This is what disdain for what's "best for society" leads to.The balancing force limiting individual rights should be the individual rights of others. What's "best for society" is a dubious justification, enlisted by everyone with a desire to control others.
That's an evocative photo, but can you elaborate?
For what it's worth, I don't disdain what's best for society. I just recognize that it's a matter of opinion and personal preference. It's something we can, and should, work out through voluntary cooperation rather than coercive laws.