Is it ethical for the Democratic party to keep blacks on the plantation needing government handouts

FWIW I don't dispute that capitalism has been bailed out. I dispute that you are capable of being honest.
i am more honest than You; I resort to the fewest fallacies.
You resort to defining the rule through exception and being intentionally vague.

That’s exactly how socialism operates.
that was You, begging the question. that is exactly how "socialists" operate.
I’m not begging the question I’m telling you that is how socialists operate. They are liars.
Who isn't a liar would be easier to answer...
Probably.
 
That is Your special pleading. Any government programs used to prop up capitalism are socialism.
And mistakes. You want socialism.
We have socialism. Capitalism "died in 1929."
You keep repeating that like you think it means something. Is that what you think is in the constitution?
The Constitution doesn't outline the type of economic system the US will have..


No but this does




View attachment 226057
A flag made in China?
 
That is Your special pleading. Any government programs used to prop up capitalism are socialism.
And mistakes. You want socialism.
We have socialism. Capitalism "died in 1929."
You keep repeating that like you think it means something. Is that what you think is in the constitution?
The Constitution doesn't outline the type of economic system the US will have..
Socialism is a religion. But let’s get back on topic.
Any economic system can have a cult of personality, the US has one right now as president...
 
And mistakes. You want socialism.
We have socialism. Capitalism "died in 1929."
You keep repeating that like you think it means something. Is that what you think is in the constitution?
The Constitution doesn't outline the type of economic system the US will have..
Socialism is a religion. But let’s get back on topic.
Any economic system can have a cult of personality, the US has one right now as president...
That’s nice but do you think it is ethical to keep blacks on the plantation?
 
That's all we need... Democrats accusing Republicans for what Democrats did for 130 years.
You want to talk about handouts? Look at red states. The neediest places in the country. In Appalachia infant mortality rate is rising and life expectancy is falling. Republicans are killing their own base with their greed for the rich.
 
That's all we need... Democrats accusing Republicans for what Democrats did for 130 years.
You want to talk about handouts? Look at red states. The neediest places in the country. In Appalachia infant mortality rate is rising and life expectancy is falling. Republicans are killing their own base with their greed for the rich.
So you are saying it isn’t ethical to keep blacks on an economic plantation?
 
That's all we need... Democrats accusing Republicans for what Democrats did for 130 years.
You want to talk about handouts? Look at red states. The neediest places in the country. In Appalachia infant mortality rate is rising and life expectancy is falling. Republicans are killing their own base with their greed for the rich.
You should make a thread about that.
 
That is, bailing out capitalism.
We are talking about your misinformed understanding of the commerce clause. Care to dodge some more?
That is Your special pleading. Any government programs used to prop up capitalism are socialism.
And mistakes. You want socialism.
We have socialism. Capitalism "died in 1929."
You keep repeating that like you think it means something. Is that what you think is in the constitution?
it does. You would know that, if you understood economics. A commerce clause.
 
That's all we need... Democrats accusing Republicans for what Democrats did for 130 years.
You want to talk about handouts? Look at red states. The neediest places in the country. In Appalachia infant mortality rate is rising and life expectancy is falling. Republicans are killing their own base with their greed for the rich.
So you are saying it isn’t ethical to keep blacks on an economic plantation?
not when we could be solving simple poverty and let markets and market participants, do their own thing.
 
We are talking about your misinformed understanding of the commerce clause. Care to dodge some more?
That is Your special pleading. Any government programs used to prop up capitalism are socialism.
And mistakes. You want socialism.
We have socialism. Capitalism "died in 1929."
You keep repeating that like you think it means something. Is that what you think is in the constitution?
it does. You would know that, if you understood economics. A commerce clause.
I wouldn’t expect a socialist to see it differently.

Now would you like to discuss the OP?
 
That's all we need... Democrats accusing Republicans for what Democrats did for 130 years.
You want to talk about handouts? Look at red states. The neediest places in the country. In Appalachia infant mortality rate is rising and life expectancy is falling. Republicans are killing their own base with their greed for the rich.
So you are saying it isn’t ethical to keep blacks on an economic plantation?
not when we could be solving simple poverty and let markets and market participants, do their own thing.
That’s nice but do you think it is ethical to keep blacks on an economic plantation?
 
That is Your special pleading. Any government programs used to prop up capitalism are socialism.
And mistakes. You want socialism.
We have socialism. Capitalism "died in 1929."
You keep repeating that like you think it means something. Is that what you think is in the constitution?
it does. You would know that, if you understood economics. A commerce clause.
I wouldn’t expect a socialist to see it differently.

