Iraq A Stain On The America Of Old

[Unkotare]

repugnants[sic] = apologists for war criminals , warmongers and imperialists

.

What, specifically, are you referring to?

 

[Contumacious]

repugnants[sic] = apologists for war criminals , warmongers and imperialists

.

What, specifically, are you referring to?

You are full of unko.

.

 

[Unkotare]

repugnants[sic] = apologists for war criminals , warmongers and imperialists

.

What, specifically, are you referring to?

You are full of unko.

.

Could you answer my question?

 

[theliq]

Wipe your chin.

Calm down.

We simulposted and it was aimed at the moron above you.

You're simulposting and pleasuring yourself both at the same time?

Wow. You're talented.

Make sure you wash up when you're done asswipe.

You REALLY ARE A FUCKING MORONtheliq..this warrior bloke must have a cog or two short seriously. And moronically can respond with the word ASSWIPE the IDIOT

 

[Contumacious]

What, specifically, are you referring to?

You are full of unko.

.

Could you answer my question?

There was no legitimate reason to invade Iraq. NONE.

.

 

[theliq]

What, specifically, are you referring to?

You are full of unko.

.

Could you answer my question?

HE ALREADY HAS YOU DUMBASS "UNKO" which in Unkotarism translates as "SHIT" YA MUG.

tl

 

[frazzledgear]

It's not hyperbolic.

The United States attacked a country that did not attack it first. The United States engaged in actions that caused the deaths of well over 100,000 Iraqis.

A) Did you know that Iraq invaded Kuwait in 1990?
B) DId YOU KNOW that Saddam Agreed to a Cease Fire in 1991 that when he fired on US planes..
CLINTON did this!!!
Timeline Iraq War IRAQ events... time line
In the first three months of 1999, U.S. led-forces bombarded Iraq with 241,000 pounds of bombsjust shy of the 253,000 pounds dropped under President Bush in the eight months leading up to the final UN resolution before the war.
The Raw Story | Clinton bombing of Iraq far exceeded Bush's in run-up to war; Bush 'spikes of activity' questioned
By August of 1999, American and British pilots had fired more than 1,100 missiles against 359 targetsthat year alone.

So when Saddam as these 32 democrats AGREED!!!
BEFORE BUSH!!!

BEFORE BUSH ... When CLINTON was President...
"..deny Iraq the capacity to develop WMD".Bill Clinton,1998
"..most brutal dictators of Century", Biden,1998
"Iraq compliance with Resolution 687 becomes shell game"..Daschle 1998
"He will use those WMDs again,as he has ten times since 1983" ..Berger- Clinton National. Security. Advisor 1998
"posed by Iraq's refusal to end its WMD programs" Levin 1998
"Saddam has been engaged in development of WMDs which is a threat.."Pelosi 1998
"Hussein has chosen to spend his money on building WMDS.."Albright 1999




Had any other country engaged in those sorts of actions, especially one without Nukes, they'd be in big trouble. And their leaders would be subject to prosecution in the Hague.

WRONG dumb f...k!

Finally were you aware that Saddam murdered 300,000 people?

And PLEASE you fu...king idiot...
WHO KILLED the NOT 100,000 but 87,000 Iraqis???

Do YOU REALLY think Bush did it? Do you think US troops killed those Iraqis?

WHO do you idiots think KILLED THEM??

Dumb f...kls... the Terrorists that people LIKE YOU became CHEERLEADERS!
'

Well, first off the Baathists didn't murder 300,000 people. You seem to have erased quite a bit of history. Iraq has been to war several times..and almost every time..they've been the patsy of the US.

The Iraq Iran war was egged on by this country. In fact, Iraq was supplied by the US with the very chemical weapons that killed a great deal of the 300K people.

Next up..was Saddam Hussien was personally given the green light by April Glaspie to invade Kuwait...then told to leave..and that did it. That little bit green lighted the first pounded Iraq took by the US.

Second up..was Clinton..who needed some distraction from his Monica fling. So not only did he bomb Iraq..he pasted them with some withering sanctions. That killed a good 100K or so..

Finally up..to bring it home..was GW Bush.

And boy what fun he had!

There were NO Terrorists in Iraq..short bread.

You SERIOUSLY believe a nation must wait until AFTER their citizens have been slaughtered to act to protect them? Are you for real? In this day and age that first strike could be THE lethal one, you do realize that. The side that gets to determine when the conflict starts is already 2/3 of the way to victory and already has their enemy at the greatest possible disadvantage. Rule number one in every military academy on the planet. And here you are insisting we MUST give that advantage to our ENEMIES? I'm sure they fully agree with that one. LOL -but no NATION on the planet does, sorry. Not part of the so-called "rules of war" in case you are stupid enough to believe that.

