KittenKoder
Senior Member
derangement, why do liberals always have to have "somebody" to hate?
Same reason cons do.
Tell us why you think that is?
Our country seems to feed on aggression lately ... not sure but that may be why.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
derangement, why do liberals always have to have "somebody" to hate?
Same reason cons do.
Tell us why you think that is?
If true, then why so much outrage about one line of one speech which makes him look bad?
Which line of what speech?
It was Obama saying something about the fact that listening to him won't help the country. It got so blown out of proportion by so many, even twisted into some strange rumor that Obama was saying that he shouldn't be allowed to talk on the radio ... it was just a bunch of screaming about it, and yet, it was only one line to make a point that falling lock step behind one persons ideas isn't going to work.
Which line of what speech?
It was Obama saying something about the fact that listening to him won't help the country. It got so blown out of proportion by so many, even twisted into some strange rumor that Obama was saying that he shouldn't be allowed to talk on the radio ... it was just a bunch of screaming about it, and yet, it was only one line to make a point that falling lock step behind one persons ideas isn't going to work.
LOL. I have no "outrage" nor have heard it. Other than speculation on it being the first step towards the reestablishment of the un"Fairness Doctrine"... It's speculation, not "outrage".
Which line of what speech?
It was Obama saying something about the fact that listening to him won't help the country. It got so blown out of proportion by so many, even twisted into some strange rumor that Obama was saying that he shouldn't be allowed to talk on the radio ... it was just a bunch of screaming about it, and yet, it was only one line to make a point that falling lock step behind one persons ideas isn't going to work.
LOL. I have no "outrage" nor have heard it. Other than speculation on it being the first step towards the reestablishment of the un"Fairness Doctrine"... It's speculation, not "outrage".
The attempt to diminish opposition to the re-election plans of Obama and Congressional Democrats, in his "stimulus" package that mysteriously interjects most cash on election years has largely been successful with the aid of the MSM. However, it won't last long. Already "facts" about the stimulus are coming out, it will be changed before there is a Senate vote and all speculation about "Rush" will only diminish the Ds who brought it out to begin with...
Same reason cons do.
Tell us why you think that is?
Our country seems to feed on aggression lately ... not sure but that may be why.
It was Obama saying something about the fact that listening to him won't help the country. It got so blown out of proportion by so many, even twisted into some strange rumor that Obama was saying that he shouldn't be allowed to talk on the radio ... it was just a bunch of screaming about it, and yet, it was only one line to make a point that falling lock step behind one persons ideas isn't going to work.
LOL. I have no "outrage" nor have heard it. Other than speculation on it being the first step towards the reestablishment of the un"Fairness Doctrine"... It's speculation, not "outrage".
The attempt to diminish opposition to the re-election plans of Obama and Congressional Democrats, in his "stimulus" package that mysteriously interjects most cash on election years has largely been successful with the aid of the MSM. However, it won't last long. Already "facts" about the stimulus are coming out, it will be changed before there is a Senate vote and all speculation about "Rush" will only diminish the Ds who brought it out to begin with...
Obama has become Rush's number 1 promoter.
Pretty much. It's like the teacher's union and the orange juice boycott. They never sold more orange juice.It was Obama saying something about the fact that listening to him won't help the country. It got so blown out of proportion by so many, even twisted into some strange rumor that Obama was saying that he shouldn't be allowed to talk on the radio ... it was just a bunch of screaming about it, and yet, it was only one line to make a point that falling lock step behind one persons ideas isn't going to work.
LOL. I have no "outrage" nor have heard it. Other than speculation on it being the first step towards the reestablishment of the un"Fairness Doctrine"... It's speculation, not "outrage".
The attempt to diminish opposition to the re-election plans of Obama and Congressional Democrats, in his "stimulus" package that mysteriously interjects most cash on election years has largely been successful with the aid of the MSM. However, it won't last long. Already "facts" about the stimulus are coming out, it will be changed before there is a Senate vote and all speculation about "Rush" will only diminish the Ds who brought it out to begin with...
Obama has become Rush's number 1 promoter.
LOL. I have no "outrage" nor have heard it. Other than speculation on it being the first step towards the reestablishment of the un"Fairness Doctrine"... It's speculation, not "outrage".
The attempt to diminish opposition to the re-election plans of Obama and Congressional Democrats, in his "stimulus" package that mysteriously interjects most cash on election years has largely been successful with the aid of the MSM. However, it won't last long. Already "facts" about the stimulus are coming out, it will be changed before there is a Senate vote and all speculation about "Rush" will only diminish the Ds who brought it out to begin with...
Obama has become Rush's number 1 promoter.
And with only one sentence ... strange how our media works.
Obama has become Rush's number 1 promoter.
And with only one sentence ... strange how our media works.
Well it is true some dems and even a few reps have been tinkering with the idea of bringing the fairness doctrine back to shut up political speech they do not like. Obama just validated their concerns. I'm starting to think Obama should have a teleprompter strapped to his forehead at all times.
And with only one sentence ... strange how our media works.
Well it is true some dems and even a few reps have been tinkering with the idea of bringing the fairness doctrine back to shut up political speech they do not like. Obama just validated their concerns. I'm starting to think Obama should have a teleprompter strapped to his forehead at all times.
At least he'd be able to read it ...
Rush is the same old joke !