Jews oppose Iran Nuclear deal 2 to 1

[CowboyTed]

Polls Showing Jewish Support for Iran Deal More Credible - Breaking News Forward.com

 

[CowboyTed]

US Jews maintain strong support of Iran deal -- J Street poll The Times of Israel

 

[CowboyTed]

Move this thread to the bushit section...

 

[Jroc]

You just re-posted the same polls idiot.. Read theorugh the thread before you post

 

[Jroc]

 

[Bfgrn]

No. You are.

You have a problem with the fact that the majority of Jews in America support the Iran Deal?

Umm...No they don't, most Jews don't support this deal. Funny you think Jews in this country shouldn't worry about Israel, only Israeli Jews should do that. Going by your "logic" The Arabs and muslims around the world shouldn't worry about the Arabs in Israel? The "Palestinians" Just trying to be clear as to your position

Please work on your reading skills - I said "majority of Jews in America".

you

The Iran Deal Poll Jewish Journal

You guys keep posting the same bullshit poll over and over. The poll i used is more recent, has a larger sample, (twice the amount of people polled) more in depth, with a smaller margin of error....And the American people as a whole certainly don't support this "deal"

The survey of 1,034 people was conducted by Olive Tree Strategies on behalf of pro-Israel advocacy group The Israel Project. It claims a margin of error of 3 percent, and is the most extensive yet to be conducted on the issue. It comes as a wide array of U.S. Jewish groups have announced opposition to the deal, which is believed to endanger Israel and U.S. security.

In the survey, which was divided into three parts, respondents were first quizzed about their position on the deal based on their current knowledge without being provided any further information — 47 percent said they oppose it and 44 percent were in favor.

Asked if Congress should “approve the deal and lift sanctions on Iran,” 40 percent said yes while 45 percent said no.

The pollster then presented a number of talking points both for and against the deal, asking respondents if they agreed or disagreed with the various arguments. The arguments in favor of the deal were taken from the White House website and those against were compiled by The Israel Project.

In this category, an aggregate of 51 percent said Congress should not approve the deal while 35 percent were still in favor of approval.

U.s. national survey of Jewish community on Iran nuclear deal -- DATA

Your survey has been dismissed.


The Israel Project

After an initial question about whether the respondent is a U.S. citizen, the survey asks:

“Now, generally speaking, would you say that things in the country are going in the right direction, or have they pretty seriously gotten off on the wrong track?”

Right direction: 37 percent Wrong track: 53 percent Don’t know/no opinion: 9 percent

Ira Sheskin, a University of Miami demographer who has conducted dozens of Jewish surveys, called it a terrible question.

Instead of framing the alternative of “right direction” as “wrong direction,” it articulates the negative as: “pretty seriously gotten off on the wrong track.”

“I would read that question and dismiss the entire survey,” Sheskin said. “They clearly are looking for particular responses when they do that.”

Let’s take a look at another question from the survey:

“Recently, the United States and five other countries (known as the P5+1) reached an agreement with Iran regarding the lifting of economic sanctions on Iran in exchange for concessions in Iran’s nuclear program. Based on what you know, do you approve or disapprove of this agreement?

Approve: 44 percent Disapprove: 47 percent Don’t know/no opinion: 9 percent

Suggesting that Iran agreed only to “concessions” on its nuclear program rather than agreed not to produce nuclear weapons bolsters the argument against the deal.

Finally, the most compelling reason to dismiss the results of The Israel Project poll come from the pollster himself, Nathan Klein. He told JTA he designed the questions to “educate” respondents about the Iran deal over the course of the questionnaire in order to gauge how their views would change once they were better informed. The following question was asked three times over the course of the survey, with the responses shifting over time:

“Now that you have some more information, in your own opinion, do you think that Congress should vote to approve the deal and lift sanctions on Iran or reject the deal and NOT lift sanctions on Iran?”

Near beginning of survey: 40 percent approve; 45 percent reject. Middle of survey: 35 percent approve; 51 percent reject. Near end of survey: 30 percent approve; 58 percent reject.

The survey was conducted via email and the questions were designed by Klein, founder of Olive Tree Strategies, former pollster for the National Republican Senatorial Committee and former director of research and messaging at The Israel Project. Klein used a third-party company that relied on previous email surveys it had conducted to find self-identified Jews in its database. Jewish respondents were sent an email blast with a link to the online survey. Only those who affirmed their religion as Jewish were able to complete the survey. In all, there were 1,034 respondents, and the poll was conducted July 21-26. The margin of error was 3 percent.

Though a cheaper method of polling, online surveys are inherently less reliable than telephone surveys, according to Sheskin, the Miami demographer, because studies show that those who feel most strongly about an issue are most inclined to complete online surveys (by contrast, telephone respondents are more likely to cooperate and complete surveys at random). In this case, the online survey probably favors those who oppose the Iran deal, because while the deal’s opponents tend to be adamant in their opposition, many Jewish proponents are openly ambivalent.


Read more: Polls Showing Jewish Support for Iran Deal More Credible - Breaking News Forward.com

Dismissed by who the leftist? The forward is a leftist rag not any more credible than a Jstreet poll .My poll also states "the more they know" in those polls you sited they don't know anything, but the talking points put out by Obama Kerry..Leftist polls rely on ignorance as does leftist ideology in general oh love the code pink photo

LOL...do you really believe The Israel Project is non-partisan?

Polls and Advertisements

TIP's other core activities include funding public opinion polls on U.S. views of Israel and its neighbors and producing TV commercials promoting an Israel-centric view of the Middle East. In early 2004, for example, the group began running 30-second TV ads across the United States, which according to UPI featured "mothers of victims killed in suicide bombings" in an effort to build support for building the so-called security barrier between Israel and the West Bank.[22]

The polling methods used by the Israel Project have on many occasions received criticism from polling experts. In one such case in 2014, TIP claimed that a poll it had carried out found "broad, bipartisan support for increased sanctions" on Iran. However, pollster Dina Smeltz of the Chicago Council on Global Affairs said the poll was not neutral and that its results should not be considered credible. Smeltz noted that when asked directly and clearly about whether the United States should increase sanctions on Iran, a majority of Americans (52 percent) were against it. Only when TIP framed survey questions with language that was biased and clearly attempting to persuade respondents to "change their views one way or another" does support emerge for TIP's hawkish agenda on Iran.[23]

A December 2013 poll conducted by GOP pollster Frank Luntz on behalf of the Israel Project was also criticized. According to ThinkProgress, which surveyed American opinion on Iran, the poll offered "an unrealistic menu of choices" and failed "to inform respondents that more sanctions now would likely end negotiations with Iran."[24]

- See more at: The Israel Project - Profile - Right Web - Institute for Policy Studies

 

[Jroc]

Umm...No they don't, most Jews don't support this deal. Funny you think Jews in this country shouldn't worry about Israel, only Israeli Jews should do that. Going by your "logic" The Arabs and muslims around the world shouldn't worry about the Arabs in Israel? The "Palestinians" Just trying to be clear as to your position

Please work on your reading skills - I said "majority of Jews in America".

you

The Iran Deal Poll Jewish Journal

You guys keep posting the same bullshit poll over and over. The poll i used is more recent, has a larger sample, (twice the amount of people polled) more in depth, with a smaller margin of error....And the American people as a whole certainly don't support this "deal"

The survey of 1,034 people was conducted by Olive Tree Strategies on behalf of pro-Israel advocacy group The Israel Project. It claims a margin of error of 3 percent, and is the most extensive yet to be conducted on the issue. It comes as a wide array of U.S. Jewish groups have announced opposition to the deal, which is believed to endanger Israel and U.S. security.