That STUPID comment tells me liberals should never be in charge of providing for our national defense -because they won't do it and believe we must be attacked first!! NO NATION on the planet must wait while they see a growing threat and sit there and wait until their enemy is finally ready to strike -that is called.........SUICIDE.

Your liberal re-write of history is total BULLSHIT buddy. Get a real history book instead of the filth written by leftwing extremists hoping their re-write will be accepted as "truth". Oh sure, the one nation that had a unilateral embargo against Iraq for all but a matter of weeks out of 35 years, but Saddam was our "patsy"? Do you realize what a MORON you really have to be to buy into that? You are spewing nothing but the known lying ass liberal PROPAGANDA -not facts. Right down to the liberal LYING ASS BULLSHIT that the US supplied Iraq with chemical weapons. Wow -you just proved yourself to be a total tool and useful idiot because BREAKING NEWS ALERT HERE - where Saddam got those WMD is a matter of documented and PROVEN FACT. And it wasn't us. Guess again. He built them AFTER he was given all the outside help he needed to build his own WMD factories. And they know EXACTLY who and where that outside help was. And again, it wasn't us. Never heard of Iraq's extremely cozy relationships with France, Russia, Germany, Czechoslovakia? Is that really news to you given the FACT these countries helped Saddam build both its WMD factories and nuclear weapons program? And then kept him constantly supplied with the necessary chemicals to keep his factories in high gear and figured out how to get around global bans on them? Huh? What's the matter? Your liberal handlers fail to inform you about those very real FACTS in their zeal to pretend the US is responsible for all the world's ills? That the most transparent government on the planet, the one where our state secrets routinely appear in newspapers is actually dirtier than the most OPPRESSIVE and HIDDEN ONES? Just how low is your IQ?

Did it seriously not give you any pause whatsoever at the absolutely LUDICROUS notion that THE nation that led a worldwide ban on the use of WMD -would then turn around and violate the ban IT was instrumental in brokering a handful of years later? Really, gave you no problem did it? Wow -that SERIOUSLY seriously goes to show the DEPTH of your sheer HATRED of this country that you would even believe such total bullshit much less repeat it -but especially when the truth is a matter of DOCUMENTED HISTORY! Bad news -where Saddam got them is documented fact, right down to how he managed to avoid detection by spreading around who he dealt with to get his supplies and the DATES he got them. So where are those same documents showing the real documents are not only total lies -but in reality those WMD came from the US and his WMD factories were built by the US. And while you are at it, please provide the detailed explanation for why the nations that really did help Iraq with its WMD and nuclear weapons programs -don't deny it? Not one. And while you are at it -throw in the official explanations about why none of the truly guilty parties are accusing the US of being the one that actually did it. I'd really like to hear that one too.

Don't you think it would have been a MAJOR and STUNNING revelation of the globe-shattering sort if Saddam publicly accused the US of not only supplying him with WMD but then set him up to take the fall after and had used him as a patsy? Do you REALLY not know why it is only lying ass fucking asshole US liberals who said it -and not Saddam HIMSELF? And not ANY other nation, particularly the ones who really did it? I'll give you a clue -because it is provably untrue. I know liberals insist history has nothing to teach them -but in this case, history is already DOCUMENTED FACT and not open to liberal re-write more than 40 years later even though they desperately want a re-write because it furthers their own anti-US agenda. And don't kid yourself about that.

The FACT is Iraq was the client state of...........FRANCE. Oh wow, yes, that nation that already made billions off Iraq and had already concluded another $55 billion oil contract. But ONLY if Saddam remained in power. That France -ever heard of it? I am CONSTANTLY amazed by the liberal re-write that doesn't just gloss over the truth about France, it totally IGNORES IT! But liberals admire France and I am now convinced are willing to say ANYTHING to try and divert attention from the unholy relationship between France and Iraq and divert attention from the full extent of France's REAL and very evil, inhumane role in Iraq. Iraq and France had a mutually masturbatory relationship to protect both their interests going back decades and it started as soon as they heard our embassy doors slam shut once the Ba'athists took power and France saw an opening to really ramp up its own influence in the region by stepping into the void. France fostered the hatred and distrust of the US in order to protect its own influence in Iraq. Iraq openly bragged about having bought and paid for France politicians and THEIR protection at the UN. After France abstained from voting prior to the Gulf War, Saddam warned France if it failed to protect Iraq at the Security Council again like that - he would revealed all the names of French politicians he bought and paid for. France made BILLIONS off Iraq by in exchange for protecting it at the UN. In exchange France ended up controlling more than 85% of Iraq's import market. Iraq was NEVER the "patsy" of the US honey. The US had a unilateral embargo against it from the time the Ba'athists took power. France took advantage of it and never left. France is NOT our ally -it is our adversary. Not an outright enemy (at least not yet) -but an adversary seeking to reduce US influence in order to replace it with their own. And YES the Ba'athists really did murder 300,000 people -most of whom are unaccounted for to this day. I'm surprised you would make such a stupid claim when that is one made by the Iraqi people themselves. You gonna call them liars too because your handlers told you to? They really did use gas on the Kurds and they really did round up nearly every single Iraqi Jew and hung them in the public square as "CIA spies". People were constantly being executed on accusations they were working for the CIA -but NEVER for being ones for France. Or Russia. Or Germany. You know, the nations that helped him build his WMD factories and build his nuclear weapons plant that Israel finally bombed which the world condemned but secretly thank it for doing? You seriously think liberals can re-write documented UN findings on how Saddam got WMD so you can pretend the US did it?? You fucking liars. Oh sure -the country that initiated the worldwide ban on WMD turned around in a MASSIVE violation and armed Saddam with them? You are out of your fucking mind and it indicates just how LOST you really are as a political ideologue who cannot bear to have FACTS contradict his make believe world.

