Is Ben Carson running for president - or is he a perfect con artist?

I find it rather disturbing that Carson thinks that the pyramids were built by Joseph (of the coat of many colors), so that Egypt would have a place to store their grain for the 7 years of famine that Joseph predicted.

Not only does he not understand foreign policy, he really doesn't even get his own religion.
 
Being a GOP candidate for president...

...hey, it isn't brain surgery...

...it's what results when brain surgery goes horribly horribly wrong.
 
I find it rather disturbing that Carson thinks that the pyramids were built by Joseph (of the coat of many colors), so that Egypt would have a place to store their grain for the 7 years of famine that Joseph predicted.

Not only does he not understand foreign policy, he really doesn't even get his own religion.

My question to Carson would be,

explain to us in detail why you think your religion is any more credible than the religion of the ancient Egyptians.
 
There probably was food stored in the pyramids with the corpses!(Hey, what would pharoah eat in the afterlife? Other things were found in these pyramids ranging from games, weapons and even a boat!!)

It is also possible that the pyramids doubled as a granary while it was being built.

However I doubt Joseph built the pyramids nor the pyramids was built for the exclusive purpose of storing food. Yes, it was designed to preserve the King of Egypt for as long as possible.
 
"Is Ben Carson running for president - or is he a perfect con artist?"

Ummm....that would be OBAMA!

Yeah, because Obama made the country better than how George W. Bush left it.

Actually, Bush's economic record beats Obama's soundly.
In what planet? Bubbaland Faux News? Considering that Obama had to start from the "toilet" where Bush put the country before he left, Obama's economic record brought us out of Bush's impending depression.

... the president took office during the worst economic downturn since the Great Depression and has managed to turn things around and get growth back on track.
Obama's economy - How it stacks up to other presidents

U-6 unemployment was much lower under Bush. Median family income was better under Bush. Small-business creation was better under Bush. Bush added less debt in 8 years than Obama has added in less than 7 years. Etc., etc., etc.
Except when things started going south for Bush....and by the time he left, the country was in utter chaos. Considering that Bush followed Clinton...with the best economy record, Bush should have done better.

The bursting of the Internet stock bubble in 2000 led to a mild recession early in President George W. Bush's first term. The recession was soon over but job losses continued for more than a year, resulting in what was widely known as a jobless recovery for much of Bush's time in office.

When jobs finally did come, many were due to a housing bubble that eventually brought on the Great Recession.

There has been far more hiring under Obama than under Bush.
Obama's economy - How it stacks up to other presidents


As for the debt......considering that Bush didn't budget the Iraq war and the debt was still there when Obama took office, conservatives think they can fool everyone into thinking it was Obama's spending. Talk about deception/denial. Thanks, Republicans.



The most striking fact about the cost of the war in Iraq has been the extent to which it has been kept "off the books" of the government's ledgers and hidden from the American people. This was done by design. A fundamental assumption of the Bush administration's approach to the war was that it was only politically sustainable if it was portrayed as near-costless to the American public and to key constituencies in Washington.

More fundamentally, the Bush administration masked the cost of the war with deficit spending to ensure that the American people would not face up to its costs while President Bush was in office.


One consequence of the way that the true costs of the Iraq war was hidden from the American people was an explosion of fraud, waste and abuse. The recent final report of the Special Inspector General for Iraq Reconstruction (Sigir) estimatesthat the US lost to corruption or waste at least $8bn of the $60bn devoted to reconstructing Iraq.



How the US public was defrauded by the hidden cost of the Iraq war | Michael Boyle

 
There probably was food stored in the pyramids with the corpses!(Hey, what would pharoah eat in the afterlife? Other things were found in these pyramids ranging from games, weapons and even a boat!!)

It is also possible that the pyramids doubled as a granary while it was being built.

However I doubt Joseph built the pyramids nor the pyramids was built for the exclusive purpose of storing food. Yes, it was designed to preserve the King of Egypt for as long as possible.

Then again after Napoleon slaughtered all the priests who really know what the hieroglyphics really meant, so now who can really say what the Pyramids were for..
 
"Is Ben Carson running for president - or is he a perfect con artist?"

Ummm....that would be OBAMA!

Yeah, because Obama made the country better than how George W. Bush left it.

Con Artist:

It will pay for itself (BS!)
It won't cost a dime (BS!)
It will LOWER the cost of health care (BS!)
It will NOT cost people their job or insurance (BS!)
If you like your insurance and your doctor you can KEEP your insurance and doctor (BS - Lie of the Year!)

FACT: Obama is the POSTER CHILD for 'Political CON ARTIST'!


No, actually Bush/Cheney are.....Republican/conservatives are still lying and covering up for him.

How the US public was defrauded by the hidden cost of the Iraq war | Michael Boyle
 
I feel sorry for black kids who thought they had an academic hero to look up to. Rain Man has betrayed and shamed them.
 
On February 7, 2013, Ben Carson appeared at a National Prayer Breakfast, where he visibly annoyed President Obama by delivering a right-wing speech denouncing Obamacare and cultural liberalism, and calling for a flat tax based on the biblical tithe. Conservatives, still devastated by Obama’s reelection, took delight in the appearance on the scene of a surprising new presidential antagonist, who until that point had no political profile. “Finally, a self-reliant conservative decided to make this every bit as political as Obama does,” tweeted conservative pundit David Limbaugh.The Wall Street Journal celebrated Carson’s remarks in a short editorial, headlined “Ben Carson for President.” The headline was obviously hyperbolic; nothing in the text that followed proposed that Carson run for public office.