In the survey, which was divided into three parts, respondents were first quizzed about their position on the deal based on their current knowledge without being provided any further information — 47 percent said they oppose it and 44 percent were in favor.

Asked if Congress should “approve the deal and lift sanctions on Iran,” 40 percent said yes while 45 percent said no.

The pollster then presented a number of talking points both for and against the deal, asking respondents if they agreed or disagreed with the various arguments. The arguments in favor of the deal were taken from the White House website and those against were compiled by The Israel Project.

In this category, an aggregate of 51 percent said Congress should not approve the deal while 35 percent were still in favor of approval.

U.s. national survey of Jewish community on Iran nuclear deal -- DATA

Your survey has been dismissed.


The Israel Project

After an initial question about whether the respondent is a U.S. citizen, the survey asks:

“Now, generally speaking, would you say that things in the country are going in the right direction, or have they pretty seriously gotten off on the wrong track?”

Right direction: 37 percent Wrong track: 53 percent Don’t know/no opinion: 9 percent

Ira Sheskin, a University of Miami demographer who has conducted dozens of Jewish surveys, called it a terrible question.

Instead of framing the alternative of “right direction” as “wrong direction,” it articulates the negative as: “pretty seriously gotten off on the wrong track.”

“I would read that question and dismiss the entire survey,” Sheskin said. “They clearly are looking for particular responses when they do that.”

Let’s take a look at another question from the survey:

“Recently, the United States and five other countries (known as the P5+1) reached an agreement with Iran regarding the lifting of economic sanctions on Iran in exchange for concessions in Iran’s nuclear program. Based on what you know, do you approve or disapprove of this agreement?

Approve: 44 percent Disapprove: 47 percent Don’t know/no opinion: 9 percent

Suggesting that Iran agreed only to “concessions” on its nuclear program rather than agreed not to produce nuclear weapons bolsters the argument against the deal.

Finally, the most compelling reason to dismiss the results of The Israel Project poll come from the pollster himself, Nathan Klein. He told JTA he designed the questions to “educate” respondents about the Iran deal over the course of the questionnaire in order to gauge how their views would change once they were better informed. The following question was asked three times over the course of the survey, with the responses shifting over time:

“Now that you have some more information, in your own opinion, do you think that Congress should vote to approve the deal and lift sanctions on Iran or reject the deal and NOT lift sanctions on Iran?”

Near beginning of survey: 40 percent approve; 45 percent reject. Middle of survey: 35 percent approve; 51 percent reject. Near end of survey: 30 percent approve; 58 percent reject.

The survey was conducted via email and the questions were designed by Klein, founder of Olive Tree Strategies, former pollster for the National Republican Senatorial Committee and former director of research and messaging at The Israel Project. Klein used a third-party company that relied on previous email surveys it had conducted to find self-identified Jews in its database. Jewish respondents were sent an email blast with a link to the online survey. Only those who affirmed their religion as Jewish were able to complete the survey. In all, there were 1,034 respondents, and the poll was conducted July 21-26. The margin of error was 3 percent.

Though a cheaper method of polling, online surveys are inherently less reliable than telephone surveys, according to Sheskin, the Miami demographer, because studies show that those who feel most strongly about an issue are most inclined to complete online surveys (by contrast, telephone respondents are more likely to cooperate and complete surveys at random). In this case, the online survey probably favors those who oppose the Iran deal, because while the deal’s opponents tend to be adamant in their opposition, many Jewish proponents are openly ambivalent.


Read more: Polls Showing Jewish Support for Iran Deal More Credible - Breaking News Forward.com

Dismissed by who the leftist? The forward is a leftist rag not any more credible than a Jstreet poll .My poll also states "the more they know" in those polls you sited they don't know anything, but the talking points put out by Obama Kerry..Leftist polls rely on ignorance as does leftist ideology in general oh love the code pink photo

LOL...do you really believe The Israel Project is non-partisan?

Polls and Advertisements

TIP's other core activities include funding public opinion polls on U.S. views of Israel and its neighbors and producing TV commercials promoting an Israel-centric view of the Middle East. In early 2004, for example, the group began running 30-second TV ads across the United States, which according to UPI featured "mothers of victims killed in suicide bombings" in an effort to build support for building the so-called security barrier between Israel and the West Bank.[22]

The polling methods used by the Israel Project have on many occasions received criticism from polling experts. In one such case in 2014, TIP claimed that a poll it had carried out found "broad, bipartisan support for increased sanctions" on Iran. However, pollster Dina Smeltz of the Chicago Council on Global Affairs said the poll was not neutral and that its results should not be considered credible. Smeltz noted that when asked directly and clearly about whether the United States should increase sanctions on Iran, a majority of Americans (52 percent) were against it. Only when TIP framed survey questions with language that was biased and clearly attempting to persuade respondents to "change their views one way or another" does support emerge for TIP's hawkish agenda on Iran.[23]

A December 2013 poll conducted by GOP pollster Frank Luntz on behalf of the Israel Project was also criticized. According to ThinkProgress, which surveyed American opinion on Iran, the poll offered "an unrealistic menu of choices" and failed "to inform respondents that more sanctions now would likely end negotiations with Iran."[24]

- See more at: The Israel Project - Profile - Right Web - Institute for Policy Studies

I believe the more people know the more they don't like this bullshit deal. Why is that you people love Iran so much anyways? is it because they are America haters like yourself ?..Think progress WTF? Only in the leftist world is less information better. Kind of like The New york times when they gave less information about the genocide of Jews during WWII

 

[Bfgrn]

Please work on your reading skills - I said "majority of Jews in America".

you

The Iran Deal Poll Jewish Journal

You guys keep posting the same bullshit poll over and over. The poll i used is more recent, has a larger sample, (twice the amount of people polled) more in depth, with a smaller margin of error....And the American people as a whole certainly don't support this "deal"

The survey of 1,034 people was conducted by Olive Tree Strategies on behalf of pro-Israel advocacy group The Israel Project. It claims a margin of error of 3 percent, and is the most extensive yet to be conducted on the issue. It comes as a wide array of U.S. Jewish groups have announced opposition to the deal, which is believed to endanger Israel and U.S. security.

In the survey, which was divided into three parts, respondents were first quizzed about their position on the deal based on their current knowledge without being provided any further information — 47 percent said they oppose it and 44 percent were in favor.

Asked if Congress should “approve the deal and lift sanctions on Iran,” 40 percent said yes while 45 percent said no.

The pollster then presented a number of talking points both for and against the deal, asking respondents if they agreed or disagreed with the various arguments. The arguments in favor of the deal were taken from the White House website and those against were compiled by The Israel Project.

In this category, an aggregate of 51 percent said Congress should not approve the deal while 35 percent were still in favor of approval.

U.s. national survey of Jewish community on Iran nuclear deal -- DATA

Your survey has been dismissed.


The Israel Project

After an initial question about whether the respondent is a U.S. citizen, the survey asks:

“Now, generally speaking, would you say that things in the country are going in the right direction, or have they pretty seriously gotten off on the wrong track?”

Right direction: 37 percent Wrong track: 53 percent Don’t know/no opinion: 9 percent

Ira Sheskin, a University of Miami demographer who has conducted dozens of Jewish surveys, called it a terrible question.

