Is McCarthy's poster relevant today?

[occupied]

You are talking nonsense. The communists admitted that the red net of agents really was, he did what he had to do: he protected America from foreign agents who wanted bloody terror, that is, he protected Americans from the red threat.

If Soviet agents were something to fear then explain why the right is now deeply entwined with authoritarian Russia? Perhaps we should have another witch hunt for Russian sympathizers?

 

[PoliticalChic]

I don't think we understand each other. I ask: what does McCarthy have to do with Hegel and his works?

Let's start here:

The Constitution was a distillation of the views of Madison, Jefferson and Franklin. Progressivism is from the views of Rousseau, Hegel and Marx.







Now, let's quote 'progressives,' also known as totalitarians.



a. The Germans have a history of embracing authoritarian rule. As the German philosopher Hegel said, “The state says … you must obey …. The state has rights against the individual; its members have obligations, among them that of obeying without protest” (Ralf Dahrendorf, Society and Democracy in Germany).



b. The attitude of the FDR government can be seen in these words of A.B. “Happy” Chandler, a former Kentucky governor: “[A]ll of us owe the government; we owe it for everything we have—and that is the basis of obligation—and the government can take everything we have if the government needs it. . . . The government can assert its right to have all the taxes it needs for any purpose, either now or at any time in the future.”

From a speech delivered on the Senate floor

May 14, 1943 Happy Chandler's dangerous statism - The Bluegrass Institute for Public Policy Solutions



c. Jim Cramer, one of the Left's apparatchiks, say what Democrats believe, encourage.....but blames it on the other side.



“government has a right to force you to obey and has always exercised it especially under GOP”



Anyone think to question what the GOP has forced any to obey about?



Masks?



Injections?



Taxation?







See what I mean about the Left/Progressives lying about everything?



The Democrats are the European Party, the party of Obey.

We’re the other side, the personal liberty, individualism, the right to make personal decisions.




McCarthy fought, gave his career, perhaps his life, to hold back this Leftist wave that has been victorious.

 

[rupol2000]

Fascists were socialists.

Like these:
Mao…greatest mass murderer in the history of mankind. Stalin was number two on the hit parade, and Hitler, number three.
And, coincidently, all had the word ‘socialist’ associated with them.
Just like the Democrats.

Democrats are the "light version" of the communists. When the Bolsheviks came to power in Russia, they first legalized free sex and destroyed traditional families. This stage is needed to facilitate enslavement, when the corrupted people lose their vigilance and ideology.

 

[PoliticalChic]

Democrats are the "light version" of the communists. When the Bolsheviks came to power in Russia, they first legalized free sex and destroyed traditional families. This stage is needed to facilitate enslavement, when the corrupted people lose their vigilance and ideology.

Only 'light' until they have enough control.

They have already a history of concentration camps for Americans.

 

[rupol2000]

Let's start here:

The Constitution was a distillation of the views of Madison, Jefferson and Franklin. Progressivism is from the views of Rousseau, Hegel and Marx.







Now, let's quote 'progressives,' also known as totalitarians.



a. The Germans have a history of embracing authoritarian rule. As the German philosopher Hegel said, “The state says … you must obey …. The state has rights against the individual; its members have obligations, among them that of obeying without protest” (Ralf Dahrendorf, Society and Democracy in Germany).



b. The attitude of the FDR government can be seen in these words of A.B. “Happy” Chandler, a former Kentucky governor: “[A]ll of us owe the government; we owe it for everything we have—and that is the basis of obligation—and the government can take everything we have if the government needs it. . . . The government can assert its right to have all the taxes it needs for any purpose, either now or at any time in the future.”

From a speech delivered on the Senate floor

May 14, 1943 Happy Chandler's dangerous statism - The Bluegrass Institute for Public Policy Solutions



c. Jim Cramer, one of the Left's apparatchiks, say what Democrats believe, encourage.....but blames it on the other side.



“government has a right to force you to obey and has always exercised it especially under GOP”



Anyone think to question what the GOP has forced any to obey about?



Masks?



Injections?



Taxation?







See what I mean about the Left/Progressives lying about everything?



The Democrats are the European Party, the party of Obey.

We’re the other side, the personal liberty, individualism, the right to make personal decisions.




McCarthy fought, gave his career, perhaps his life, to hold back this Leftist wave that has been victorious.

Yes, yes, that's right. I don't argue with this.
There was a different context.
Nevermind

 

[rupol2000]

If Soviet agents were something to fear then explain why the right is now deeply entwined with authoritarian Russia?

Because it's RINO

 

[whoisit]

Hegel....excellent focus.

More the father of the Democrat Party than Andrew Jackson was.


1. The 19th Century found the center of learning in Germany. There, the finest institutions of learning, the most progressive....in every sense....theories about education, about governing, about life, and here was where many, especially the aristocrats of every Western nation sent their scions to be educated.


