g5000
Diamond Member
- Nov 26, 2011
- 127,128
- 70,852
- 2,605
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Nope. It's the symptom. That's why you liberal are killing our country. You keep thinking the symptom is the disease, and can't see you are FEEDING the disease.
Our Founders cured it. But you liberals brought it back from the grave.
Legalizing pot in Michigan does not affect people in every state.
ou can't state a lie and pretend it's true. Your little sophomoric non sequiturs are not working.
Now, come on. Tell us how legalizing pot in Michigan is discrimination. We're waaaaaaaaaitiiiiiiinnng!
Legalizing pot in Michigan does not affect people in every state.
Sure it does. If you travel to Michigan from another state, then it affects you because you can toke legally.
According to The Derp, driving a car 100 mph in Kansas somehow affects a driver in Washington, DC.
hard to disagree with that based on the 2016 candidateI always analogize them to fantasy sports leagues. They're people with a pretend party, that picks pretend candidates, who pretend to compete in elections.
A political party's principles and platforms need to work on BOTH a Federal and State/Local level. California is an example of raw political power being concentrated in a ONE party state. Power that HAS NO bounds on principles or platforms but exists MAINLY to perpetuate that Party's existence.
and, why does the Fed Gov have authority to prohibit pot?Well, it's under federal prohibition. So it sure as shit is a federal issue.
And it USED to be that Congress writes the laws. That's no more. Because Congress has abrogated that responsibility and now writes "fill in the blank" legislation. Leaving it to the "minions of morons" in the ever expanding bureaucracy to take their sweet ass time to make the DETAILS of the law. You see this in the INCOMPLETELY IMPLEMENTED Dodd-Frank financial bill or the ObamaCare Med Insurance bill.
To accuse me of propounding states rights for the purposes of discrimination is a goddam motherfucking syphilitic pissant little worm tactic.
The Libertarian Party view on immigration (whoa!)
3.4 Free Trade and Migration
We support the removal of governmental impediments to free trade. Political freedom and escape from tyranny demand that individuals not be unreasonably constrained by government in the crossing of political boundaries. Economic freedom demands the unrestricted movement of human as well as financial capital across national borders. However, we support control over the entry into our country of foreign nationals who pose a credible threat to security, health or property.
Whoa!!!However, we support control over the entry into our country of foreign nationals who pose a credible threat to security, health or property.
But the federal law has not been changed. Law.....not policy, law!Isn’t pot still illegal on a federal level? I guess Derp would be in favor of the Feds making mass arrests in Colorado and California of people using and selling pot!
No, I'm in favor of changing federal policy and why I vote for politicians who support doing so.
You don't know what a fallacy is.First of all, that's not a requirement...so interesting how you use a logical fallacy to argue that I'm making a logical fallacy. Was that your intent? Back to the drawing board!
Discrimination violates Civil Rights and the 14th Amendment. So try again without using a logical fallacy. Thanks.
That 18th century thinking is what has made this country number one, dumbass.
How does legalizing pot discriminate against blacks?STILL waiting!