Instead of framing the alternative of “right direction” as “wrong direction,” it articulates the negative as: “pretty seriously gotten off on the wrong track.”

“I would read that question and dismiss the entire survey,” Sheskin said. “They clearly are looking for particular responses when they do that.”

Let’s take a look at another question from the survey:

“Recently, the United States and five other countries (known as the P5+1) reached an agreement with Iran regarding the lifting of economic sanctions on Iran in exchange for concessions in Iran’s nuclear program. Based on what you know, do you approve or disapprove of this agreement?

Approve: 44 percent Disapprove: 47 percent Don’t know/no opinion: 9 percent

Suggesting that Iran agreed only to “concessions” on its nuclear program rather than agreed not to produce nuclear weapons bolsters the argument against the deal.

Finally, the most compelling reason to dismiss the results of The Israel Project poll come from the pollster himself, Nathan Klein. He told JTA he designed the questions to “educate” respondents about the Iran deal over the course of the questionnaire in order to gauge how their views would change once they were better informed. The following question was asked three times over the course of the survey, with the responses shifting over time:

“Now that you have some more information, in your own opinion, do you think that Congress should vote to approve the deal and lift sanctions on Iran or reject the deal and NOT lift sanctions on Iran?”

Near beginning of survey: 40 percent approve; 45 percent reject. Middle of survey: 35 percent approve; 51 percent reject. Near end of survey: 30 percent approve; 58 percent reject.

The survey was conducted via email and the questions were designed by Klein, founder of Olive Tree Strategies, former pollster for the National Republican Senatorial Committee and former director of research and messaging at The Israel Project. Klein used a third-party company that relied on previous email surveys it had conducted to find self-identified Jews in its database. Jewish respondents were sent an email blast with a link to the online survey. Only those who affirmed their religion as Jewish were able to complete the survey. In all, there were 1,034 respondents, and the poll was conducted July 21-26. The margin of error was 3 percent.

Though a cheaper method of polling, online surveys are inherently less reliable than telephone surveys, according to Sheskin, the Miami demographer, because studies show that those who feel most strongly about an issue are most inclined to complete online surveys (by contrast, telephone respondents are more likely to cooperate and complete surveys at random). In this case, the online survey probably favors those who oppose the Iran deal, because while the deal’s opponents tend to be adamant in their opposition, many Jewish proponents are openly ambivalent.


Read more: Polls Showing Jewish Support for Iran Deal More Credible - Breaking News Forward.com

Dismissed by who the leftist? The forward is a leftist rag not any more credible than a Jstreet poll .My poll also states "the more they know" in those polls you sited they don't know anything, but the talking points put out by Obama Kerry..Leftist polls rely on ignorance as does leftist ideology in general oh love the code pink photo

LOL...do you really believe The Israel Project is non-partisan?

Polls and Advertisements

TIP's other core activities include funding public opinion polls on U.S. views of Israel and its neighbors and producing TV commercials promoting an Israel-centric view of the Middle East. In early 2004, for example, the group began running 30-second TV ads across the United States, which according to UPI featured "mothers of victims killed in suicide bombings" in an effort to build support for building the so-called security barrier between Israel and the West Bank.[22]

The polling methods used by the Israel Project have on many occasions received criticism from polling experts. In one such case in 2014, TIP claimed that a poll it had carried out found "broad, bipartisan support for increased sanctions" on Iran. However, pollster Dina Smeltz of the Chicago Council on Global Affairs said the poll was not neutral and that its results should not be considered credible. Smeltz noted that when asked directly and clearly about whether the United States should increase sanctions on Iran, a majority of Americans (52 percent) were against it. Only when TIP framed survey questions with language that was biased and clearly attempting to persuade respondents to "change their views one way or another" does support emerge for TIP's hawkish agenda on Iran.[23]

A December 2013 poll conducted by GOP pollster Frank Luntz on behalf of the Israel Project was also criticized. According to ThinkProgress, which surveyed American opinion on Iran, the poll offered "an unrealistic menu of choices" and failed "to inform respondents that more sanctions now would likely end negotiations with Iran."[24]

- See more at: The Israel Project - Profile - Right Web - Institute for Policy Studies

I believe the more people know the more they don't like this bullshit deal. Why is that you people love Iran so much anyways? is it because they are America haters like yourself ?..Think progress WTF? Only in the leftist world is less information better. Kind of like The New york times when they gave less information about the genocide of Jews during WWII

The more people know, the MORE they will favor this deal.

Let's recap...

Heavy sanctions have been in place for years...they have had ZERO effect in stopping Iran's nuclear program.

There are ZERO inspections of Iran's nuclear facilities currently being done.

Continuing the sanctions will not be supported by China or Russia...translation...they will end with or without a deal.

Iran has accepted enormous cuts to its nuclear program, not to mention invasive inspections. NONE of that has ever happened before.

• Iran will give up about 14,000 of its 20,000 centrifuges.
• Iran will give up 97 percent of its enriched uranium; it will hold on to only 300 kilograms' worth.
• Iran will be forbidden from enriching uranium beyond energy-grade fuel, or 3.67 percent enrichment. (Weapons-grade uranium is 90 percent enriched.)
• Iran will destroy or export the core of its plutonium plant at Arak, and replace it with a new core that cannot produce weapons-grade plutonium. It will ship out all spent nuclear fuel.

 

[Jroc]

you
You guys keep posting the same bullshit poll over and over. The poll i used is more recent, has a larger sample, (twice the amount of people polled) more in depth, with a smaller margin of error....And the American people as a whole certainly don't support this "deal"

U.s. national survey of Jewish community on Iran nuclear deal -- DATA

Your survey has been dismissed.


The Israel Project

After an initial question about whether the respondent is a U.S. citizen, the survey asks:

“Now, generally speaking, would you say that things in the country are going in the right direction, or have they pretty seriously gotten off on the wrong track?”

Right direction: 37 percent Wrong track: 53 percent Don’t know/no opinion: 9 percent

Ira Sheskin, a University of Miami demographer who has conducted dozens of Jewish surveys, called it a terrible question.

Instead of framing the alternative of “right direction” as “wrong direction,” it articulates the negative as: “pretty seriously gotten off on the wrong track.”

“I would read that question and dismiss the entire survey,” Sheskin said. “They clearly are looking for particular responses when they do that.”

Let’s take a look at another question from the survey:

“Recently, the United States and five other countries (known as the P5+1) reached an agreement with Iran regarding the lifting of economic sanctions on Iran in exchange for concessions in Iran’s nuclear program. Based on what you know, do you approve or disapprove of this agreement?

Approve: 44 percent Disapprove: 47 percent Don’t know/no opinion: 9 percent

Suggesting that Iran agreed only to “concessions” on its nuclear program rather than agreed not to produce nuclear weapons bolsters the argument against the deal.

Finally, the most compelling reason to dismiss the results of The Israel Project poll come from the pollster himself, Nathan Klein. He told JTA he designed the questions to “educate” respondents about the Iran deal over the course of the questionnaire in order to gauge how their views would change once they were better informed. The following question was asked three times over the course of the survey, with the responses shifting over time:

“Now that you have some more information, in your own opinion, do you think that Congress should vote to approve the deal and lift sanctions on Iran or reject the deal and NOT lift sanctions on Iran?”

Near beginning of survey: 40 percent approve; 45 percent reject. Middle of survey: 35 percent approve; 51 percent reject. Near end of survey: 30 percent approve; 58 percent reject.