Now would you like to discuss the OP?
it is unethical for the right wing to deny and disparage equal protection of the law, to keep blacks on the plantation.
 
That's all we need... Democrats accusing Republicans for what Democrats did for 130 years.
You want to talk about handouts? Look at red states. The neediest places in the country. In Appalachia infant mortality rate is rising and life expectancy is falling. Republicans are killing their own base with their greed for the rich.
So you are saying it isn’t ethical to keep blacks on an economic plantation?
not when we could be solving simple poverty and let markets and market participants, do their own thing.
That’s nice but do you think it is ethical to keep blacks on an economic plantation?
No, it must be unethical if there is a more cost effective way to ensure better coverage.
 
And mistakes. You want socialism.
We have socialism. Capitalism "died in 1929."
You keep repeating that like you think it means something. Is that what you think is in the constitution?
it does. You would know that, if you understood economics. A commerce clause.
I wouldn’t expect a socialist to see it differently.

Now would you like to discuss the OP?
it is unethical for the right wing to deny and disparage equal protection of the law, to keep blacks on the plantation.
You should start a thread on that.

This isn’t that thread.
 
That's all we need... Democrats accusing Republicans for what Democrats did for 130 years.
You want to talk about handouts? Look at red states. The neediest places in the country. In Appalachia infant mortality rate is rising and life expectancy is falling. Republicans are killing their own base with their greed for the rich.
So you are saying it isn’t ethical to keep blacks on an economic plantation?
not when we could be solving simple poverty and let markets and market participants, do their own thing.
That’s nice but do you think it is ethical to keep blacks on an economic plantation?
No, it must be unethical if there is a more cost effective way to ensure better coverage.
Why the condition?

Why wouldn’t it just be unethical period?
 
You want to talk about handouts? Look at red states. The neediest places in the country. In Appalachia infant mortality rate is rising and life expectancy is falling. Republicans are killing their own base with their greed for the rich.
So you are saying it isn’t ethical to keep blacks on an economic plantation?
not when we could be solving simple poverty and let markets and market participants, do their own thing.
That’s nice but do you think it is ethical to keep blacks on an economic plantation?
No, it must be unethical if there is a more cost effective way to ensure better coverage.
Why the condition?

Why wouldn’t it just be unethical period?
Because god only makes ethical things?
 
We have socialism. Capitalism "died in 1929."
You keep repeating that like you think it means something. Is that what you think is in the constitution?
it does. You would know that, if you understood economics. A commerce clause.
I wouldn’t expect a socialist to see it differently.

Now would you like to discuss the OP?
it is unethical for the right wing to deny and disparage equal protection of the law, to keep blacks on the plantation.
You should start a thread on that.

This isn’t that thread.
not really about ethics?
 
You want to talk about handouts? Look at red states. The neediest places in the country. In Appalachia infant mortality rate is rising and life expectancy is falling. Republicans are killing their own base with their greed for the rich.
So you are saying it isn’t ethical to keep blacks on an economic plantation?
not when we could be solving simple poverty and let markets and market participants, do their own thing.
That’s nice but do you think it is ethical to keep blacks on an economic plantation?
No, it must be unethical if there is a more cost effective way to ensure better coverage.
Why the condition?

Why wouldn’t it just be unethical period?
There is a cost effective solution.

some solution is better than no solution.
 
You keep repeating that like you think it means something. Is that what you think is in the constitution?
it does. You would know that, if you understood economics. A commerce clause.
I wouldn’t expect a socialist to see it differently.

Now would you like to discuss the OP?
it is unethical for the right wing to deny and disparage equal protection of the law, to keep blacks on the plantation.
You should start a thread on that.

This isn’t that thread.
not really about ethics?
I agree that the decit behind socialism is unethical. I just don't agree that that is the topic of this OP.

I'd ask you to create a thread about how you believe that socialism is ethical but socialism doesn't operate that way. It's like a thief that steals under the cover of darkness, so I would not expect any socialist to create a thread extolling its virtue.
 
So you are saying it isn’t ethical to keep blacks on an economic plantation?
not when we could be solving simple poverty and let markets and market participants, do their own thing.
That’s nice but do you think it is ethical to keep blacks on an economic plantation?
No, it must be unethical if there is a more cost effective way to ensure better coverage.
Why the condition?

Why wouldn’t it just be unethical period?
There is a cost effective solution.

some solution is better than no solution.
That didn't explain why you made it conditional.

Yes, there is a cost effective solution, stop pretending like you are victims and pull yourself up by the bootstraps. That doesn't cost anything at all.
 

Forum List

Back
Top