iran’s development program for intercontinental ballistic missiles — designed as they are to strike the American homeland — wouldn’t be hindered in the slightest.

Reports, confirmed by National Security Adviser Susan Rice, have revealed two secret deals struck between the IAEA and Iran

.

These side deals were meant to allow the IAEA to investigate “Potential Military Dimensions (PMD)” of Iran’s nuclear program – the most critical aspect of the agreement. Since 2011, when the IAEA’s announced its suspicions of a military side to Iran’s nuclear program, Iran refused to cooperate with the UN body’s inquiry. But, suddenly, on the eve of the July deadline, the obstinate Iranians finally agreed to accommodate the IAEA’s inquiry into any “Potential Military Dimensions” to their nuclear program.

The IAEA report has been predetermined by political pressure from higher ups. The Iranians have nothing to fear, which makes an absolute mockery of the entire deal.

Further disturbing leaks have emerged. During a Senate Foreign Relations Committee hearing, Democrat Bob Menendez revealed how the IAEA has agreed not only to forego its right to inspect Iran’s suspicious activities “anytime, anywhere,” but it will now only analyze uranium samples provided by Iran

As Iran’s Supreme Leader Ayatollah Khamenei defiantly tweeted: “Even with the #IranDeal, our policies toward the US Arrogant system will not change. US policies in the region differ 180° from Iran’s.” He added: “The US is perfect instance of arrogance. Prepare yourselves for more fight against arrogance.”

Now it’s up to Congress. The Iran deal has proven itself ridden with lies and teeming with secrets, its UN guarantors bought and sold. Already many European nations have sent their foreign ministers to Iran to start the business bazaar with Tehran.

Iran Deal Secrets Slowly Leaking Out Jewish Israel News Algemeiner.com

 

[JoeB131]

outside of the talking points, the more we know, the worst this deal looks

Yawn, guy. Best deal we are going to get. Deal with it.

 

[The Rabbi]

outside of the talking points, the more we know, the worst this deal looks

Yawn, guy. Best deal we are going to get. Deal with it.

Straight off the talking points.
Yeah it's either this or all out nuclear war. Tell us, Maobama.
Truth is no deal would be better than this one. Another Obama lose-lose scenario. This man could not buy a used car successfully.

 

[JoeB131]

Straight off the talking points.
Yeah it's either this or all out nuclear war. Tell us, Maobama.
Truth is no deal would be better than this one. Another Obama lose-lose scenario. This man could not buy a used car successfully.

Uh, no guy. I'm going to try to explain this to you in terms even you'd understand.

The alternative is not this or nuclear war.

The alternative is the process going on without us.

This isn't OUR negotiation. This negotiation was started by the Germans, British and French. They Russians and Chinese signed on later as did we.

SEVEN Nations negotiated this treaty in good faith, on the expectation that all seven would abide by it.

If we renege on the treaty now, the other six countries are not going to say, "Well, heck, America isn't going to sign on because the Israelis don't like it!, We'd better renege on it, too."

Nope. They will just continue on and deal with Iran on their own terms. And probably say to themselves, "Who invited the Americans, anyway? They just manage to screw things up!"

The reality is, this is a multi-lateral world. We aren't the only game in town anymore. China, RUssia and the EU are all major players.

 

[Fishlore]

Israel sees Iran as its mortal enemy. A little historical perspective raises an interesting question.

Originally, Israel saw Jordan, Syria, and Egypt as mortal enemies.

Jordan and Egypt dropped out and Saudi Arabia joined the mortal enemies group along with Iraq as the replacement baddies.

Every nation in the Arab world has been descried by Israel as its "mortal enemy" at one time or another.

Israel is a nuclear superpower and hasn't been attacked by any state in over fifty years.

Iran has never attacked Israel; in fact, Iran has not engaged in conflict outside its borders for over two centuries.

Israel is a master at playing the victim. Jews are still milking the Holocaust for sympathy seventy-five years later. The "mortal threat" bogeyman has been the rationale for billions of US dollars in military aid.

It would be far more accurate to say that the Palestinians see Israel as their "mortal enemy". After all, Israel has invaded Palestine, occupied it in violation of international law and is now in the process of digesting Palestine into Eretz Israel while Its American sugar Daddy wrings its hands in dismay.

Israel's "mortal enemy" is not Iran, it is Israel's own Nazi-like behavior that has turned not only Iran but almost every nation except the USA against the Jewish state. Read it and weep.

You need to get those facts checked.
Hezbollah has attacked israel almost every year. And Iran funds and arms them.

What you say about Iran and Hezbollah is true. Hezbollah is certainly the enemy of Israel -- a fact on which both sides agree -- but hardly a "mortal enemy." Hezbollah does not have the capacity to defeat Israel, its capability is only that of guerrilla warfare and so-called terrorism. This capacity is very real but does not include the capability of destroying the Jewish state.

