It’s Interesting How Obama Says Things That Are So Quickly Proven False

Are you just figuring this out now?

Obama has had a very willing set of conspirators in the MSM. They cover up his prevarications and promote the barackobama.com spin.


I take it that you don't know what 'shut down' means either.
 
There are a lot of either people who don't pay attention to what is said, or they are not too bright. Shut down, people. He said 'shut down'. Do you not know what that means????
 
Jarhead....one other thing:

Obama PROMISED transparency surrounding negotiations leading to the ObamaCare bill.

Not only was CSPAN calling him out on it, but NOW they are stonewalling Congress' demands to release the records of their closed door meetings!

Yes... I forgot about the transparency thing.


Obama tells GOP: Nice try on health care records - Washington Times
WASHINGTON (AP) — President Barack Obama once promised that negotiations over his health care overhaul would be carried out openly, in front of TV cameras and microphones. Tell that to the White House now.

Republican congressional investigators got the brush-off this past week after pressing for details of meetings between White House officials and interest groups, including drug companies and hospitals that provided critical backing for Obama’s health insurance expansion.

Complying with the records request from the House Energy and Commerce Committee “would constitute a vast and expensive undertaking” and could “implicate longstanding executive branch confidentiality interests,” White House lawyer Robert Bauer wrote the committee. Translation: Nice try.


The Moonbats don't seem to care when a Democrat lies to them.

Nor did Loonbats care when the Republicans lied to them.

They managed to push through an unfunded prescription drug bill that they claimed would cost only $400 billion over 10 years, but a month later with the ink barely dry, that figure was raised to $534 billion. Oops. Lie or just a miscalculation?

Closed door meetings? There are always closed door meetings in Washington. Seriously? Even though the matter went all the way to the USSC, we never did find out what went on behind closed doors when Dick Cheney conducted his *private* meetings with his "Energy Task Force," nor who was even on that committee from the private sector.

What about ignored Congressional subpoenaes regarding illegal torture? Emails mysteriously disappeared, documents produced so heavily redacted they read like a child's first spelling book.

Please stop the hypocrisy.
 
OBAMA: “Oil production last year rose to its highest level since 2003.” (Heather Zichal, “Expanding Safe and Responsible Energy Production,” The White House Blog, 3/8/11)

THE TRUTH:

* The Obama Administration’s actions have caused domestic energy production to decrease.
* In 2007, the U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) projected total 2010 U.S. oil production on federal lands to be 850 million barrels. Today’s actual production on federal lands is 714 million barrels, a 16 percent decline from what was projected. If it wasn’t for the Obama Administration, the U.S. would be producing more energy.
Come on! This crap has already been debunked earlier in this thread.

The ACTUAL production was up over the previous ACTUAL production. But that will never stop a CON$ervative from manufacturing a lie.

Again, how big of a major league :ahole-1: do you have to be to claim that ACTUAL production that exceeded the previous ACTUAL production means that ACTUAL production is "down," and anyone who accurately claims that ACTUAL production is UP is a liar!!!! :cuckoo:

Simple....

If you spend the money and the resources (or havr the resources available) to increase prodiction of X to (x+Y) ...and you get substantially less than (x + Y) although perhaps an increase over X.....then production is down per dollar/man hour spent (or available).

Your problem is you look at an increase as sa simple "volume"...but in a business/economic analysis, it is based on a ratio.

Sadly, such is how many on the left view things.

You need to think out of the box.

Except that Seeker's repeated tomes speak to a specific number of barrels of oil, not ratios. Nice spin, though.
 
No matter what important and disastrous Obamarrhoidal Policy you choose.....and, I'm not even going to list Obami Salaami's tour de force, his Nation-breaking Obamacare......which, in general, 70% of the Nation rejects.

Let's analyze just a few of those that are endangering our Country and our Economic System.....and YOU decide if each of these issues were submerged in a fog of OUTRAGEOUS LIES or being played out with "smoke & mirrors":

You can't give houses at greatly discounted prices to those who can't even afford those prices as Fannie & Freddie (Dem Party's cats' paws) did, and have our Economic System survive. And the dozen or so Youtube Videos on the F & F Congressional Hearings prove that.

