Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
the problem is DCS can't comment about an ongoing case publicly, so we are only getting one side.I'll bet you almost any amount of money that there's a lot more to that story that Faux is telling you.
Seems like it. But the media will persuade.Actually, no, DCS specifically cited the untreated eating disorder and the removal of the child from School as reasons why the child was removed.
It wasn't just about the pronouns.
Plenty of commentary that kids who have no inclination of Gender dysphoria, are influenced by the over reaching sensationalism of it.Oh, come on, man. This isn't a fad.
This wrong. They are not evil hoards, at least not everyone believes that. Stop using such a wide brush of generalization.Funny, the only people I see politicizing transgender issues is the right wing who are trying to convince people there's a hoard of evil trannies out to get their kids.
Gays have existed for millenia. They kept their bodies. Can we at least admit that this fad of plastic surgery is creating a new problem that hasn't been fully explored? And can we start addressing GAC and all the huge life changing risks and complications that come from it instead of treating it as some warm and fuzzy security blanket? Conservatives want children to be left alone and to let their bodies grow so that person can make an informed decision about their future sexual health. There are some religious and political nuts out there, sure. But there is a voice that says, I don't care what an adult wants to do with their bodies. And I think children should be allowed to grow into adulthood with their body fully functioning sexually so they can make an informed decision. Is that too much ask?Again, the only people I see getting 'triggered" are the right wing going crazy because Trans people exist.
There are lots of things that seem to only have one side, like January 6th. Isn't that right, there is no other side, just yours and that of Joe Biden.the problem is DCS can't comment about an ongoing case publicly, so we are only getting one side.
But even the side we are getting we know 1) The child had an eating disorder that had been left untreated for two years and 2) that the child was removed from school when the school disagreed with the parents on how to proceed.
YES, OTHER ARTICLES PROVIDE ACTUAL INFORMATION.the problem is DCS can't comment about an ongoing case publicly, so we are only getting one side.
But even the side we are getting we know 1) The child had an eating disorder that had been left untreated for two years and 2) that the child was removed from school when the school disagreed with the parents on how to proceed.
Missing my point. It's not done on a child. But if a child is subjected to hormone blockers, it can cause complications for future surgeries.I would generally be reluctant to allow bottom surgery on a minor, which is why it is almost never done.
Then you're increasing the chance for fully sexual function and removing the ability for that person to experience sex, or a full blown orgasm. I would never want to take that away from my child or any child.Other gender-affirming care does make sense, before the body grows too far into the wrong gender for that person. If you are going to treat someone with hormones, it's best to do that before the kid reaches puberty.
Not in every society. Plenty of societies have accepted it, and you know it.For thousands of years, homosexuals were murdered by religious fanatics.
You're missing the point again. Transgender is only a thing because we have this idea biological gender shouldn't be defined or applied to a person. We have had cross dressers, we have had gays, butches, dykes, etc. who have lived fulfilling sexual lives. My point is that medical capacity is attempting to reclassify biological sex via irreversible cosmetic surgery. And that decision should be left up to an adult.Also, transgender isn't the same thing as homosexuality.
There are lots of things that seem to only have one side, like January 6th. Isn't that right, there is no other side, just yours and that of Joe Biden.
That is why when you shoot unarmed women at the Capital, you don't even need and investigation because it is just so one sided and obvious.
Chloe Brockman has so many mental problems that her gender identity was kind of besides the point.It's like the whole gender controversy. It's one sided as well. That is why you need to silence people like this.
The abuse would be going along with the child's fairytale.No one on the left has defended that.
This couple's refusal to recognize the child's gender identity was causing the child harm.
If the parents were abusive, I would agree. But the charge is their abuse is only refusing to use certain pronouns.
That is not abuse. They are loving parents.
Is that why there are 3 lawsuits going on now because a doctor cut their breadt off between the ages of 13 to 15?I would generally be reluctant to allow bottom surgery on a minor, which is why it is almost never done.
Other gender-affirming care does make sense, before the body grows too far into the wrong gender for that person. If you are going to treat someone with hormones, it's best to do that before the kid reaches puberty.
For thousands of years, homosexuals were murdered by religious fanatics.
Also, transgender isn't the same thing as homosexuality.
Somehow, I don't think any kid is going to sign up to something that will subject them to ridicule and abuse from their peers. If anything, I suspect the amount of transgender youth is probably underreported.Plenty of commentary that kids who have no inclination of Gender dysphoria, are influenced by the over reaching sensationalism of it.
I'm not saying that it isn't real. But children are highly influenced and can be influenced by social circles.
