Jesse Jackson's Odd Complaint: Trayvon Martin Denied Jury of His Peers

[Wehrwolfen]

By Mark Finkelstein
July 14, 2013


Appearing on MSNBC this morning, Jesse Jackson condemned the Zimmerman verdict as a "tremendous miscarriage of justice." It is a mark of Jackson's misconception of just what constitutes justice that chief among his complaints was that Trayvon Martin was denied a jury of his peers because there were no African-Americans or men on it.

But—as Jackson is apparently unaware—the Constitution provides that it is the accused, not the possible victim, who is entitled to an impartial jury [in fact the Constitution nowhere speaks of a jury of peers]. View the video after the jump.

Jesse Jackson's Odd Complaint: Trayvon Denied Jury of His Peers | MRCTV​

]Excerpt]

Read more:
Jesse Jackson's Odd Complaint: Trayvon Martin Denied Jury of His Peers | NewsBusters

Jesse and Al were satisfied when OJ Simpson was acquitted by a jury of his peers. As far as the Holder DOJ trying Zimmerman on racial hatred charges, the FBI already investigated that possibility and found nothing.

 

[Mr. H.]

Neither prosecution nor Defense had any qualms about the jury that was seated.

 

[percysunshine]

Maybe something good will come out of this. Jackson, Sharpton and the rest of the hucksters in the race extortion industrial complex just struck out. There are no riots. No riots means no CNN coverage. No CNN coverage means no advertising dollars to fuel the machine. Good riddance if it sticks.

 

[asaratis]

Jesse Jackson is a delusional race pimp. He thrives on whatever discord is created by his dishonesty.

 

[dilloduck]

Advertising your stupidity usually isn't a smart move but unfortunately his audience thinks just like him. Trayvon didn't even get to consult with attorneys.

 

[R.C. Christian]

Sharpton is even worse that Jesse Jackass. The 2 of them can't go to hell fast enough.

 

[whitehall]

Umm, the accused gets a jury of his peers. Nowhere in the history of the entire freaking legal history was it ever alleged that the accused has to face a jury of the victim's peers.

 

[Wehrwolfen]

Advertising your stupidity usually isn't a smart move but unfortunately his audience thinks just like him. Trayvon didn't even get to consult with attorneys.

,

No he didn't, but he took his best shot at Zimmerman. If Zimmerman hadn't been able to get to his gun, Zimmerman's family would probably have attended funeral of Martin's racial revenge on that "Crazy Ass Cracker". Did George Zimmerman have a choice? The jury didn't think so.

 

[Octoldit]

Anyone of understanding knows Jesse Jackson (was probably in on it) and used the death of Martin Luther King to make a career of exploiting people for his own monetary gain, and the political gain of those who murdered Dr. King. Jesse is a fake Rev, leader, and preacher.

However rigging the jury with all females was not about obtaining justice for the young victim, but was about covering up a murder. Women are not men, can never be men and don't think like men. The intention of a jury with no men just as it turned out was to circumvent justice not obtain justice for the victim in this case.

Any man would know deadly force is far from the only option against a 17 year old boy who he claimed "ambushed him". How one gets ambush while stalking someone else is something that makes no sense. The 29 year old man hunted down that teenager, and if he was punched in the face and knocked to the ground it was because he allowed his self to attacked and knocked to the ground so he would have a pre-mediated reason to murder that boy.

But it must always be remembered how the Zionist use the media to play Americans against each other to take the focus off all their abundant crimes against every aspect of this nation and the free nations of world.


Injustice against one American is injustice against all Americans. What might seem like an attack on one group of Americans has political overtones in terms of grooming illegal aliens who gain citizenship by military service, and ignoring the laws to create pseudo americans who can be used for unconstitutional things true Americans won't do. The Zionist are not pushing gun control and a fast track for citizenship for millions of illegal aliens without having a tyrannical scheme in place.

 

[Mr. H.]

Anyone of understanding knows Jesse Jackson (was probably in on it) and used the death of Martin Luther King to make a career of exploiting people for his own monetary gain, and the political gain of those who murdered Dr. King. Jesse is a fake Rev, leader, and preacher.

However rigging the jury with all females was not about obtaining justice for the young victim, but was about covering up a murder. Women are not men, can never be men and don't think like men. The intention of a jury with no men just as it turned out was to circumvent justice not obtain justice for the victim in this case.

Any man would know deadly force is far from the only option against a 17 year old boy who he claimed "ambushed him". How one gets ambush while stalking someone else is something that makes no sense. The 29 year old man hunted down that teenager, and if he was punched in the face and knocked to the ground it was because he allowed his self to attacked and knocked to the ground so he would have a pre-mediated reason to murder that boy.

But it must always be remembered how the Zionist use the media to play Americans against each other to take the focus off all their abundant crimes against every aspect of this nation and the free nations of world.


Injustice against one American is injustice against all Americans. What might seem like an attack on one group of Americans has political overtones in terms of grooming illegal aliens who gain citizenship by military service, and ignoring the laws to create pseudo americans who can be used for unconstitutional things true Americans won't do. The Zionist are not pushing gun control and a fast track for citizenship for millions of illegal aliens without having a tyrannical scheme in place.

The prosecution has as much input on the makeup of a jury as does the defense.

Read: FAIL

 

[blastoff]

By Mark Finkelstein
July 14, 2013


Appearing on MSNBC this morning, Jesse Jackson condemned the Zimmerman verdict as a "tremendous miscarriage of justice." It is a mark of Jackson's misconception of just what constitutes justice that chief among his complaints was that Trayvon Martin was denied a jury of his peers because there were no African-Americans or men on it.

But—as Jackson is apparently unaware—the Constitution provides that it is the accused, not the possible victim, who is entitled to an impartial jury [in fact the Constitution nowhere speaks of a jury of peers]. View the video after the jump.

Jesse Jackson's Odd Complaint: Trayvon Denied Jury of His Peers | MRCTV​

]Excerpt]

Read more:
Jesse Jackson's Odd Complaint: Trayvon Martin Denied Jury of His Peers | NewsBusters

Jesse and Al were satisfied when OJ Simpson was acquitted by a jury of his peers. As far as the Holder DOJ trying Zimmerman on racial hatred charges, the FBI already investigated that possibility and found nothing.

What's all the fuss about Jesse thinking a defendant has a right to be judged by a jury of someone else's peers? Did any of you stop to think the phony reverend Jackson might be a learned scholar from the Shelia Jackson Lee school of Mars Rovers on the Moon preservation society, or other hustles aimed at the low information idiots?