Ivanka Trump Wore $138 Dress to Address Prosperity – Hillary Wore $12,000 Smock to Address Poverty

[Dragonlady]

Perhaps instead of Crooked Hillary she should be Hypocrite Hillary!!?

Ivanka wore a custom made version of a dress from her own line. Ivanka's dress most certainly cost more than $138, but the knock off's of it which she sold (and which are now sold out), sold for $138. In other words, she the RNC was a free ad for her clothing line. Proving once again that the Trumps are profiting from Donald's run.

Hillary is a wealthy woman and I have no problem with her wearing expensive clothing, especially since I'm pretty sure that she got the coat at a very hefty discount, or for free.

So let me review what you posted.

Ivanka Trump was promoting her line of clothing. Interesting, i didn't see a label, sign or whatever that told me that information until you spilled the beans.

You have no problem with Mrs. Clinton become rich through donations and have no problem wearing a piece of clothing that emphasizes that exact point?

Mrs. Tuzla Clinton is bought and paid for, Ivanka did in fact build that.

No Ivanka did NOT build that. She has her name on a line of clothing, which is not to say that she designed the dress or, sewed the dress, but rather that she used the event to promote said line of clothing and to make money.

 

[Dragonlady]

Ivanka tried to sell the dress after the speech

What do you mean tried? She did sell the dress.

But the stormfont o/p is worried about what Hilary's clothes cost. I figure it's none of his freaking business.

We just love to shove the liberals' hypocrisy in your face...yhou're the guys who bitch about how much money people have, how many homes they have and what everything they have costs..... We really dont' care

but seriously.....12 grand for THAT???????
Typical government spending money wastefully...12 grand....jesus

Mrs Tuzla should have saved some cash and bought an outfit from Ivanka's line of clothing. Not sure how much it would help but it certainly wouldn't hurt.

For starters, the jacket didn't cost $12,000, it costs $7,400, which is admittedly, a lot. But really, you're grossly exaggerating:

http://fashionista.com/2016/06/hillary-clinton-giorgio-armani

I personally would never buy a dress from Ivanka's cheap ass "Made in China" line, because they would neither flatter an older woman's figure, nor fit it properly. The line and the sizing are designed for younger women.

What a candidate wears and how much it costs, should be of no consideration whatsoever. Do you talk about whether the men are wearing off the rack or custom made, or how much they paid for it?

 

[irosie91]

Today's narrative. Entitled slut. Or the endearing grandmother.

Calling Ivanka Trump a "slut" is both inaccurate and inappropriate.

Understandable and agree.

Notice the disclaimer at the bottom.

I threw it out there knowing someone else would have eventually said it in a derogatory manner.

In today's political climate, to have the courage to make her first appearance on a national stage is commendable. To see the insults and ridicule towards her is inappropriate and likely inaccurate.

no doubt her father warned her--------I HAVE NO DOUBT

 

[irosie91]

When Reagan ran the first time
he was not a millionaire

just saying

are you sure? what would he have done with all dat
ROYALTY money?

Reagan was an actor in the days before residual payments were made. That didn't start happening until reruns became a big business on TV, and for movies, when cross marketing started in the 70's as well as the rise of indie films. Indie directors couldn't afford big salaries for actors, so they gave percentages of profits instead.

are you sure? You are insisting that REAGAN and wifey did NOT GET A DIME when their movies were shown on TV? Did he get paid for doing that nighttime thing----uhm.....
---intro for the general electric theater----in the 1950s? into the 60s? He worked lots-------he wasn't paid-----as to royalties----I have a sense that you are slightly off-----
he worked a long long time and did lots and his stuff was used OVER AND OVER AND OVER

 

[boedicca]

Ivanka tried to sell the dress after the speech

What do you mean tried? She did sell the dress.

But the stormfont o/p is worried about what Hilary's clothes cost. I figure it's none of his freaking business.

Oh, puhleeze. You loons cackled about how much Sarah Palin's outfits cost.

Tits For Tats, hun.

sarah pain's clothes were paid for from campaign donations that she misspent.

no one wants to see your t**s.

The campaign paying for Sarah's clothes is not nearly as egregious as hiLIARy's lifestyle (including wardrobe) being funded by laundered Clinton Foundation money stolen from Haitian Earthquake Refugees.

 

[ElmerMudd]

Couldn't squeeze the whole title in the box.

Here is the original: Ivanka Trump Wore $138 Dress to Address the Nation on Prosperity – Hillary Wore $12,000 Smock to Address Nation on Poverty

Ivanka wore the dress then use the exposure from the speech to promote the dress and made 10's or 100's of thousand dollars through sales after the speech.
Do you know what Ivanka wore to private parties durring the convention; a $27,000 Parinici to one.

The commments in the article are hilarious. But really, 12,000 for something that look like a vacuum cleaner bag.