This wrong. They are not evil hoards, at least not everyone believes that. Stop using such a wide brush of generalization.
Gays have existed for millenia. They kept their bodies. Can we at least admit that this fad of plastic surgery is creating a new problem that hasn't been fully explored? And can we start addressing GAC and all the huge life changing risks and complications that come from it instead of treating it as some warm and fuzzy security blanket? Conservatives want children to be left alone and to let their bodies grow so that person can make an informed decision about their future sexual health. There are some religious and political nuts out there, sure. But there is a voice that says, I don't care what an adult wants to do with their bodies. And I think children should be allowed to grow into adulthood with their body fully functioning sexually so they can make an informed decision. Is that too much ask?
You're missing the point again. Transgender is only a thing because we have this idea biological gender shouldn't be defined or applied to a person. We have had cross dressers, we have had gays, butches, dykes, etc. who have lived fulfilling sexual lives. My point is that medical capacity is attempting to reclassify biological sex via irreversible cosmetic surgery. And that decision should be left up to an adult.
Just three?Is that why there are 3 lawsuits going on now because a doctor cut their breadt off between the ages of 13 to 15?
No one under the age of 18 should be able to get a sex change. Not even the drugs to start the process.Just three?
250,000 Americans DIE every year because of medical mistakes.
Just three sounds like a pretty low number.
No
No one under the age of 18 should be able to get a sex change. Not even the drugs to start the process.
The exact opposite is happening. Being "trans" or non-binary, or being a part of the LBGTQ++++++++++++ community is being widely accepted.Somehow, I don't think any kid is going to sign up to something that will subject them to ridicule and abuse from their peers. If anything, I suspect the amount of transgender youth is probably underreported.
Suggesting that children should be allowed to grow and mature in their biological bodies so they can make an informed decision based on experience and full functioning body is not whining.Then you guys will stop whining about it, then? I mean, you'd think it was the biggest issue we face the way some of you are carrying on.
Illogical argument. Conservative and progressives alike do agree that children should be allowed to develop fully before GAC is provided. One's political leaning doesn't immediately discredit their approach for medical care. The facts are valid that GAC, at an early age, does irreversible and biological harm to the body. Not to mention, the mental health concerns of regret that can and does happen. My point again, is that GAC is not some magic wand that is the end all answer to gender dysphoria. As stated GAC is a warm fuzzy blanket that covers the truth of life long, irreversible physical changes and carries potential absolute risks to a human's sexuality, sexual function, sexual pleasure and fulfillment.Are "conservatives" medical professionals? If you had cancer, would you want a "conservative" giving you medical advice, or would you go to a medical professional that specializes in this sort of thing
See my above comment.I think that GAC should be practiced with care at ANY age. But in some cases, it's probably useful.
Practiced, but not refined, not perfect and come with a whole host of issues that should not be applied to a child. If an adult who has experienced sexual functionality says yes to the surgery, knowing that they potentially lose sexual sensitive, never orgasm again, have to take hormones, will have to use skin grafts to shape a faux penis that will never work as a real penis all the while removing potentially any sexual functionality, sure, go for it. But leave kids alone.Gender Reassignment Surgery is a proven medical treatment that has been practiced for nearly 80 years.
Also, transgender isn't the same thing as homosexuality.
Chloe Brockman has so many mental problems that her gender identity was kind of besides the point.
Just a thought, can we stop generalizing and placing Dems and Republicans into two absolutely black and white boxes.Democrats are coming for your kids America!!!
If it wasn't for covid giving parents a look into the schools, democrats would still be grooming kids to prepare to take them away and mutilate them in secret.
Democrats = WEF
Democrats support pedos and will share thier fate in Hell. If you support democrats, you support pedos dressing in drag and performing for children.Just a thought, can we stop generalizing and placing Dems and Republicans into two absolutely black and white boxes.
Not EVERY Democrat or liberal wants to mutilate children and
This is a round about way of saying not all Republicans support child sacrifice.not every republican wants to remove genuine mental health or restrict adults from doing whatever they want with their fully mature adult bodies.
Democrats = party of pedos.This forum is has more than enough fools that generalize EVERYTHING, let's not do the same.
Which is kind of the point.
The sick fucks that push this fucked-up shit take advantage of vulnerable children's like Chloe, who have various mental issues that make them particularly susceptible to it. Some sick fuck planets the idea in her head that she should be a boy, and steered her toward having her body irreversibly damage by drugs and surgeries under the fraudulent guise of helping her to become a boy.
The hard fact is that a girl, is not, and cannot become a boy, nor is a boy nor can a boy become a girl. It is flat-out biologically impossible.