Use of proxy forces such as the Iranian support for Hezbollah is not new, nor is it in itself morally culpable. Reagan supported the Contras in Nicaragua; hell, France supported the American militants in the American Revolution. The technique is just one of many in trans-national conflict.

The hysterical propaganda about Israel's "mortal enemies" is just that -- propaganda.

 

[Jroc]

Israel sees Iran as its mortal enemy. A little historical perspective raises an interesting question.

Originally, Israel saw Jordan, Syria, and Egypt as mortal enemies.

Jordan and Egypt dropped out and Saudi Arabia joined the mortal enemies group along with Iraq as the replacement baddies.

Every nation in the Arab world has been descried by Israel as its "mortal enemy" at one time or another.

Israel is a nuclear superpower and hasn't been attacked by any state in over fifty years.

Iran has never attacked Israel; in fact, Iran has not engaged in conflict outside its borders for over two centuries.

Israel is a master at playing the victim. Jews are still milking the Holocaust for sympathy seventy-five years later. The "mortal threat" bogeyman has been the rationale for billions of US dollars in military aid.

It would be far more accurate to say that the Palestinians see Israel as their "mortal enemy". After all, Israel has invaded Palestine, occupied it in violation of international law and is now in the process of digesting Palestine into Eretz Israel while Its American sugar Daddy wrings its hands in dismay.

Israel's "mortal enemy" is not Iran, it is Israel's own Nazi-like behavior that has turned not only Iran but almost every nation except the USA against the Jewish state. Read it and weep.

You need to get those facts checked.
Hezbollah has attacked israel almost every year. And Iran funds and arms them.

What you say about Iran and Hezbollah is true. Hezbollah is certainly the enemy of Israel -- a fact on which both sides agree -- but hardly a "mortal enemy." Hezbollah does not have the capacity to defeat Israel, its capability is only that of guerrilla warfare and so-called terrorism. This capacity is very real but does not include the capability of destroying the Jewish state.

Use of proxy forces such as the Iranian support for Hezbollah is not new, nor is it in itself morally culpable. Reagan supported the Contras in Nicaragua; hell, France supported the American militants in the American Revolution. The technique is just one of many in trans-national conflict.

The hysterical propaganda about Israel's "mortal enemies" is just that -- propaganda.

some people just cant comprehend what 100s of billions of dollars can do

 

[Jroc]

Straight off the talking points.
Yeah it's either this or all out nuclear war. Tell us, Maobama.
Truth is no deal would be better than this one. Another Obama lose-lose scenario. This man could not buy a used car successfully.

Uh, no guy. I'm going to try to explain this to you in terms even you'd understand.

The alternative is not this or nuclear war.

The alternative is the process going on without us.

This isn't OUR negotiation. This negotiation was started by the Germans, British and French. They Russians and Chinese signed on later as did we.

SEVEN Nations negotiated this treaty in good faith, on the expectation that all seven would abide by it.

If we renege on the treaty now, the other six countries are not going to say, "Well, heck, America isn't going to sign on because the Israelis don't like it!, We'd better renege on it, too."

Nope. They will just continue on and deal with Iran on their own terms. And probably say to themselves, "Who invited the Americans, anyway? They just manage to screw things up!"

The reality is, this is a multi-lateral world. We aren't the only game in town anymore. China, RUssia and the EU are all major players.

Coming from the miserable idiot who cant wait to see millions of dead Jews and Israel destroyed...You and the mullahs have the same goal, of course you like the deal

 

[EriktheRed]

Straight off the talking points.
Yeah it's either this or all out nuclear war. Tell us, Maobama.
Truth is no deal would be better than this one. Another Obama lose-lose scenario. This man could not buy a used car successfully.

Uh, no guy. I'm going to try to explain this to you in terms even you'd understand.

The alternative is not this or nuclear war.

The alternative is the process going on without us.

This isn't OUR negotiation. This negotiation was started by the Germans, British and French. They Russians and Chinese signed on later as did we.

SEVEN Nations negotiated this treaty in good faith, on the expectation that all seven would abide by it.

If we renege on the treaty now, the other six countries are not going to say, "Well, heck, America isn't going to sign on because the Israelis don't like it!, We'd better renege on it, too."

Nope. They will just continue on and deal with Iran on their own terms. And probably say to themselves, "Who invited the Americans, anyway? They just manage to screw things up!"

The reality is, this is a multi-lateral world. We aren't the only game in town anymore. China, RUssia and the EU are all major players.

Coming from the miserable idiot who cant wait to see millions of dead Jews and Israel destroyed...You and the mullahs have the same goal, of course you like the deal

You didn't actually respond to any of the points made, now did you. You have any better response than hyperbole?