Ivanka Trump Wore $138 Dress to Address the Nation on Prosperity - Hillary Wore $12,000 Smock to Address Nation on Poverty

 

[Dragonlady]

are you sure? You are insisting that REAGAN and wifey did NOT GET A DIME when their movies were shown on TV? Did he get paid for doing that nighttime thing----uhm.....
---intro for the general electric theater----in the 1950s? into the 60s? He worked lots-------he wasn't paid-----as to royalties----I have a sense that you are slightly off-----
he worked a long long time and did lots and his stuff was used OVER AND OVER AND OVER

The agreement with the Screen Actors Guild regarding movie residuals was not signed until 1960, and it did not apply to movies made before the agreement was signed. Ronnie only appeared in 3 movies after 1960, and two of those performances were voice overs.

Residual (entertainment industry) - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Prior to the 1970's, residuals were only paid for the first 6 times a television program was rerun. The new contract in the 1970's which saw residuals being paid on every rerun, only applied to new shows. Reagan's last TV show went off the air in 1965.

Ronald Reagan filmography - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

So no, he was not receiving big $$$ from his old movies or TV shows.

 

[Dragonlady]

sarah pain's clothes were paid for from campaign donations that she misspent.

no one wants to see your t**s.

The campaign paying for Sarah's clothes is not nearly as egregious as hiLIARy's lifestyle (including wardrobe) being funded by laundered Clinton Foundation money stolen from Haitian Earthquake Refugees.

The difference being that the Republican Party spent $125,000 on Sarah Palin's wardrobe, while Hillary is supplying her own clothes.

The Clinton Foundation is NOT financing Hillary's campaign. That is a complete lie. Nor was money stolen from Haitian Refugees.

It's pretty pathetic when your criticisms of the candidate are all based on lies, because other than lying, you have nothing on her.

 

[boedicca]

sarah pain's clothes were paid for from campaign donations that she misspent.

no one wants to see your t**s.

The campaign paying for Sarah's clothes is not nearly as egregious as hiLIARy's lifestyle (including wardrobe) being funded by laundered Clinton Foundation money stolen from Haitian Earthquake Refugees.

The difference being that the Republican Party spent $125,000 on Sarah Palin's wardrobe, while Hillary is supplying her own clothes.

The Clinton Foundation is NOT financing Hillary's campaign. That is a complete lie. Nor was money stolen from Haitian Refugees.

It's pretty pathetic when your criticisms of the candidate are all based on lies, because other than lying, you have nothing on her.

hiLIARy's clothes are paid for by taxpayers and the victims of tragedies who are used as fodder for the Clinton Foundation Grift Machine to hoover up "charitable" donations.

 

[irosie91]

could be smoking
but hard to think the MSM would be so complicit in
covering up all these years

Jackie Kennedy smoked and it was hidden----I don't think she smoked a whole lot. I do not smoke------do you believe me?

Mrs. Kennedy was not the President. However, Mr. Kennedy had a terrible time with Addison's disease, and hid it well.

yes---both Addison's and back problems----so?

 

[irosie91]

Ivanka tried to sell the dress after the speech

What do you mean tried? She did sell the dress.

But the stormfont o/p is worried about what Hilary's clothes cost. I figure it's none of his freaking business.

We just love to shove the liberals' hypocrisy in your face...yhou're the guys who bitch about how much money people have, how many homes they have and what everything they have costs..... We really dont' care

but seriously.....12 grand for THAT???????
Typical government spending money wastefully...12 grand....jesus

Mrs Tuzla should have saved some cash and bought an outfit from Ivanka's line of clothing. Not sure how much it would help but it certainly wouldn't hurt.

For starters, the jacket didn't cost $12,000, it costs $7,400, which is admittedly, a lot. But really, you're grossly exaggerating:

http://fashionista.com/2016/06/hillary-clinton-giorgio-armani

I personally would never buy a dress from Ivanka's cheap ass "Made in China" line, because they would neither flatter an older woman's figure, nor fit it properly. The line and the sizing are designed for younger women.

What a candidate wears and how much it costs, should be of no consideration whatsoever. Do you talk about whether the men are wearing off the rack or custom made, or how much they paid for it?

her stuff is made in china?

 

[Dragonlady]

Ivanka tried to sell the dress after the speech

What do you mean tried? She did sell the dress.

But the stormfont o/p is worried about what Hilary's clothes cost. I figure it's none of his freaking business.

We just love to shove the liberals' hypocrisy in your face...yhou're the guys who bitch about how much money people have, how many homes they have and what everything they have costs..... We really dont' care

but seriously.....12 grand for THAT???????
Typical government spending money wastefully...12 grand....jesus

Mrs Tuzla should have saved some cash and bought an outfit from Ivanka's line of clothing. Not sure how much it would help but it certainly wouldn't hurt.

For starters, the jacket didn't cost $12,000, it costs $7,400, which is admittedly, a lot. But really, you're grossly exaggerating:

http://fashionista.com/2016/06/hillary-clinton-giorgio-armani

I personally would never buy a dress from Ivanka's cheap ass "Made in China" line, because they would neither flatter an older woman's figure, nor fit it properly. The line and the sizing are designed for younger women.