The only time the unilateral US embargo on Iraq that the US failed to get other nations to join was even slightly lifted was on a very limited and temporary basis for a matter of WEEKS during the Iran-Iraq War. At the time Iran was seen as posing the greater threat to the region than Saddam and yes, the US tested the possibility relations with Saddam could be repaired. Something they knew was not possible in a matter of weeks when all ties were once again cut off. The enmity between Iran and Iraq was not started by the US and I can't believe you are SO ignorant about that one honey. It goes back thousands of years and is even mentioned in the Bible. The Iraqis are ARABS -but the Iranians are PERSIAN and that is never forgotten anywhere in the region.

The US tested the possibility of a relationship with Iraq by sharing INTELLIGENCE with Saddam about Iranian troop movements and selling Iraq two COMMERCIAL airliners. That was the sum total. No arms deals. It ended once he gassed them. It was the US that pursued UN sanctions against Saddam for using gas on the Iranians, NOT its butt buddy France. Or Russia. Or Germany. The US embassy in Iraq closed when the Ba'athists took power FOR A REASON. And it wasn't because they became OUR patsy honey. And it remained closed until the new interim government took office 35 years later.

None of the liberal re-write resembles the REAL history here -which is actually DOCUMENTED HISTORY in case you REALLY didn't know that. Your bullshit is ridiculously easy to disprove -because no matter how much you WISH it were true -it just didn't happen that way. And nobody is buying your re-write except other moronic liberals too fucking lazy to research it themselves. But it means actually LOOKING for it in apolitical, unbiased recounting of documented history -instead of expecting to find it at the very same place you pick up your liberal talking points.

I'm sorry -there WERE terrorists in Iraq but they weren't attacking IRAQIS. That Saddam had a cozy relationship with terrorists and that Saddam had allowed them to build a base in Iraq is FACT, fact that was confirmed by Saddam's own son. There was an enforced no fly zone over northern Iraq that protected the Kurds from being attacked from the air by Saddam. He gave the Al Qaeda linked group Jund al-Islam SAFE HAVEN in exchange for their harassment of the Kurds. Which they vigorously did. Al Qaeda terrorists came and went at will and received medical treatment at the elite government medical facilities reserved for the ruling elite. Terrorists would not have attacked one of their biggest financiers, would they? But gee, wouldn't you really expect them to attack those who removed their biggest source of financial support because they want to return to the "good ole days"? Really? You really couldn't see why they would do that? Just common sense on that one but never justifies not doing it and thereby serving a serious blow to those Saddam financially supported at the same time 25 million Iraqis are liberated from the grip of a murderous thug and his equally murderous evil spawn.

 

[Contumacious]

[You SERIOUSLY believe a nation must wait until AFTER their citizens have been slaughtered to act to protect them? Are you for real? In this day and age that first strike could be THE lethal one, you do realize that. n.

HUH?

What the fucketh?

Yo Vern, snap out of it. The ONLY thing Saddam like to attack was the G Spots of his 50 Ho's.

So don't go there.

.

 

[Unkotare]

You are full of unko.

.

Could you answer my question?

There was no legitimate reason to invade Iraq. NONE.

.

I understand that is your ignorant, childish, subjective view, but could you actually answer my question?

 

[Unkotare]

[You SERIOUSLY believe a nation must wait until AFTER their citizens have been slaughtered to act to protect them? Are you for real? In this day and age that first strike could be THE lethal one, you do realize that. n.

HUH?

What the fucketh?

Yo Vern, snap out of it. The ONLY thing Saddam like to attack was the G Spots of his 50 Ho's.

So don't go there.

.

That was an incredibly stupid comment.

