Is it ethical for the Democratic party to keep blacks on the plantation needing government handouts

[sealybobo]

Is it ethical for the Democratic party to keep blacks on the plantation needing government handouts?

"...Democrats are still "keeping blacks in their place" -- telling them they need lowered standards, affirmative action, special programs, and freebies to succeed. Democrats constantly send blacks the message they are not as smart as whites..."

Articles: Blacks Still 'Played' and Controlled by Tired Old Democrat Paradigms

Is it ethical for the Democratic States to keep Red States on the plantation?

High-tax, traditionally Democratic states (blue), subsidize low-tax, traditionally Republican states (red) — in a big way.

these states send far more tax dollars to Washington than residents in low-tax states.

In fact, most high-tax states send more money to Washington than they get back in federal spending. Most low-tax states make a profit from the federal government’s system of taxing and spending.

THE FACTS:

Connecticut residents paid an average of $15,643 per person in federal taxes in 2015, according to a report by the Rockefeller Institute of Government. Massachusetts paid $13,582 per person, New Jersey paid $13,137 and New York paid $12,820.

California residents paid an average of $10,510.

At the other end, Mississippi residents paid an average of $5,740 per person, while West Virginia paid $6,349, Kentucky paid $6,626 and South Carolina paid $6,665.

Low-tax red states also fare better when you take into account federal spending.

Mississippi received $2.13 for every tax dollar the state sent to Washington in 2015, according to the Rockefeller study. West Virginia received $2.07, Kentucky got $1.90 and South Carolina got $1.71.

Meanwhile, New Jersey received 74 cents in federal spending for tax every dollar the state sent to Washington. New York received 81 cents, Connecticut received 82 cents and Massachusetts received 83 cents.

Hey Red states. Get off the Federal Government plantation! Stop sucking off the federal governments tit.

What a con game. The Republicans in Red states cry about the federal government and they cry about democrats but then they are taking more from the Federal Government than they pay in and we in the blue states run by Democrats pay more than we get back. Isn't that interesting?

AP FACT CHECK: Blue high-tax states fund red low-tax states

/----/ Libtards demand redistribution, Libtards get redistribution and Libtards complain about redistribution.
View attachment 220428

The question is why do republicans complain?

 

[rightwinger]

If Republican policies were so effective, there would be no need for a “plantation”

People across the nation would be thriving in jobs that pay so well that nobody would need Govt assistance

 

[Cellblock2429]

Is it ethical for the Democratic party to keep blacks on the plantation needing government handouts?

"...Democrats are still "keeping blacks in their place" -- telling them they need lowered standards, affirmative action, special programs, and freebies to succeed. Democrats constantly send blacks the message they are not as smart as whites..."

Articles: Blacks Still 'Played' and Controlled by Tired Old Democrat Paradigms

Is it ethical for the Democratic States to keep Red States on the plantation?

High-tax, traditionally Democratic states (blue), subsidize low-tax, traditionally Republican states (red) — in a big way.

these states send far more tax dollars to Washington than residents in low-tax states.

In fact, most high-tax states send more money to Washington than they get back in federal spending. Most low-tax states make a profit from the federal government’s system of taxing and spending.

THE FACTS:

Connecticut residents paid an average of $15,643 per person in federal taxes in 2015, according to a report by the Rockefeller Institute of Government. Massachusetts paid $13,582 per person, New Jersey paid $13,137 and New York paid $12,820.

California residents paid an average of $10,510.

At the other end, Mississippi residents paid an average of $5,740 per person, while West Virginia paid $6,349, Kentucky paid $6,626 and South Carolina paid $6,665.

Low-tax red states also fare better when you take into account federal spending.

Mississippi received $2.13 for every tax dollar the state sent to Washington in 2015, according to the Rockefeller study. West Virginia received $2.07, Kentucky got $1.90 and South Carolina got $1.71.

Meanwhile, New Jersey received 74 cents in federal spending for tax every dollar the state sent to Washington. New York received 81 cents, Connecticut received 82 cents and Massachusetts received 83 cents.

Hey Red states. Get off the Federal Government plantation! Stop sucking off the federal governments tit.