What a candidate wears and how much it costs, should be of no consideration whatsoever. Do you talk about whether the men are wearing off the rack or custom made, or how much they paid for it?

her stuff is made in china?

China and Viet Nam

Ivanka Trump is putting 'America first' while selling dresses made in China

In Ivanka's defense, it is now impossible to manufacture a clothing line in North America. All of the manufacturing facilities are gone.

 

[NYcarbineer]

What do you mean tried? She did sell the dress.

But the stormfont o/p is worried about what Hilary's clothes cost. I figure it's none of his freaking business.

We just love to shove the liberals' hypocrisy in your face...yhou're the guys who bitch about how much money people have, how many homes they have and what everything they have costs..... We really dont' care

but seriously.....12 grand for THAT???????
Typical government spending money wastefully...12 grand....jesus

Mrs Tuzla should have saved some cash and bought an outfit from Ivanka's line of clothing. Not sure how much it would help but it certainly wouldn't hurt.

For starters, the jacket didn't cost $12,000, it costs $7,400, which is admittedly, a lot. But really, you're grossly exaggerating:

http://fashionista.com/2016/06/hillary-clinton-giorgio-armani

I personally would never buy a dress from Ivanka's cheap ass "Made in China" line, because they would neither flatter an older woman's figure, nor fit it properly. The line and the sizing are designed for younger women.

What a candidate wears and how much it costs, should be of no consideration whatsoever. Do you talk about whether the men are wearing off the rack or custom made, or how much they paid for it?

her stuff is made in china?

China and Viet Nam

Ivanka Trump is putting 'America first' while selling dresses made in China

In Ivanka's defense, it is now impossible to manufacture a clothing line in North America. All of the manufacturing facilities are gone.

Totally the fault of 'free trade' Republicans, and Democrats acting like Republicans.

 

[NYcarbineer]

Ivanka tried to sell the dress after the speech

What do you mean tried? She did sell the dress.

But the stormfont o/p is worried about what Hilary's clothes cost. I figure it's none of his freaking business.

We just love to shove the liberals' hypocrisy in your face...yhou're the guys who bitch about how much money people have, how many homes they have and what everything they have costs..... We really dont' care

but seriously.....12 grand for THAT???????
Typical government spending money wastefully...12 grand....jesus

Mrs Tuzla should have saved some cash and bought an outfit from Ivanka's line of clothing. Not sure how much it would help but it certainly wouldn't hurt.

For starters, the jacket didn't cost $12,000, it costs $7,400, which is admittedly, a lot. But really, you're grossly exaggerating:

http://fashionista.com/2016/06/hillary-clinton-giorgio-armani

I personally would never buy a dress from Ivanka's cheap ass "Made in China" line, because they would neither flatter an older woman's figure, nor fit it properly. The line and the sizing are designed for younger women.

What a candidate wears and how much it costs, should be of no consideration whatsoever. Do you talk about whether the men are wearing off the rack or custom made, or how much they paid for it?

her stuff is made in china?

Yes.

Although her breast implants may have been made in her father's fantasies.

 

[NYcarbineer]

sarah pain's clothes were paid for from campaign donations that she misspent.

no one wants to see your t**s.

The campaign paying for Sarah's clothes is not nearly as egregious as hiLIARy's lifestyle (including wardrobe) being funded by laundered Clinton Foundation money stolen from Haitian Earthquake Refugees.

The difference being that the Republican Party spent $125,000 on Sarah Palin's wardrobe, while Hillary is supplying her own clothes.

The Clinton Foundation is NOT financing Hillary's campaign. That is a complete lie. Nor was money stolen from Haitian Refugees.

It's pretty pathetic when your criticisms of the candidate are all based on lies, because other than lying, you have nothing on her.

hiLIARy's clothes are paid for by taxpayers and the victims of tragedies who are used as fodder for the Clinton Foundation Grift Machine to hoover up "charitable" donations.

Prove it or die.

 

[boedicca]

sarah pain's clothes were paid for from campaign donations that she misspent.

no one wants to see your t**s.

The campaign paying for Sarah's clothes is not nearly as egregious as hiLIARy's lifestyle (including wardrobe) being funded by laundered Clinton Foundation money stolen from Haitian Earthquake Refugees.

The difference being that the Republican Party spent $125,000 on Sarah Palin's wardrobe, while Hillary is supplying her own clothes.

The Clinton Foundation is NOT financing Hillary's campaign. That is a complete lie. Nor was money stolen from Haitian Refugees.

It's pretty pathetic when your criticisms of the candidate are all based on lies, because other than lying, you have nothing on her.

hiLIARy's clothes are paid for by taxpayers and the victims of tragedies who are used as fodder for the Clinton Foundation Grift Machine to hoover up "charitable" donations.

Prove it or die.

Oh f*ck off. Nobody appointed you Executioner.

And you can read all about the Clinton's financial corruption in "Clinton Cash".