It Isn't Okay to Attack a Judge, Unless It Is Judge Aileen Cannon, Then No Holds Barred

excalibur

Diamond Member
Mar 19, 2015
18,191
34,549
2,290
The same talking head nutters shake their heads when Trump, who is the under politically driven legal assault, says anything about a judge. They go bonkers, in fact.

The same talking heads have no compunction to regularly bash Judge Cannon.

Same as always from the left. Do as we say, we'll so as we please.




 
The same talking head nutters shake their heads when Trump, who is the under politically driven legal assault, says anything about a judge. They go bonkers, in fact.

The same talking heads have no compunction to regularly bash Judge Cannon.

Same as always from the left. Do as we say, we'll so as we please.





Schumer disagrees
 
Hey, Judge Cannon rejected Trump's motion to dismiss the case against him.



There ya go!

You can stop sending her death threats, driven by Jack Smith's hateful rhetoric, now.
 
Why do Conservatives suck at Comparables?

If a lawyer attacks the judges decisions, he deserves to be sanctioned
If a lawyer complains about the decisions a judge makes in court, she is far game
 
Why do Conservatives suck at Comparables?

If a lawyer attacks the judges decisions, he deserves to be sanctioned
If a lawyer complains about the decisions a judge makes in court, she is far game
and if the president of the senate threatens a justice, he gets a pass.
 
Hey, Judge Cannon rejected Trump's motion to dismiss the case against him.



There ya go!

You can stop sending her death threats, driven by Jack Smith's hateful rhetoric, now.

Yeah, now watch the orange douchebag turn on her and her family. The poor lady doesn't know what she is in for.
 
Yeah, now watch the orange douchebag turn on her and her family. The poor lady doesn't know what she is in for.
That may happen. But I wouldn't bet on it.

There is a large difference between a judge that makes absurd rulings against Trump, including rulings designed to slow down the Trump campaign, and a judge that has made, and likely will make, rulings that are favorable and unfavorable to both sides.
 
That may happen. But I wouldn't bet on it.

There is a large difference between a judge that makes absurd rulings against Trump, including rulings designed to slow down the Trump campaign, and a judge that has made, and likely will make, rulings that are favorable and unfavorable to both sides.
In other words - yes, Trump will make threats against judges and their families but only if he feels they may go against him?

Good to know.
 
In other words - yes, Trump will make threats against judges and their families but only if he feels they may go against him?

Good to know.
He hasn’t made any threats, of course. That’s nonsense. But obviously, he does say mean things about people that are mean to him.

A little childish, but not as childish as the people who spend their entire lives, stressing out about what the big orange monster says, and does.
 
He hasn’t made any threats, of course. That’s nonsense. But obviously, he does say mean things about people that are mean to him.

A little childish, but not as childish as the people who spend their entire lives, stressing out about what the big orange monster says, and does.
It is childish to condemn what someone does as President?
 
He hasn’t made any threats, of course. That’s nonsense. But obviously, he does say mean things about people that are mean to him.

A little childish, but not as childish as the people who spend their entire lives, stressing out about what the big orange monster says, and does.
Bringing up the issue of your orange douchebag tirades against Judges which could lead to attacks on them and their families by his rabid supporters is childish?

And you retards wonder why no one takes you seriously.
 
Bringing up the issue of your orange douchebag tirades against Judges which could lead to attacks on them and their families by his rabid supporters is childish?

And you retards wonder why no one takes you seriously.
For example, it is childish to accuse him of threats and then change it to “douchebag tirades” when you get called on that lie.

I’m pretty sure calling people “douchebag” and thinking it makes you sound like a big boy happens around 6th grade, shortly after learning to call boys “fag.”
 
Yes you did..

A little childish, but not as childish as the people who spend their entire lives, stressing out about what the big orange monster says, and does.
By that I meant that it is childish to spend their entire lives stressing out about what the big orange monster says and does, not to condemn what someone does as President.
 
It is essential to attack judges who you disagree with.
That is how a republic is supposed to work.

What you are NOT supposed to do is try to prevent fair and open elections with bogus prosecutions.

All the prosecutors of the 91 charges against Trumps should be attacked and arrested.

Clearly the law says presidents can give permanent copies of any classified docs they want, to whomever they want.

Clearly the law says loan applicants evaluations can not be used by banks, and pros have to be hired for that.

Clearly there is no way to create or use fake electors. Total impossibility.

Clearly being blackmailed for hush money makes Stormy the criminal, not Trump.
 

Forum List

Back
Top