Were there any Obamarrhoidal lies associated with this issue ?

You can't force banks to lend money to those who can't afford to pay the loans and have our Economic System survive.

Were there any Obamarrhoidal lies associated with this issue ?


You can't tax the small businesses out of business (and these provide ~75% of all the jobs in America) and then complain that these business can't provide jobs.

Were there any Obamarrhoidal lies associated with this issue ?


You can't have ridiculously exorbitant entitlement systems for big unions paid for by bribes to the CORRUPT Dem Party whose manipulations yank money out of the wallets of the other workers and result in bankrupting the States and the Fed Govt.

Were there any Obamarrhoidal lies associated with this issue ?


You can't have an effective Educational System if you have an overwhelming number of negro youth out of control in our classes and illegal immigration's children lowering the standard of our education to being a joke.

Were there any Obamarrhoidal lies associated with this issue ?


You can't "dumb down" the tests for the low-IQed negroes and mexicans so that an already ridiculous low "D" entrance threshold is being forced down the throats by nincompoop Eric Holder (Dept of Justice) to an "F" so as to allow semi-idiots have responsible jobs in Police and Fire-Fighting. This latest example of "social engineering" is just the tip of a corrupt Dem iceberg.

Were there any Obamarrhoidal lies associated with this issue ?


You can't stop the issuance of ALL permits for Off-shore and In-Shore Oil Drilling and force increasingly impossible type of regulations every time the given ones are met......THEN BLATANTLY LIE ABOUT INCREASED OIL PRODUCTION AND FACILITATION OF SUCH BY RIGGED STATS AND JUST OUTRAGEOUS LIES..........while the proof is in the pudding by our Oil Prices going thru the roof.....and likely to get a helluva lot worse with the Mid East about to explode !!!!!

Were there any Obamarrhoidal lies associated with this issue ?


And.....being hostage to the Oily Mid East Sheiks and our enemies like Hugo Chavez is taken even to a more bizarre level.

Were there any Obamarrhoidal lies associated with this issue ?


And, as to the trillions of dollars in debt ???

Were there any Obamarrhoidal lies associated with this issue ?


The semi-black MARXIST MONUMENTAL FRAUD Obami Salaami has increased the debt in TWO YEARS what Bush did in EIGHT ......forcing the Nation into a $14 Trillion Debt that even our children in generations to come might not be able to pay off......overwhelmingly this money going into the coffers of Obami Salaami's cronies and especially the Big Unions and Big Corporations like GE and GM committed to electing this POS.

Were there any Obamarrhoidal lies associated with this issue ?


And the Obamarrhoidal Idiots, are STILL yapping about those who oppose the present totally INSANE policies of the Most Disastrous President in America's History !!!
 
Last edited:
Ummm...I guess you failed to read the part about him being PROVEN false???

Which part was that? Has Obama "shut down" all oil production? Hardly. THAT was the lie, not his.


The part that this link lead to: The American Petroleum Institute responded to the president:

They're doing what they're PAID to do. From the API website:
API's mission is to influence public policy in support of a strong, viable U.S. oil and natural gas industry essential to meet the energy needs of consumers in an efficient, environmentally responsible manner.

And how much they spend and to which party:

Oil & Gas | OpenSecrets

Lobbying Spending Database Oil & Gas, 2010 | OpenSecrets
 
Drilling isn't my problem, and I don't think it's Obama's problem either.


If it isn't a problem for Obama, please explain why he refused to follow the Judge's decision and illegally refuse to lift the Permitorium on drilling?

The Obama Administration LEGALLY appealed that decision and it was ultimately overturned by the appeals court. They did nothing illegal, so at least cancel that erroneous thought.
 
The true believer lefty really doesn't care if Obama lies. Only if a righty lies. The only thing that matters to the lefty is the goal. How you get there is irrelevant. Rules are for your opponents.

