James O'Keefe set to Expose Deep State with New Investigation

OKeefe does more than selectively edit
He modifies the question to make a response seem offensive

Original question: Do you like mosquitos?
Answer : I hate the bastards

Revised question: Do you like black people?
Answer: I hate the bastards

You have actual proof of that?

Falling for the ACORN Hoax

The videos that have been released appear to have been edited, in some cases substantially, including the insertion of a substitute voiceover for significant portions of Mr. O’Keefe’s and Ms. Giles’s comments, which makes it difficult to determine the questions to which ACORN employees are responding. A comparison of the publicly available transcripts to the released videos confirms that large portions of the original video have been omitted from the released versions.

So, editing.

Yawn.
Not just editing but lying about the pimp outfit, substituting in different questions than the people had answered and omitting where ACORN turned him down

Editing.

Again, where is the evidence of "substituting"

All you had was overlaying, and even then you have access to the full transcripts.

Sorry...not playing your obtuse game
 
You have actual proof of that?

Falling for the ACORN Hoax

The videos that have been released appear to have been edited, in some cases substantially, including the insertion of a substitute voiceover for significant portions of Mr. O’Keefe’s and Ms. Giles’s comments, which makes it difficult to determine the questions to which ACORN employees are responding. A comparison of the publicly available transcripts to the released videos confirms that large portions of the original video have been omitted from the released versions.

So, editing.

Yawn.
Not just editing but lying about the pimp outfit, substituting in different questions than the people had answered and omitting where ACORN turned him down

Editing.

Again, where is the evidence of "substituting"

All you had was overlaying, and even then you have access to the full transcripts.

Sorry...not playing your obtuse game

You can ignore reality all you want, the fact is he's an investigative journalist, and no matter how much you try to smear him, he gets results.
 
Falling for the ACORN Hoax

The videos that have been released appear to have been edited, in some cases substantially, including the insertion of a substitute voiceover for significant portions of Mr. O’Keefe’s and Ms. Giles’s comments, which makes it difficult to determine the questions to which ACORN employees are responding. A comparison of the publicly available transcripts to the released videos confirms that large portions of the original video have been omitted from the released versions.

So, editing.

Yawn.
Not just editing but lying about the pimp outfit, substituting in different questions than the people had answered and omitting where ACORN turned him down

Editing.

Again, where is the evidence of "substituting"

All you had was overlaying, and even then you have access to the full transcripts.

Sorry...not playing your obtuse game

You can ignore reality all you want, the fact is he's an investigative journalist, and no matter how much you try to smear him, he gets results.

And if he doesn't get the results he wants, he just makes them up.

Yeah that ain't "journalism". That's "fiction".
 
So, editing.

Yawn.
Not just editing but lying about the pimp outfit, substituting in different questions than the people had answered and omitting where ACORN turned him down

Editing.

Again, where is the evidence of "substituting"

All you had was overlaying, and even then you have access to the full transcripts.

Sorry...not playing your obtuse game

You can ignore reality all you want, the fact is he's an investigative journalist, and no matter how much you try to smear him, he gets results.

And if he doesn't get the results he wants, he just makes them up.

Yeah that ain't "journalism". That's "fiction".

Editing is not making things up.

The fact you have access to the transcripts and the unedited videos is proof they are not made up.

So progressive TV shows editing, OK, Conservative investigative journalists editing, ITS THE DEBBIL!!!!

haaaack.
 
Not just editing but lying about the pimp outfit, substituting in different questions than the people had answered and omitting where ACORN turned him down

Editing.

Again, where is the evidence of "substituting"

All you had was overlaying, and even then you have access to the full transcripts.

Sorry...not playing your obtuse game

You can ignore reality all you want, the fact is he's an investigative journalist, and no matter how much you try to smear him, he gets results.

And if he doesn't get the results he wants, he just makes them up.

Yeah that ain't "journalism". That's "fiction".

Editing is not making things up.

The fact you have access to the transcripts and the unedited videos is proof they are not made up.

So progressive TV shows editing, OK, Conservative investigative journalists editing, ITS THE DEBBIL!!!!

haaaack.

Actually it's proof of --- the reverse.

Have you actually SEEN the unedited vids? O'Creep traded immunity from prosecution for turning over the raw videos that prove him a fraud. For example, the ACORN employee who played along milking as much personal info from O'Creep as he could and then soon as they left immediately reported them to the cops. Such as the voiceovered female employee made to look like she's saying "you can do it, somebody will say yes" to prostitution, where she's actually saying "you can do it, somebody will say yes" to her prospects of legitimate employment and housing.

Don't give us that shit. This mythology got busted years ago.
 
Editing.

Again, where is the evidence of "substituting"

All you had was overlaying, and even then you have access to the full transcripts.