What a con game. The Republicans in Red states cry about the federal government and they cry about democrats but then they are taking more from the Federal Government than they pay in and we in the blue states run by Democrats pay more than we get back. Isn't that interesting?

AP FACT CHECK: Blue high-tax states fund red low-tax states

/----/ Libtards demand redistribution, Libtards get redistribution and Libtards complain about redistribution.
View attachment 220428

The question is why do republicans complain?

/——/ Because we have to deal with idiots like you

 

[Cellblock2429]

If Republican policies were so effective, there would be no need for a “plantation”

People across the nation would be thriving in jobs that pay so well that nobody would need Govt assistance

/—-/ Dems were in charge when the plantations were opened. Republic reformed welfare and it worked until Obozo undid it.

 

[Taz]

Why do you hate Blacks so much?

I want to set them free. I want your people to apologize to them.

lol, who are “my people”?

Tell you what, I'll explain that after you apologize to the blacks for the racist history of Democrats. Fair enough?

I’m a Libertarian, not a Dem.

I see Libertarians as less than Democrats. A bunch of amoral socialists in waiting.

I just liked some of the things Johnston was proposing, like bringing all our military from around the world back home, as an example. But more people should back a third party, the 2 we have are totally bonkers.

 

[rightwinger]

If Republican policies were so effective, there would be no need for a “plantation”

People across the nation would be thriving in jobs that pay so well that nobody would need Govt assistance

/—-/ Dems were in charge when the plantations were opened. Republic reformed welfare and it worked until Obozo undid it.

It worked until George W Bush wrecked the economy

 

[ding]

I want to set them free. I want your people to apologize to them.

lol, who are “my people”?

Tell you what, I'll explain that after you apologize to the blacks for the racist history of Democrats. Fair enough?

I’m a Libertarian, not a Dem.

I see Libertarians as less than Democrats. A bunch of amoral socialists in waiting.

I just liked some of the things Johnston was proposing, like bringing all our military from around the world back home, as an example. But more people should back a third party, the 2 we have are totally bonkers.

I’m sure their stance on amorality is pleasing to you.

 

[Cellblock2429]

If Republican policies were so effective, there would be no need for a “plantation”

People across the nation would be thriving in jobs that pay so well that nobody would need Govt assistance

/—-/ Dems were in charge when the plantations were opened. Republic reformed welfare and it worked until Obozo undid it.

It worked until George W Bush wrecked the economy

/——/ Bush didn’t wreck the economy. How stupid.

 

[Taz]

lol, who are “my people”?

Tell you what, I'll explain that after you apologize to the blacks for the racist history of Democrats. Fair enough?

I’m a Libertarian, not a Dem.

I see Libertarians as less than Democrats. A bunch of amoral socialists in waiting.

I just liked some of the things Johnston was proposing, like bringing all our military from around the world back home, as an example. But more people should back a third party, the 2 we have are totally bonkers.

I’m sure their stance on amorality is pleasing to you.

So you're saying that the GOP isn't amoral?

 

[ding]

Tell you what, I'll explain that after you apologize to the blacks for the racist history of Democrats. Fair enough?

I’m a Libertarian, not a Dem.

I see Libertarians as less than Democrats. A bunch of amoral socialists in waiting.

I just liked some of the things Johnston was proposing, like bringing all our military from around the world back home, as an example. But more people should back a third party, the 2 we have are totally bonkers.

I’m sure their stance on amorality is pleasing to you.

So you're saying that the GOP isn't amoral?

I’m saying that you don’t understand this discussion. It is above your level of intelligence.

 

[Flash]

One thing about being a Black Democrat Welfare Plantation Slave. It is optional, not mandatory.

 

[Taz]

I’m a Libertarian, not a Dem.

I see Libertarians as less than Democrats. A bunch of amoral socialists in waiting.

I just liked some of the things Johnston was proposing, like bringing all our military from around the world back home, as an example. But more people should back a third party, the 2 we have are totally bonkers.

I’m sure their stance on amorality is pleasing to you.

So you're saying that the GOP isn't amoral?

I’m saying that you don’t understand this discussion. It is above your level of intelligence.

