A logical, simple truth with profound meaning

Discussion in 'Religion and Ethics' started by K9Buck, Feb 13, 2019.

  1. K9Buck
    Offline

    K9Buck Gold Member

    Joined:
    Dec 25, 2009
    Messages:
    7,342
    Thanks Received:
    1,182
    Trophy Points:
    280
    Ratings:
    +6,386
    There cannot be an infinite regression of causes; there must be a single, uncaused cause.
     
    • Agree Agree x 1
    • Funny Funny x 1
    • Winner Winner x 1
  2. Darkwind
    Offline

    Darkwind Gold Member

    Joined:
    Jun 18, 2009
    Messages:
    24,541
    Thanks Received:
    4,584
    Trophy Points:
    290
    Ratings:
    +14,214
    Ah..the first cause theory. Which states, just because.

    *nods sagely*
     
    • Funny Funny x 1
    • Funny and Agree!! Funny and Agree!! x 1
  3. gulfman
    Offline

    gulfman VIP Member

    Joined:
    Dec 25, 2017
    Messages:
    381
    Thanks Received:
    42
    Trophy Points:
    78
    Ratings:
    +581
    And,if you had done anything without any restictions on you not to do so.would you have still done so or not?
     
  4. K9Buck
    Offline

    K9Buck Gold Member

    Joined:
    Dec 25, 2009
    Messages:
    7,342
    Thanks Received:
    1,182
    Trophy Points:
    280
    Ratings:
    +6,386
    The prevailing theory is that the first event to occur in our universe was the "big bang". Who or what caused it?
     
  5. dblack
    Online

    dblack Platinum Member

    Joined:
    May 21, 2011
    Messages:
    30,738
    Thanks Received:
    2,772
    Trophy Points:
    1,130
    Ratings:
    +8,665
    Why? Why is an infinite regression any less plausible than an uncaused cause?
     
    • Agree Agree x 1
  6. Billy_Kinetta
    Offline

    Billy_Kinetta Paladin of the Lost Hour Gold Supporting Member Supporting Member

    Joined:
    Mar 4, 2013
    Messages:
    38,551
    Thanks Received:
    7,422
    Trophy Points:
    1,160
    Ratings:
    +47,822
    Indeed. When you work back to a beginning, there must be cause.

    What created the state of existence? It could not have come from nothing, because with nothing, nothing exists.
     
    • Agree Agree x 1
  7. K9Buck
    Offline

    K9Buck Gold Member

    Joined:
    Dec 25, 2009
    Messages:
    7,342
    Thanks Received:
    1,182
    Trophy Points:
    280
    Ratings:
    +6,386
    It's simple logic. If you cannot follow this simple logic, then you are unable to understand even rudimentary concepts.
     
    • Agree Agree x 1
  8. flacaltenn
    Offline

    flacaltenn Senior Mod Staff Member Senior USMB Moderator Gold Supporting Member

    Joined:
    Jun 9, 2011
    Messages:
    52,944
    Thanks Received:
    9,166
    Trophy Points:
    2,030
    Location:
    Hillbilly Hollywood, Tenn
    Ratings:
    +33,287
    There are some "initial conditions" that we dont yet have the tools to measure or observe or explain. And all that needs to be taken on faith.

    Just as the Big Bang itself needs to be actually taken on faith.. Because no scientist can rationalize all of the energy, matter in the universe existing at a single point in space. Not with a trillion stars, a billion celestial bodies and all the energy needed to create them and put them in their place in an infinite universe.
     
    • Thank You! Thank You! x 1
  9. K9Buck
    Offline

    K9Buck Gold Member

    Joined:
    Dec 25, 2009
    Messages:
    7,342
    Thanks Received:
    1,182
    Trophy Points:
    280
    Ratings:
    +6,386
    An objective person might likely believe that it's likely that there is an intelligent being outside of our universe that is that "uncaused cause". Atheists will argue that, unless one can prove that the aforementioned "intelligent being outside of our universe" exists, that it can then be assumed that no such being actually exists. They'll say "we don't know" but that doesn't mean it was "God". Atheists demand absolute PROOF. In many things in life, decisions are made on information that falls short of that doctrine. There is the concept of "the preponderance of the evidence", which atheists presumably accept in all other facets of life, but not when it comes to the possibility of "God". Atheists will then, often times, mock believers with the "sky fairy" rhetoric while simultaneously accepting any theory so long as it doesn't involve the possibility of an intelligent creator.
     
    Last edited: Feb 13, 2019
  10. K9Buck
    Offline

    K9Buck Gold Member

    Joined:
    Dec 25, 2009
    Messages:
    7,342
    Thanks Received:
    1,182
    Trophy Points:
    280
    Ratings:
    +6,386
    Faith is the key word. But logic tells us that there HAD to be an uncaused cause, aka "the first cause". Something, or someone, had to give that first domino (so to speak) that initial push to get it all started. Does anyone here deny this?

    [​IMG]
     
    • Agree Agree x 1

Share This Page