CDZ Jesus didn't exist

[TemplarKormac]

Millions of people have traced their ancestry to the Islamic prophet Mohammed. None can say the same of Jesus. Even Joeseph Smith has living descendents. No one claims to be related to Jesus though.

No body. No DNA. No remains. No tomb. No descendents = Didn't exist.

Spartacus, No body, no DNA, no tomb, no descendents = Didn't exist...except he did.

Sebastian the First of Portugal. No body, no DNA, no tomb, no descendents = Didn't exist...except he did.

Glenn Miller. No body, no DNA, no tomb, no descendents (his children were adopted) = Didn't exist...except he did.

Anyone who died childless and was cremated, lost at sea, went missing, burned up in a fire, all the children who have been abducted and never recovered...none of them ever existed by your definition.

I'm beginning to believe that in your haste to post something anti-Christian, you failed to think this all the way through.

Well then, I suppose we know what happened to Jimmy Hoffa.

 

[CrusaderFrank]

Millions of people have traced their ancestry to the Islamic prophet Mohammed. None can say the same of Jesus. Even Joeseph Smith has living descendents. No one claims to be related to Jesus though.

No body. No DNA. No remains. No tomb. No descendents = Didn't exist.

Using that "logic" Hitler didn't exist either, Boy Wonder

false Hitler had brothers and sisters that and the family still exists today.
there is no empirical evidence of any kind for Jesus ...
thanks frank!

Why does even the idea of Jesus trouble Progressives?

In Roman times Progressives would have been huge supporters of Rome, they stopped listening after "render unto Caesar..."

 

[daws101]

Millions of people have traced their ancestry to the Islamic prophet Mohammed. None can say the same of Jesus. Even Joeseph Smith has living descendents. No one claims to be related to Jesus though.

No body. No DNA. No remains. No tomb. No descendents = Didn't exist.

Using that "logic" Hitler didn't exist either, Boy Wonder

false Hitler had brothers and sisters that and the family still exists today.
there is no empirical evidence of any kind for Jesus ...
thanks frank!

Why does even the idea of Jesus trouble Progressives?

In Roman times Progressives would have been huge supporters of Rome, they stopped listening after "render unto Caesar..."

false if jesus did exist he would have been a progressive ...

 

[sealybobo]

Millions of people have traced their ancestry to the Islamic prophet Mohammed. None can say the same of Jesus. Even Joeseph Smith has living descendents. No one claims to be related to Jesus though.

How about even a relative of peter Paul john or any of those other guys? No last names even? No graves? I went and saw the temple of Apollo much older.
No body. No DNA. No remains. No tomb. No descendents = Didn't exist.

 

[sealybobo]

Millions of people have traced their ancestry to the Islamic prophet Mohammed. None can say the same of Jesus. Even Joeseph Smith has living descendents. No one claims to be related to Jesus though.

No body. No DNA. No remains. No tomb. No descendents = Didn't exist.

Using that "logic" Hitler didn't exist either, Boy Wonder

false Hitler had brothers and sisters that and the family still exists today.
there is no empirical evidence of any kind for Jesus ...
thanks frank!

Why does even the idea of Jesus trouble Progressives?

In Roman times Progressives would have been huge supporters of Rome, they stopped listening after "render unto Caesar..."

Because a lot of us are atheists. Why does science bother theists is what I want to know.

 

[sealybobo]

Millions of people have traced their ancestry to the Islamic prophet Mohammed. None can say the same of Jesus. Even Joeseph Smith has living descendents. No one claims to be related to Jesus though.

No body. No DNA. No remains. No tomb. No descendents = Didn't exist.

The Bible tells us that Jesus had siblings.

Hostile Non-Biblical Pagan Accounts There are a number of ancient classical accounts of Jesus from pagan, non-Christian sources. These accounts are generally hostile to Christianity; some ancient authors denied the miraculous nature of Jesus and the events surrounding His life:

Thallus (52AD)
Tacitus (56-120AD)
Mara Bar-Serapion (70AD)
Phlegon (80-140AD)
Pliny the Younger (61-113AD)
Suetonius (69-140AD)
Lucian of Samosata: (115-200 A.D.)
Celsus (175AD)

Hostile Non-Biblical Jewish Accounts:

Josephus (37-101AD)
Jewish Talmud (400-700AD)
The Toledot Yeshu (1000AD)

There is evidence outside the Bible that provides proof that Jesus did exist.

Josephus never met Jesus. He only wrote of a story he heard was spreading by a small cult that was growing. I'm not checking the rest. F for fail. If ones bad the rest are suspect.

 

[daws101]

Millions of people have traced their ancestry to the Islamic prophet Mohammed. None can say the same of Jesus. Even Joeseph Smith has living descendents. No one claims to be related to Jesus though.

No body. No DNA. No remains. No tomb. No descendents = Didn't exist.

Using that "logic" Hitler didn't exist either, Boy Wonder

false Hitler had brothers and sisters that and the family still exists today.
there is no empirical evidence of any kind for Jesus ...
thanks frank!

Why does even the idea of Jesus trouble Progressives?

In Roman times Progressives would have been huge supporters of Rome, they stopped listening after "render unto Caesar..."

Because a lot of us are atheists. Why does science bother theists is what I want to know.

it is and has been chipping away at their beliefs Not for any malevolent reason but because knowledge tends to kill ignorance.

 

[|electric|foxy|]

war of religions, haha