Do try to pull up that faded memory from your brain when Republicans ruled, would ya, hypocrite?
 
gautama said:
The display of MONUMENTAL distortion and OUTRIGHT BLATANT LYING on the part of the Pathological Liar Obami Salami and his Obamarrhoidal Stooges has reached a point where it is useless to discuss anything that the semi-black Pathologically LYING MARXIST says or even does.....and then blatantly denies doing so by barfing out lies which his Obamarrhoidal stooges pick up en masse and flood the information systems with their flagrant lies, echoing their master puppeteer.

All this points to the absolute necessity to throw this Piece of Shit out of office come 2012.

Will you put yourself on YouTube when he wins reelection?
ExplodingHead.jpg
 
Drilling isn't my problem, and I don't think it's Obama's problem either.


If it isn't a problem for Obama, please explain why he refused to follow the Judge's decision and illegally refuse to lift the Permitorium on drilling?

The Obama Administration LEGALLY appealed that decision and it was ultimately overturned by the appeals court. They did nothing illegal, so at least cancel that erroneous thought.


2/2/11 10:12 PM EST

A federal judge in Louisiana held the Interior Department in contempt late Wednesday, citing the agency for “dismissive conduct” by blocking offshore oil drilling during last year’s Gulf of Mexico oil spill.

Judge Martin Feldman of the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Louisiana last summer blocked the Obama administration’s first attempt to place a moratorium on offshore drilling, only to have Interior come back with a second ban.

Read more: Judge holds Interior Department in contempt - Dan Berman - POLITICO.com


Judge holds Interior Department in contempt - Dan Berman - POLITICO.com

http://www.politico.com/static/PPM191_feldman.html

:eusa_eh:
 
15/3/11
Appeals court gives Interior reprieve on deepwater drilling permits - The Hill's E2-Wire

The U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit granted a stay of the order while the case is under appeal.

Judge Martin Feldman — a Louisiana district court judge — in February ordered Interior to make decisions on five pending Gulf of Mexico permit applications by mid-March, and later ordered a decision on two others by March 31.

But Interior appealed the orders in early March, and asked the court for a stay pending appeal, warning that complying with the order might force the department to “deny the applications outright” and divert resources from review of other permit requests.

Three appellate judges blocked Feldman's order pending appeal without comment Tuesday.
 
Simple....

If you spend the money and the resources (or havr the resources available) to increase prodiction of X to (x+Y) ...and you get substantially less than (x + Y) although perhaps an increase over X.....then production is down per dollar/man hour spent (or available).

Your problem is you look at an increase as sa simple "volume"...but in a business/economic analysis, it is based on a ratio.

Sadly, such is how many on the left view things.

You need to think out of the box.
All you have shown is just how WORTHLESS projections are.

You need to confine yourself to the truth.

You have just lost the debate.
One cannot make an educated decision without running projections that are based on factual historical data.
Projections are not only NOT worthless...but they are imperative for proper decision making.

In the case of oil..it is based on historical usage (demand); available resources; available capital to employ those reseources.

So...in essence...using YOUR insitance that production was up....sure....but we had the ability to employ many more people and have the production up even more.

Obama policies prevented this.....and as opposed to accepting the heat, he simply used rhetoric and said "look, oil production is up"...
Just to remind you what was claimed:

OBAMA: “Oil production last year rose to its highest level since 2003.” (Heather Zichal, “Expanding Safe and Responsible Energy Production,” The White House Blog, 3/8/11)

THE TRUTH:

* The Obama Administration’s actions have caused domestic energy production to decrease.

And it wasn't Obama's policies that kept production down, it was the policy of the oil monopoly to CAP new wells rather than employ more people and put the oil on the market.

One need only look at the Deepwater Horizon well. Oil was found, but it was capped, not put on the market. It was capped improperly and it exploded and the force with which the oil escaped gives you an idea of just how plentiful the find was. But again, men were not being employed to bring that oil to market before it exploded. This was due to the policies of the oil monopoly, not Obama. Please show where Obama forced BP to cap the Deepwater Horizon well before it exploded!
 
Last edited:
The problem with this president is that he stays in campaign mode, and like many a campaigner whose rhetoric gets the better of his reason, he talks faster than he thinks. He's not the first, and likely not the last, to do that: I just wish the man would admit it.

He even conducts his foreign affairs like he's in campaign mode!

