Iranians Shrug Off Obama - America Soon To Follow?

[MaggieMae]

I could not help but chuckle at the naive implorations by a few in this forum declaring that Obama was altering the attitude of the Muslim world through a few speeches given in recent weeks.

It is that degree of naivety that is the now-crumbling foundation of the Obama administration. They were elected on the power of speech, so they are now convinced they can actually govern by that same power - that words in essence, are more critical than actual results.

So, while Obama's personal popularity remains high, his job approval has fallen, particularly in the categories of handling the economy, government spending, and taxes. The reality of the time is now in stark contrast to the lofty rhetoric of Obama's so often contradictory words.

And now with the overwhelming victory by Iranian Muslim hardliner President Ahmadinejad in Iran, re-elected by well over 60% of the population (a far more statistically significant victory than Obama's own victory in the United States last year) we see Obama's impotence with the American economy now extending to foreign policy.

The Obama White House is a place of increasing uncertainty. The community organizer turned President struggles for a coherent message - particularly when removed from the safety of his teleprompted script. The economy continues to stagnate, and a tide of opposition grows against his health care plan, where more moderate Democrats are now quietly backing away from the White House for fear of being attached to its quite possible legislative failure.

And so, this White House continues its campaign of words-words-words, but fewer and fewer and fewer care to listen, with a hint of fomenting contempt against this overly scripted and verbose President beginning to accumulate across America.

The vast majority of Iranian people are not impressed with Obama.

Perhaps it is that one thing which the Iranians and the American people wil sooner rather than later, have in common.
http://www.nytimes.com/2009/06/14/world/middleeast/14iran.html?_r=2&hp

Oy. Another retarded article that assumes that the election was free and fair.

And even more retards who hate Obama so much that they appear to be supporting enemies now. Why are they gleeful over another four years of Achmedinijad? Sick, sick, sick.

 

[MaggieMae]

I could not help but chuckle at the naive implorations by a few in this forum declaring that Obama was altering the attitude of the Muslim world through a few speeches given in recent weeks.

It is that degree of naivety that is the now-crumbling foundation of the Obama administration. They were elected on the power of speech, so they are now convinced they can actually govern by that same power - that words in essence, are more critical than actual results.

So, while Obama's personal popularity remains high, his job approval has fallen, particularly in the categories of handling the economy, government spending, and taxes. The reality of the time is now in stark contrast to the lofty rhetoric of Obama's so often contradictory words.

And now with the overwhelming victory by Iranian Muslim hardliner President Ahmadinejad in Iran, re-elected by well over 60% of the population (a far more statistically significant victory than Obama's own victory in the United States last year) we see Obama's impotence with the American economy now extending to foreign policy.

The Obama White House is a place of increasing uncertainty. The community organizer turned President struggles for a coherent message - particularly when removed from the safety of his teleprompted script. The economy continues to stagnate, and a tide of opposition grows against his health care plan, where more moderate Democrats are now quietly backing away from the White House for fear of being attached to its quite possible legislative failure.

And so, this White House continues its campaign of words-words-words, but fewer and fewer and fewer care to listen, with a hint of fomenting contempt against this overly scripted and verbose President beginning to accumulate across America.

The vast majority of Iranian people are not impressed with Obama.

Perhaps it is that one thing which the Iranians and the American people wil sooner rather than later, have in common.
http://www.nytimes.com/2009/06/14/world/middleeast/14iran.html?_r=2&hp

Oy. Another retarded article that assumes that the election was free and fair.

this, coming from an Obamabot, who is puzzled that his Messiah has yet to perform any miracles.

The only ones who thought he SHOULD perform miracles, and who therefore labeled him The Messiah, are the fringers, like you. When was the last time a president was successful in changing the geopolitical face of any Muslim country? But suddenly the fact that Obama can't "micraculously" do it, earns another strike against him. Are you idiots for real?

 

[Meister]

I could not help but chuckle at the naive implorations by a few in this forum declaring that Obama was altering the attitude of the Muslim world through a few speeches given in recent weeks.