The survey was conducted via email and the questions were designed by Klein, founder of Olive Tree Strategies, former pollster for the National Republican Senatorial Committee and former director of research and messaging at The Israel Project. Klein used a third-party company that relied on previous email surveys it had conducted to find self-identified Jews in its database. Jewish respondents were sent an email blast with a link to the online survey. Only those who affirmed their religion as Jewish were able to complete the survey. In all, there were 1,034 respondents, and the poll was conducted July 21-26. The margin of error was 3 percent.

Though a cheaper method of polling, online surveys are inherently less reliable than telephone surveys, according to Sheskin, the Miami demographer, because studies show that those who feel most strongly about an issue are most inclined to complete online surveys (by contrast, telephone respondents are more likely to cooperate and complete surveys at random). In this case, the online survey probably favors those who oppose the Iran deal, because while the deal’s opponents tend to be adamant in their opposition, many Jewish proponents are openly ambivalent.


Read more: Polls Showing Jewish Support for Iran Deal More Credible - Breaking News Forward.com

Dismissed by who the leftist? The forward is a leftist rag not any more credible than a Jstreet poll .My poll also states "the more they know" in those polls you sited they don't know anything, but the talking points put out by Obama Kerry..Leftist polls rely on ignorance as does leftist ideology in general oh love the code pink photo

LOL...do you really believe The Israel Project is non-partisan?

Polls and Advertisements

TIP's other core activities include funding public opinion polls on U.S. views of Israel and its neighbors and producing TV commercials promoting an Israel-centric view of the Middle East. In early 2004, for example, the group began running 30-second TV ads across the United States, which according to UPI featured "mothers of victims killed in suicide bombings" in an effort to build support for building the so-called security barrier between Israel and the West Bank.[22]

The polling methods used by the Israel Project have on many occasions received criticism from polling experts. In one such case in 2014, TIP claimed that a poll it had carried out found "broad, bipartisan support for increased sanctions" on Iran. However, pollster Dina Smeltz of the Chicago Council on Global Affairs said the poll was not neutral and that its results should not be considered credible. Smeltz noted that when asked directly and clearly about whether the United States should increase sanctions on Iran, a majority of Americans (52 percent) were against it. Only when TIP framed survey questions with language that was biased and clearly attempting to persuade respondents to "change their views one way or another" does support emerge for TIP's hawkish agenda on Iran.[23]

A December 2013 poll conducted by GOP pollster Frank Luntz on behalf of the Israel Project was also criticized. According to ThinkProgress, which surveyed American opinion on Iran, the poll offered "an unrealistic menu of choices" and failed "to inform respondents that more sanctions now would likely end negotiations with Iran."[24]

- See more at: The Israel Project - Profile - Right Web - Institute for Policy Studies

I believe the more people know the more they don't like this bullshit deal. Why is that you people love Iran so much anyways? is it because they are America haters like yourself ?..Think progress WTF? Only in the leftist world is less information better. Kind of like The New york times when they gave less information about the genocide of Jews during WWII

The more people know, the MORE they will favor this deal.

Let's recap...

Heavy sanctions have been in place for years...they have had ZERO effect in stopping Iran's nuclear program.

There are ZERO inspections of Iran's nuclear facilities currently being done.

Continuing the sanctions will not be supported by China or Russia...translation...they will end with or without a deal.

Iran has accepted enormous cuts to its nuclear program, not to mention invasive inspections. NONE of that has ever happened before.

• Iran will give up about 14,000 of its 20,000 centrifuges.
• Iran will give up 97 percent of its enriched uranium; it will hold on to only 300 kilograms' worth.
• Iran will be forbidden from enriching uranium beyond energy-grade fuel, or 3.67 percent enrichment. (Weapons-grade uranium is 90 percent enriched.)
• Iran will destroy or export the core of its plutonium plant at Arak, and replace it with a new core that cannot produce weapons-grade plutonium. It will ship out all spent nuclear fuel.

"Let recap".. Iran will retains nuclear program. it will also get 100s of billions of dollars to fund it's terrorist activities around the world, while holding our citizens hostage and chanting death to America. they will get i month notice for inspection of sites, no snap inspections you people are a joke really

 

[Jroc]

The Most Glaring Flaws in Obama’s Iran Deal

Iran dug in its heels on key red lines proclaimed by Supreme Leader Ali Khamenei, while the administration’s red lines gradually became blurred pink lines.

Iran’s nuclear infrastructure is left largely intact. Centrifuges will be mothballed but not dismantled.

Iran’s illicit nuclear facilities Natanz and Fordow, whose operations were supposed to be shut down under multiple U.N. Security Council resolutions, have now been legitimized, despite the fact that they were built covertly in violation of the Nuclear Non-proliferation Treaty.

Iran is essentially rewarded for cheating under the agreement.

It gained a better deal on uranium enrichment than Washington has offered to its own allies.

Taiwan, South Korea and the United Arab Emirates were denied enrichment arrangements that Iran now has pocketed.

Instead of dismantling Iran’s nuclear infrastructure, the agreement dismantles the sanctions that brought Tehran to the negotiating table in the first place.

Ultimately the Iranian economy would be boosted by tens of billions of dollars more through a surge of oil revenues as oil sanctions are lifted.

This could help Iran reshape the regional balance of power and establish hegemony over Iraq, Yemen, important oil resources and oil supply routes.

Much of this money will go to fund the Assad regime, Hezbollah, Yemeni Houthi rebels, Hamas, Palestinian Islamic Jihad and other terrorist groups funded by Iran.

This would rapidly lead to escalation of the wars, shadow wars and civil wars already taking place around the Middle East.

The dangers posed by Iran’s enhanced ability to finance global terrorism would be compounded by the administration’s last minute capitulation on the U.N. arms embargo, which will be gradually eased if Iran remains in compliance with the agreement.

This would allow Iran to upgrade its conventional weapons through imports from foreign suppliers and enable it to more easily arm its foreign allies and surrogates.

The bottom line is that the Obama administration now has signed an agreement that will expand Iran’s power and influence, strain U.S. relations with its regional friends,

The Most Glaring Flaws in Obama s Iran Deal

 

[PaintMyHouse]

Your survey has been dismissed.


The Israel Project

After an initial question about whether the respondent is a U.S. citizen, the survey asks:

“Now, generally speaking, would you say that things in the country are going in the right direction, or have they pretty seriously gotten off on the wrong track?”

Right direction: 37 percent Wrong track: 53 percent Don’t know/no opinion: 9 percent

Ira Sheskin, a University of Miami demographer who has conducted dozens of Jewish surveys, called it a terrible question.

Instead of framing the alternative of “right direction” as “wrong direction,” it articulates the negative as: “pretty seriously gotten off on the wrong track.”

“I would read that question and dismiss the entire survey,” Sheskin said. “They clearly are looking for particular responses when they do that.”

Let’s take a look at another question from the survey:

“Recently, the United States and five other countries (known as the P5+1) reached an agreement with Iran regarding the lifting of economic sanctions on Iran in exchange for concessions in Iran’s nuclear program. Based on what you know, do you approve or disapprove of this agreement?

Approve: 44 percent Disapprove: 47 percent Don’t know/no opinion: 9 percent

Suggesting that Iran agreed only to “concessions” on its nuclear program rather than agreed not to produce nuclear weapons bolsters the argument against the deal.

