I had to laugh because there are two threads started by a liberal on this board. The first bashing Dick Chenney & his use of waterboarding on the mastermind of the 9/11 attacks. Most recently another thread started regarding charging P. Bush & Dick Chenney for war crimes for treatment of prisoners at CLUB GITMO the island paradise prison resort. So my question to all of you, since LIBERALS have repeatedly refused to answer this question: They have avoided answering this question at all corners. Here it is: If you had a loved one, someone you love more than life itself, that was captured by a terrorist group. One of them was caught. You know that your loved one only has hours left before he/she is killed. All the coffee, donuts & sweet talking this terrorist is not working. The terrorist will not disclose where your loved one is. Would you tell the interregators to use all means, including waterboarding, to encourage this terrorist to talk? Or according to the liberals on this board, would you be more afraid that by waterboarding this terrorist to save your loved ones life, you would only be creating another terrorist? Answer with: 1. You would approve of waterboarding this terrorist to save your loved ones life? 2. You would dis-approve of waterboarding this terrorist, or using any other means to get information from him, because of your fear that you would only be creating another terrorist? A special note to liberals on this board: If you get on this thread & refuse to answer with a simple # 1 or # 2, then I will presume that you are O.K. with waterboarding a terrorist to save your loved ones life, but are opposed to it when someone else uses it to save theirs.