Sorry...not playing your obtuse game

You can ignore reality all you want, the fact is he's an investigative journalist, and no matter how much you try to smear him, he gets results.

And if he doesn't get the results he wants, he just makes them up.

Yeah that ain't "journalism". That's "fiction".

Editing is not making things up.

The fact you have access to the transcripts and the unedited videos is proof they are not made up.

So progressive TV shows editing, OK, Conservative investigative journalists editing, ITS THE DEBBIL!!!!

haaaack.

Actually it's proof of --- the reverse.

Have you actually SEEN the unedited vids? O'Creep traded immunity from prosecution for turning over the raw videos that prove him a fraud. For example, the ACORN employee who played along milking as much personal info from O'Creep as he could and then soon as they left immediately reported them to the cops. Such as the voiceovered female employee made to look like she's saying "you can do it, somebody will say yes" to prostitution, where she's actually saying "you can do it, somebody will say yes" to her prospects of legitimate employment and housing.

Don't give us that shit. This mythology got busted years ago.

Wow, talk about spin.

So you are against any form of investigative journalism where the journalist mis-represents themself to get a story?

Or only when it fucks over your progressive butt buddies?
 
So no other news organizations edit?

He also releases the unedited versions I believe.

And are you forgetting that famous inserted 7 second gap during Katie's gun crusade?

Why Katie Couric’s ‘misleading’ editing matters in the presidential campaign
OKeefe does more than selectively edit
He modifies the question to make a response seem offensive

Original question: Do you like mosquitos?
Answer : I hate the bastards

Revised question: Do you like black people?
Answer: I hate the bastards

You have actual proof of that?

Falling for the ACORN Hoax

The videos that have been released appear to have been edited, in some cases substantially, including the insertion of a substitute voiceover for significant portions of Mr. O’Keefe’s and Ms. Giles’s comments, which makes it difficult to determine the questions to which ACORN employees are responding. A comparison of the publicly available transcripts to the released videos confirms that large portions of the original video have been omitted from the released versions.

So, editing.

Yawn.
Not just editing but lying about the pimp outfit, substituting in different questions than the people had answered and omitting where ACORN turned him down

Conservative journalism at its finest.......can’t wait for DEEP STATE


ACORN was a commie front group so of course you remain butthurt over its demise. Good riddance and GREAT job by O'Keefe.

(snicker)
 
Sorry...not playing your obtuse game

You can ignore reality all you want, the fact is he's an investigative journalist, and no matter how much you try to smear him, he gets results.

And if he doesn't get the results he wants, he just makes them up.

Yeah that ain't "journalism". That's "fiction".

Editing is not making things up.

The fact you have access to the transcripts and the unedited videos is proof they are not made up.

So progressive TV shows editing, OK, Conservative investigative journalists editing, ITS THE DEBBIL!!!!

haaaack.

Actually it's proof of --- the reverse.

Have you actually SEEN the unedited vids? O'Creep traded immunity from prosecution for turning over the raw videos that prove him a fraud. For example, the ACORN employee who played along milking as much personal info from O'Creep as he could and then soon as they left immediately reported them to the cops. Such as the voiceovered female employee made to look like she's saying "you can do it, somebody will say yes" to prostitution, where she's actually saying "you can do it, somebody will say yes" to her prospects of legitimate employment and housing.

Don't give us that shit. This mythology got busted years ago.

Wow, talk about spin.

So you are against any form of investigative journalism where the journalist mis-represents themself to get a story?

Or only when it fucks over your progressive butt buddies?

Say what?

Look don't sit here and insult the reader, K? O'Creep didn't just misrepresent himself; he misrepresented how he represented himself, parading around in that ludicrous Hallowe'en pimp costume that wasn't part of what he wore, and then completely misrepresented what the ACORN people said and did on top of that. All to get his fifteen minutes of Fox-fawning fame.

You notice Fox Noise, while creaming its jeans over Pimply boy, never mentioned that the ACORN guy immediately called the police on them? Just a random omission I'm sure.

Don't sit here and insult people's intelligence as if this whole scam didn't get exposed just because you want to live in La La Land. Thank you.
 
You can ignore reality all you want, the fact is he's an investigative journalist, and no matter how much you try to smear him, he gets results.

And if he doesn't get the results he wants, he just makes them up.

Yeah that ain't "journalism". That's "fiction".

Editing is not making things up.

The fact you have access to the transcripts and the unedited videos is proof they are not made up.

So progressive TV shows editing, OK, Conservative investigative journalists editing, ITS THE DEBBIL!!!!

haaaack.

Actually it's proof of --- the reverse.