For example he makes threatening statements saying Khadaffi must go and that we're watching what he's doing and we will hold him responsible, yet he does absolutely NOTHING and everyone knows his words have no teeth.

I'll bet Khadaffi really cares what he says?? :doubt:

And yet if he approved a US unilateral flyover, guess who would be the fist bunch of clowns screeching that he should pay more attention to OUR problems HERE? Yeah, you.

Here's a heads-up on that subject and whenever it arises for the remainder of Obama's term: The United States will never unilaterally go into another country and stoke the seeds of war. Got it? If you want more blood and sacrifice by our military, then you'll just have to wait until you elect a neocon.

Maggie,
That's wonderful; now tell me, if we go and "stoke the seeds of war" in concert with the U.N. or the EU, or the Arab League (that's certainly not "unilaterally") just how much difference do you suppose that will make to those who are actually DOING the bleeding and sacrificing? Excuse me, but it's been my experience that in the middle of a firefight, it does not make a hell of a lot of difference exactly what other countries did or did not support your nation's action in sending you there; there are somewhat more immediate priorities to be concerned with. Beyond that, there's no way to ask a dead man whether he felt better dying, knowing that a dozen or so other countries approved of his being there to get shot, but I have just a hunch the answer would be, "Not really."
 
gautama said:
The display of MONUMENTAL distortion and OUTRIGHT BLATANT LYING on the part of the Pathological Liar Obami Salami and his Obamarrhoidal Stooges has reached a point where it is useless to discuss anything that the semi-black Pathologically LYING MARXIST says or even does.....and then blatantly denies doing so by barfing out lies which his Obamarrhoidal stooges pick up en masse and flood the information systems with their flagrant lies, echoing their master puppeteer.

All this points to the absolute necessity to throw this Piece of Shit out of office come 2012.

Will you put yourself on YouTube when he wins reelection?
ExplodingHead.jpg

SaggieMaggie,

You can fantasize all you want, all it does is it will make the REALITY of that DISASTROUS MONUMENTAL FRAUD, the Stone Cold MARXIST Obami Salaami's EXPULSION from the White House more painful for Obamarrhoidal LibTURDS like yourself who dedicated every second of their pathetic existence defending that POS.
 
gautama said:
The display of MONUMENTAL distortion and OUTRIGHT BLATANT LYING on the part of the Pathological Liar Obami Salami and his Obamarrhoidal Stooges has reached a point where it is useless to discuss anything that the semi-black Pathologically LYING MARXIST says or even does.....and then blatantly denies doing so by barfing out lies which his Obamarrhoidal stooges pick up en masse and flood the information systems with their flagrant lies, echoing their master puppeteer.

All this points to the absolute necessity to throw this Piece of Shit out of office come 2012.

Will you put yourself on YouTube when he wins reelection?
ExplodingHead.jpg

SaggieMaggie,

You can fantasize all you want, all it does is it will make the REALITY of that DISASTROUS MONUMENTAL FRAUD, the Stone Cold MARXIST Obami Salaami's EXPULSION from the White House more painful for Obamarrhoidal LibTURDS like yourself who dedicated every second of their pathetic existence defending that POS.
Man, what a dick!
What forum full of Einsteins do you copy your phrases from?
 

Will you put yourself on YouTube when he wins reelection?
ExplodingHead.jpg

SaggieMaggie,

You can fantasize all you want, all it does is it will make the REALITY of that DISASTROUS MONUMENTAL FRAUD, the Stone Cold MARXIST Obami Salaami's EXPULSION from the White House more painful for Obamarrhoidal LibTURDS like yourself who dedicated every second of their pathetic existence defending that POS.
Man, what a dick!
What forum full of Einsteins do you copy your phrases from?

I(diot)D(umbass)B(atshit),

I proudly admit my Monumental Dick's hard-on for the DISASTROUS MONUMENTAL FRAUD, the Stone Cold MARXIST Obami Salaami and his Obamarrhoidal LibTURDS !!!

As to the phraseology, like my dick, it merely rises to the occasion.
 
If it isn't a problem for Obama, please explain why he refused to follow the Judge's decision and illegally refuse to lift the Permitorium on drilling?