Finally, the most compelling reason to dismiss the results of The Israel Project poll come from the pollster himself, Nathan Klein. He told JTA he designed the questions to “educate” respondents about the Iran deal over the course of the questionnaire in order to gauge how their views would change once they were better informed. The following question was asked three times over the course of the survey, with the responses shifting over time:

“Now that you have some more information, in your own opinion, do you think that Congress should vote to approve the deal and lift sanctions on Iran or reject the deal and NOT lift sanctions on Iran?”

Near beginning of survey: 40 percent approve; 45 percent reject. Middle of survey: 35 percent approve; 51 percent reject. Near end of survey: 30 percent approve; 58 percent reject.

The survey was conducted via email and the questions were designed by Klein, founder of Olive Tree Strategies, former pollster for the National Republican Senatorial Committee and former director of research and messaging at The Israel Project. Klein used a third-party company that relied on previous email surveys it had conducted to find self-identified Jews in its database. Jewish respondents were sent an email blast with a link to the online survey. Only those who affirmed their religion as Jewish were able to complete the survey. In all, there were 1,034 respondents, and the poll was conducted July 21-26. The margin of error was 3 percent.

Though a cheaper method of polling, online surveys are inherently less reliable than telephone surveys, according to Sheskin, the Miami demographer, because studies show that those who feel most strongly about an issue are most inclined to complete online surveys (by contrast, telephone respondents are more likely to cooperate and complete surveys at random). In this case, the online survey probably favors those who oppose the Iran deal, because while the deal’s opponents tend to be adamant in their opposition, many Jewish proponents are openly ambivalent.


Read more: Polls Showing Jewish Support for Iran Deal More Credible - Breaking News Forward.com

Dismissed by who the leftist? The forward is a leftist rag not any more credible than a Jstreet poll .My poll also states "the more they know" in those polls you sited they don't know anything, but the talking points put out by Obama Kerry..Leftist polls rely on ignorance as does leftist ideology in general oh love the code pink photo

LOL...do you really believe The Israel Project is non-partisan?

Polls and Advertisements

TIP's other core activities include funding public opinion polls on U.S. views of Israel and its neighbors and producing TV commercials promoting an Israel-centric view of the Middle East. In early 2004, for example, the group began running 30-second TV ads across the United States, which according to UPI featured "mothers of victims killed in suicide bombings" in an effort to build support for building the so-called security barrier between Israel and the West Bank.[22]

The polling methods used by the Israel Project have on many occasions received criticism from polling experts. In one such case in 2014, TIP claimed that a poll it had carried out found "broad, bipartisan support for increased sanctions" on Iran. However, pollster Dina Smeltz of the Chicago Council on Global Affairs said the poll was not neutral and that its results should not be considered credible. Smeltz noted that when asked directly and clearly about whether the United States should increase sanctions on Iran, a majority of Americans (52 percent) were against it. Only when TIP framed survey questions with language that was biased and clearly attempting to persuade respondents to "change their views one way or another" does support emerge for TIP's hawkish agenda on Iran.[23]

A December 2013 poll conducted by GOP pollster Frank Luntz on behalf of the Israel Project was also criticized. According to ThinkProgress, which surveyed American opinion on Iran, the poll offered "an unrealistic menu of choices" and failed "to inform respondents that more sanctions now would likely end negotiations with Iran."[24]

- See more at: The Israel Project - Profile - Right Web - Institute for Policy Studies

I believe the more people know the more they don't like this bullshit deal. Why is that you people love Iran so much anyways? is it because they are America haters like yourself ?..Think progress WTF? Only in the leftist world is less information better. Kind of like The New york times when they gave less information about the genocide of Jews during WWII

The more people know, the MORE they will favor this deal.

Let's recap...

Heavy sanctions have been in place for years...they have had ZERO effect in stopping Iran's nuclear program.

There are ZERO inspections of Iran's nuclear facilities currently being done.

Continuing the sanctions will not be supported by China or Russia...translation...they will end with or without a deal.

Iran has accepted enormous cuts to its nuclear program, not to mention invasive inspections. NONE of that has ever happened before.

• Iran will give up about 14,000 of its 20,000 centrifuges.
• Iran will give up 97 percent of its enriched uranium; it will hold on to only 300 kilograms' worth.
• Iran will be forbidden from enriching uranium beyond energy-grade fuel, or 3.67 percent enrichment. (Weapons-grade uranium is 90 percent enriched.)
• Iran will destroy or export the core of its plutonium plant at Arak, and replace it with a new core that cannot produce weapons-grade plutonium. It will ship out all spent nuclear fuel.

"Let recap".. Iran will retains nuclear program. it will also get 100s of billions of dollars to fund it's terrorist activities around the world, while holding our citizens hostage and chanting death to America. they will get i month notice for inspection of sites, no snap inspections you people are a joke really

Hostage? You mean Americans in Iran who broke Iranian laws?

 

[Jroc]

Dismissed by who the leftist? The forward is a leftist rag not any more credible than a Jstreet poll .My poll also states "the more they know" in those polls you sited they don't know anything, but the talking points put out by Obama Kerry..Leftist polls rely on ignorance as does leftist ideology in general oh love the code pink photo

LOL...do you really believe The Israel Project is non-partisan?

Polls and Advertisements

TIP's other core activities include funding public opinion polls on U.S. views of Israel and its neighbors and producing TV commercials promoting an Israel-centric view of the Middle East. In early 2004, for example, the group began running 30-second TV ads across the United States, which according to UPI featured "mothers of victims killed in suicide bombings" in an effort to build support for building the so-called security barrier between Israel and the West Bank.[22]

The polling methods used by the Israel Project have on many occasions received criticism from polling experts. In one such case in 2014, TIP claimed that a poll it had carried out found "broad, bipartisan support for increased sanctions" on Iran. However, pollster Dina Smeltz of the Chicago Council on Global Affairs said the poll was not neutral and that its results should not be considered credible. Smeltz noted that when asked directly and clearly about whether the United States should increase sanctions on Iran, a majority of Americans (52 percent) were against it. Only when TIP framed survey questions with language that was biased and clearly attempting to persuade respondents to "change their views one way or another" does support emerge for TIP's hawkish agenda on Iran.[23]

A December 2013 poll conducted by GOP pollster Frank Luntz on behalf of the Israel Project was also criticized. According to ThinkProgress, which surveyed American opinion on Iran, the poll offered "an unrealistic menu of choices" and failed "to inform respondents that more sanctions now would likely end negotiations with Iran."[24]

- See more at: The Israel Project - Profile - Right Web - Institute for Policy Studies

I believe the more people know the more they don't like this bullshit deal. Why is that you people love Iran so much anyways? is it because they are America haters like yourself ?..Think progress WTF? Only in the leftist world is less information better. Kind of like The New york times when they gave less information about the genocide of Jews during WWII

The more people know, the MORE they will favor this deal.

Let's recap...

Heavy sanctions have been in place for years...they have had ZERO effect in stopping Iran's nuclear program.

There are ZERO inspections of Iran's nuclear facilities currently being done.

Continuing the sanctions will not be supported by China or Russia...translation...they will end with or without a deal.

Iran has accepted enormous cuts to its nuclear program, not to mention invasive inspections. NONE of that has ever happened before.

• Iran will give up about 14,000 of its 20,000 centrifuges.
• Iran will give up 97 percent of its enriched uranium; it will hold on to only 300 kilograms' worth.
• Iran will be forbidden from enriching uranium beyond energy-grade fuel, or 3.67 percent enrichment. (Weapons-grade uranium is 90 percent enriched.)
• Iran will destroy or export the core of its plutonium plant at Arak, and replace it with a new core that cannot produce weapons-grade plutonium. It will ship out all spent nuclear fuel.

