bripat9643
Diamond Member
- Apr 1, 2011
- 170,170
- 47,332
- 2,180
- Thread starter
- #321
Married gay men and women are no more fuck buddies than married straight men and women. Why do you think marriage is just about sex?I don't think companies should have to pay insurance for a single man's 100 wives. That would bankrupt them. The point is that polygamy and same-sex marriage are separate questions of law, and the decision regarding one does not change the legality of the other.Many marriage benefits do not transfer over the marriages between more than two people. For example, insurance policies offered by employers often cover the spouse. But what if I have 100 spouses? The company now has to pay for 100 more insurance plans, likely bankrupting it. Allowing same-sex marriage has no such affect.Why just two? Because more than two is more psychologically disturbing to kids than two men or two women playing at "mom and dad" ?
If so, how?
If you feel that is a good enough reason, and you want to marry multiple people, feel free to file a lawsuit. Meanwhile, same-sex marriage will continue to be legalized, because it's legalization does not hinge on whether or not polygamy should be legal.
So if you're really concerned about marriage equality you'd be fighting to change those insurance policies etc. Yet you aren't.
Weird. One might almost think you were against consenting people of all walks getting married?
Why should a company have to pay for the insurance coverage for someone's fuck buddy? In the case of a wife, we're normally talking about the mother of the man's children. It's obvious why a corporation would agree to cover her. But why would would some homo's fuck buddy need coverage? Doesn't he already have his own coverage?
Sex without any possibility of creating children is just sex. Two gay guys shacking up are a couple of fuck buddies, and nothing more. The same goes for a straight couple who are shaking up.