“Internet at the Speed of Government”

But we have oligarchies controlling the internet. Our speeds are pathetic compared to the rest of the world. There is no incentive to make better internet when you are the only one or have only 1 competitor. Give them shitty internet and charge enormous amounts of money for it. Why add costs when you don't have to?

Net neutrality treats all data the same. Period. That's a very good thing.

You are a fucking retard, period.

You have no idea how the technology works, and you have no what application of law from the 30's means for 21st century technology. You know that your masters tell you that you are in favor of this, so you blindly and stupidly are.
 
But we have oligarchies controlling the internet. Our speeds are pathetic compared to the rest of the world. There is no incentive to make better internet when you are the only one or have only 1 competitor. Give them shitty internet and charge enormous amounts of money for it. Why add costs when you don't have to?

Net neutrality treats all data the same. Period. That's a very good thing.

You are a fucking retard, period.

You have no idea how the technology works, and you have no what application of law from the 30's means for 21st century technology. You know that your masters tell you that you are in favor of this, so you blindly and stupidly are.

57578883.jpg
 
Our speeds are pathetic compared to the rest of the world.

You do not need more speed, trust me. All you need is for your speed to not be throttled, and perhaps to refrain from consuming bloated web content.
 
You do not need more speed, trust me. All you need is for your speed to not be throttled, and perhaps to refrain from consuming bloated web content.

ROFL

You've already demonstrated that you have zero knowledge of the technology, but others should "trust you?"

Someone taking your advice on networking is like asking the gardener who doesn't speak English to advise on open heart surgery.
 
Internet at the speed of government.

Just look at Turkey's own "net neutrality" laws that gives government power to suspend the internet, shut off social networks, search and arrest without warrant... all in the interest of fairness and public safety. Lefties policies at work.

Except we have a Constitution that prevents that. But your irrational fear is duly noted.

We have Constitution should prevent many things done by the government and look where we are.

But no, "Constitution is a charter of negative liberties that limits government power" and liberals must change that.

 
You do not need more speed, trust me. All you need is for your speed to not be throttled, and perhaps to refrain from consuming bloated web content.

ROFL

You've already demonstrated that you have zero knowledge of the technology, but others should "trust you?"

Someone taking your advice on networking is like asking the gardener who doesn't speak English to advise on open heart surgery.

Yes, please, continue your fraud. I'm very interested to know how you're about to reconcile your upcoming contradictions and utter lack of knowledge of anything. Please....tell us about how internet in the US is too slow. Go ahead. I'm waiting with bated breath.
 
You do not need more speed, trust me. All you need is for your speed to not be throttled, and perhaps to refrain from consuming bloated web content.

ROFL

You've already demonstrated that you have zero knowledge of the technology, but others should "trust you?"

Someone taking your advice on networking is like asking the gardener who doesn't speak English to advise on open heart surgery.

Yes, please, continue your fraud. I'm very interested to know how you're about to reconcile your upcoming contradictions and utter lack of knowledge of anything. Please....tell us about how internet in the US is too slow. Go ahead. I'm waiting with bated breath.

We all should have internet speed like they have in Venezuela. Its internet speed was rated at 1.7 mbps, behind both the region average of 5 mbps and the world average of 20 mbps.

Here is another example of leftist utopia. Venezuela reaches the final stage of socialism: no toilet paper
 
You do not need more speed, trust me. All you need is for your speed to not be throttled, and perhaps to refrain from consuming bloated web content.

ROFL

You've already demonstrated that you have zero knowledge of the technology, but others should "trust you?"

Someone taking your advice on networking is like asking the gardener who doesn't speak English to advise on open heart surgery.

Yes, please, continue your fraud. I'm very interested to know how you're about to reconcile your upcoming contradictions and utter lack of knowledge of anything. Please....tell us about how internet in the US is too slow. Go ahead. I'm waiting with bated breath.

We all should have internet speed like they have in Venezuela. Its internet speed was rated at 1.7 mbps, behind both the region average of 5 mbps and the world average of 20 mbps.

Here is another example of leftist utopia. Venezuela reaches the final stage of socialism: no toilet paper

Oh Jesus fucking Christ, you couldn't be more wrong. Listen, the people here claiming that the US population is some kind of victim because they don't have internet speeds of infinity are completely wrong and don't know what they are talking about. But you're just as wrong when you make this bullshit argument that net neutrality is "Obamacare for the internet."
 