"Let recap".. Iran will retains nuclear program. it will also get 100s of billions of dollars to fund it's terrorist activities around the world, while holding our citizens hostage and chanting death to America. they will get i month notice for inspection of sites, no snap inspections you people are a joke really

Hostage? You mean Americans in Iran who broke Iranian laws?

I mean those Obama doesn't care about, as much as he does about freeing Gitmo terrorist... Yeah those

 

[PaintMyHouse]

LOL...do you really believe The Israel Project is non-partisan?

Polls and Advertisements

TIP's other core activities include funding public opinion polls on U.S. views of Israel and its neighbors and producing TV commercials promoting an Israel-centric view of the Middle East. In early 2004, for example, the group began running 30-second TV ads across the United States, which according to UPI featured "mothers of victims killed in suicide bombings" in an effort to build support for building the so-called security barrier between Israel and the West Bank.[22]

The polling methods used by the Israel Project have on many occasions received criticism from polling experts. In one such case in 2014, TIP claimed that a poll it had carried out found "broad, bipartisan support for increased sanctions" on Iran. However, pollster Dina Smeltz of the Chicago Council on Global Affairs said the poll was not neutral and that its results should not be considered credible. Smeltz noted that when asked directly and clearly about whether the United States should increase sanctions on Iran, a majority of Americans (52 percent) were against it. Only when TIP framed survey questions with language that was biased and clearly attempting to persuade respondents to "change their views one way or another" does support emerge for TIP's hawkish agenda on Iran.[23]

A December 2013 poll conducted by GOP pollster Frank Luntz on behalf of the Israel Project was also criticized. According to ThinkProgress, which surveyed American opinion on Iran, the poll offered "an unrealistic menu of choices" and failed "to inform respondents that more sanctions now would likely end negotiations with Iran."[24]

- See more at: The Israel Project - Profile - Right Web - Institute for Policy Studies

I believe the more people know the more they don't like this bullshit deal. Why is that you people love Iran so much anyways? is it because they are America haters like yourself ?..Think progress WTF? Only in the leftist world is less information better. Kind of like The New york times when they gave less information about the genocide of Jews during WWII

The more people know, the MORE they will favor this deal.

Let's recap...

Heavy sanctions have been in place for years...they have had ZERO effect in stopping Iran's nuclear program.

There are ZERO inspections of Iran's nuclear facilities currently being done.

Continuing the sanctions will not be supported by China or Russia...translation...they will end with or without a deal.

Iran has accepted enormous cuts to its nuclear program, not to mention invasive inspections. NONE of that has ever happened before.

• Iran will give up about 14,000 of its 20,000 centrifuges.
• Iran will give up 97 percent of its enriched uranium; it will hold on to only 300 kilograms' worth.
• Iran will be forbidden from enriching uranium beyond energy-grade fuel, or 3.67 percent enrichment. (Weapons-grade uranium is 90 percent enriched.)
• Iran will destroy or export the core of its plutonium plant at Arak, and replace it with a new core that cannot produce weapons-grade plutonium. It will ship out all spent nuclear fuel.

"Let recap".. Iran will retains nuclear program. it will also get 100s of billions of dollars to fund it's terrorist activities around the world, while holding our citizens hostage and chanting death to America. they will get i month notice for inspection of sites, no snap inspections you people are a joke really

Hostage? You mean Americans in Iran who broke Iranian laws?

I mean those Obama doesn't care about, as much as he does about freeing Gitmo terrorist... Yeah those

So you mean Americans in jail for breaking the law, but somehow, because they're Americans, they shouldn't be subject to Iranian laws? And that's somehow Obama's fault? Interesting.

 

[Bfgrn]

Your survey has been dismissed.


The Israel Project

After an initial question about whether the respondent is a U.S. citizen, the survey asks:

“Now, generally speaking, would you say that things in the country are going in the right direction, or have they pretty seriously gotten off on the wrong track?”

Right direction: 37 percent Wrong track: 53 percent Don’t know/no opinion: 9 percent

Ira Sheskin, a University of Miami demographer who has conducted dozens of Jewish surveys, called it a terrible question.

Instead of framing the alternative of “right direction” as “wrong direction,” it articulates the negative as: “pretty seriously gotten off on the wrong track.”

“I would read that question and dismiss the entire survey,” Sheskin said. “They clearly are looking for particular responses when they do that.”

Let’s take a look at another question from the survey:

“Recently, the United States and five other countries (known as the P5+1) reached an agreement with Iran regarding the lifting of economic sanctions on Iran in exchange for concessions in Iran’s nuclear program. Based on what you know, do you approve or disapprove of this agreement?

Approve: 44 percent Disapprove: 47 percent Don’t know/no opinion: 9 percent

Suggesting that Iran agreed only to “concessions” on its nuclear program rather than agreed not to produce nuclear weapons bolsters the argument against the deal.

Finally, the most compelling reason to dismiss the results of The Israel Project poll come from the pollster himself, Nathan Klein. He told JTA he designed the questions to “educate” respondents about the Iran deal over the course of the questionnaire in order to gauge how their views would change once they were better informed. The following question was asked three times over the course of the survey, with the responses shifting over time:

“Now that you have some more information, in your own opinion, do you think that Congress should vote to approve the deal and lift sanctions on Iran or reject the deal and NOT lift sanctions on Iran?”

Near beginning of survey: 40 percent approve; 45 percent reject. Middle of survey: 35 percent approve; 51 percent reject. Near end of survey: 30 percent approve; 58 percent reject.

The survey was conducted via email and the questions were designed by Klein, founder of Olive Tree Strategies, former pollster for the National Republican Senatorial Committee and former director of research and messaging at The Israel Project. Klein used a third-party company that relied on previous email surveys it had conducted to find self-identified Jews in its database. Jewish respondents were sent an email blast with a link to the online survey. Only those who affirmed their religion as Jewish were able to complete the survey. In all, there were 1,034 respondents, and the poll was conducted July 21-26. The margin of error was 3 percent.

Though a cheaper method of polling, online surveys are inherently less reliable than telephone surveys, according to Sheskin, the Miami demographer, because studies show that those who feel most strongly about an issue are most inclined to complete online surveys (by contrast, telephone respondents are more likely to cooperate and complete surveys at random). In this case, the online survey probably favors those who oppose the Iran deal, because while the deal’s opponents tend to be adamant in their opposition, many Jewish proponents are openly ambivalent.


Read more: Polls Showing Jewish Support for Iran Deal More Credible - Breaking News Forward.com

Dismissed by who the leftist? The forward is a leftist rag not any more credible than a Jstreet poll .My poll also states "the more they know" in those polls you sited they don't know anything, but the talking points put out by Obama Kerry..Leftist polls rely on ignorance as does leftist ideology in general oh love the code pink photo

LOL...do you really believe The Israel Project is non-partisan?

