Is The Holocaust A Hoax?

3280105_370.jpg
Dodge !
 
Many of my distant Gypsy relatives met the same fate as those Jews.


And gays.

And anyone else who got in the way.

And Jehovah's Witnesses.

Just not sure how any of them got in the way. Hitler was a warped mind.
the same way they do today.

Yeah, coming to your door once or twice a year. Big deal.
OMG several months ago, two of the most gorgeous young ladies from JW rang the doorbell. No wait, they were Mormons. Skirts and neckties. I just couldn't say no to The Book of Mormon. Damn I'm too old to lust after such young beauty. :beer:

So, now I had The Book of Mormon. What to do with it... I took it with me to my office, but stopped by where I get my oil changed because they have a waiting room. So I placed it on a table in their waiting room and covered it up with magazines. :lol:
 
Many of my distant Gypsy relatives met the same fate as those Jews.


And gays.

And anyone else who got in the way.

And Jehovah's Witnesses.

Just not sure how any of them got in the way. Hitler was a warped mind.
the same way they do today.

Yeah, coming to your door once or twice a year. Big deal.
Not when a kingdom hall is a block away.
 
Many of my distant Gypsy relatives met the same fate as those Jews.


And gays.

And anyone else who got in the way.

And Jehovah's Witnesses.

Just not sure how any of them got in the way. Hitler was a warped mind.
the same way they do today.

Yeah, coming to your door once or twice a year. Big deal.
Not when a kingdom hall is a block away.

Whatever a Kingdom Hall is. You whine a lot.
 
And gays.

And anyone else who got in the way.

And Jehovah's Witnesses.

Just not sure how any of them got in the way. Hitler was a warped mind.
the same way they do today.

Yeah, coming to your door once or twice a year. Big deal.
Not when a kingdom hall is a block away.

Whatever a Kingdom Hall is. You whine a lot.
You should learn a little bit about what you are defending.
I whine? Coming from you that's damn funny.
 
Just for your information.. The US didn't destabilize the region on behalf of Israel. We did it in the name of stupidity and arrogance.

Whom do you mean with "we"?
USA is controlled by the Israel Lobby.
Prominent American professors have written a well footnoted book about that.

The Israel Lobby and U.S. Foreign Policy - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

And yes, the destabilization was planned to solve the security problems of Israel.
The plan is called "A clean break".

----
A Clean Break: A New Strategy for Securing the Realm (commonly known as the "Clean Break" report) is a policy document that was prepared in 1996 by a study group led by Richard Perle forBenjamin Netanyahu, the then Prime Minister of Israel.[1] The report explained a new approach to solving Israel's security problems in the Middle East....

A Clean Break: A New Strategy for Securing the Realm - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
----


It was US policy that locked up the Iraqi people with a madman, took the keys to their economy, and bombed them DAILY for 12 years whilst depriving them of food and medicine. It was on Pearle's advice that this fiction of democracy to the Middle East got built.. Perle may be coincidentally a JEW -- but his wet dreams were NOT shared by Israel..

Don't care what crazy stuff you want to read. The FACT is that Saddam threw MISSILES into Israel trying to get them to enter the Gulf War in 1991 and Israel sat by as did most of the Arab neighbors. And with all the vacuums of powers that WE have created, relations between Israel and MANY Arab neighbors have never been better.

In FACT -- both Saudi and Jordan are CURRENTLY talking to Israel about strategies to fix the problems that WE created.. You are just as bad as the HOLO deniers. Because the only thing ever lobbied us for is their OWN existence..

As in this total SNAFU with the Iran nuclear deal. Where was the powerful Israeli puppetmaster when this deal was going thru Congress? Shove it buster... Excuses and scapegoats are all you are looking for. The problem lies with our CONSISTENTLY shitty ME policy -- not with some fictional cabal that steers our constant stupidity.
 
And Jehovah's Witnesses.

Just not sure how any of them got in the way. Hitler was a warped mind.
the same way they do today.