You do not need more speed, trust me. All you need is for your speed to not be throttled, and perhaps to refrain from consuming bloated web content.

ROFL

You've already demonstrated that you have zero knowledge of the technology, but others should "trust you?"

Someone taking your advice on networking is like asking the gardener who doesn't speak English to advise on open heart surgery.

Yes, please, continue your fraud. I'm very interested to know how you're about to reconcile your upcoming contradictions and utter lack of knowledge of anything. Please....tell us about how internet in the US is too slow. Go ahead. I'm waiting with bated breath.

We all should have internet speed like they have in Venezuela. Its internet speed was rated at 1.7 mbps, behind both the region average of 5 mbps and the world average of 20 mbps.

Here is another example of leftist utopia. Venezuela reaches the final stage of socialism: no toilet paper

Oh Jesus fucking Christ, you couldn't be more wrong. Listen, the people here claiming that the US population is some kind of victim because they don't have internet speeds of infinity are completely wrong and don't know what they are talking about. But you're just as wrong when you make this bullshit argument that net neutrality is "Obamacare for the internet."

I don't believe in government control over anything but what's in Article 1 Section 8 of the Constitution.

Net neutrality would fit under another thread we have here - Every Liberal Cause Is Based On A Lie.

You may think that government want you to think what "net neutrality" is, but in reality it about one thing - government control.
 
You do not need more speed, trust me. All you need is for your speed to not be throttled, and perhaps to refrain from consuming bloated web content.

ROFL

You've already demonstrated that you have zero knowledge of the technology, but others should "trust you?"

Someone taking your advice on networking is like asking the gardener who doesn't speak English to advise on open heart surgery.

Yes, please, continue your fraud. I'm very interested to know how you're about to reconcile your upcoming contradictions and utter lack of knowledge of anything. Please....tell us about how internet in the US is too slow. Go ahead. I'm waiting with bated breath.

We all should have internet speed like they have in Venezuela. Its internet speed was rated at 1.7 mbps, behind both the region average of 5 mbps and the world average of 20 mbps.

Here is another example of leftist utopia. Venezuela reaches the final stage of socialism: no toilet paper

Oh Jesus fucking Christ, you couldn't be more wrong. Listen, the people here claiming that the US population is some kind of victim because they don't have internet speeds of infinity are completely wrong and don't know what they are talking about. But you're just as wrong when you make this bullshit argument that net neutrality is "Obamacare for the internet."

I don't believe in government control over anything but what's in Article 1 Section 8 of the Constitution.

Net neutrality would fit under another thread we have here - Every Liberal Cause Is Based On A Lie.

You may think that government want you to think what "net neutrality" is, but in reality it about one thing - government control.

Well if I'm going to agree with that, I may as well believe that 9-11 was pulled off by the CIA.
 
[
Yes, please, continue your fraud. I'm very interested to know how you're about to reconcile your upcoming contradictions and utter lack of knowledge of anything. Please....tell us about how internet in the US is too slow. Go ahead. I'm waiting with bated breath.

Oh, what "fraud" is this, sploogy?

When did I say the Internet in the major cities was too slow?

You're too dumb to even keep track of the players. You have no idea what is going on around you, you only know that George Soros told you that you support the government take-over of the Internet.
 
Oh Jesus fucking Christ, you couldn't be more wrong. Listen, the people here claiming that the US population is some kind of victim because they don't have internet speeds of infinity are completely wrong and don't know what they are talking about. But you're just as wrong when you make this bullshit argument that net neutrality is "Obamacare for the internet."

The USA has the highest available Internet speeds in the world. You can get gigabit connections, for a price.
 
[
Yes, please, continue your fraud. I'm very interested to know how you're about to reconcile your upcoming contradictions and utter lack of knowledge of anything. Please....tell us about how internet in the US is too slow. Go ahead. I'm waiting with bated breath.

Oh, what "fraud" is this, sploogy?

When did I say the Internet in the major cities was too slow?

You're too dumb to even keep track of the players. You have no idea what is going on around you, you only know that George Soros told you that you support the government take-over of the Internet.

:lmao:

I just told someone that they already have all the internet speed they need, and you said I was wrong. But now, I"m right, but just not right.

Man, you're a fucking joke. A bad joke. You're even more pathetic than Obama, which is pretty damn hard to do.
 
Internet at the speed of government.

Just look at Turkey's own "net neutrality" laws that gives government power to suspend the internet, shut off social networks, search and arrest without warrant... all in the interest of fairness and public safety. Lefties policies at work.

