Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
Originally posted by OCA
Wrong again! Its stunning how fucking wrong you are today, not unusual just stunning. Yes the White House does the diplomatic side but the battlefield decisions are left up to the generals, it was always this way up till Vietnam. You fall into the trap that the hippies(liberals) stopped the war, completely untrue, the oval office fucked it up, and I fear that is happening in Iraq.
Yeah the battle operations could be finished inside a month no problem but America does not have the stomach or fortitude for bloodshed on either side anymore hence we get into situations like we are now.
Originally posted by rtwngAvngr
the white house caved to pressure from hippies, and lying ex servicemen, like john kerry, coopted by the hippies.
There are generations of people raised under islamic tyranny and brainwashed against the U.S.. Your assertion that this can all be over in a month is just a fantasy. Sorry.
Originally posted by OCA
Apparently you have no faith in the US military, I do. The WOT won't be over in a month but the Iraqi insurgency could certainly be crushed easily. WHITE HOUSE HANDS OFF THE MILITARY!
Originally posted by rtwngAvngr
How is it apparent I have no faith in the military? That does not follow from anything I've stated. You're grasping at straws.
The president is the head of the military. Go ask newguy, your constitutional source of hind-end joy.
Originally posted by OCA
Absolutely he is the CIC. He should decide when we start and when we end but should no be involved in battlefield decisions or else we find ourselves in the situation we have today.
Originally posted by rtwngAvngr
By what authority do you seek to limit the president's power to merely determining start and end dates? Your own idiocy? That carries no weight with rest of us. I just thought you should know that.
Originally posted by OCA
Us? Whom do you propose to be speaking for? But I guess you like the current military situation in Iraq and how the oval office has made all the right decisions
Originally posted by rtwngAvngr
I think Bush has done as well as anyone could, considering all factors.
Originally posted by OCA
By taking the battle to the terrorists yes. Militarily many blunders have been made and that leads to the current situation in regards to this election. Listen Kerry shouldn't even have a chance to win this thing but Bush has fucked it up so bad that we now have a 50-50 chance of a president Kerry next January.
Originally posted by rtwngAvngr
He's done fine. Perfection? No. Dems act like terrorism shouldn't even be a priority. and those ARE The only two realistic choices. Your yammering only helps kerry.
Originally posted by OCA
No it doesn't. It helps to get Bush back on track. You just spout the party line like one of the mindless lemmings headed for the cliff. I'm trying to keep George from taking the leap.
Originally posted by rtwngAvngr
Bush is on track. Your efforts only assist the dems in their constant attacks.
Originally posted by OCA
ROFLMAO! If you think he's on track and there is no problem then i've got some prime property to sell you. Kind of reminds me of 92," there is no recession"
Our party needs some realists not people like you who bury their head in the sand and pretend everything is ok.
Originally posted by rtwngAvngr
I am a realist. The reality is the only viable choice besides Bush is much much worse than bush. That's the reality.
Originally posted by OCA
So you agree that our choices are not stellar?
Originally posted by rtwngAvngr
I really think Bush is doing a good job. Take your revolution elsewhere, hippy.
Originally posted by OCA
LMFAO hard to deal with someone who is buried headfirst in the sand up to their ass.
Originally posted by OCA
Do you realize that you're attitude of "there is no problem" may be the reason that Republicans lose this election?
Originally posted by rtwngAvngr
No. I'm not aware of that at all. You holding bush up to a standard of perfection when the other party doesn't even take terrorism seriously is the real problem.
