It’s Not Just Hillary: Scott Walker’s Email Controversy

dimocraps are lying scum. Period.

A Federal Judge has ordered the dimocrap scumbag persecutors to cease and desist.

This thread is a non-starter but Conservatives gotta jump in and be REactive instead of PROactive.

We have the NUMBER ONE dimocrap scum candidate for POTUS falling apart and we can't get a decent thread going on it?

This thread is a pile of fucking shit and deserves the same thing a pile of shit deserves -- To be flushed down the shitter
 
the dem/lib defense for breaking the law-----------------you did it too so that makes it OK.
It's all they've got... when you're facing incontrovertible fact... deflect... dodge... claim precedent... anything to avoid or delay admitting guilt.

It's not like we haven't seen a number of Pubs do that, too, over time, it's just that the Dems have that down to a science, and play that card so more frequently, that it seems like their own exclusive domain.

It's the Position of Weakness.

Makes sense, though, given the reduced and degraded state in which they now find themselves, after losing both House and Senate, and shifting into Lame Duck mode, where the Duck can't get anything done except by Imperial Decree, which merely accelerates the downward slide.

Not a good time to be a Dem, that's for sure.

It's their turn in the barrel.
 
So now we have four far right twerkers and gastric penguins insisting they, themselves, are not racialist.

Your past postings, guys, condemn you, so let your future postings here exonerate you.

The OP is not about color or race. Any reference, deliberate or sly, is racialist because you can't put it into the context of the OP.

Now try harder.
 
So now we have four far right twerkers and gastric penguins insisting they, themselves, are not racialist.

Your past postings, guys, condemn you, so let your future postings here exonerate you.

The OP is not about color or race. Any reference, deliberate or sly, is racialist because you can't put it into the context of the OP.

Now try harder.


Is any mention of the name "obama" now considered racist? WTF is wrong with you?
 
Redfish, mention Obama all you want. You don't need my permission. :)
 
The Wisconsin governor kept a secret email system too, and some of his aides were found guilty of other crimes too. And it’s not over yet.

It s Not Just Hillary Scott Walker s Email Controversy - The Daily Beast

You would think folks would learn.

^ Fakey, the fully exposed fake Republican, breathlessly carries Shrillary's water!

Fakey, you dimwit, let's get you clued in on something. The ones eagerly exposing what Shrillary did are your fellow far left wing liberal Democratics.
 
The Wisconsin governor kept a secret email system too, and some of his aides were found guilty of other crimes too. And it’s not over yet.

It s Not Just Hillary Scott Walker s Email Controversy - The Daily Beast

You would think folks would learn.

^ Fakey, the fully exposed fake Republican, breathlessly carries Shrillary's water!

Fakey, you dimwit, let's get you clued in on something. The ones eagerly exposing what Shrillary did are your fellow far left wing liberal Democratics.
You are hung over as usual, so not even thinking at your normal mediocre level.

I have been saying that if both broke the law, punish both of them.

And you are not a mainstream Republican, just a far right reactionary twerker and gastric penguin belching mouth farts.

And in the primaries next year below is a metaphor for what we are going to do the rest of the far right candidates.

 
My loyalty is to the country not to parties.

If either of them, or Obama, or whomever, had done wrong, investigate them.

If you have knowledge of criminal activity, notify the DOJ.
Obama's DOJ? HA HA
Jake, you're own words on this site make you an anti white racist, no matter your color!
 
My loyalty is to the country not to parties.

If either of them, or Obama, or whomever, had done wrong, investigate them.

If you have knowledge of criminal activity, notify the DOJ.
Obama's DOJ? HA HA
Jake, you're own words on this site make you an anti white racist, no matter your color!
I accept your admission of defeat, my little racialist.
 
So now we have four far right twerkers and gastric penguins insisting they, themselves, are not racialist.

Your past postings, guys, condemn you, so let your future postings here exonerate you.

The OP is not about color or race. Any reference, deliberate or sly, is racialist because you can't put it into the context of the OP.

Now try harder.
Nobody said the OP was about race.

But race did come into play during the course of one or more legitimate and naturally-flowing sidebars that sprang up during the course of this thread to date.

Let me make one thing perfectly clear to you.

You do not control the content nor pace of this thread nor any other.

You are not a moderator nor a system administrator.

If you have a problem with the content of sidebars that evolve in this thread - or that of any other thread on this board system - I suggest that you take it up with the folks that run the place.

You do not have that authority nor do you have the technical capability to censure your colleagues in such a fashion.

The issue of race surfaced naturally during the course of legitimate sidebar conversations undertaken with a considerable measure of goodwill during the early going.

Including some intelligent give-and-take... until you stuck your big nose into the mix, anyway, and dragged the conversation down to a 4th-grade recess-yard level.

Do not presume to dictate to either myself nor any other contributor, as to what constitutes a legitimate sidebar nor segue nor secondary exchange, based upon the OP or the natural and logical flow of dialogue and give-and-take which results from my participation or that of any other colleague, engaged in legitimate dialogue.