Except we have a Constitution that prevents that. But your irrational fear is duly noted.
The Constitution has failed utterly to prevent anything that it was supposed to prevent, so why should this case be any different?
 
I don't believe in government control over anything but what's in Article 1 Section 8 of the Constitution.

Net neutrality would fit under another thread we have here - Every Liberal Cause Is Based On A Lie.

You may think that government want you to think what "net neutrality" is, but in reality it about one thing - government control.

Well if I'm going to agree with that, I may as well believe that 9-11 was pulled off by the CIA.

Why don't you?

I stated that net neutrality is about government control over internet. You argued that is not and said that net neutrality is not Obamacare for the internet. In sense of control, they're the same. They're both based on lies.

Now, can you explain how 9/11 compares to either one.
 
Internet at the speed of government.

Just look at Turkey's own "net neutrality" laws that gives government power to suspend the internet, shut off social networks, search and arrest without warrant... all in the interest of fairness and public safety. Lefties policies at work.

This is why the democrats have mobilized the drooling Soros drones to bleat their idiocy. they have the power now to regulate content on the Internet. The biggest blow to the dominance of the left was the loss of control over what information people had access to. Edward Murrow built a propaganda machine that placed information in the hands of the party, to be manipulated as the party saw fit. The rise of Fox News and particularly the Internet broke the managed news controlled by the party.

But with the Internet as a Title II utility, the party can again exert control over what information is allowed to flow to the public. Expect strict regulations on what sort of information is allowed on sites. My guess is that the FCC will go after certain sites for anti-homosexual views to begin with, since all must bow to the queers in this Obamanation.

This is another example to be added to the thread Every Liberal Cause Is Based On A Lie. Is net neutrality about internet speed for end user? They say it is, but if is about the speed, why are they going after its content?
We're starting to look more and more as former Soviet Union, where every information and thought were under gov't control.

29fyosn.jpg
 
Internet at the speed of government.

Just look at Turkey's own "net neutrality" laws that gives government power to suspend the internet, shut off social networks, search and arrest without warrant... all in the interest of fairness and public safety. Lefties policies at work.

This is why the democrats have mobilized the drooling Soros drones to bleat their idiocy. they have the power now to regulate content on the Internet. The biggest blow to the dominance of the left was the loss of control over what information people had access to. Edward Murrow built a propaganda machine that placed information in the hands of the party, to be manipulated as the party saw fit. The rise of Fox News and particularly the Internet broke the managed news controlled by the party.

But with the Internet as a Title II utility, the party can again exert control over what information is allowed to flow to the public. Expect strict regulations on what sort of information is allowed on sites. My guess is that the FCC will go after certain sites for anti-homosexual views to begin with, since all must bow to the queers in this Obamanation.

This is another example to be added to the thread Every Liberal Cause Is Based On A Lie. Is net neutrality about internet speed for end user? They say it is, but if is about the speed, why are they going after its content?
We're starting to look more and more as former Soviet Union, where every information and thought were under gov't control.

29fyosn.jpg
Hey, crazy person, who is "going after" internet content?
 
Internet at the speed of government.

Just look at Turkey's own "net neutrality" laws that gives government power to suspend the internet, shut off social networks, search and arrest without warrant... all in the interest of fairness and public safety. Lefties policies at work.

This is why the democrats have mobilized the drooling Soros drones to bleat their idiocy. they have the power now to regulate content on the Internet. The biggest blow to the dominance of the left was the loss of control over what information people had access to. Edward Murrow built a propaganda machine that placed information in the hands of the party, to be manipulated as the party saw fit. The rise of Fox News and particularly the Internet broke the managed news controlled by the party.

But with the Internet as a Title II utility, the party can again exert control over what information is allowed to flow to the public. Expect strict regulations on what sort of information is allowed on sites. My guess is that the FCC will go after certain sites for anti-homosexual views to begin with, since all must bow to the queers in this Obamanation.

This is another example to be added to the thread Every Liberal Cause Is Based On A Lie. Is net neutrality about internet speed for end user? They say it is, but if is about the speed, why are they going after its content?
We're starting to look more and more as former Soviet Union, where every information and thought were under gov't control.

29fyosn.jpg
Hey, crazy person, who is "going after" internet content?

Check section that regulate use of lawful content. Well, you can't check it yet, since they're still debating if hurting someones feelings is lawful. You know, like calling someone crazy, like you called me, or calling someone moron, like I called you...
 

Forum List

Back
Top