Czernobog
Gold Member
And what point would that be, sister?Thank you for proving my point, brother.LOL. You keep talking about belief, like this is a matter of belief. ?Facts do not require belief. Scientists don't get together every Sunday singing, "Yes, Gravity is real! I will have faith! I will be strong! I believe in my heart that what goes up, up, up, must come down!"So what part of my saying believe whatever you want did you not understand? It seems to me that you are trying very hard to make me try to convince you.If you think this is anger, you don't get out much. The "brother" thing does annoy me. It presumes a familiarity with me that you have not earned. So, kindly quit referring to me by a title you have no right to. We are not brothers, there is no "tree of life", there is genetics.No, technically we're not. Just because we share common DNA traits simply makes us the same species, not family. So, feel free to fuck off with that condescending "Brother" bullshit
Do you even know what condescending means? Webster 1828 defines condescending as:
1. Descending from rank or distinction in the intercourse of life; receding from rights or claims; yielding.
2. Yielding to inferiors; courteous; obliging.
That was how it was originally used in the English language. Anyway, I disagree we are all brothers and sister in the great tree of life. You seem upset.
No. that would be the expalnation of your religion. Facts are facts, and propaganda has nothing to do with it.
It seems that I am the only one being honest here and that I was correct that you believe that you are the only one who knows what the facts are.
If you claim to believe that the Bible is truthful, and accurate, yes, it is irrational.
Can you show me where I made that claim, brother? Is that really the comment you were responding to? Can you at least identify the post number so that I may see the words I wrote?
It is irrational to point out the inconsistencies in your Bible? That's funny. There is nothing irrational in quoting the Bible. What is irrational is believing that such a contradictory, irrational 2,000 year old book of myths is any more than it is - a 2,000 year old collection of myths, and legends.
I couldn't be more happier for you to believe that. I also couldn't find it more irrational that you want to discuss something you don't believe.
You're right, honest men can. Unfortunately, your religion doesn't promote the honest exchange of ideas, because any time someone dares to challenge your "faith" you lash out, call the challengers "militant", "jerks", and refuse to answer the challenge. Then you pat yourself on the back like you have made some point. As to making me "... look foolish using secular arguments," be sure to let me know when you think you have actually done that.
lol, just look at every single reply I have made to you. Just look at how angry you are. The proof is in the pudding, brother.
As to all of the rest. You keep talking about beliefs. I don't have to believe anything. Things either are, or they are not. If they are, they can be proven. If they are not, they cannot be. Belief has nothing to do with it. Belief is your failing, not mine. That is the problem with religion; it requires accepting things for which there is no evidence. There is another word for accepting things for which there is no evidence - it's called delusion.
If you want to believe I have no evidence or proof for believing the way I do, I'm fine with that. I hope you don't mind if I disagree. The only question left is are you going to prove me right about you wanting to argue about it.
If you don't want me to call you brother anymore, then I suggest you change your tone, brother.
If they did that, we would think they are pretty insecure about it. The only person here who seems to think that belief, and faith are important is you. Why is that, sister?