Got it?

Now... back off, bitch.

====================

We now return you to your regularly schedule programming...
 
So now we have four far right twerkers and gastric penguins insisting they, themselves, are not racialist.

Your past postings, guys, condemn you, so let your future postings here exonerate you.

The OP is not about color or race. Any reference, deliberate or sly, is racialist because you can't put it into the context of the OP.

Now try harder.
Nobody said the OP was about race.

But race did come into play during the course of one or more legitimate and naturally-flowing sidebars that sprang up during the course of this thread to date.

Let me make one thing perfectly clear to you.

You do not control the content nor pace of this thread nor any other.

You are not a moderator nor a system administrator.

If you have a problem with the content of sidebars that evolve in this thread - or that of any other thread on this board system - I suggest that you take it up with the folks that run the place.

You do not have that authority nor do you have the technical capability to censure your colleagues in such a fashion.

The issue of race surfaced naturally during the course of legitimate sidebar conversations undertaken with a considerable measure of goodwill during the early going.

Including some intelligent give-and-take... until you stuck your big nose into the mix, anyway, and dragged the conversation down to a 4th-grade recess-yard level.

Do not presume to dictate to either myself nor any other contributor, as to what constitutes a legitimate sidebar nor segue nor secondary exchange, based upon the OP or the natural and logical flow of dialogue and give-and-take which results from my participation or that of any other colleague, engaged in legitimate dialogue.

Got it?

Now... back off, bitch.

====================

We now return you to your regularly schedule programming...

Tell us how you really feel.... :)
 
So now we have four far right twerkers and gastric penguins insisting they, themselves, are not racialist.

Your past postings, guys, condemn you, so let your future postings here exonerate you.

The OP is not about color or race. Any reference, deliberate or sly, is racialist because you can't put it into the context of the OP.

Now try harder.
Nobody said the OP was about race.

But race did come into play during the course of one or more legitimate and naturally-flowing sidebars that sprang up during the course of this thread to date.

Let me make one thing perfectly clear to you.

You do not control the content nor pace of this thread nor any other.

You are not a moderator nor a system administrator.

If you have a problem with the content of sidebars that evolve in this thread - or that of any other thread on this board system - I suggest that you take it up with the folks that run the place.

You do not have that authority nor do you have the technical capability to censure your colleagues in such a fashion.

The issue of race surfaced naturally during the course of legitimate sidebar conversations undertaken with a considerable measure of goodwill during the early going.

Including some intelligent give-and-take... until you stuck your big nose into the mix, anyway, and dragged the conversation down to a 4th-grade recess-yard level.

Do not presume to dictate to either myself nor any other contributor, as to what constitutes a legitimate sidebar nor segue nor secondary exchange, based upon the OP or the natural and logical flow of dialogue and give-and-take which results from my participation or that of any other colleague, engaged in legitimate dialogue.

Got it?

Now... back off, bitch.

====================

We now return you to your regularly schedule programming...

Tell us how you really feel.... :)

:)

On racialist matters, I will always be in any racialist's face. Period.
 
So now we have four far right twerkers and gastric penguins insisting they, themselves, are not racialist.

Your past postings, guys, condemn you, so let your future postings here exonerate you.

The OP is not about color or race. Any reference, deliberate or sly, is racialist because you can't put it into the context of the OP.

Now try harder.
Nobody said the OP was about race.

But race did come into play during the course of one or more legitimate and naturally-flowing sidebars that sprang up during the course of this thread to date.

Let me make one thing perfectly clear to you.

You do not control the content nor pace of this thread nor any other.

You are not a moderator nor a system administrator.

If you have a problem with the content of sidebars that evolve in this thread - or that of any other thread on this board system - I suggest that you take it up with the folks that run the place.

You do not have that authority nor do you have the technical capability to censure your colleagues in such a fashion.

The issue of race surfaced naturally during the course of legitimate sidebar conversations undertaken with a considerable measure of goodwill during the early going.

Including some intelligent give-and-take... until you stuck your big nose into the mix, anyway, and dragged the conversation down to a 4th-grade recess-yard level.

Do not presume to dictate to either myself nor any other contributor, as to what constitutes a legitimate sidebar nor segue nor secondary exchange, based upon the OP or the natural and logical flow of dialogue and give-and-take which results from my participation or that of any other colleague, engaged in legitimate dialogue.

Got it?

Now... back off, bitch.

====================

We now return you to your regularly schedule programming...

Tell us how you really feel.... :)

:)

On racialist matters, I will always be in any racialist's face. Period.
You're an idiot, a partisan hack, and a one-trick pony.

Begone, pissant.
 
My loyalty is to the country not to parties.

If either of them, or Obama, or whomever, had done wrong, investigate them.

If you have knowledge of criminal activity, notify the DOJ.
Obama's DOJ? HA HA
Jake, you're own words on this site make you an anti white racist, no matter your color!
I accept your admission of defeat, my little racialist.

Pussy boy?

On your best day you could never "defeat" anyone.
 

Forum List

Back
Top