It is that degree of naivety that is the now-crumbling foundation of the Obama administration. They were elected on the power of speech, so they are now convinced they can actually govern by that same power - that words in essence, are more critical than actual results.

So, while Obama's personal popularity remains high, his job approval has fallen, particularly in the categories of handling the economy, government spending, and taxes. The reality of the time is now in stark contrast to the lofty rhetoric of Obama's so often contradictory words.

And now with the overwhelming victory by Iranian Muslim hardliner President Ahmadinejad in Iran, re-elected by well over 60% of the population (a far more statistically significant victory than Obama's own victory in the United States last year) we see Obama's impotence with the American economy now extending to foreign policy.

The Obama White House is a place of increasing uncertainty. The community organizer turned President struggles for a coherent message - particularly when removed from the safety of his teleprompted script. The economy continues to stagnate, and a tide of opposition grows against his health care plan, where more moderate Democrats are now quietly backing away from the White House for fear of being attached to its quite possible legislative failure.

And so, this White House continues its campaign of words-words-words, but fewer and fewer and fewer care to listen, with a hint of fomenting contempt against this overly scripted and verbose President beginning to accumulate across America.

The vast majority of Iranian people are not impressed with Obama.

Perhaps it is that one thing which the Iranians and the American people wil sooner rather than later, have in common.
http://www.nytimes.com/2009/06/14/world/middleeast/14iran.html?_r=2&hp

Oy. Another retarded article that assumes that the election was free and fair.

And even more retards who hate Obama so much that they appear to be supporting enemies now. Why are they gleeful over another four years of Achmedinijad? Sick, sick, sick.

I don't understand that at all. Achmedinijad may be the most dangerous person in the world including that N. Korea nutjob.

 

[MaggieMae]

I could not help but chuckle at the naive implorations by a few in this forum declaring that Obama was altering the attitude of the Muslim world through a few speeches given in recent weeks.

It is that degree of naivety that is the now-crumbling foundation of the Obama administration. They were elected on the power of speech, so they are now convinced they can actually govern by that same power - that words in essence, are more critical than actual results.

So, while Obama's personal popularity remains high, his job approval has fallen, particularly in the categories of handling the economy, government spending, and taxes. The reality of the time is now in stark contrast to the lofty rhetoric of Obama's so often contradictory words.

And now with the overwhelming victory by Iranian Muslim hardliner President Ahmadinejad in Iran, re-elected by well over 60% of the population (a far more statistically significant victory than Obama's own victory in the United States last year) we see Obama's impotence with the American economy now extending to foreign policy.

The Obama White House is a place of increasing uncertainty. The community organizer turned President struggles for a coherent message - particularly when removed from the safety of his teleprompted script. The economy continues to stagnate, and a tide of opposition grows against his health care plan, where more moderate Democrats are now quietly backing away from the White House for fear of being attached to its quite possible legislative failure.

And so, this White House continues its campaign of words-words-words, but fewer and fewer and fewer care to listen, with a hint of fomenting contempt against this overly scripted and verbose President beginning to accumulate across America.

The vast majority of Iranian people are not impressed with Obama.

Perhaps it is that one thing which the Iranians and the American people wil sooner rather than later, have in common.
http://www.nytimes.com/2009/06/14/world/middleeast/14iran.html?_r=2&hp

,,,

By your bump, I see you're unfazed and rooting for another four years of Achmedinijad. Good for you. At least we know where you're coming from. The Iranian election, however, may well spark another revolution, because like most countries who recognize that they can no longer survive in a closed society, moderates are demanding CHANGE. Even the Ayatollah's in Iran (who have the real power) are aware of this.

Obama’s speech: A boost to moderates in Iran’s election? | csmonitor.com
Obama criticized Holocaust deniers. But Ayatollah Khamenei praised US effort at a "new image."

 

[elvis]

Oy. Another retarded article that assumes that the election was free and fair.

this, coming from an Obamabot, who is puzzled that his Messiah has yet to perform any miracles.