2. Woodrow Wilson learned administration under the tutelage of Richard Ely at Johns Hopkins who had himself studied under European specialists such as Bluntschli at Heidelberg. And the intellectual tradition in which he studied was both Hegelian and historicist. In the ‘Study’, Wilson was quite candid about the novelty of his ideas, confessing that the science of administration ‘is a foreign science, speaking very little the language of English or American principle. . . . It has been developed by French and German professors.’
Woodrow Wilson: The Nation's Worst President III - Behind Blue Lines

3. W.E.B. DuBois was a Socialist and Radical Democrat, who could trace his root to Germany.
DuBois had studied at the University of Berlin, and this itself was the almost universal among early progressives, who envied Bismarck’s welfare state, and Hegel’s philosophy. Hegel introduced a system for understanding the history of philosophy and the world itself, often described as a "progression in which each successive movement emerges as a resolution to the contradictions inherent in the preceding movement"
Georg Wilhelm Friedrich Hegel - Wikipedia


4.The source of Progressive ideas was Germany, specifically the philosophy of Hegel, and this euro-thinking placed the ruler above the ruled: Germans have a history of accepting authoritarian rule.

" It was initially an academic phenomenon far removed from American politics. Particularly in the post–Civil War American university, professors — many of whom had obtained their graduate training in German universities, and whose thought reflected the “intoxicating effect of the undiluted Hegelian philosophy upon the American mind,” as progressive Charles Merriam once put it — articulated a critique of America that was as deep as it was wide. It began with a conscious rejection of the natural-rights principles of the American founding and the promotion of a new understanding of freedom, history, and the state in their stead. From this foundation, the progressives then criticized virtually every aspect of our traditional way of life, recommending reforms or “social reorganization” on a sweeping scale, the primary engine of which was to be a new, “positive” role for the state." The Refounding of America | National Review



If you have been tricked into voting Democrat…..didn’t ideas like censorship of free speech, choosing favorites based on their skin color, and all sorts of mandates,….give you a clue that these are un-American????

MCarthy was a great American who had to fight not only those who were taking over the nation but also the Media Complex, like one of his worst enemies Edward Murrow the " Good Night ,Good Luck " socialist radical who was loved by naive silly housewives.
Wilson sold out Americas financial system to their comrade's aka Federal Reserve at Jykel Island.

 

[occupied]

Because it's RINO

It's because the right will team up with anyone who might might help them. Never mind the strings attached. For example check the right's lukewarm reaction to Putin trying to remake the Soviet Union.

 

[whoisit]

What does McCarthy have to do with this?

He was one of the few Americans who was willing to stand up to them while the so called leaders bowed to the socialist Communist.

 

[rupol2000]

It's because the right will team up with anyone who might might help them. Never mind the strings attached. For example check the right's lukewarm reaction to Putin trying to remake the Soviet Union.

How can Putin help the right now? He leaned a little to the right when Bush was in power, after that he left the ruling party, and has no real levers of power in Russia, he is a nominal leader, and in general Russia is much more to the left of the United States even in this form, under the Democrats. How can they "help the right"? What is this nonsense?

 

[rupol2000]

remake the Soviet Union.

For the right, the enemy was not the Soviet Union but the KGB. Eisenhower had normal relations with the USSR when Khrushchev ruled there and the KGB was removed from power, during the Reagan era it was similar. These were de facto their proteges in the USSR.

 

[occupied]

He was one of the few Americans who was willing to stand up to them while the so called leaders bowed to the socialist Communist.

He was am unprincipled political opportunist who tried to build a political career out of turning Americans against each other. Ironically he also made it way more difficult for the proper authorities to detect Soviet espionage.

 

[whoisit]

Since most Americans don't know much about what is really going on for pastr 100 years or so I thought I'd put up a little info.

 

[occupied]

How can Putin help the right now? He leaned a little to the right when Bush was in power, after that he left the ruling party, and has no real levers of power in Russia, he is a nominal leader, and in general Russia is much more to the left of the United States even in this form, under the Democrats. How can they "help the right"? What is this nonsense?

He's already helped the right elect Trump. Now it's time for them to help him by hobbling the American response to his desired anexation of Ukraine.

 

[whoisit]

He was am unprincipled political opportunist who tried to build a political career out of turning Americans against each other. Ironically he also made it way more difficult for the proper authorities to detect Soviet espionage.

If you knew your history you would realize that it wasn't Americans McCarthy was fighting, it was those who had come to take over.

 

[rupol2000]

He's already helped the right elect Trump

If it's true it doesn't matter because Trump is a left RINO

 

[occupied]

If you knew your history you would realize that it wasn't Americans McCarthy was fighting, it was those who had come to take over.

McCarthy went after Americans, mostly intellectuals and actors, for having once associated with known communists. Meanwhile actual Soviet agents were having remarkable success simply buying intelligence from people who liked having money.

 

[rupol2000]

By the way, if the United States is going to really defend Ukraine, then a condition should be set: the prohibition of Bandera organizations. Bandera are a branch of Bolshevism. They worked to prevent the reunification of Ukraine with Poland, used bloody terror and killed Ukrainians and Poles. This is a red extremist organization associated with Bolshevism.

 

[rupol2000]

The main desire of the Bolsheviks is to prevent the restoration of Poland within its former borders, including Ukraine. Bandera is the executor of this order. Bloody killer of the Polish and Ukrainian people, terrorist and criminal.

 

[rupol2000]

Before you "defend" Ukraine, ask the Poles what they think about corrupt Ukrainian politics. If Moscow is now ultra-left, then Kiev is working for Moscow.