Discussion in 'Politics' started by longknife, Mar 31, 2015.
Well if I'm going to agree with that, I may as well believe that 9-11 was pulled off by the CIA.
Oh, what "fraud" is this, sploogy?
When did I say the Internet in the major cities was too slow?
You're too dumb to even keep track of the players. You have no idea what is going on around you, you only know that George Soros told you that you support the government take-over of the Internet.
The USA has the highest available Internet speeds in the world. You can get gigabit connections, for a price.
I just told someone that they already have all the internet speed they need, and you said I was wrong. But now, I"m right, but just not right.
Man, you're a fucking joke. A bad joke. You're even more pathetic than Obama, which is pretty damn hard to do.
The Constitution has failed utterly to prevent anything that it was supposed to prevent, so why should this case be any different?
Why don't you?
I stated that net neutrality is about government control over internet. You argued that is not and said that net neutrality is not Obamacare for the internet. In sense of control, they're the same. They're both based on lies.
Now, can you explain how 9/11 compares to either one.
Waiting to hear something like "if you like your internet, you can keep your internet".
This is another example to be added to the thread Every Liberal Cause Is Based On A Lie. Is net neutrality about internet speed for end user? They say it is, but if is about the speed, why are they going after its content?
We're starting to look more and more as former Soviet Union, where every information and thought were under gov't control.
Hey, crazy person, who is "going after" internet content?
Check section that regulate use of lawful content. Well, you can't check it yet, since they're still debating if hurting someones feelings is lawful. You know, like calling someone crazy, like you called me, or calling someone moron, like I called you...
Separate names with a comma.