 

[Caroljo]

[You SERIOUSLY believe a nation must wait until AFTER their citizens have been slaughtered to act to protect them? Are you for real? In this day and age that first strike could be THE lethal one, you do realize that. n.

HUH?

What the fucketh?

Yo Vern, snap out of it. The ONLY thing Saddam like to attack was the G Spots of his 50 Ho's.

So don't go there.

.

Saddam tortured and murdered MANY of his own people....have you always lived under a rock??? When our military went into Iraq they found terrorists training camps, which of course had been abandoned once we got there. They know Al Quada trained there, with Saddams blessings. Don't be stupid or do you just like to side with terrorists?

 

[Contumacious]

[You SERIOUSLY believe a nation must wait until AFTER their citizens have been slaughtered to act to protect them? Are you for real? In this day and age that first strike could be THE lethal one, you do realize that. n.

HUH?

What the fucketh?

Yo Vern, snap out of it. The ONLY thing Saddam like to attack was the G Spots of his 50 Ho's.

So don't go there.

.

Saddam tortured and murdered MANY of his own people....have you always lived under a rock??? When our military went into Iraq they found terrorists training camps, which of course had been abandoned once we got there. They know Al Quada trained there, with Saddams blessings. Don't be stupid or do you just like to side with terrorists?

Are you smoking Mexican sinsemilla?
.

 

[High_Gravity]

WRONG dumb f...k!

Finally were you aware that Saddam murdered 300,000 people?

And PLEASE you fu...king idiot...
WHO KILLED the NOT 100,000 but 87,000 Iraqis???

Do YOU REALLY think Bush did it? Do you think US troops killed those Iraqis?

WHO do you idiots think KILLED THEM??

Dumb f...kls... the Terrorists that people LIKE YOU became CHEERLEADERS!
'

Well, first off the Baathists didn't murder 300,000 people. You seem to have erased quite a bit of history. Iraq has been to war several times..and almost every time..they've been the patsy of the US.

The Iraq Iran war was egged on by this country. In fact, Iraq was supplied by the US with the very chemical weapons that killed a great deal of the 300K people.

Next up..was Saddam Hussien was personally given the green light by April Glaspie to invade Kuwait...then told to leave..and that did it. That little bit green lighted the first pounded Iraq took by the US.

Second up..was Clinton..who needed some distraction from his Monica fling. So not only did he bomb Iraq..he pasted them with some withering sanctions. That killed a good 100K or so..

Finally up..to bring it home..was GW Bush.

And boy what fun he had!

There were NO Terrorists in Iraq..short bread.

You SERIOUSLY believe a nation must wait until AFTER their citizens have been slaughtered to act to protect them? Are you for real? In this day and age that first strike could be THE lethal one, you do realize that. The side that gets to determine when the conflict starts is already 2/3 of the way to victory and already has their enemy at the greatest possible disadvantage. Rule number one in every military academy on the planet. And here you are insisting we MUST give that advantage to our ENEMIES? I'm sure they fully agree with that one. LOL -but no NATION on the planet does, sorry. Not part of the so-called "rules of war" in case you are stupid enough to believe that.

That STUPID comment tells me liberals should never be in charge of providing for our national defense -because they won't do it and believe we must be attacked first!! NO NATION on the planet must wait while they see a growing threat and sit there and wait until their enemy is finally ready to strike -that is called.........SUICIDE.

Your liberal re-write of history is total BULLSHIT buddy. Get a real history book instead of the filth written by leftwing extremists hoping their re-write will be accepted as "truth". Oh sure, the one nation that had a unilateral embargo against Iraq for all but a matter of weeks out of 35 years, but Saddam was our "patsy"? Do you realize what a MORON you really have to be to buy into that? You are spewing nothing but the known lying ass liberal PROPAGANDA -not facts. Right down to the liberal LYING ASS BULLSHIT that the US supplied Iraq with chemical weapons. Wow -you just proved yourself to be a total tool and useful idiot because BREAKING NEWS ALERT HERE - where Saddam got those WMD is a matter of documented and PROVEN FACT. And it wasn't us. Guess again. He built them AFTER he was given all the outside help he needed to build his own WMD factories. And they know EXACTLY who and where that outside help was. And again, it wasn't us. Never heard of Iraq's extremely cozy relationships with France, Russia, Germany, Czechoslovakia? Is that really news to you given the FACT these countries helped Saddam build both its WMD factories and nuclear weapons program? And then kept him constantly supplied with the necessary chemicals to keep his factories in high gear and figured out how to get around global bans on them? Huh? What's the matter? Your liberal handlers fail to inform you about those very real FACTS in their zeal to pretend the US is responsible for all the world's ills? That the most transparent government on the planet, the one where our state secrets routinely appear in newspapers is actually dirtier than the most OPPRESSIVE and HIDDEN ONES? Just how low is your IQ?