Have you actually SEEN the unedited vids? O'Creep traded immunity from prosecution for turning over the raw videos that prove him a fraud. For example, the ACORN employee who played along milking as much personal info from O'Creep as he could and then soon as they left immediately reported them to the cops. Such as the voiceovered female employee made to look like she's saying "you can do it, somebody will say yes" to prostitution, where she's actually saying "you can do it, somebody will say yes" to her prospects of legitimate employment and housing.

Don't give us that shit. This mythology got busted years ago.

Wow, talk about spin.

So you are against any form of investigative journalism where the journalist mis-represents themself to get a story?

Or only when it fucks over your progressive butt buddies?

Say what?

Look don't sit here and insult the reader, K? O'Creep didn't just misrepresent himself; he misrepresented how he represented himself, parading around in that ludicrous Hallowe'en pimp costume that wasn't part of what he wore, and then completely misrepresented what the ACORN people said and did.

You notice Fox Noise, while creaming its jeans over Pimply boy, never mentioned that the ACORN guy immediately called the police on them? Just a random omission I'm sure.

Don't sit here and insult people's intelligence as if this whole scam didn't get exposed just because you want to live in La La Land. Thank you.

Nice job of not answering any of my questions, hack
 
Is he going to dress like a pimp?

O Keefe has no credibility

Let's be real. It doesn't matter what, if any, corruption O'Keefe might reveal. You don't care. You're a partisan hack and your loyalty isn't to the average American, but to the DNC. O'Keefe could uncover that the DNC was running a child sex-slave ring and you'd be fine with it.
 
Note to Republicans....

Janes OKeefe actually IS Fake News
He literally makes it up
How is letting people talk to his investigators on their own accord and recording them and then posting it for the world to see fake news? He isn't making it up he just lets them talk and he asks questions..he is what journalists USED to be...REAL JOURNALISM is a dying thing...O'Keefe is one of a handful that still do REAL reporting.
 
Note to Republicans....

Janes OKeefe actually IS Fake News
He literally makes it up
How is letting people talk to his investigators on their own accord and recording them and then posting it for the world to see fake news? He isn't making it up he just lets them talk and he asks questions..he is what journalists USED to be...REAL JOURNALISM is a dying thing...O'Keefe is one of a handful that still do REAL reporting.

One has to suspend reality to be a liberal.
 
I think it's funny as hell that all the liberal pukes here are all bad mouthing O'Keefe and I'll bet not one of them has any idea of who he is and never heard of him before tonight.
Oh no, we all know who that lying little creep is. He embodies fake news. King of the editing room.

So no other news organizations edit?

He also releases the unedited versions I believe.

And are you forgetting that famous inserted 7 second gap during Katie's gun crusade?

Why Katie Couric’s ‘misleading’ editing matters in the presidential campaign
You find that corner yet Marty?
 
And if he doesn't get the results he wants, he just makes them up.

Yeah that ain't "journalism". That's "fiction".

Editing is not making things up.

The fact you have access to the transcripts and the unedited videos is proof they are not made up.

So progressive TV shows editing, OK, Conservative investigative journalists editing, ITS THE DEBBIL!!!!

haaaack.

Actually it's proof of --- the reverse.

Have you actually SEEN the unedited vids? O'Creep traded immunity from prosecution for turning over the raw videos that prove him a fraud. For example, the ACORN employee who played along milking as much personal info from O'Creep as he could and then soon as they left immediately reported them to the cops. Such as the voiceovered female employee made to look like she's saying "you can do it, somebody will say yes" to prostitution, where she's actually saying "you can do it, somebody will say yes" to her prospects of legitimate employment and housing.

Don't give us that shit. This mythology got busted years ago.

Wow, talk about spin.

So you are against any form of investigative journalism where the journalist mis-represents themself to get a story?

Or only when it fucks over your progressive butt buddies?

Say what?

Look don't sit here and insult the reader, K? O'Creep didn't just misrepresent himself; he misrepresented how he represented himself, parading around in that ludicrous Hallowe'en pimp costume that wasn't part of what he wore, and then completely misrepresented what the ACORN people said and did.

You notice Fox Noise, while creaming its jeans over Pimply boy, never mentioned that the ACORN guy immediately called the police on them? Just a random omission I'm sure.

Don't sit here and insult people's intelligence as if this whole scam didn't get exposed just because you want to live in La La Land. Thank you.

Nice job of not answering any of my questions, hack

You didn't ask one, old man.
And you should get that cough checked out.
 
I think it's funny as hell that all the liberal pukes here are all bad mouthing O'Keefe and I'll bet not one of them has any idea of who he is and never heard of him before tonight.
Oh no, we all know who that lying little creep is. He embodies fake news. King of the editing room.

So no other news organizations edit?

He also releases the unedited versions I believe.

And are you forgetting that famous inserted 7 second gap during Katie's gun crusade?