The only ones who thought he SHOULD perform miracles, and who therefore labeled him The Messiah, are the fringers, like you. When was the last time a president was successful in changing the geopolitical face of any Muslim country? But suddenly the fact that Obama can't "micraculously" do it, earns another strike against him. Are you idiots for real?

Obama has zero influence on Iran's or any other country's elections. The sooner people like chris and Nik accept that reality, the better. If the Messiah comment is so outrageous, explain why people were fainting at his rallies.

 

[MaggieMae]

As I have posted hear often, my impression is that The Prophet has undertaken a counter propaganda campaign. It may or may not work, whole or in part. He is in a unique position to attempt it.

The Prophet's public execution of this has been poor so far and has already caused him to lose support in the US across parties. For that reason and his apparent assumption that all these savvy, crooked, megalomaniacal savages will fall into his thrall, I believe his initiative will fail no matter how it is spun. Would love to be wrong.

Sure you would.

 

[elvis]

I could not help but chuckle at the naive implorations by a few in this forum declaring that Obama was altering the attitude of the Muslim world through a few speeches given in recent weeks.

It is that degree of naivety that is the now-crumbling foundation of the Obama administration. They were elected on the power of speech, so they are now convinced they can actually govern by that same power - that words in essence, are more critical than actual results.

So, while Obama's personal popularity remains high, his job approval has fallen, particularly in the categories of handling the economy, government spending, and taxes. The reality of the time is now in stark contrast to the lofty rhetoric of Obama's so often contradictory words.

And now with the overwhelming victory by Iranian Muslim hardliner President Ahmadinejad in Iran, re-elected by well over 60% of the population (a far more statistically significant victory than Obama's own victory in the United States last year) we see Obama's impotence with the American economy now extending to foreign policy.

The Obama White House is a place of increasing uncertainty. The community organizer turned President struggles for a coherent message - particularly when removed from the safety of his teleprompted script. The economy continues to stagnate, and a tide of opposition grows against his health care plan, where more moderate Democrats are now quietly backing away from the White House for fear of being attached to its quite possible legislative failure.

And so, this White House continues its campaign of words-words-words, but fewer and fewer and fewer care to listen, with a hint of fomenting contempt against this overly scripted and verbose President beginning to accumulate across America.

The vast majority of Iranian people are not impressed with Obama.

Perhaps it is that one thing which the Iranians and the American people wil sooner rather than later, have in common.
http://www.nytimes.com/2009/06/14/world/middleeast/14iran.html?_r=2&hp

,,,

By your bump, I see you're unfazed and rooting for another four years of Achmedinijad. Good for you. At least we know where you're coming from. The Iranian election, however, may well spark another revolution, because like most countries who recognize that they can no longer survive in a closed society, moderates are demanding CHANGE. Even the Ayatollah's in Iran (who have the real power) are aware of this.

Obama’s speech: A boost to moderates in Iran’s election? | csmonitor.com
Obama criticized Holocaust deniers. But Ayatollah Khamenei praised US effort at a "new image."

no one was rooting for another four years of A-jad, you dumb fuck. We were saying that your Messiah had no pull over him winning or losing.

 

[Nik]

this, coming from an Obamabot, who is puzzled that his Messiah has yet to perform any miracles.

The only ones who thought he SHOULD perform miracles, and who therefore labeled him The Messiah, are the fringers, like you. When was the last time a president was successful in changing the geopolitical face of any Muslim country? But suddenly the fact that Obama can't "micraculously" do it, earns another strike against him. Are you idiots for real?

Obama has zero influence on Iran's or any other country's elections. The sooner people like chris and Nik accept that reality, the better. If the Messiah comment is so outrageous, explain why people were fainting at his rallies.

So nobody votes based on foreign policy? You are really, really stupid dude. Outrageously so, even.

 

[Nik]

,,,

By your bump, I see you're unfazed and rooting for another four years of Achmedinijad. Good for you. At least we know where you're coming from. The Iranian election, however, may well spark another revolution, because like most countries who recognize that they can no longer survive in a closed society, moderates are demanding CHANGE. Even the Ayatollah's in Iran (who have the real power) are aware of this.

