sealadaigh
Rookie
- Banned
- #41
What a friend the Jews have in Phillip!!! If he wasn't so obsessed with the Jews, he would have read about a South Korean who basically committed the same thing as Pollard, but he only got a 7-year sentence, got released after 6 years, and the South Korean community in America was up in arms that he even got sent to jail. Meanwhile, I am willing to bet that Phillip hasn't even read all the different articles about Pollard, and how he was made an example. Meanwhile, Phillip probably has nothing to say about Addison Ames who actually was responsible for the death of American agents. No doubt Phillip is salivating over the fact that murderers will be released from jail so that they can start killing some more Israelis"...Netanyahu has proved adept at intervening in American politics; he is equally good at leveraging latent tensions over Israel-America relations. But exacting concessions from the mediator is not the point. You dont hold talks in Oslo to make peace with Norwegians. Netanyahu wants to replace Israeli-Palestinian negotiation with Israeli-American squabbling, because he wants to stall. Those of us who are serious about a two-state solution cannot let him."What a friend we have in Israel... Netanyahu demands Jonathan Pollard a convicted traitor to America for Israel be released for Palestinian prisoners...This is why AIPAC should register as a foreign agency and not a political action committee serving an American interest group...
Israel will be the death of this nation.
Jonathan Pollard Means Israeli-American Squabbling Instead of Israeli-Palestinian Negotiation - The Daily Beast
Usually, prisoner swaps involve, well, swaps. You release my prisoners, I release yours. But what to make of Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahus demand that, in return for freeing Palestinian prisoners, the United States release Jonathan Pollard, an American citizen who is serving a life sentence for passing information to Israel?
This strange triangulation exposes the farce of negotiations. The New York Times quoted Netanyahus reasons for negotiating as preventing the creation of a binational state between the Jordan River and the Mediterranean Sea, and preventing the establishment of an additional Iranian-sponsored terrorist state on Israels borders. One state, two states: whatever it is, hes against it. But since he needs to satisfy both Washington and his right-wing base, Netanyahu plays the Pollard card to signal that he isnt really dealing with Palestinians; hes haggling with America.
pollard won't appeal for parole. instead, he expects a presidential pardon.
israel refuses to give back the documents pollard delivered to them and that we (the USA) have requested.
i think also a very salient point is that the USA is supposed to be a disinterested or neutral third party in these peace talks but the israeli government is too obtuse to understand that this request/demand by netanyahu and israel jeopardises that position and puts the USA in the seat of a negotiating party.
this has nothing to do with south korea, aldrich ames, or whatever really and those cases are not similar to pollard's case anyway. there may be a better forum for that other than this one.