Did it seriously not give you any pause whatsoever at the absolutely LUDICROUS notion that THE nation that led a worldwide ban on the use of WMD -would then turn around and violate the ban IT was instrumental in brokering a handful of years later? Really, gave you no problem did it? Wow -that SERIOUSLY seriously goes to show the DEPTH of your sheer HATRED of this country that you would even believe such total bullshit much less repeat it -but especially when the truth is a matter of DOCUMENTED HISTORY! Bad news -where Saddam got them is documented fact, right down to how he managed to avoid detection by spreading around who he dealt with to get his supplies and the DATES he got them. So where are those same documents showing the real documents are not only total lies -but in reality those WMD came from the US and his WMD factories were built by the US. And while you are at it, please provide the detailed explanation for why the nations that really did help Iraq with its WMD and nuclear weapons programs -don't deny it? Not one. And while you are at it -throw in the official explanations about why none of the truly guilty parties are accusing the US of being the one that actually did it. I'd really like to hear that one too.

Don't you think it would have been a MAJOR and STUNNING revelation of the globe-shattering sort if Saddam publicly accused the US of not only supplying him with WMD but then set him up to take the fall after and had used him as a patsy? Do you REALLY not know why it is only lying ass fucking asshole US liberals who said it -and not Saddam HIMSELF? And not ANY other nation, particularly the ones who really did it? I'll give you a clue -because it is provably untrue. I know liberals insist history has nothing to teach them -but in this case, history is already DOCUMENTED FACT and not open to liberal re-write more than 40 years later even though they desperately want a re-write because it furthers their own anti-US agenda. And don't kid yourself about that.

The FACT is Iraq was the client state of...........FRANCE. Oh wow, yes, that nation that already made billions off Iraq and had already concluded another $55 billion oil contract. But ONLY if Saddam remained in power. That France -ever heard of it? I am CONSTANTLY amazed by the liberal re-write that doesn't just gloss over the truth about France, it totally IGNORES IT! But liberals admire France and I am now convinced are willing to say ANYTHING to try and divert attention from the unholy relationship between France and Iraq and divert attention from the full extent of France's REAL and very evil, inhumane role in Iraq. Iraq and France had a mutually masturbatory relationship to protect both their interests going back decades and it started as soon as they heard our embassy doors slam shut once the Ba'athists took power and France saw an opening to really ramp up its own influence in the region by stepping into the void. France fostered the hatred and distrust of the US in order to protect its own influence in Iraq. Iraq openly bragged about having bought and paid for France politicians and THEIR protection at the UN. After France abstained from voting prior to the Gulf War, Saddam warned France if it failed to protect Iraq at the Security Council again like that - he would revealed all the names of French politicians he bought and paid for. France made BILLIONS off Iraq by in exchange for protecting it at the UN. In exchange France ended up controlling more than 85% of Iraq's import market. Iraq was NEVER the "patsy" of the US honey. The US had a unilateral embargo against it from the time the Ba'athists took power. France took advantage of it and never left. France is NOT our ally -it is our adversary. Not an outright enemy (at least not yet) -but an adversary seeking to reduce US influence in order to replace it with their own. And YES the Ba'athists really did murder 300,000 people -most of whom are unaccounted for to this day. I'm surprised you would make such a stupid claim when that is one made by the Iraqi people themselves. You gonna call them liars too because your handlers told you to? They really did use gas on the Kurds and they really did round up nearly every single Iraqi Jew and hung them in the public square as "CIA spies". People were constantly being executed on accusations they were working for the CIA -but NEVER for being ones for France. Or Russia. Or Germany. You know, the nations that helped him build his WMD factories and build his nuclear weapons plant that Israel finally bombed which the world condemned but secretly thank it for doing? You seriously think liberals can re-write documented UN findings on how Saddam got WMD so you can pretend the US did it?? You fucking liars. Oh sure -the country that initiated the worldwide ban on WMD turned around in a MASSIVE violation and armed Saddam with them? You are out of your fucking mind and it indicates just how LOST you really are as a political ideologue who cannot bear to have FACTS contradict his make believe world.

The only time the unilateral US embargo on Iraq that the US failed to get other nations to join was even slightly lifted was on a very limited and temporary basis for a matter of WEEKS during the Iran-Iraq War. At the time Iran was seen as posing the greater threat to the region than Saddam and yes, the US tested the possibility relations with Saddam could be repaired. Something they knew was not possible in a matter of weeks when all ties were once again cut off. The enmity between Iran and Iraq was not started by the US and I can't believe you are SO ignorant about that one honey. It goes back thousands of years and is even mentioned in the Bible. The Iraqis are ARABS -but the Iranians are PERSIAN and that is never forgotten anywhere in the region.

