Jeb Bush's Proposed Tax Cuts: 53% Goes To Top 1%

[ninja007]

Republicans can care less about the poor.

SO MUCH LESS THEY DONATE MORE TIME AND MONEY TO THE POOR THAN LIBS AND ITS NOT EVEN CLOSE LIAR.

 

[Dad2three]

if libs put 1% of their time and effort into helping the black community as they do in attacking the rich.....................

\


As opposed to CONservative/GOP policy that attack the black community?

can you be more specific?

Calling black lives matter group a hate group for one?


Ronnie's "war on drugs" that puts US at the top of the list in the PIC?

 

[Dad2three]

Bush sucks.

ALL 3 DO, BUT YOU'LL STILL HAVE TO VOTE FOR HIM OR STAY HOME IN 2016!!! lol

 

[Dad2three]

100% of the bailout went to the rich.

Either that or turn Dubya's great recession into the GOP's second great depression? Hint when the top 20% of US own 80% of ALL assets, where do you think the money goes?

why dont you worry about your wallet instead of somebody else's jealous hater. Go make yourself rich lib.

Oh right, the rights famous bumper sticker mentality where zero cognitive abilities are needed. LOL


Go read the gawddam context dumbass!

 

[Dad2three]

Republicans can care less about the poor.

SO MUCH LESS THEY DONATE MORE TIME AND MONEY TO THE POOR THAN LIBS AND ITS NOT EVEN CLOSE LIAR.

DEBUNKED MANY, MANY TIMES Bubba

Debunking the "Conservatives Give More to Charity" Myth


What follows is a discussion about the issue of whether Conservatives or Liberals; Republicans or Democrats give more charity.

Since the publication of Who Really Cares: The Surprising Truth About Compassionate Conservatism

it has become common for conservatives to say they give more to charity than liberals. Many, many conservatives have cited the book I just linked to for support.

However, that book is just wrong. A recent MIT study countered it finding:

In this paper, we first show that conservatives and liberals are equally generous in their donation habits. This pattern holds at both the individual and state level, and contradicts the conventional wisdom that partisans differ in their generosity. Second, we show that while levels of giving are roughly equivalent, liberals are much more likely to donate to secular organizations, and conservatives are more likely to donate to religious causes, especially their own congregation.

http://www.gospelpolitics.com/debun...-give-more-to-charity-myth.html#ixzz3lyArPAFD

However, there is another issue to address which is: what to count as charity? All of these studies use the IRS definition of "charity" rather than the biblical definition. In the bible, God defines charity as giving to the needy without receiving, or expecting to receive, anything in return. Most "charity" conservatives give is in the form of tithes to their church. The vast majority of that money goes to salaries and building expenses -- for people and buildings that provide the giver with services. A tiny, miniscule fraction goes to the poor and needy.


So, in actuality, it seems that liberals give quite a bit more to biblical charity than conservatives.

Debunking the "Conservatives Give More to Charity" Myth


LMAOROG

 

[Dad2three]

Republicans can care less about the poor.

SO MUCH LESS THEY DONATE MORE TIME AND MONEY TO THE POOR THAN LIBS AND ITS NOT EVEN CLOSE LIAR.

Study: Conservatives and liberals are equally charitable, but they give to different charities

You can read more support for this at conservatives give to religious organizations; liberals to secular charitable organizations and are conservatives more charitable or simply more religious.



Study: Conservatives and liberals are equally charitable, but they give to different charities

 

[Sun Devil 92]

Republicans can care less about the poor.

SO MUCH LESS THEY DONATE MORE TIME AND MONEY TO THE POOR THAN LIBS AND ITS NOT EVEN CLOSE LIAR.

Watch out...here comes the MIT waste of taxpayer money study.

I don't know if they are or they are not....but using MIT ???

What a waste.

 

[Davros]

Bottom line is the rich don't need a tax cut. Ask your front runner Trump what he thinks.

 

[Political Junky]

The poorest fifth of Americans would get just under 3 percent of the tax breaks.

More than half of the tax cuts proposed in former Florida Gov. Jeb Bush's (R) tax plan would flow to America's wealthiest citizens, according to a report released by the nonpartisan group Citizens for Tax Justice, which advocates for "requiring the wealthy to pay their fair share."

While Americans at every income level would get a tax break under the presidential hopeful's plan, the report concludes, the size of that break would differ vastly. Those part of the poorest 20 percent of the country would receive, on average, a $227 cut, while those in the top 1 percent could expect about $82,392 -- a nearly 53 percent share of the individual income tax cuts.

More: More Than Half Of Jeb Bush's Proposed Tax Cuts Would Benefit The Top 1 Percent: Report

I recently heard that about 400 wealthy families control our government. Can those 400 wealthy families put Jeb in the White House? I don't know...

He's no different than his brother.

 

[Dad2three]

Republicans can care less about the poor.

SO MUCH LESS THEY DONATE MORE TIME AND MONEY TO THE POOR THAN LIBS AND ITS NOT EVEN CLOSE LIAR.

Watch out...here comes the MIT waste of taxpayer money study.

I don't know if they are or they are not....but using MIT ???

What a waste.

Ad hom on MIT? lol

 

[Dad2three]