Remodeling Maidiac
Diamond Member
- Banned
- #1
Justice Kennedy has harsh questions for the govts lawyer.
Check out scotusblog
Not looking good for uncle Sam.
Check out scotusblog
Not looking good for uncle Sam.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Since when does anyone trust the analysis of conservatives further than they can throw them?
You CONZ are just whistling past the graveyard on this one.
Tell me...what will you do if the court finds this constitutional?
Bitch about the LIBERAL BIAS on the Supreme Court?
Since when does anyone trust the analysis of conservatives further than they can throw them?
You CONZ are just whistling past the graveyard on this one.
Tell me...what will you do if the court finds this constitutional?
Bitch about the LIBERAL BIAS on the Supreme Court?
Since when does anyone trust the analysis of conservatives further than they can throw them?
You CONZ are just whistling past the graveyard on this one.
Tell me...what will you do if the court finds this constitutional?
Bitch about the LIBERAL BIAS on the Supreme Court?
Tell me...what will you do if the court finds this unconstitutional?
Since when does anyone trust the analysis of conservatives further than they can throw them?
You CONZ are just whistling past the graveyard on this one.
Tell me...what will you do if the court finds this constitutional?
Bitch about the LIBERAL BIAS on the Supreme Court?
Tell me...what will you do if the court finds this unconstitutional?
Probably celebrate a little. That would hasten the march toward single payer.
Republicans and the insurance lobby will have the most difficulty if the mandate is declared unconstitutional.
BTW.........the court is not acting within the limits placed on it by the USC if the rule on it either way. That ought to bother you nutters but it doesn't. Wonder why?
Since when does anyone trust the analysis of conservatives further than they can throw them?
You CONZ are just whistling past the graveyard on this one.
Tell me...what will you do if the court finds this constitutional?
Bitch about the LIBERAL BIAS on the Supreme Court?
Since when does anyone trust the analysis of conservatives further than they can throw them?
You CONZ are just whistling past the graveyard on this one.
Tell me...what will you do if the court finds this constitutional?
Bitch about the LIBERAL BIAS on the Supreme Court?
I hope you're right. They need to shoot this down and go back to the drawing board. I know of no one who is against helping the truly needy in our country and we helped with their healthcare through Medicaid and many states have additional programs.
It feels completely wrong having the government tell you that you have to buy something, at a higher price than you are now, or you will face fines and maybe jail. Obama kept going back and forth on the mandate, saying it's a tax, it's not a tax........ He knows it's unconstitutional and he couldn't spin it to make it look otherwise.
If those liberal judges opt to set a precedent by effectively altering our constitution, kiss the country goodbye. Once they hand power to government to make these kinds of changes in our foundation, it's all down hill.
Since when does anyone trust the analysis of conservatives further than they can throw them?
You CONZ are just whistling past the graveyard on this one.
Tell me...what will you do if the court finds this constitutional?
Bitch about the LIBERAL BIAS on the Supreme Court?
Tell me...what will you do if the court finds this unconstitutional?
Probably celebrate a little. That would hasten the march toward single payer.
Republicans and the insurance lobby will have the most difficulty if the mandate is declared unconstitutional.
BTW.........the court is not acting within the limits placed on it by the USC if the rule on it either way. That ought to bother you nutters but it doesn't. Wonder why?
Probably celebrate a little. That would hasten the march toward single payer.
Republicans and the insurance lobby will have the most difficulty if the mandate is declared unconstitutional.
BTW.........the court is not acting within the limits placed on it by the USC if the rule on it either way. That ought to bother you nutters but it doesn't. Wonder why?
Did you just say that if the SCOTUS rules for, or against Obamacare, they are acting outside their Constitutional authority?
Justice Kennedy has harsh questions for the govts lawyer.
Check out scotusblog
Not looking good for uncle Sam.
Since when does anyone trust the analysis of conservatives further than they can throw them?
You CONZ are just whistling past the graveyard on this one.
Tell me...what will you do if the court finds this constitutional?
Bitch about the LIBERAL BIAS on the Supreme Court?
Tell me...what will you do if the court finds this unconstitutional?
Probably celebrate a little. That would hasten the march toward single payer.
Republicans and the insurance lobby will have the most difficulty if the mandate is declared unconstitutional.
BTW.........the court is not acting within the limits placed on it by the USC if the rule on it either way. That ought to bother you nutters but it doesn't. Wonder why?
Did you just say that if the SCOTUS rules for, or against Obamacare, they are acting outside their Constitutional authority?
Probably celebrate a little. That would hasten the march toward single payer.
Republicans and the insurance lobby will have the most difficulty if the mandate is declared unconstitutional.
BTW.........the court is not acting within the limits placed on it by the USC if the rule on it either way. That ought to bother you nutters but it doesn't. Wonder why?
Did you just say that if the SCOTUS rules for, or against Obamacare, they are acting outside their Constitutional authority?
Yes. Do you think you have trapped me or something? The law was passed by duly elected representatives of the people and signed by the duly elected President of the United States. They shouldn't even be hearing the case.
Probably celebrate a little. That would hasten the march toward single payer.
Republicans and the insurance lobby will have the most difficulty if the mandate is declared unconstitutional.
BTW.........the court is not acting within the limits placed on it by the USC if the rule on it either way. That ought to bother you nutters but it doesn't. Wonder why?
Did you just say that if the SCOTUS rules for, or against Obamacare, they are acting outside their Constitutional authority?
Yes. Do you think you have trapped me or something? The law was passed by duly elected representatives of the people and signed by the duly elected President of the United States. They shouldn't even be hearing the case.