Polls and Advertisements

TIP's other core activities include funding public opinion polls on U.S. views of Israel and its neighbors and producing TV commercials promoting an Israel-centric view of the Middle East. In early 2004, for example, the group began running 30-second TV ads across the United States, which according to UPI featured "mothers of victims killed in suicide bombings" in an effort to build support for building the so-called security barrier between Israel and the West Bank.[22]

The polling methods used by the Israel Project have on many occasions received criticism from polling experts. In one such case in 2014, TIP claimed that a poll it had carried out found "broad, bipartisan support for increased sanctions" on Iran. However, pollster Dina Smeltz of the Chicago Council on Global Affairs said the poll was not neutral and that its results should not be considered credible. Smeltz noted that when asked directly and clearly about whether the United States should increase sanctions on Iran, a majority of Americans (52 percent) were against it. Only when TIP framed survey questions with language that was biased and clearly attempting to persuade respondents to "change their views one way or another" does support emerge for TIP's hawkish agenda on Iran.[23]

A December 2013 poll conducted by GOP pollster Frank Luntz on behalf of the Israel Project was also criticized. According to ThinkProgress, which surveyed American opinion on Iran, the poll offered "an unrealistic menu of choices" and failed "to inform respondents that more sanctions now would likely end negotiations with Iran."[24]

- See more at: The Israel Project - Profile - Right Web - Institute for Policy Studies

I believe the more people know the more they don't like this bullshit deal. Why is that you people love Iran so much anyways? is it because they are America haters like yourself ?..Think progress WTF? Only in the leftist world is less information better. Kind of like The New york times when they gave less information about the genocide of Jews during WWII

The more people know, the MORE they will favor this deal.

Let's recap...

Heavy sanctions have been in place for years...they have had ZERO effect in stopping Iran's nuclear program.

There are ZERO inspections of Iran's nuclear facilities currently being done.

Continuing the sanctions will not be supported by China or Russia...translation...they will end with or without a deal.

Iran has accepted enormous cuts to its nuclear program, not to mention invasive inspections. NONE of that has ever happened before.

• Iran will give up about 14,000 of its 20,000 centrifuges.
• Iran will give up 97 percent of its enriched uranium; it will hold on to only 300 kilograms' worth.
• Iran will be forbidden from enriching uranium beyond energy-grade fuel, or 3.67 percent enrichment. (Weapons-grade uranium is 90 percent enriched.)
• Iran will destroy or export the core of its plutonium plant at Arak, and replace it with a new core that cannot produce weapons-grade plutonium. It will ship out all spent nuclear fuel.

"Let recap".. Iran will retains nuclear program. it will also get 100s of billions of dollars to fund it's terrorist activities around the world, while holding our citizens hostage and chanting death to America. they will get i month notice for inspection of sites, no snap inspections you people are a joke really

Iran will not "retain it's nuclear program"...

Does Iran have a right to nuclear energy?

 

[Jroc]

Dismissed by who the leftist? The forward is a leftist rag not any more credible than a Jstreet poll .My poll also states "the more they know" in those polls you sited they don't know anything, but the talking points put out by Obama Kerry..Leftist polls rely on ignorance as does leftist ideology in general oh love the code pink photo

LOL...do you really believe The Israel Project is non-partisan?

Polls and Advertisements

TIP's other core activities include funding public opinion polls on U.S. views of Israel and its neighbors and producing TV commercials promoting an Israel-centric view of the Middle East. In early 2004, for example, the group began running 30-second TV ads across the United States, which according to UPI featured "mothers of victims killed in suicide bombings" in an effort to build support for building the so-called security barrier between Israel and the West Bank.[22]

The polling methods used by the Israel Project have on many occasions received criticism from polling experts. In one such case in 2014, TIP claimed that a poll it had carried out found "broad, bipartisan support for increased sanctions" on Iran. However, pollster Dina Smeltz of the Chicago Council on Global Affairs said the poll was not neutral and that its results should not be considered credible. Smeltz noted that when asked directly and clearly about whether the United States should increase sanctions on Iran, a majority of Americans (52 percent) were against it. Only when TIP framed survey questions with language that was biased and clearly attempting to persuade respondents to "change their views one way or another" does support emerge for TIP's hawkish agenda on Iran.[23]

A December 2013 poll conducted by GOP pollster Frank Luntz on behalf of the Israel Project was also criticized. According to ThinkProgress, which surveyed American opinion on Iran, the poll offered "an unrealistic menu of choices" and failed "to inform respondents that more sanctions now would likely end negotiations with Iran."[24]

- See more at: The Israel Project - Profile - Right Web - Institute for Policy Studies

I believe the more people know the more they don't like this bullshit deal. Why is that you people love Iran so much anyways? is it because they are America haters like yourself ?..Think progress WTF? Only in the leftist world is less information better. Kind of like The New york times when they gave less information about the genocide of Jews during WWII

The more people know, the MORE they will favor this deal.

Let's recap...

Heavy sanctions have been in place for years...they have had ZERO effect in stopping Iran's nuclear program.

There are ZERO inspections of Iran's nuclear facilities currently being done.

Continuing the sanctions will not be supported by China or Russia...translation...they will end with or without a deal.

Iran has accepted enormous cuts to its nuclear program, not to mention invasive inspections. NONE of that has ever happened before.

• Iran will give up about 14,000 of its 20,000 centrifuges.
• Iran will give up 97 percent of its enriched uranium; it will hold on to only 300 kilograms' worth.
• Iran will be forbidden from enriching uranium beyond energy-grade fuel, or 3.67 percent enrichment. (Weapons-grade uranium is 90 percent enriched.)
• Iran will destroy or export the core of its plutonium plant at Arak, and replace it with a new core that cannot produce weapons-grade plutonium. It will ship out all spent nuclear fuel.

"Let recap".. Iran will retains nuclear program. it will also get 100s of billions of dollars to fund it's terrorist activities around the world, while holding our citizens hostage and chanting death to America. they will get i month notice for inspection of sites, no snap inspections you people are a joke really

Iran will not "retain it's nuclear program"...

Does Iran have a right to nuclear energy?

I don't need all the stupid graphics they don't impress me. funny you libs trust Iran so much No they don't need nuclear anything

 

[Jroc]

Iran publishes book on how to outwit US and destroy Israel

While Secretary of State John Kerry and President Obama do their best to paper over the brutality of the Iranian regime and force through a nuclear agreement, Iran’s religious leader has another issue on his mind: The destruction of Israel.

Ayatollah Ali Khamenei has published a new book called “Palestine,” a 416-page screed against the Jewish state. A blurb on the back cover credits Khamenei as “The flagbearer of Jihad to liberate Jerusalem.”

A friend sent me a copy from Iran, the only place the book is currently available, though an Arabic translation is promised soon.

Obama administration officials likely hope that no American even hears about it

.
Reclaiming Muslim lands’

Khamenei makes his position clear from the start: Israel has no right to exist as a state.

He uses three words. One is “nabudi” which means “annihilation.” The other is “imha” which means “fading out,” and, finally, there is “zaval” meaning “effacement.”

Khamenei claims that his strategy for the destruction of Israel is not based on anti-Semitism, which he describes as a European phenomenon. His position is instead based on “well-established Islamic principles.”

One such principle is that a land that falls under Muslim rule, even briefly, can never again be ceded to non-Muslims. What matters in Islam is ownership of a land’s government, even if the majority of inhabitants are non-Muslims.

Iran publishes book on how to outwit US and destroy Israel New York Post

 

[PaintMyHouse]

Iran publishes book on how to outwit US and destroy Israel

While Secretary of State John Kerry and President Obama do their best to paper over the brutality of the Iranian regime and force through a nuclear agreement, Iran’s religious leader has another issue on his mind: The destruction of Israel.

Ayatollah Ali Khamenei has published a new book called “Palestine,” a 416-page screed against the Jewish state. A blurb on the back cover credits Khamenei as “The flagbearer of Jihad to liberate Jerusalem.”