The US tested the possibility of a relationship with Iraq by sharing INTELLIGENCE with Saddam about Iranian troop movements and selling Iraq two COMMERCIAL airliners. That was the sum total. No arms deals. It ended once he gassed them. It was the US that pursued UN sanctions against Saddam for using gas on the Iranians, NOT its butt buddy France. Or Russia. Or Germany. The US embassy in Iraq closed when the Ba'athists took power FOR A REASON. And it wasn't because they became OUR patsy honey. And it remained closed until the new interim government took office 35 years later.

None of the liberal re-write resembles the REAL history here -which is actually DOCUMENTED HISTORY in case you REALLY didn't know that. Your bullshit is ridiculously easy to disprove -because no matter how much you WISH it were true -it just didn't happen that way. And nobody is buying your re-write except other moronic liberals too fucking lazy to research it themselves. But it means actually LOOKING for it in apolitical, unbiased recounting of documented history -instead of expecting to find it at the very same place you pick up your liberal talking points.

I'm sorry -there WERE terrorists in Iraq but they weren't attacking IRAQIS. That Saddam had a cozy relationship with terrorists and that Saddam had allowed them to build a base in Iraq is FACT, fact that was confirmed by Saddam's own son. There was an enforced no fly zone over northern Iraq that protected the Kurds from being attacked from the air by Saddam. He gave the Al Qaeda linked group Jund al-Islam SAFE HAVEN in exchange for their harassment of the Kurds. Which they vigorously did. Al Qaeda terrorists came and went at will and received medical treatment at the elite government medical facilities reserved for the ruling elite. Terrorists would not have attacked one of their biggest financiers, would they? But gee, wouldn't you really expect them to attack those who removed their biggest source of financial support because they want to return to the "good ole days"? Really? You really couldn't see why they would do that? Just common sense on that one but never justifies not doing it and thereby serving a serious blow to those Saddam financially supported at the same time 25 million Iraqis are liberated from the grip of a murderous thug and his equally murderous evil spawn.

WHOA! now thats one long ass post!

 

[High_Gravity]

HUH?

What the fucketh?

Yo Vern, snap out of it. The ONLY thing Saddam like to attack was the G Spots of his 50 Ho's.

So don't go there.

.

Saddam tortured and murdered MANY of his own people....have you always lived under a rock??? When our military went into Iraq they found terrorists training camps, which of course had been abandoned once we got there. They know Al Quada trained there, with Saddams blessings. Don't be stupid or do you just like to side with terrorists?

Are you smoking Mexican sinsemilla?
.

You are smoking the tip of your boyfriends dick.

 

[Caroljo]

HUH?

What the fucketh?

Yo Vern, snap out of it. The ONLY thing Saddam like to attack was the G Spots of his 50 Ho's.

So don't go there.

.

Saddam tortured and murdered MANY of his own people....have you always lived under a rock??? When our military went into Iraq they found terrorists training camps, which of course had been abandoned once we got there. They know Al Quada trained there, with Saddams blessings. Don't be stupid or do you just like to side with terrorists?

Are you smoking Mexican sinsemilla?
.

No...i'm really not having that much fun today...Lol!
My son has been deployed to Iraq 3 times...he knows what he saw.

 

[High_Gravity]

It's not hyperbolic.

The United States attacked a country that did not attack it first. The United States engaged in actions that caused the deaths of well over 100,000 Iraqis.

A) Did you know that Iraq invaded Kuwait in 1990?
B) DId YOU KNOW that Saddam Agreed to a Cease Fire in 1991 that when he fired on US planes..
CLINTON did this!!!
Timeline Iraq War IRAQ events... time line
In the first three months of 1999, U.S. led-forces bombarded Iraq with 241,000 pounds of bombsjust shy of the 253,000 pounds dropped under President Bush in the eight months leading up to the final UN resolution before the war.
The Raw Story | Clinton bombing of Iraq far exceeded Bush's in run-up to war; Bush 'spikes of activity' questioned
By August of 1999, American and British pilots had fired more than 1,100 missiles against 359 targetsthat year alone.

So when Saddam as these 32 democrats AGREED!!!
BEFORE BUSH!!!

BEFORE BUSH ... When CLINTON was President...
"..deny Iraq the capacity to develop WMD".Bill Clinton,1998
"..most brutal dictators of Century", Biden,1998
"Iraq compliance with Resolution 687 becomes shell game"..Daschle 1998
"He will use those WMDs again,as he has ten times since 1983" ..Berger- Clinton National. Security. Advisor 1998
"posed by Iraq's refusal to end its WMD programs" Levin 1998
"Saddam has been engaged in development of WMDs which is a threat.."Pelosi 1998
"Hussein has chosen to spend his money on building WMDS.."Albright 1999




Had any other country engaged in those sorts of actions, especially one without Nukes, they'd be in big trouble. And their leaders would be subject to prosecution in the Hague.

