BlackAsCoal
Gold Member
- Oct 13, 2008
- 5,199
- 530
- 155
Do you actually believe that the government has the manpower, the will, and th efficiency required to pull off such a plan ?
Already staffed and ready my brother.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Do you actually believe that the government has the manpower, the will, and th efficiency required to pull off such a plan ?
A more likely scenario is that Mexico will invade the southwest, Russia will invade Alaska, and the Canadians will take over shipping in the St. Lawrence River. At that point The Northeast states will declare gay marriage as the law of the land and because of that The South will secede, taking along wit it Texas and Louisiana. The northeast states will declare war but we'll simply cut off the oil and natural gas pipelines to them. Maybe Japan will take over Hawaii and what's left of California and the west coast.
Already staffed and ready my brother.
The funding was set aside 2 decades ago
The Supreme Court ruled in 1868 in White v Texas that states do not have a right to secede. I don't agree with it, but that's a whole different topic.
The fact is, the Federal government has given itself the legal right to hold states within the union by whatever means necessary. Basically, secession would require a successful armed rebellion.
THEY may believe they can pull it off but I remain HIGHLY skeptical.
I think the Declaration of Independence gives all states the right to secede.
In fact, I think the south had that right and the north stepped all over them.
You're right, it will take a successful armed rebellion, and that's why our forefathers gave us the 2nd amendment.
Personally, I'd like to revisit that ruling, overturn it, and let Texas be the first to secede. Take Alaska with ya, but since Texas is truly like its own country, let them go first
If you think six-guns will get in the way .. think again brother.
In America, marching is the most violent form of outrage we can muster.
What do you think we are .. Cubans?
Very good glock as your usual self, a likely scenario... Fact of the matter average Americans are growing increasingly agitated with unconstitutional financial bailouts to corperate crooks and the knowledge that in no way would we ever be able to pay all that back, not necessarally improbable but impossible. The government knows for a fact that WE THE PEOPLE for the most part are not totally stupid ecspecailly the ones that didnt vote for the Kenyen foreign national "OBAMA". President elect OBAMA in my deepest beleif will be a one term president, he will not go down in history as a failure as Obama is walking into a already failed economy in which he helped create and for this reason will not be able to help. Obama beleives that because we are already in deep financial debt that a few more trillion in socialist programs wont hurt???
It'd be stupid to even consider saying that we are not losing our freedoms and rights by leaps and bounds when the very fact that we've just been strapped with over a trillion dollars in brand spanking new bailout debt, besides the already standing national debt, this's not freedom folks this's pure bondage. The sovereign states are also growing weary of activist judges posing Federal laws against the will of the majority..
Mark it down the USA is a massive freight train rushing down the tracks of chaos to head on collision with social and financial disaster...
Queer marriage and taxes on coal.The idea that the US would break up is so ludicrous as to not even rise to the level that someone should expend mental energy considering it.
It has less a chance of occurring than the new fantasy that someone thought up that Northern Virginia secede from Virginia and become the 51st state.
Both of these would require great energy from citizens who are not inspired to act. Could they be so inspired? I cannot imagine a scenario where they could be.
I'm not even thinking about militias---I wanna see them simply try to herd millions of cats. I guess the easiest way would be to only allow food bowls to be placed in detention centers.
Thinking back on this further, I think China would be more likely.Being taking over by Japan...hmmm...well I do have a lot of Japanese friends and it is the cleanest country I've ever seen. Of course, most of the Japanese that come here want to remain here, but well, I would love to live in Japan. They have one of the best public transportation systems in the world. The people are friendly. Heck, they leave their bicycles out at night and don't even have to lock them, so no petty crime. Not sure that would be all bad.
Queer marriage and taxes on coal.
Cats would just go kill something else to eat .. herding us would be far easier than herding cats.
so the "incentive" for us to comply would be threats of bodily harm ?
Thinking back on this further, I think China would be more likely.