But now Carson actually is running for president. Or is he? It is hard to tell. Conservative politics are so closely intermingled with a lucrative entertainment complex that it is frequently impossible to distinguish between a political project (that is, something designed to result in policy change) and a money-making venture. Declaring yourself a presidential candidate gives you access to millions of dollars' worth of free media attention that can build a valuable brand. So the mere fact that Carson calls himself a presidential candidate does not prove he is actually running for president rather than taking advantage of the opportunity to build his brand. Indeed, it is possible to be actually leading the polls without seriously trying to win the presidency.

And the notion that Carson could be president is preposterous. The problem is not only that he has never run for elected office. He has never managed a large organization; he has not worked in and around public policy, and he lacks a competent grasp of issues. His stance on health care, the closest thing to an issue with which his professional experience has brought him into contact, is gibberish. He mostly thrills audiences by scoffing at evolution and insisting Muslims be barred from the presidency, stances he cannot even defend coherently.

It is possible that Carson has come to genuinely believe that he is qualified to serve as president. (As a follower of the conspiracy theorist W. Cleon Skousen, Carson seems to subscribe in earnest to a series of completely fantastical beliefs.) It is also possible that Carson is being manipulated by staffers who stand to profit off their association with him. But the most likely explanation for his behavior is that Carson himself is in this thing to make a lot of money.

Carson is doing a lot of things that seem puzzling for a presidential campaign, but quite logical for a brand-building exercise. He is taking weeks off the campaign trail to go on a book tour. His campaign itself is structured much more like a scamming venture than a political one. An astronomical 69 percent of his fund-raising totals are spent on more fund-raising. (Bernie Sanders, by contrast, spends just 4 percent of his intake on fund-raising.) In addition to direct mail, Carson seems to have undertaken a massive phone-spamming operation. Spending most of your money to raise more money is not a good way to get elected president, but it is a good way to build a massive list of supporters that can later be monetized. Perhaps it is a giveaway that the official title for Armstrong Williams, the figure running the Carson “campaign,” is “business manager,” as opposed to “campaign manager.” It does suggests that Carson is engaged in a for-profit venture.

Carson’s combination of flamboyantly reactionary statements and subdued (to the point of appearing medicated) persona lend him an aura of trust and honesty. Carson’s supporters see him as a brave truth-teller; his critics think he’s genuinely nuts. Even those concerned with his methods grant him the presumption of innocence — right-wing commentator Erick Erickson, running down Carson’s astronomical fund-raising costs, frets, “I suspect there are some who see Carson as a cash cow.” But it is a fallacy to imagine that a kook cannot also be a scammer. There is a long tradition of cult leaders, televangelists, and other snake-oil salesmen who were both.

Carson’s relationship with Mannatech, a medical-supplement operator that uses misleading claims to exploit Christian customers, may provide the most revealing window into his methodology. Consider the utterly calm and putatively genuine way in which Carson flatly denied a question at the last debate about his business relationship with Mannatech: (see video)

If you have the facts in mind — Carson maintained an extensive relationship with the company — when you watch this answer, his unflinching dishonesty has a chilling quality. He is a perfect con artist. And his history with Mannatech seems to serve as a precursor to his current enterprise. Carson used his inspiring story to pitch credulous (overwhelmingly Christian) customers. Carson has simply moved on to a bigger stage and cut out the middleman. The old scam was using the Ben Carson brand to pitch Mannatech. The new scam is pitching Ben Carson.

Video: Is Ben Carson Running for President? By Jonathan Chait

I can't imagine that Carson is actually really running for president. However, I can clearly imagine that he is running a major scam on gullible people.

You tell us. He's leading in some of the polls, even over Hillary.
Ok guys. Now is the time to prove republicans are racist.

Ben Carson wanted to be president. Instead he took a job running hud. He must still want to be president. So Ben Carson should run in 2024.

And he was loyal to trump. So trump supporters should love this choice.

And now he can say he has the experience running a department of government for 4 years.

Why not Ben? It# his turn
 
Sleepy Ben is grifting of gullible evangelicals of course and has no intention of running.
Wonder if he was allowed to take his $35,000 dining set with him?
And what about the grain in those pyramid silos - A man gets hungry you know!

thats-clearly-a-dog-park-built-by-noah-after-the-50351699.png
 
Sleepy Ben is grifting of gullible evangelicals of course and has no intention of running.
Wonder if he was allowed to take his $35,000 dining set with him?
And what about the grain in those pyramid silos - A man gets hungry you know!

thats-clearly-a-dog-park-built-by-noah-after-the-50351699.png
Then he’s perfect because one of trumps flaws was that he obviously wasn’t really a religious man. If Ben truly believes that should get the evangelicals out.

Does the Republican Party rely so much on white racists votes that they can’t run a black man?
 
Does the Republican Party rely so much on white racists votes that they can’t run a black man?

I think that's a pretty safe bet. ;)
So this black person would have to appeal to moderates bigly. Like a Will Smith before we knew jada cheats on him.

He would have to say all the right things. Hed have to be pro Christian and not anti Muslim.

He would have to appeal to mexicans and women.

He would have to be pro choice but against abortions.

He could win some racists over by being pro gun.

Openly support gays to be free to be who they are without being persecuted but support companies who don’t want trannys waiting on tables.

He would have to admit that many republican policies are racist and be pro diversity. We are a very diverse nation.
 
Carson is a brain surgeon but he's no rocket scientist.
Secretary of housing and urban development. Trump was flawed because he didn’t know how government worked. Ben now does. That makes him an even better candidate than he was in 2016.

Plus he never went against trump.
 

Forum List

Back
Top