Sixties Fan
Diamond Member
- Mar 6, 2017
- 61,916
- 11,628
- 2,140
A good Historical review on how modern Israel came to be, and the rights of the Jewish people to the land
Look, it is understandable that Jews, whether descendants of converts or not, believe they have a right to the land they colonized. But, you also have to understand that it is based on a document that is self-serving. Not everyone believes that the document is historically factual or that it has any religious validity. Think of billions of people that practice other religions, Hindus etc. More importantly, the inhabitants of Palestine, some of whose ancestors had lived in the area before the Hebrews even arrived, believe they have equal or more rights to live there than people that lived on other continents. Furthermore, as has been established and is historically provable, many if not most of the inhabitants that were living in the area are descendants of the Samaritans and Jews that adopted Christianity as their religion. Who do you think the first Christians were? From 400 AD until the Muslims conquest the area was almost exclusively Christian, these Christians did not just appear magically, they were the same people that had always lived there. Whether they were forcefully converted or not, they converted, but it did not change their ancestry. The Latin Kingdom of Jerusalem ruled over an overwhelming majority of Greek Orthodox Christians, native Christians, They, the rulers, were Roman Catholics. It is also provable that most of these Greek Orthodox Christians eventually converted to Islam. whether forcefully or not.
So, until the Zionist Jews accept that they came from somewhere else and evicted most of and implemented their rule over the remaining native inhabitants, there will never be peace. The primary fault lies with the British and their colonial empire ideology, which never took the rights of the native people into consideration. They assumed that the native people, being backward and non-Europeans as they considered them, could easily be put under European rule as per their past experience. Rhodesia, South Africa, India etc. were ruled through companies like the British East India Company, the British South Africa Company (Cecil Rhodes) etc. The Zionist Organization was considered an analog to these enterprises. Do I fault the Zionists for taking advantage of the opportunity? No, but the consequences are what they are today.
Ask yourselves this:
If most if not all are converts to Judaism, why in the world would they stand Pogroms and Pogroms, the Inquisition, more Pogroms and then the Holocaust?
Why in the world, knowing that they are all European converts to a very hated religion and people, would they not, en masse, convert to Christianity or Islam?
And why, if knowing that these are all converts to Judaism, why didn't the Inquisition
force all of them to convert to Christianity?
Why would the Muslims accept anyone who returned to the Land of Israel as Jews, if they should have known 1400 years ago, that most Jews were gone, and these could not possibly have been the indigenous Jews of the Land?
Why didn't Islam simply force this Fake Jews to convert to Islam?
Why have fake Jews anywhere on the lands Islam conquered?
Or in their dealings with the "European" Jews in Spain?
How about the Visigoth who conquered Spain for a period?
They did not force those "Jews" to convert to Christianity by force, as Mohammad did with the tribes of Arabia?
Neither did the Vatican.
Why allow "fake Jews", who would not have gone through a proper conversion into Judaism to exist?