When you need to resort to insults as your only comeback, I know I just won the argument. Thanks for playing.

 

[ding]

I see Libertarians as less than Democrats. A bunch of amoral socialists in waiting.

I just liked some of the things Johnston was proposing, like bringing all our military from around the world back home, as an example. But more people should back a third party, the 2 we have are totally bonkers.

I’m sure their stance on amorality is pleasing to you.

So you're saying that the GOP isn't amoral?

I’m saying that you don’t understand this discussion. It is above your level of intelligence.

When you need to resort to insults as your only comeback, I know I just won the argument. Thanks for playing.

If you actually understood my point your argument would carry more weight.

 

[Taz]

I just liked some of the things Johnston was proposing, like bringing all our military from around the world back home, as an example. But more people should back a third party, the 2 we have are totally bonkers.

I’m sure their stance on amorality is pleasing to you.

So you're saying that the GOP isn't amoral?

I’m saying that you don’t understand this discussion. It is above your level of intelligence.

When you need to resort to insults as your only comeback, I know I just won the argument. Thanks for playing.

If you actually understood my point your argument would carry more weight.

Another insult. You can stop now, I've won the argument already. ;biggrin:

 

[ding]

I’m sure their stance on amorality is pleasing to you.

So you're saying that the GOP isn't amoral?

I’m saying that you don’t understand this discussion. It is above your level of intelligence.

When you need to resort to insults as your only comeback, I know I just won the argument. Thanks for playing.

If you actually understood my point your argument would carry more weight.

Another insult. You can stop now, I've won the argument already. ;biggrin:

If you understood why amorality was worse than immorality then you might have a case but you don’t.

 

[Taz]

So you're saying that the GOP isn't amoral?

I’m saying that you don’t understand this discussion. It is above your level of intelligence.

When you need to resort to insults as your only comeback, I know I just won the argument. Thanks for playing.

If you actually understood my point your argument would carry more weight.

Another insult. You can stop now, I've won the argument already. ;biggrin:

If you understood why amorality was worse than immorality then you might have a case but you don’t.

The GOP is both.

 

[ding]

I’m saying that you don’t understand this discussion. It is above your level of intelligence.

When you need to resort to insults as your only comeback, I know I just won the argument. Thanks for playing.

If you actually understood my point your argument would carry more weight.

Another insult. You can stop now, I've won the argument already. ;biggrin:

If you understood why amorality was worse than immorality then you might have a case but you don’t.

The GOP is both.

So you so you admit you don’t know why amorality is worse than immorality.

I already knew that you didn’t know. How could you.

 

[rightwinger]

If Republican policies were so effective, there would be no need for a “plantation”

People across the nation would be thriving in jobs that pay so well that nobody would need Govt assistance

/—-/ Dems were in charge when the plantations were opened. Republic reformed welfare and it worked until Obozo undid it.

It worked until George W Bush wrecked the economy

/——/ Bush didn’t wreck the economy. How stupid.

It was stupid of him
He sat there like a deer in the headlights while the economy collapsed around him

 

[Cellblock2429]

If Republican policies were so effective, there would be no need for a “plantation”

People across the nation would be thriving in jobs that pay so well that nobody would need Govt assistance

/—-/ Dems were in charge when the plantations were opened. Republic reformed welfare and it worked until Obozo undid it.

It worked until George W Bush wrecked the economy

/——/ Bush didn’t wreck the economy. How stupid.

It was stupid of him
He sat there like a deer in the headlights while the economy collapsed around him

/—-/Is that the talking point direct from LiberalPropagandaville?

 

[Cellblock2429]

If Republican policies were so effective, there would be no need for a “plantation”

People across the nation would be thriving in jobs that pay so well that nobody would need Govt assistance

/—-/ Dems were in charge when the plantations were opened. Republic reformed welfare and it worked until Obozo undid it.

It worked until George W Bush wrecked the economy

/——/ Bush didn’t wreck the economy. How stupid.

It was stupid of him
He sat there like a deer in the headlights while the economy collapsed around him

/——/ if you blame GWB for wrecking the economy will you give Trump credit for improving it?