Unkotare
Diamond Member
- Aug 16, 2011
- 131,263
- 25,581
- 2,180
North Korea has nukes, I mean they could blow us up at any minute
No they couldn't.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
North Korea has nukes, I mean they could blow us up at any minute
unfortunately, the war is imminent.
Obama wants to be reelected. He needs to impress AIPAC and the zionist lobby.
The reason Obama removed the troops from Iraq so quickly is to prevent Iran from retaliating against the 150,000 troops which were stationed there.
.
Yeah, I remember...I also remember we kicked the VC and NVA's asses from one end of Vietnam to the other and back again, then had victory stolen from us by a self-serving media and gutless politicians back home. We could have crushed the North Vietnamese anytime we wanted; all we needed were the orders; orders we never got. Damn shame!If Iran closes down the strait it will be with the wreckage of their LOL "navy".
Rember the VietCong, who fought the US wearing black pajamas?
US Servicemen dead 47, 378
Non hostile deaths 10,800
MIA's 2338
POW 766 (114 died in captivity)
Wounded in Action 303, 704
Severely disabled 75,000
But who gives a fuck?
Plus you bastards love having your anuses stimulated by TSA.
As always, Heil Hitler.
.
.
North Korea has nukes, I mean they could blow us up at any minute
No they couldn't.
North Korea has nukes, I mean they could blow us up at any minute
No they couldn't.
I was being sarcastic, of course they couldn't and neither could Iran.
Doesn't stop the bloodthirsty neocon warmongers from demanding the U.S. gov't sacrifice tens of thousands of american soldiers in a war of aggression, having nothing to do with the defense of this country.
No they couldn't.
I was being sarcastic, of course they couldn't and neither could Iran.
Doesn't stop the bloodthirsty neocon warmongers from demanding the U.S. gov't sacrifice tens of thousands of american soldiers in a war of aggression, having nothing to do with the defense of this country.
Ah, so you think it's better to wait until they really can blow us up at any minute and THEN try and do something about it? Great plan, General.
I was being sarcastic, of course they couldn't and neither could Iran.
Doesn't stop the bloodthirsty neocon warmongers from demanding the U.S. gov't sacrifice tens of thousands of american soldiers in a war of aggression, having nothing to do with the defense of this country.
Ah, so you think it's better to wait until they really can blow us up at any minute and THEN try and do something about it?
Lol adorable.
You're scared they could end up with a nuke 100 years after we have one? .
You're scared they could end up with a nuke 100 years after we have one? .
Do you really think it will take 30 more years for Iran to complete a nuke? You are naive in many self-destructive ways.
You're scared they could end up with a nuke 100 years after we have one? .
Do you really think it will take 30 more years for Iran to complete a nuke? You are naive in many self-destructive ways.
I've been hearing the Iran-nuke fearmongering from the pro-war crowd for many years, no reason to think it'll take 30 more years for them to have a nuke.
But ok for the sake of discussion, you want us to blow up a country because they're within 80 years of our technology and military? ?
Why am I not hearing people beating the war drum against North Korea who already has a nuke?
I meant there's no reason to think it WON'T take 30+ more years for them to get a nuke, I worded that wrong..
I meant there's no reason to think it WON'T take 30+ more years for them to get a nuke, I worded that wrong.
Nukes are just as or more effective, our defense against a nuke is roughly 2175676897168136 times better than Iran's nuke technology is and ever will be.
That was cute and all, but not NK isn't Iran. My point is why aren't you begging and pleading for bloodshed in a war with North Korea like you are Iran when there's so many parallels? Both hostile enemies, but the one with nukes is no big whoop, the one without them is. Very weird.
I meant there's no reason to think it WON'T take 30+ more years for them to get a nuke, I worded that wrong.
Nukes are just as or more effective, our defense against a nuke is roughly 2175676897168136 times better than Iran's nuke technology is and ever will be.
That was cute and all, but not NK isn't Iran. My point is why aren't you begging and pleading for bloodshed in a war with North Korea like you are Iran when there's so many parallels? Both hostile enemies, but the one with nukes is no big whoop, the one without them is. Very weird.
You know, I underestimated you. I never realized just how monumentally fucking stupid you are.