Yeah, coming to your door once or twice a year. Big deal.
Not when a kingdom hall is a block away.

Whatever a Kingdom Hall is. You whine a lot.
You should learn a little bit about what you are defending.
I whine? Coming from you that's damn funny.

They come to your door, you tell them you aren't interested and they leave. GG, how freakin whiney are you that you can't respect their ex cerise of freedom.

If if this is all it took to send Hitler over the edge, then he is a whiney little bitch, much like you.

You nutters crack me up, claim to be about freedom and tolerance but you are intolerant about others exercising their freedom of religion.
 
the same way they do today.

Yeah, coming to your door once or twice a year. Big deal.
Not when a kingdom hall is a block away.

Whatever a Kingdom Hall is. You whine a lot.
You should learn a little bit about what you are defending.
I whine? Coming from you that's damn funny.

They come to your door, you tell them you aren't interested and they leave. GG, how freakin whiney are you that you can't respect their ex cerise of freedom.

If if this is all it took to send Hitler over the edge, then he is a whiney little bitch, much like you.

You nutters crack me up, claim to be about freedom and tolerance but you are intolerant about others exercising their freedom of religion.
really ? how does my right to privacy interfere with their freedom to practice their religion.
it does not.
if you had a functioning brain you know that.
not being bothered is not intolerant.
if I were truly intolerant why would I waste time reading and responding to your silly shit?
 
Yeah, coming to your door once or twice a year. Big deal.
Not when a kingdom hall is a block away.

Whatever a Kingdom Hall is. You whine a lot.
You should learn a little bit about what you are defending.
I whine? Coming from you that's damn funny.

They come to your door, you tell them you aren't interested and they leave. GG, how freakin whiney are you that you can't respect their ex cerise of freedom.

If if this is all it took to send Hitler over the edge, then he is a whiney little bitch, much like you.

You nutters crack me up, claim to be about freedom and tolerance but you are intolerant about others exercising their freedom of religion.
really ? how does my right to privacy interfere with their freedom to practice their religion.
it does not.
if you had a functioning brain you know that.
not being bothered is not intolerant.
if I were truly intolerant why would I waste time reading and responding to your silly shit?

Read the Supreme Court rulings over the decades and get back to me. Their freedom to practice their religion does not effect your privacy. You still have a right to not answer the door. Just like when salesmen call or come to your door. It is not infringing on your right to privacy. Of course you can show me the Supreme Court case that shows it is infringing on your privacy.

Your stupid claim, it would never hold up in court. I don't care if you respond to me or not, you are here for my entertainment, however you are boring and failing at that.
 
Not when a kingdom hall is a block away.

Whatever a Kingdom Hall is. You whine a lot.
You should learn a little bit about what you are defending.
I whine? Coming from you that's damn funny.

They come to your door, you tell them you aren't interested and they leave. GG, how freakin whiney are you that you can't respect their ex cerise of freedom.

If if this is all it took to send Hitler over the edge, then he is a whiney little bitch, much like you.

You nutters crack me up, claim to be about freedom and tolerance but you are intolerant about others exercising their freedom of religion.
really ? how does my right to privacy interfere with their freedom to practice their religion.
it does not.
if you had a functioning brain you know that.
not being bothered is not intolerant.
if I were truly intolerant why would I waste time reading and responding to your silly shit?

Read the Supreme Court rulings over the decades and get back to me. Their freedom to practice their religion does not effect your privacy. You still have a right to not answer the door. Just like when salesmen call or come to your door. It is not infringing on your right to privacy. Of course you can show me the Supreme Court case that shows it is infringing on your privacy.