The Obama Administration LEGALLY appealed that decision and it was ultimately overturned by the appeals court. They did nothing illegal, so at least cancel that erroneous thought.


2/2/11 10:12 PM EST

A federal judge in Louisiana held the Interior Department in contempt late Wednesday, citing the agency for “dismissive conduct” by blocking offshore oil drilling during last year’s Gulf of Mexico oil spill.

Judge Martin Feldman of the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Louisiana last summer blocked the Obama administration’s first attempt to place a moratorium on offshore drilling, only to have Interior come back with a second ban.

Read more: Judge holds Interior Department in contempt - Dan Berman - POLITICO.com


Judge holds Interior Department in contempt - Dan Berman - POLITICO.com

http://www.politico.com/static/PPM191_feldman.html

:eusa_eh:

And ~~

U.S. Wins Delay in Deadlines for Quick Drill Permit Action - Bloomberg
 
He even conducts his foreign affairs like he's in campaign mode!

For example he makes threatening statements saying Khadaffi must go and that we're watching what he's doing and we will hold him responsible, yet he does absolutely NOTHING and everyone knows his words have no teeth.

I'll bet Khadaffi really cares what he says?? :doubt:

And yet if he approved a US unilateral flyover, guess who would be the fist bunch of clowns screeching that he should pay more attention to OUR problems HERE? Yeah, you.

Here's a heads-up on that subject and whenever it arises for the remainder of Obama's term: The United States will never unilaterally go into another country and stoke the seeds of war. Got it? If you want more blood and sacrifice by our military, then you'll just have to wait until you elect a neocon.

Maggie,
That's wonderful; now tell me, if we go and "stoke the seeds of war" in concert with the U.N. or the EU, or the Arab League (that's certainly not "unilaterally") just how much difference do you suppose that will make to those who are actually DOING the bleeding and sacrificing? Excuse me, but it's been my experience that in the middle of a firefight, it does not make a hell of a lot of difference exactly what other countries did or did not support your nation's action in sending you there; there are somewhat more immediate priorities to be concerned with. Beyond that, there's no way to ask a dead man whether he felt better dying, knowing that a dozen or so other countries approved of his being there to get shot, but I have just a hunch the answer would be, "Not really."

So which country sustained the highest death toll in Iraq? How many NATO forces are actually fighting in Afghanistan compared to American military? Once we get into a conflict, everyone else looks to our guys to take the fall (literally). I can guarantee the first shot fired by an American will cause the entire region to explode in a ground war. I hope it never comes to that.
 
And it wasn't Obama's policies that kept production down, it was the policy of the oil monopoly to CAP new wells rather than employ more people and put the oil on the market.

One need only look at the Deepwater Horizon well. Oil was found, but it was capped, not put on the market. It was capped improperly and it exploded and the force with which the oil escaped gives you an idea of just how plentiful the find was. But again, men were not being employed to bring that oil to market before it exploded. This was due to the policies of the oil monopoly, not Obama. Please show where Obama forced BP to cap the Deepwater Horizon well before it exploded!

Usually an exploration well, like the one at the Macondo site, is not used for production. Those wells are drilled later after the oil field engineers finish with their projections about the oil field. The fact that BP has used these exploration wells later on for procduction might be one of the factors that led to the disaster.

RIGZONE - Total, Chevron Question Safety of BP Macondo Well Design

Most oil companies operating in the Gulf of Mexico have sought to distance themselves from BP and its practices.

The Total and Chevron executives didn't go as far as to say the well design caused the blowout that destroyed the Deepwater Horizon, killing 11 men and triggering an oil spill of almost five million barrels. It is impossible to say why the disaster happened when most investigations have yet to reach a conclusion, they said.

BP's internal investigation concluded that well design played no part in the accident.

Cohagan said BP designed the Macondo exploration well so that it could also be used to produce oil later, thus saving the cost of drilling another well on the same field--something Chevron doesn't do.

Because it doesn't use exploration wells for production later on, Chevron can use more steel liners and a greater number of larger physical barriers that improve the safety of the well
 

Forum List

Back
Top