Magnificat
Active Member
- May 30, 2019
- 318
- 21
- 33
- Thread starter
- #201
Well DUH. Atheist scientists are not gonna publish anything that contradicts their pet "theory". Now, the question is can you refute them? I think not. But feel free to try. BTW. Turn that around. You only find anti creation articals on atheist websites. See how that works?It is not absurd. Why else do evolutionists use the fossils to date the layer they are found in?You read the website of an anti-science group and you think you know more than trained scientists? That offends me.The whole idea of a geologic column is simply ridiculous. Here. Educate yourself. Your ignorance offends me.Link?
Rock layers may be flipped but that does not mean they are out of sequence. Fossils may burrow into older sediments and get buried there but that does not mean they are out of sequence. Both cases are easily recognized by scientists.
Geological Column and Inherent Problems - Creation Studies Institute
You site is replete with errors and straw men. Here's just one example:
The Geological Column concept also relies on the presupposition that long periods of time elapsed between each stratum.That is absurd. Certainly some formations take a long time (e.g., chalk cliffs of Dover are the remains of diatoms that settled to the sea floor over an enormous time period) but some are almost instantaneous (e.g., flood deposits and volcanic eruptions). Both these cases are well documented by science.
It is education and knowledge, not ignorance, that offends you.
Simple answer? They don't. They also use parts of the layer itself to date the fossils.
Still waiting for you to post a link to support your claim that they have found fossils out of sequence.
I just did a Google search for "fossils out of sequence", and found some websites that said that, but interestingly enough, they were all in support of creation theories.