WRONG dumb f...k!

Finally were you aware that Saddam murdered 300,000 people?

And PLEASE you fu...king idiot...
WHO KILLED the NOT 100,000 but 87,000 Iraqis???

Do YOU REALLY think Bush did it? Do you think US troops killed those Iraqis?

WHO do you idiots think KILLED THEM??

Dumb f...kls... the Terrorists that people LIKE YOU became CHEERLEADERS!
'

Well, first off the Baathists didn't murder 300,000 people. You seem to have erased quite a bit of history. Iraq has been to war several times..and almost every time..they've been the patsy of the US.

The Iraq Iran war was egged on by this country. In fact, Iraq was supplied by the US with the very chemical weapons that killed a great deal of the 300K people.

Next up..was Saddam Hussien was personally given the green light by April Glaspie to invade Kuwait...then told to leave..and that did it. That little bit green lighted the first pounded Iraq took by the US.

Second up..was Clinton..who needed some distraction from his Monica fling. So not only did he bomb Iraq..he pasted them with some withering sanctions. That killed a good 100K or so..

Finally up..to bring it home..was GW Bush.

And boy what fun he had!

There were NO Terrorists in Iraq..short bread.

I have to disagree with your last part, Abu Musab Al-Zarqawi was in Iraq prior to the US invasion and so was the terrorist group Ansar Al Islam, who had training camps in Northern Iraq. Saddam also financed Palestinian suicide bombers in the Israel/Palestine area.

 

[Cammmpbell]

Well, first off the Baathists didn't murder 300,000 people. You seem to have erased quite a bit of history. Iraq has been to war several times..and almost every time..they've been the patsy of the US.

The Iraq Iran war was egged on by this country. In fact, Iraq was supplied by the US with the very chemical weapons that killed a great deal of the 300K people.

Next up..was Saddam Hussien was personally given the green light by April Glaspie to invade Kuwait...then told to leave..and that did it. That little bit green lighted the first pounded Iraq took by the US.

Second up..was Clinton..who needed some distraction from his Monica fling. So not only did he bomb Iraq..he pasted them with some withering sanctions. That killed a good 100K or so..

Finally up..to bring it home..was GW Bush.

And boy what fun he had!

There were NO Terrorists in Iraq..short bread.

That STUPID comment tells me liberals should never be in charge of providing for our national defense .

WHOA! now thats one long ass post!

Yeah....I summari ed it. I remember FDR and the second world war. He had better be glad that someone was in the white house who not only got into the war but had the foresight to proceed with the Manhatten project and the Atomic Bomb. If we had waited for a Republican to commit that much of the national treasure to an unproven endeavor of that magnitude we would all be goose stepping and saluting Heil Hitler. I won't even mention that another lilly livered left wing pussy made the decision to drop the bombs on Hiroshima and Nagasaki..........yes, I guess I did.

Coming off that little deal John Fitgerald Kennedy pledged to send a man to the moon and return him safely to the earth. That low down left wing pussy tied up huge national treasure in something which was totally experimental and if he had not done so at the time he did the Soviet Union would have a flag planted up there. Wait for a Republican white house and majority to commit to anything which doesn't ensure a profitible outcome for companies like Halliburton, Boeing, Blackwater and General Dynamics.

Don't Hold Your Breath!

 

[Navy1960]

George Tenet, Director of Central Intelligence (DCI) and his deputy John McLaughlin went to the White House on Sunday, December 21, 2002 to brief the president, vice-president and the national security advisor on the intelligence regarding Iraq’s nuclear, chemical, biological and missile programs. The president was not impressed with the evidence. At the conclusion of McLaughlin’s presentation, the president asked Tenet, “…is this best we’ve got?” Tenet replied unequivocally “Don’t worry; it’s a slam dunk case!”1

Yet as the world now knows, instead of a “slam dunk case” America’s intelligence on Iraq’s Weapons of Mass Destruction (WMD) was flat-out wrong. The president’s Commission on the Intelligence Capabilities of the United States Regarding Weapons of Mass Destruction called this profound intelligence failure “one of the most public—the most damaging—intelligence failures in recent American history.”2 In a world where, according to the 2002 National Security Strategy of the United States, the “gravest danger our Nation faces lies at the crossroads of radicalism and technology,” this intelligence failure has troubling implications for the security of the United States.3 Accordingly, the intelligence community must improve their ability to assess the full range of state and non-state actor nuclear, biological and chemical weapons programs.
http://www.airpower.au.af.mil/airchronicles/cc/tracey.html

"Since 2003, Coalition forces have recovered approximately 500 weapons munitions which contain degraded mustard or sarin nerve agent," said an overview of the report unveiled by Senator Rick Santorum and Peter Hoekstra, head of the intelligence committee of the House of Representatives.

