Sky Dancer
Rookie
- Jan 21, 2009
- 19,307
- 1,320
- 0
- Thread starter
- Banned
- #181
No "Comparison" exists.
The only reason you bring up the subject of pedophile priests is whatever agenda you may have to use the imaginary comparison as a critical arguement.
Apparently, the simple issue of female priests not being allowed in the Catholic Church is not sufficient to sustain a credible arguement, or you simply like the red herring that turns every discussion about the Catholic Church into a discussion about pedophillia.
One begins to wonder about the root cause of either agenda: My guess is that you want to be a Catholic Priest, but your gender prevents it.
Suggestion: Become Episcopalian.
Comparing the damage to the Church of women priests versus pedophile priests as on a par is absurd.
The damage pedophile priests do to Catholic families is far worse. IMO, the RCC would be strenghtened, not damaged by having women priests. I also think married priests would help.
I assure you:
You would look good in the hat.
I prefer Buddhist hats. We wear them at drubchens.