A friend sent me a copy from Iran, the only place the book is currently available, though an Arabic translation is promised soon.

Obama administration officials likely hope that no American even hears about it

.
Reclaiming Muslim lands’

Khamenei makes his position clear from the start: Israel has no right to exist as a state.

He uses three words. One is “nabudi” which means “annihilation.” The other is “imha” which means “fading out,” and, finally, there is “zaval” meaning “effacement.”

Khamenei claims that his strategy for the destruction of Israel is not based on anti-Semitism, which he describes as a European phenomenon. His position is instead based on “well-established Islamic principles.”

One such principle is that a land that falls under Muslim rule, even briefly, can never again be ceded to non-Muslims. What matters in Islam is ownership of a land’s government, even if the majority of inhabitants are non-Muslims.

Iran publishes book on how to outwit US and destroy Israel New York Post

416 pages? Have they not heard of YouTube, or brevity? No one reads any more...

 

[Jroc]

Iran publishes book on how to outwit US and destroy Israel

While Secretary of State John Kerry and President Obama do their best to paper over the brutality of the Iranian regime and force through a nuclear agreement, Iran’s religious leader has another issue on his mind: The destruction of Israel.

Ayatollah Ali Khamenei has published a new book called “Palestine,” a 416-page screed against the Jewish state. A blurb on the back cover credits Khamenei as “The flagbearer of Jihad to liberate Jerusalem.”

A friend sent me a copy from Iran, the only place the book is currently available, though an Arabic translation is promised soon.

Obama administration officials likely hope that no American even hears about it

.
Reclaiming Muslim lands’

Khamenei makes his position clear from the start: Israel has no right to exist as a state.

He uses three words. One is “nabudi” which means “annihilation.” The other is “imha” which means “fading out,” and, finally, there is “zaval” meaning “effacement.”

Khamenei claims that his strategy for the destruction of Israel is not based on anti-Semitism, which he describes as a European phenomenon. His position is instead based on “well-established Islamic principles.”

One such principle is that a land that falls under Muslim rule, even briefly, can never again be ceded to non-Muslims. What matters in Islam is ownership of a land’s government, even if the majority of inhabitants are non-Muslims.

Iran publishes book on how to outwit US and destroy Israel New York Post

416 pages? Have they not heard of YouTube, or brevity? No one reads any more...

I'm sure it's meant for a targeted audience of Israel ,Jew haters. Did you order yours yet?

 

[The Rabbi]

Dismissed by who the leftist? The forward is a leftist rag not any more credible than a Jstreet poll .My poll also states "the more they know" in those polls you sited they don't know anything, but the talking points put out by Obama Kerry..Leftist polls rely on ignorance as does leftist ideology in general oh love the code pink photo

LOL...do you really believe The Israel Project is non-partisan?

Polls and Advertisements

TIP's other core activities include funding public opinion polls on U.S. views of Israel and its neighbors and producing TV commercials promoting an Israel-centric view of the Middle East. In early 2004, for example, the group began running 30-second TV ads across the United States, which according to UPI featured "mothers of victims killed in suicide bombings" in an effort to build support for building the so-called security barrier between Israel and the West Bank.[22]

The polling methods used by the Israel Project have on many occasions received criticism from polling experts. In one such case in 2014, TIP claimed that a poll it had carried out found "broad, bipartisan support for increased sanctions" on Iran. However, pollster Dina Smeltz of the Chicago Council on Global Affairs said the poll was not neutral and that its results should not be considered credible. Smeltz noted that when asked directly and clearly about whether the United States should increase sanctions on Iran, a majority of Americans (52 percent) were against it. Only when TIP framed survey questions with language that was biased and clearly attempting to persuade respondents to "change their views one way or another" does support emerge for TIP's hawkish agenda on Iran.[23]

A December 2013 poll conducted by GOP pollster Frank Luntz on behalf of the Israel Project was also criticized. According to ThinkProgress, which surveyed American opinion on Iran, the poll offered "an unrealistic menu of choices" and failed "to inform respondents that more sanctions now would likely end negotiations with Iran."[24]

- See more at: The Israel Project - Profile - Right Web - Institute for Policy Studies

I believe the more people know the more they don't like this bullshit deal. Why is that you people love Iran so much anyways? is it because they are America haters like yourself ?..Think progress WTF? Only in the leftist world is less information better. Kind of like The New york times when they gave less information about the genocide of Jews during WWII

The more people know, the MORE they will favor this deal.

Let's recap...

Heavy sanctions have been in place for years...they have had ZERO effect in stopping Iran's nuclear program.

There are ZERO inspections of Iran's nuclear facilities currently being done.

Continuing the sanctions will not be supported by China or Russia...translation...they will end with or without a deal.

Iran has accepted enormous cuts to its nuclear program, not to mention invasive inspections. NONE of that has ever happened before.

• Iran will give up about 14,000 of its 20,000 centrifuges.
• Iran will give up 97 percent of its enriched uranium; it will hold on to only 300 kilograms' worth.
• Iran will be forbidden from enriching uranium beyond energy-grade fuel, or 3.67 percent enrichment. (Weapons-grade uranium is 90 percent enriched.)
• Iran will destroy or export the core of its plutonium plant at Arak, and replace it with a new core that cannot produce weapons-grade plutonium. It will ship out all spent nuclear fuel.

"Let recap".. Iran will retains nuclear program. it will also get 100s of billions of dollars to fund it's terrorist activities around the world, while holding our citizens hostage and chanting death to America. they will get i month notice for inspection of sites, no snap inspections you people are a joke really

Iran will not "retain it's nuclear program"...

Does Iran have a right to nuclear energy?

How many centrifuges are they dismantling?
WHo is supposed to monitor all this?
The agreement is a sham. Those who support it are either duped or hate Israel. Possibly both.

 

[PaintMyHouse]

Iran publishes book on how to outwit US and destroy Israel

While Secretary of State John Kerry and President Obama do their best to paper over the brutality of the Iranian regime and force through a nuclear agreement, Iran’s religious leader has another issue on his mind: The destruction of Israel.

Ayatollah Ali Khamenei has published a new book called “Palestine,” a 416-page screed against the Jewish state. A blurb on the back cover credits Khamenei as “The flagbearer of Jihad to liberate Jerusalem.”

A friend sent me a copy from Iran, the only place the book is currently available, though an Arabic translation is promised soon.

Obama administration officials likely hope that no American even hears about it

.
Reclaiming Muslim lands’

Khamenei makes his position clear from the start: Israel has no right to exist as a state.

He uses three words. One is “nabudi” which means “annihilation.” The other is “imha” which means “fading out,” and, finally, there is “zaval” meaning “effacement.”

Khamenei claims that his strategy for the destruction of Israel is not based on anti-Semitism, which he describes as a European phenomenon. His position is instead based on “well-established Islamic principles.”

One such principle is that a land that falls under Muslim rule, even briefly, can never again be ceded to non-Muslims. What matters in Islam is ownership of a land’s government, even if the majority of inhabitants are non-Muslims.

Iran publishes book on how to outwit US and destroy Israel New York Post

416 pages? Have they not heard of YouTube, or brevity? No one reads any more...

I'm sure it's meant for a targeted audience of Israel ,Jew haters. Did you order yours yet?

I'm anti-Zionist, not antisemitic. Israel is bad for the Jews, and the rest of the fucking world.