Why Katie Couric’s ‘misleading’ editing matters in the presidential campaign
OKeefe does more than selectively edit
He modifies the question to make a response seem offensive

Original question: Do you like mosquitos?
Answer : I hate the bastards

Revised question: Do you like black people?
Answer: I hate the bastards

You have actual proof of that?

Watch the Acorn tapes and you will see OKeefe at his best

~~~~~~

Visit our related site here.
Home Deep State Unmasked Deep State Unmasked: State Department on Hidden Cam, “Resist Everything,” “I Have Nothing to Lose”

FacebookTwitterPinterestLinkedInShare
Deep State Unmasked: State Department on Hidden Cam, “Resist Everything,” “I Have Nothing to Lose”

Not just editing but lying about the pimp outfit, substituting in different questions than the people had answered and omitting where ACORN turned him down


Editing.

Again, where is the evidence of "substituting"

All you had was overlaying, and even then you have access to the full transcripts.


Sorry...not playing your obtuse game


You can ignore reality all you want, the fact is he's an investigative journalist, and no matter how much you try to smear him, he gets results.


And if he doesn't get the results he wants, he just makes them up.

Yeah that ain't "journalism". That's "fiction".



~~~~~~
Deep State Un-Masked: State Dept. On Hidden Cam,
"Resist Everything," "I Have Nothing To Lose"
Deep State Unmasked: State Department on Hidden Cam, “Resist Everything,” “I Have Nothing to Lose” – Project Veritas
 
CNN is the worst. I wouldn't be surprised if people letter bombed them. During the entire election campaign it literally was the Clinton News Network. If CNN was not talking about how bad Tomahawk Trump was, CNN was constantly asking when Bernie Sanders will drop out of the race. It was so obvious to anyone watching how biased it was, not even Bush got such a bad treatment. Now CNN out in front with the Russia lie. CNN is getting death threats. Believe me. Hopefully, the police can keep up with all of them. OH SHIT THEY CAUGHT VAN JONES ADMITTING TO HIS LIES!

CNN’s PR nightmare continues thanks to 2nd Project Veritas video
Just go away

Anyone trying to compare the journalistic standards of James OKeefe to CNN is a short bus refugee
What journalistic standards do you believe CNN has?
 
Falling for the ACORN Hoax

The videos that have been released appear to have been edited, in some cases substantially, including the insertion of a substitute voiceover for significant portions of Mr. O’Keefe’s and Ms. Giles’s comments, which makes it difficult to determine the questions to which ACORN employees are responding. A comparison of the publicly available transcripts to the released videos confirms that large portions of the original video have been omitted from the released versions.

So, editing.

Yawn.
Not just editing but lying about the pimp outfit, substituting in different questions than the people had answered and omitting where ACORN turned him down

Editing.

Again, where is the evidence of "substituting"

All you had was overlaying, and even then you have access to the full transcripts.

Sorry...not playing your obtuse game

You can ignore reality all you want, the fact is he's an investigative journalist, and no matter how much you try to smear him, he gets results.

I used to have respect for your posts, even if I disagreed with them
 
CNN is the worst. I wouldn't be surprised if people letter bombed them. During the entire election campaign it literally was the Clinton News Network. If CNN was not talking about how bad Tomahawk Trump was, CNN was constantly asking when Bernie Sanders will drop out of the race. It was so obvious to anyone watching how biased it was, not even Bush got such a bad treatment. Now CNN out in front with the Russia lie. CNN is getting death threats. Believe me. Hopefully, the police can keep up with all of them. OH SHIT THEY CAUGHT VAN JONES ADMITTING TO HIS LIES!

CNN’s PR nightmare continues thanks to 2nd Project Veritas video
Just go away

Anyone trying to compare the journalistic standards of James OKeefe to CNN is a short bus refugee
What journalistic standards do you believe CNN has?

Among the best in journalism
 
CNN is the worst. I wouldn't be surprised if people letter bombed them. During the entire election campaign it literally was the Clinton News Network. If CNN was not talking about how bad Tomahawk Trump was, CNN was constantly asking when Bernie Sanders will drop out of the race. It was so obvious to anyone watching how biased it was, not even Bush got such a bad treatment. Now CNN out in front with the Russia lie. CNN is getting death threats. Believe me. Hopefully, the police can keep up with all of them. OH SHIT THEY CAUGHT VAN JONES ADMITTING TO HIS LIES!

CNN’s PR nightmare continues thanks to 2nd Project Veritas video
Just go away

Anyone trying to compare the journalistic standards of James OKeefe to CNN is a short bus refugee
What journalistic standards do you believe CNN has?

Among the best in journalism
Only to brainless dupes like you.
 

Forum List

Back
Top