Obama’s speech: A boost to moderates in Iran’s election? | csmonitor.com
Obama criticized Holocaust deniers. But Ayatollah Khamenei praised US effort at a "new image."

no one was rooting for another four years of A-jad, you dumb fuck. We were saying that your Messiah had no pull over him winning or losing.

Actually a number of right-wingers were rooting for Ahmadinejad, sadly enough.

 

[MaggieMae]

As I have posted hear often, my impression is that The Prophet has undertaken a counter propaganda campaign. It may or may not work, whole or in part. He is in a unique position to attempt it.

The Prophet's public execution of this has been poor so far and has already caused him to lose support in the US across parties. For that reason and his apparent assumption that all these savvy, crooked, megalomaniacal savages will fall into his thrall, I believe his initiative will fail no matter how it is spun. Would love to be wrong.

What is clear is that his trip to the Middle East, his silly invitation for Iranians to celebrate the 4th of July with him - was timed during the lead up to these elections.

The Obama administration likely thought the elections were almost certain to go a different way, and thus, attempted to position the teleprompter in such a was as to make it appear he helped usher in a new era in Iran.

What has actually happened is, Obama gave a series of speeches that few paid attention to (his speeches all sound alike these days, and thus, bore the hell out of people) and the Iranians threw their support behind the more, not less, extreme anti-American candidate.

Obama failed - BIG TIME.

Translation: I didn't pay attention to his speech, I never do, nor do any in my club, so that must mean that "very few" do.

Gotcha.

 

[elvis]

I could not help but chuckle at the naive implorations by a few in this forum declaring that Obama was altering the attitude of the Muslim world through a few speeches given in recent weeks.

It is that degree of naivety that is the now-crumbling foundation of the Obama administration. They were elected on the power of speech, so they are now convinced they can actually govern by that same power - that words in essence, are more critical than actual results.

So, while Obama's personal popularity remains high, his job approval has fallen, particularly in the categories of handling the economy, government spending, and taxes. The reality of the time is now in stark contrast to the lofty rhetoric of Obama's so often contradictory words.

And now with the overwhelming victory by Iranian Muslim hardliner President Ahmadinejad in Iran, re-elected by well over 60% of the population (a far more statistically significant victory than Obama's own victory in the United States last year) we see Obama's impotence with the American economy now extending to foreign policy.

The Obama White House is a place of increasing uncertainty. The community organizer turned President struggles for a coherent message - particularly when removed from the safety of his teleprompted script. The economy continues to stagnate, and a tide of opposition grows against his health care plan, where more moderate Democrats are now quietly backing away from the White House for fear of being attached to its quite possible legislative failure.

And so, this White House continues its campaign of words-words-words, but fewer and fewer and fewer care to listen, with a hint of fomenting contempt against this overly scripted and verbose President beginning to accumulate across America.

The vast majority of Iranian people are not impressed with Obama.

Perhaps it is that one thing which the Iranians and the American people wil sooner rather than later, have in common.
http://www.nytimes.com/2009/06/14/world/middleeast/14iran.html?_r=2&hp

Oy. Another retarded article that assumes that the election was free and fair.

And even more retards who hate Obama so much that they appear to be supporting enemies now. Why are they gleeful over another four years of Achmedinijad? Sick, sick, sick.

Isn't this what you liberals accused the right of doing? so now anyone who hates Obama is supporting our enemies? You are a bigger bitch than I thought.

 

[elvis]

The only ones who thought he SHOULD perform miracles, and who therefore labeled him The Messiah, are the fringers, like you. When was the last time a president was successful in changing the geopolitical face of any Muslim country? But suddenly the fact that Obama can't "micraculously" do it, earns another strike against him. Are you idiots for real?

Obama has zero influence on Iran's or any other country's elections. The sooner people like chris and Nik accept that reality, the better. If the Messiah comment is so outrageous, explain why people were fainting at his rallies.