"Despite many efforts to locate and destroy Iraq's pre-Gulf war chemical munitions, filled and unfilled pre-Gulf war chemical munitions are assessed to still exist," the report read.

The politicians cited the report as validation of the US rationale for the war, and stressed the ongoing danger they pose.

"This is an incredibly, in my mind, significant finding. The idea that, as my colleagues have repeatedly said in this debate on the other side of the aisle, that there are no weapons of mass destruction, is in fact false," Senator Santorum said.

A Pentagon official who confirmed the findings said that all the weapons were pre-1991 vintage munitions "in such a degraded state they couldn't be used for what they are designed for."
Iraq sarin stockpiles found | News.com.au

Rumsfeld returned to Baghdad in late March 1984. By this time, the U.S. had publicly condemned Iraq's chemical weapons use, stating, "The United States has concluded that the available evidence substantiates Iran's charges that Iraq used chemical weapons" [Document 47]. Briefings for Rumsfeld's meetings noted that atmospherics in Iraq had deteriorated since his December visit because of Iraqi military reverses and because "bilateral relations were sharply set back by our March 5 condemnation of Iraq for CW use, despite our repeated warnings that this issue would emerge sooner or later" [Document 48]. Rumsfeld was to discuss with Iraqi officials the Reagan administration's hope that it could obtain Export-Import Bank credits for Iraq, the Aqaba pipeline, and its vigorous efforts to cut off arms exports to Iran. According to an affidavit prepared by one of Rumsfeld's companions during his Mideast travels, former NSC staff member Howard Teicher, Rumsfeld also conveyed to Iraq an offer from Israel to provide assistance, which was rejected [Document 61].

Although official U.S. policy still barred the export of U.S. military equipment to Iraq, some was evidently provided on a "don't ask - don't tell" basis. In April 1984, the Baghdad interests section asked to be kept apprised of Bell Helicopter Textron's negotiations to sell helicopters to Iraq, which were not to be "in any way configured for military use" [Document 55]. The purchaser was the Iraqi Ministry of Defense. In December 1982, Bell Textron's Italian subsidiary had informed the U.S. embassy in Rome that it turned down a request from Iraq to militarize recently purchased Hughes helicopters. An allied government, South Korea, informed the State Department that it had received a similar request in June 1983 (when a congressional aide asked in March 1983 whether heavy trucks recently sold to Iraq were intended for military purposes, a State Department official replied "we presumed that this was Iraq's intention, and had not asked.") [Document 44]

Shaking Hands with Saddam Hussein

I'm often amazed when I see debates on this subject at the sheer number of people of what people believe when it comes to Iraq. Here's the point Iraq at the time when the War was started the nation was led to believe that there was a threat from this nation, in that they had and flaunted many UN sanctions in regards to WMD's. Which has since been found to be factually untrue. On the Chemical warfare issue, while true, Iraq had used Chemical weapons on both Iran and the Kurds, this took place long before the Iraq War began and through many administrations, If this was a pressing issue then the US would have not only done something about it during the Reagan Administration they would have done something through all the presidents that followed. Forgive me but in my humble opinion the reason(s) for this war were not justified and further if they had been then the former Administration and every congress after that one would havve engaged the American people in its outcome. The ONLY Americans that have had a stake in the Iraq war are the people that have had to make the sacrifice to fight it , their families, and those seeking to profit dfrom it, other than that the vast majority of Amiericans have had not stake in the Iraq War. It was a war that accomplished nothing, other than to leave this nation more vulnerable, and to decimate US Military readiness as well as contribute to the financial woes that we experience today not to mention the pain and suffering that it has brought upon every single young man and woman that has had to fight in it as well as their familes. So when you try to justify this nonsense of a war keep in mind that for the most part few if any Americans had any stake in it.

 

[California Girl]

People need to stop and think about the casualties involved. If you're one of those people who don't care about casualties of non-Americans, then think about the casualties of Americans.

Think about the thousands of people who died on 9/11. Then think about the thousands more who were sent to their demise.

Please waste your beautiful mind on something like that.

I think about it. I think about it a lot. I voted for the continuation of the war when I elected Bush for his second Term when I first became eligible to vote. I live with that decision.

My, how very dramatic.

Twit.

 

[The T]

"There were NO Terrorists in Iraq..short bread."

Saddam WAS a terrorist, bragged about financing other terrorists, and even had a jehad thingy added to their Iraqi flag.
No sympathy for terrorists or their supporters here.

Indeed...To Wit:



Palestinians get Saddam funds

Saddam Hussein has paid out thousands of dollars to families of Palestinians killed in fighting with Israel.

____________________________________

Saddam Hussein's Philanthropy of Terror