Your stupid claim, it would never hold up in court. I don't care if you respond to me or not, you are here for my entertainment, however you are boring and failing at that.
You have a right to practice your religion within reasonable standards. You don’t have the right to crank up the volume, causing the noise to bleed out into the neighborhood. If your culture matters, then other cultures should also matter. It seems that this very issue has become a bone of contention in a formerly quiet area of Sunnyside, WA. The old Methodist Church, it appears, has been rented out to a group of religious folks. Based on reports that I have received, this new group obviously does not practice what they preach. I am sure that our Lord is sensitive to community standards.

Turning amplifiers up until the building literally shakes and rattles seems to be a bit much. Then excusing the imposition on others because you are of a different culture borders on lunacy. Your religion does not give you license to act in a ridiculous and stupid manner. In fact, such behavior only serves to alienate other families in your greater community. I am not sure where some people get their sense of entitlement but it only serves to magnify their ignorance and unwillingness to conform to unwritten community standards. Living together is all about people, all community members, make accommodations to coexist in a spirit of love and understanding. It should never be about imposing on others because your hearts are filled with a selfish notion of personal pride.

People that hide behind their religious beliefs in such a manner need to concentrate on the notions of the seven deadly sins. They need to reflect and begin to understand the notions of the greater good. This is not to say they should simply disregard their notions associated with religious practice. They need to work on an acceptable and reasonable compromise. Selfishness is not a trait that seems fitting of religious practice. Perhaps I am misinformed and just do not understand the basics of some religious practices. However, I am sure that is just not the case. I would suggest that a thorough reading of church doctrine and the ten commandments would quickly bring this disagreement to an amicable settlement. One man’s glory is another’s interruption. Act like you have some common sense, even if you don’t.


When Religious Practice Becomes a Public Nuisance!… Respect Is A Two-Way Street, Cultural Differences Don’t Excuse Ignorance!…
 
ARTICLE: Residential Religious Nuisance, Rluipa and Sic Utere Tuo Ut Alienum Non Laedas: "Like a Pig in the Parlor." 1
2004
5 Rutgers J. Law & Relig. 6

Author
By: Matthew T. Sutter *
Excerpt
I. INTRODUCTION

The commandments "are summed up in this word, 'Love your neighbor as yourself.' Love does no wrong to a neighbor; therefore, love is the fulfilling of the law." 2 Nearly as aspirational is the ancient 3 property law maxim 4 "sic utere tuo ut alienum non laedas," which commands each one to use his own property so as not to injure his neighbor. 5 Despite obvious similarities, at some point, formalistic and non-offensive goals of religion and law have split. As a result, religious laws, constitutions, judges, legislators and private litigants have entered into the fray. The Religious Land Use and Institutionalized Persons Act (RLUIPA) 6 is a recent legislative creation designed to protect religious exercise. This Comment attempts to locate the point where the legal commandment of sic utere tuo ut alienum non laedas retains vitality in spite of RLUIPA.

Congress enacted RLUIPA to provide federal protection for churches and other religious land uses that complained of disproportionate negative treatment before local zoning and planning boards. This Comment explains how the passage of RLUIPA, when viewed in conjunction with traditional common law preferences for religious uses, may unnecessarily favor religious land uses at the residential level. Part I details the purpose for the passage of the Land Use portion of RLUIPA. Part II traces the philosophical underpinning of the principle of sic utere tuo ut alienum non laedas in common law nuisance and, more modernly, in constitutionally sanctioned comprehensive ...

ARTICLE: Residential Religious Nuisance, Rluipa and Sic Utere Tuo Ut Alienum Non Laedas: "Like a Pig in the Parlor." 1
 
Whatever a Kingdom Hall is. You whine a lot.
You should learn a little bit about what you are defending.
I whine? Coming from you that's damn funny.

They come to your door, you tell them you aren't interested and they leave. GG, how freakin whiney are you that you can't respect their ex cerise of freedom.

If if this is all it took to send Hitler over the edge, then he is a whiney little bitch, much like you.

You nutters crack me up, claim to be about freedom and tolerance but you are intolerant about others exercising their freedom of religion.
really ? how does my right to privacy interfere with their freedom to practice their religion.
it does not.
if you had a functioning brain you know that.
not being bothered is not intolerant.
if I were truly intolerant why would I waste time reading and responding to your silly shit?