So nobody votes based on foreign policy? You are really, really stupid dude. Outrageously so, even.

They don't vote based on another country's leader, you fucking invalid.

 

[Nik]

Oy. Another retarded article that assumes that the election was free and fair.

And even more retards who hate Obama so much that they appear to be supporting enemies now. Why are they gleeful over another four years of Achmedinijad? Sick, sick, sick.

Isn't this what you liberals accused the right of doing? so now anyone who hates Obama is supporting our enemies? You are a bigger bitch than I thought.

I think it was less the "hating Obama" and the more going around the board gleefully proclaiming Ahmadinejads victory part which made her think that.

 

[Nik]

Obama has zero influence on Iran's or any other country's elections. The sooner people like chris and Nik accept that reality, the better. If the Messiah comment is so outrageous, explain why people were fainting at his rallies.

So nobody votes based on foreign policy? You are really, really stupid dude. Outrageously so, even.

They don't vote based on another country's leader, you fucking invalid.

Really? Why not? You don't think that maybe, just maybe, if another country demonizes you, you might vote for the individual who demonizes the other country back? Is that so incredibly absurd to you?

 

[elvis]

And even more retards who hate Obama so much that they appear to be supporting enemies now. Why are they gleeful over another four years of Achmedinijad? Sick, sick, sick.

Isn't this what you liberals accused the right of doing? so now anyone who hates Obama is supporting our enemies? You are a bigger bitch than I thought.

I think it was less the "hating Obama" and the more going around the board gleefully proclaiming Ahmadinejads victory part which made her think that.

Show us who did that, prodigy.

 

[Nik]

Isn't this what you liberals accused the right of doing? so now anyone who hates Obama is supporting our enemies? You are a bigger bitch than I thought.

I think it was less the "hating Obama" and the more going around the board gleefully proclaiming Ahmadinejads victory part which made her think that.

Show us who did that, prodigy.

Right-Wing Neocons Rooting For Ahmadinejad Win

 

[MaggieMae]

Question: Was there this much discussion last week when the people of Lebanon voted against Hezbollah, which Iran directly controls? Of course not. It's so much easier to lambaste the U.S. President over the reelection of the hardliner in Iran, isn't it...

This entire topic, on this message board, has nothing to do with Iran. It has everything to do with the pure unadulterated hatred of Barack Obama.

Suggestion to Gunny, et al. How about a new topic called HATE OBAMA? POST THOUGHTS HERE. That way, there would be no confusion over who supports what ISSUES because the topic would not be issue-oriented.

 

[elvis]

I think it was less the "hating Obama" and the more going around the board gleefully proclaiming Ahmadinejads victory part which made her think that.

Show us who did that, prodigy.

Right-Wing Neocons Rooting For Ahmadinejad Win

An editorial from the Huntington Post, who cited TWO neocons. I'm convinced now.

 

[elvis]

Question: Was there this much discussion last week when the people of Lebanon voted against Hezbollah, which Iran directly controls? Of course not. It's so much easier to lambaste the U.S. President over the reelection of the hardliner in Iran, isn't it...

This entire topic, on this message board, has nothing to do with Iran. It has everything to do with the pure unadulterated hatred of Barack Obama.

Suggestion to Gunny, et al. How about a new topic called HATE OBAMA? POST THOUGHTS HERE. That way, there would be no confusion over who supports what ISSUES because the topic would not be issue-oriented.

No, it has everything to do with your unadulterated worship of Obama. His message HAD to have resonated with the country. Therefore when A-jad won, since Obama's messianic speeches should have been the difference in the election, the election must have been stolen.

 

[Nik]

Show us who did that, prodigy.

Right-Wing Neocons Rooting For Ahmadinejad Win

An editorial from the Huntington Post, who cited TWO neocons. I'm convinced now.

You asked who did that. I gave you an answer. You should be convinced unless you are even more of a dishonest shithead than I previously thought.

And do tell what it being from the huffington post has to do with anything?