Instead of Jobs Bill, House Explores Bill on NONEXISTENT EPA REGS

Discussion in 'Politics' started by jillian, Nov 2, 2011.

  1. jillian
    Offline

    jillian Princess Supporting Member

    Joined:
    Apr 4, 2006
    Messages:
    69,551
    Thanks Received:
    13,012
    Trophy Points:
    2,220
    Location:
    The Other Side of Paradise
    Ratings:
    +22,427
    If they weren't so pathetic, the House would be really, really funny...

    House panel to vote on phantom EPA dust rule - The Washington Post
     
    • Thank You! Thank You! x 3
  2. Conservative
    Offline

    Conservative Type 40

    Joined:
    Jul 1, 2011
    Messages:
    17,082
    Thanks Received:
    2,026
    Trophy Points:
    48
    Location:
    Pennsylvania
    Ratings:
    +2,030
    zzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz
     
  3. Vaard
    Offline

    Vaard Active Member

    Joined:
    Nov 1, 2011
    Messages:
    786
    Thanks Received:
    97
    Trophy Points:
    28
    Ratings:
    +97
    hey, no one hunts snipes better than repubs..........


    sure, they may have never caught one yet, but they do hunt the hell out of them.......
     
    • Thank You! Thank You! x 3
  4. Lonestar_logic
    Offline

    Lonestar_logic Republic of Texas

    Joined:
    May 13, 2009
    Messages:
    24,318
    Thanks Received:
    2,193
    Trophy Points:
    205
    Ratings:
    +3,505
    The jobs bill was tabled in the senate, it has yet to go to the congressional house.

    So that's probably why they are not debating it. DUMBASS!!!
     
  5. DiamondDave
    Offline

    DiamondDave Army Vet

    Joined:
    Jun 30, 2008
    Messages:
    18,169
    Thanks Received:
    2,812
    Trophy Points:
    183
    Location:
    MD, on the Potomac River
    Ratings:
    +2,816
    We don't need a 'jobs bill' where the government spends something it don't have and wastes good money that would otherwise be spent in the private sector instead of in red-tape filled governmental bureaucracy...

    Unfortunately, if they pass a spending cut or a tax plan that starts making the ~50% who do not pay fed income tax have a stake in the game, it will get shot down by the Senate and/or Obamalama

    So... While I don't like it.. this congress is not going to get much of anything done
     
  6. Conservative
    Offline

    Conservative Type 40

    Joined:
    Jul 1, 2011
    Messages:
    17,082
    Thanks Received:
    2,026
    Trophy Points:
    48
    Location:
    Pennsylvania
    Ratings:
    +2,030
    I think her point was that instead of working on job related bills, this was what they were discussing.

    Problem with even that, is that it was a minor issue they debated, along with a bunch of other minor issues, none of which took any real time away from passing about 20 job related bills... ALL of which are now sitting on Harry Reids desk gathering dust.
     
  7. jillian
    Offline

    jillian Princess Supporting Member

    Joined:
    Apr 4, 2006
    Messages:
    69,551
    Thanks Received:
    13,012
    Trophy Points:
    2,220
    Location:
    The Other Side of Paradise
    Ratings:
    +22,427
    i realize it's beyond your comprehension, but the reason the senate took the jobs bill first (which they AREN'T supposed to do) is because the House nutters figure if there are no jobs, the president loses.

    That should clarify things ... even for subliterates like you.
     
    Last edited: Nov 2, 2011
  8. WillowTree
    Offline

    WillowTree Diamond Member

    Joined:
    Sep 15, 2008
    Messages:
    68,122
    Thanks Received:
    10,159
    Trophy Points:
    2,030
    Ratings:
    +14,671
    How long will it take the retards on the left to understand that the House has sent it's jobs bill over to the Senate and that the retard Reid has tabled them? How long?
     
  9. WillowTree
    Offline

    WillowTree Diamond Member

    Joined:
    Sep 15, 2008
    Messages:
    68,122
    Thanks Received:
    10,159
    Trophy Points:
    2,030
    Ratings:
    +14,671
    seek help. you brain has failed you.
     
  10. jillian
    Offline

    jillian Princess Supporting Member

    Joined:
    Apr 4, 2006
    Messages:
    69,551
    Thanks Received:
    13,012
    Trophy Points:
    2,220
    Location:
    The Other Side of Paradise
    Ratings:
    +22,427
    You're correct about what my point is. The House is only focusing on bills they know won't pass the senate (like ones messing with reproductive choice and contraception) and refuse to address anything that is necessary.

    A minor issue... yes. and probably wouldn't take time away from a real agenda. My problem is they have no real agenda that would do anything worthwhile. And that's intentional. They've decided to stonewall until after the 2012 election.

    And seriously.. bills about nonexistent EPA regs and nonbinding resolutions declaring that our motto is what our motto has always been?? this is what the Grand Ole Party has become?

    I miss Senator Pothole.
     
    Last edited: Nov 2, 2011

Share This Page