Read the Supreme Court rulings over the decades and get back to me. Their freedom to practice their religion does not effect your privacy. You still have a right to not answer the door. Just like when salesmen call or come to your door. It is not infringing on your right to privacy. Of course you can show me the Supreme Court case that shows it is infringing on your privacy.

Your stupid claim, it would never hold up in court. I don't care if you respond to me or not, you are here for my entertainment, however you are boring and failing at that.
You have a right to practice your religion within reasonable standards. You don’t have the right to crank up the volume, causing the noise to bleed out into the neighborhood. If your culture matters, then other cultures should also matter. It seems that this very issue has become a bone of contention in a formerly quiet area of Sunnyside, WA. The old Methodist Church, it appears, has been rented out to a group of religious folks. Based on reports that I have received, this new group obviously does not practice what they preach. I am sure that our Lord is sensitive to community standards.

Turning amplifiers up until the building literally shakes and rattles seems to be a bit much. Then excusing the imposition on others because you are of a different culture borders on lunacy. Your religion does not give you license to act in a ridiculous and stupid manner. In fact, such behavior only serves to alienate other families in your greater community. I am not sure where some people get their sense of entitlement but it only serves to magnify their ignorance and unwillingness to conform to unwritten community standards. Living together is all about people, all community members, make accommodations to coexist in a spirit of love and understanding. It should never be about imposing on others because your hearts are filled with a selfish notion of personal pride.

People that hide behind their religious beliefs in such a manner need to concentrate on the notions of the seven deadly sins. They need to reflect and begin to understand the notions of the greater good. This is not to say they should simply disregard their notions associated with religious practice. They need to work on an acceptable and reasonable compromise. Selfishness is not a trait that seems fitting of religious practice. Perhaps I am misinformed and just do not understand the basics of some religious practices. However, I am sure that is just not the case. I would suggest that a thorough reading of church doctrine and the ten commandments would quickly bring this disagreement to an amicable settlement. One man’s glory is another’s interruption. Act like you have some common sense, even if you don’t.


When Religious Practice Becomes a Public Nuisance!… Respect Is A Two-Way Street, Cultural Differences Don’t Excuse Ignorance!…

We lived in the country and the neighbors set up a tent for some kind of religious revival. And yes they were loud and inconsiderate. I don't think they follow the love your neighbor attitude.

I don't think knocking at a door is the equivalent to your story. Like I said knocking at my door, I will ignore if I wish not to talk to someone. I won't answer sales call on the phone. Small price for freedom.

Have you ever asked them not to call on you? I had neighbors years ago that asked them not to stop by and they didn't bother them. It's not a big deal to me. Just a suggestion.

Jehovah's Witnesses have a long history of favorable Supreme Court decisions. I was required to study it in a civics class a long time ago. Even Green River Laws don't apply to them as they are a religious entity.
 
We did not go stupid in the ME for Israel but some screwed up idea that we could stabilize ME oil sources.

No, because the controlled destabilization is good for Israel.

Irak and Libya were stable and prosperous countries in which religion played a subordinated role, and so was Syria.

Israel's ambassador to the United States, Michael Oren, says Israel has wanted to see Syrian President Bashar Assad removed from power since before the outbreak of war there - a shift from its publicly-stated position.
It sees his defeat by rebels who include Al Qaida-linked Islamists as preferable to his current alliance with Iran, Oren said.

read more: Ambassador Oren: Israel has wanted Assad ousted since Syria war began - Diplomacy and Defense
 
Where was the powerful Israeli puppetmaster when this deal was going thru Congress?

Not all Zionist are as crazy, as Netanyaho.
The fraction of less aggressive Zionists who prefer "Soft power" and Salami tactics had more influence in Washington.
 
Last edited:

Forum List

Back
Top