Jarhead
Gold Member
- Jan 11, 2010
- 20,670
- 2,378
- 245
WHAT don't you understand? Yes, they discussed it. Yes they studied it. But NO, they never proposed it become law. There is a HUGE difference between considering, discussing and studying and PROPOSING. You are being suckered by the people who write headlines.
What don't you understand? You're basing your opinion on one article. I'm basing the fact that the EPA proposed changing the regulation on multiple news broadcasts as well as first hand knowledge. Now, let me ask you, do you always base your idiotic assumptions on one piece of information when there are multiple other sources that say otherwise? Or is it just this one instance that you're being a complete and utter fool?
I live in the middle of Minnesota farm land. My house sits on an old farmstead with fields surrounding it. I talk to farmers daily. I also get involved in rural issues. Whether or not you want to believe it, you don't have a clue what you're talking about.
And that means that I'm done discussing this with you because when you don't want to know the TRUTH and make assumptions based on ONE WORD IN ONE ARTICLE you're wasting my time.
So, if anyone else wants to discuss this based on FACTS and not falsehoods, I'm up for it, but this idiot doesn't get a further response on this subject.
Rick
I don't care if you live in a corn field, your accusation is a strawman. The articles I read came FROM YOU...
From your linked article...
Cathy Milbourn, a spokeswoman for the Environmental Protection Agency in Washington, D.C., told the Democrat-Herald: Its too early in the review process to know whether or not EPA will revise the coarse particulate standard...
let me ask you this...
If I owned a company that made widgets...
And the EPA was discussing an initiative that would result in an increase in my cost to produce widgets that would result it in being cheaper for my clients to import widgets..goiving me reason to consider slowing down productiin iut of fear of being stuck with inventory.....
And in the meantime they shelved the idea to discuss a few months down the raod..
SO congress decides to pass legislation so that the EPA can not move forward with that initiative so I can get back to making widgets without worrying about losing all my business...
Should congress have first waiuted for the EPA to pass the intitiative?