Innocents Betrayed -- The True Story of Gun Control

Discussion in 'Politics' started by Doc91678, Dec 17, 2012.

  1. Doc91678
    Offline

    Doc91678 BANNED

    Joined:
    Nov 13, 2012
    Messages:
    753
    Thanks Received:
    99
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Location:
    Binghamton
    Ratings:
    +99
     
    • Thank You! Thank You! x 1
    Last edited: Dec 17, 2012
  2. bayoubill
    Offline

    bayoubill aka Sheik Yerbouti... Supporting Member

    Joined:
    Dec 30, 2008
    Messages:
    8,167
    Thanks Received:
    916
    Trophy Points:
    153
    Location:
    Cajun Country
    Ratings:
    +930
    this thread has been up for more than an hour and a half...

    it's gotten a few dozen views...

    libs are conspicuous by their reticence in posting a comment...
     
    Last edited: Dec 17, 2012
  3. OKTexas
    Offline

    OKTexas New Life Member of the NRA 12/15 Supporting Member

    Joined:
    Sep 13, 2012
    Messages:
    23,945
    Thanks Received:
    3,732
    Trophy Points:
    290
    Location:
    Near Magnolia, TX
    Ratings:
    +11,132
    They won't take the time to watch the video.

    I wonder how many folks know our early gun control laws were almost word of word of the laws Hitler put in place early in his regime.
     
  4. Oldguy
    Offline

    Oldguy Senior Member

    Joined:
    Sep 25, 2012
    Messages:
    4,328
    Thanks Received:
    590
    Trophy Points:
    48
    Location:
    Texas
    Ratings:
    +592

    You're right. I won't spend an hour watching it.

    In any case, y'all seem to think gun control began about the time of Hitler, for some odd reason, but you well know it goes much farther back than that in this country.

    For instance, colonial America had laws preventing the ownership of guns by slaves and Indians. During our westward expansion, one of the first steps taken to "civilize" cow towns was to prohibit the carrying of guns in the city limits. Then, in 1911, New York passed the Sullivan Act, the first attempt at comprehensive gun control. That has been followed by a succession of actions right up until today, each further delineating the boundaries of the Second Amendment.

    There has never been any doubt about the constitutionality of gun control and the Supreme Court has ruled repeatedly that guns CAN be constitutionally controlled, beginning with US vs Miller, US vs Cruikshank, Adams vs Williams and the more recent District of Columbia vs Heller and McDonald vs Chicago. There ARE boundaries to the Second Amendment and the courts have repeatedly upheld the right of states to regulate those rights.

    On a positive side, male citizens otherwise capable were required to own and maintain military style weapons as a part of their militia duties and places like Forsythe County, GA have required gun ownership of its citizens. Neither action is, or was, un-constitutional.

    Gun control is a fact of life in the United States and has been almost from day one. It is not some johnny-come-lately liberal conspiracy, but a legitimate and constitutional expression of the Will of The People, as represented in legislative or court bodies. Over the years, gun control has been both tightened, and loosened, as the Will of The People changed over time. Such will be the case in the future.

    Y'all may see commies or prospective tyrants hiding under every bed if you like, but doing so ignores the history of gun control in this country and prevents the more important debate about just what KINDS of gun control we'll have.

    The point is that if this were some kind of great conspiracy, we should be firmly under the thumb of some dictator by now and we're not (your conspiracy theories about Obama not withstanding). Instead, we are once again grappling with the dividing line between rights and responsibilities, something our Constitution protects our right to do.

    The question is not whether we will have gun control, but WHAT controls and under what circumstances. You can either hide in the corner shrieking warnings about impending doom, or join the debate.
     
    • Thank You! Thank You! x 3
  5. Old Rocks
    Offline

    Old Rocks Diamond Member

    Joined:
    Oct 31, 2008
    Messages:
    46,440
    Thanks Received:
    5,409
    Trophy Points:
    1,840
    Location:
    Portland, Ore.
    Ratings:
    +10,294
    I think that in spite of the horror visited on this nation this week, they will stay in their corner, shrieking, and will be up to we sane citizens to bring the proliferation of war weopons in this nation to an end.
     
  6. TakeAStepBack
    Offline

    TakeAStepBack Gold Member

    Joined:
    Mar 29, 2011
    Messages:
    13,935
    Thanks Received:
    1,723
    Trophy Points:
    245
    Ratings:
    +2,012
    Yeah, that's relevant. :lmao:
     
  7. Oldguy
    Offline

    Oldguy Senior Member

    Joined:
    Sep 25, 2012
    Messages:
    4,328
    Thanks Received:
    590
    Trophy Points:
    48
    Location:
    Texas
    Ratings:
    +592

    I wouldn't bet on that. We may see a return to the "assault weapons" ban of the 1990's, probably also including magazine and clip restrictions, but that will be about all. If that.

    In any case, it won't be any more than it was last time: A feel good exercise that amounts to very little.

    The truth seems to be that once the passions of the moment pass, there really isn't a whole lot of support for draconian gun control legislation.

    Nor should there be. Risk of harm is a necessary adjunct to liberty and we cannot, and should not, try to protect ourselves from every conceivable evil.
     
    • Thank You! Thank You! x 1
  8. Oldguy
    Offline

    Oldguy Senior Member

    Joined:
    Sep 25, 2012
    Messages:
    4,328
    Thanks Received:
    590
    Trophy Points:
    48
    Location:
    Texas
    Ratings:
    +592
    It was relevant to the slaves and Indians.

    The purpose of mentioning that was to demonstrate just how far back gun control goes but, of course, that went right over your head.
     
  9. TakeAStepBack
    Offline

    TakeAStepBack Gold Member

    Joined:
    Mar 29, 2011
    Messages:
    13,935
    Thanks Received:
    1,723
    Trophy Points:
    245
    Ratings:
    +2,012
    What goes over your head, smart guy, is that colonial times were monopolized by companies chartered from England (the dutch, french). There was no constitution, nor any second amendment yet. It's a failed comparison.
     
  10. Old Rocks
    Offline

    Old Rocks Diamond Member

    Joined:
    Oct 31, 2008
    Messages:
    46,440
    Thanks Received:
    5,409
    Trophy Points:
    1,840
    Location:
    Portland, Ore.
    Ratings:
    +10,294
    There is nothing in the Second Amendment that prevents a ban on assault rifles for those that cannot pass the same requirments as fully automatic weopons.

    There is nothing in the Second Amendment that prevents a law that states that if you store your guns irresponsibly, and someone takes them, you own the crimes committed with them.

    There is nothing in the Second Amendment stating that we cannot require extensive background checks, and a months waiting period for all gun purchases.
     

Share This Page