Morals are effectively standards. Standards exist in and of themselves. In other words they exist independently of man and for specific reasons. While you may wish the standards were something else, outcomes tell us that not all behaviors lead to equal outcomes. That some behaviors lead to better outcomes and some behaviors lead to worse outcomes.Yes, as it is a human construct, if that's how you judge relativity. But we can agree on some objective facts and argue from them with valid logic, meaning the conclusions aren't really "subjective" or "relative". So your question is not so simple as you think.Ok, so your view is that morality is relative, correct?
Of course sociopaths and deviants have no real clue to what you just said means. They think they can just make it up according to their own mentally ill fantasies, like the people who think we should have some 340,000,000 separate bodies of laws for each individual n stuff and it will be workable..