Quantum Windbag
Gold Member
- May 9, 2010
- 58,308
- 5,101
- 245
So our Ambassador to the United Nations is not responsible for anything she says?
Did anyone say that?
Quite a few people, one of them named Barrack Obama.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
So our Ambassador to the United Nations is not responsible for anything she says?
Did anyone say that?
She is intelligent enough to know that she wasn't allowed to talk about classified information. She is more than qualified to for Hillary's job.
So now she did know it was terrorist attack but deliberately put out false information?
Try to get your story straight.
The story is straight. Susan Rice stuck to the approved media talking points put together by the intelligence community at the request of the Select Committee on Foriegn Intelligence, regardless if she was privy to the classified information about the attack or not.
Official: Changes to Benghazi talking points made by intel community CNN Security Clearance - CNN.com Blogs
Now, will the RW loons who see this is more than it is SHUT UP!
Just who the fuck is "the intelligence community"? Someone, somewhere changed it. Using the term intelligence community is like saying the Dallas Cowboys wore a certain color uniform because the NFL said to. Kind of nebulous, no?
Plus, you do realize that you cited a blog, an opinion piece, correct?
Fuck off you piece of shit.
You praise a cover up of crimes before and after the murder of 4 Americans. You write off the DNI erasing key words from a CIA report to appease his boss, as if his boss didn't tell him to do it.
So if a CEO has his CFO cook the books, I guess his defense in court is well the CFO made the accounting data changes...."not me."
The more you RW loons whine, the sillier you look. We all know what your problem is. Willard lost and now you just got to have your pound of flesh. Sorry, there is nothing here. Move along. Obama has the votes in the Senate to confirm Rice. So sit on it and spin...
Fuck off you piece of shit.
You praise a cover up of crimes before and after the murder of 4 Americans. You write off the DNI erasing key words from a CIA report to appease his boss, as if his boss didn't tell him to do it.
So if a CEO has his CFO cook the books, I guess his defense in court is well the CFO made the accounting data changes...."not me."
The more you RW loons whine, the sillier you look. We all know what your problem is. Willard lost and now you just got to have your pound of flesh. Sorry, there is nothing here. Move along. Obama has the votes in the Senate to confirm Rice. So sit on it and spin...
There was no cover up.
And she wasn't intelligent enough to see that the talking points were wrong? She just went ahead and spewed the erroneous info anyway? She's not qualified to hold a cabinet position.
She is intelligent enough to know that she wasn't allowed to talk about classified information. She is more than qualified to for Hillary's job.
There is a difference between saying "We, obviously, can't talk about everything we know" and "There is absolutely no evidence that this was a terrorist attack."
Fuck off you piece of shit.
You praise a cover up of crimes before and after the murder of 4 Americans. You write off the DNI erasing key words from a CIA report to appease his boss, as if his boss didn't tell him to do it.
So if a CEO has his CFO cook the books, I guess his defense in court is well the CFO made the accounting data changes...."not me."
There was no cover up.
Give me one good reason why terrorist and Al Quaeda was left out of the TP's.
That settles it! The government has identified a fall guy to cover up its own wrongdoing. Not a person, someone who could be questioned and fired if necessary, but surely SOMEONE not in the white house or the state department.
fuck off you piece of shit.
You praise a cover up of crimes before and after the murder of 4 americans. You write off the dni erasing key words from a cia report to appease his boss, as if his boss didn't tell him to do it.
So if a ceo has his cfo cook the books, i guess his defense in court is well the cfo made the accounting data changes...."not me."
the more you rw loons whine, the sillier you look. We all know what your problem is. Willard lost and now you just got to have your pound of flesh. Sorry, there is nothing here. Move along. Obama has the votes in the senate to confirm rice. So sit on it and spin...
there was no cover up.
Since you are unable/unwilling to answer my first question, try this one:
Why was our UN Ambassador representing the Intelligence Community?
And she wasn't intelligent enough to see that the talking points were wrong? She just went ahead and spewed the erroneous info anyway? She's not qualified to hold a cabinet position.
She is intelligent enough to know that she wasn't allowed to talk about classified information. She is more than qualified to for Hillary's job.
There is a difference between saying "We, obviously, can't talk about everything we know" and "There is absolutely no evidence that this was a terrorist attack."
Official: Changes to Benghazi talking points made by intel community CNN Security Clearance - CNN.com Blogs
Now, will the RW loons who see this is more than it is SHUT UP!
Since you are unable/unwilling to answer my first question, try this one:
Why was our UN Ambassador representing the Intelligence Community?
Are you sure you want to ask this incredibly dumb question?
.
Official: Changes to Benghazi talking points made by intel community CNN Security Clearance - CNN.com Blogs
Now, will the RW loons who see this is more than it is SHUT UP!
of course they won't... don't be ridiculous. lol...
There was no cover up.
Give me one good reason why terrorist and Al Quaeda was left out of the TP's.
Sources: Office of the DNI cut "al Qaeda" reference from Benghazi talking points, and CIA, FBI signed off - CBS News
Another source, a senior U.S. official familiar with the drafting of the talking points, tells CBS News the "controversy this word choice has caused came as a surprise."
"The points were not, as has been insinuated by some, edited to minimize the role of extremists, diminish terrorist affiliations, or play down that this was an attack," the official tells CBS News, adding that there were "legitimate intelligence and legal issues to consider, as is almost always the case when explaining classified assessments publicly."
"Most people understand that saying 'extremists' were involved in a direct assault on the mission isn't shying away from the idea of terrorist involvement," added the official. "Because of the various elements involved in the attack, the term extremist was meant to capture the range of participants."
Several militant groups have been eyed as likely culprits, including the Islamic extremist militia Ansar al Sharia, which was based in Eastern Libya and enjoyed huge power in Benghazi before the attack. Gen. Carter Ham, chief of the U.S. Africa Command, said recently that there were "linkages" between al Qaeda and some of the people who attacked the consulate and the CIA annex about a mile away.
She is intelligent enough to know that she wasn't allowed to talk about classified information. She is more than qualified to for Hillary's job.
There is a difference between saying "We, obviously, can't talk about everything we know" and "There is absolutely no evidence that this was a terrorist attack."
Who said the bolded quote above? The only no evidence quotes I can find from the WH personal are that there was no evidence that it was a pre-planned attack.
Here's what Rice said on Meet the Press.
Well, let us-- let me tell you the-- the best information we have at present. First of all, theres an FBI investigation which is ongoing. And we look to that investigation to give us the definitive word as to what transpired. But putting together the best information that we have available to us today our current assessment is that what happened in Benghazi was in fact initially a spontaneous reaction to what had just transpired hours before in Cairo, almost a copycat of-- of the demonstrations against our facility in Cairo, which were prompted, of course, by the video. What we think then transpired in Benghazi is that opportunistic extremist elements came to the consulate as this was unfolding. They came with heavy weapons which unfortunately are readily available in post revolutionary Libya. And it escalated into a much more violent episode. Obviously, thats-- thats our best judgment now. Well await the results of the investigation.
September 16: Benjamin Netanyahu, Susan Rice, Keith Ellison, Peter King, Bob Woodward, Jeffrey Goldberg, Andrea Mitchell - Meet the Press - Transcripts | NBC News