In re: Orlando : The Pachyderm in the Room

[Contumacious]

Whenever there is a problem individuals must perform a root cause analysis

Why did a Muslim perpetrate an attack in Orlando, Florida, USA and NOT in Zurich Switzerland?

Why New York City and NOT in Geneva, Switzerland?

In 1949 Harry S Truman stole Palestine from the Palestinians, gave it to the Zionists thereby dispossessing 1.3 million Muslims of their homeland.

What motivated the 9/11 hijackers? See testimony most didn't



.

 

[Contumacious]

Whenever there is a problem individuals must perform a root cause analysis

Why did a Muslim perpetrate an attack in Orlando, Florida, USA and NOT in Zurich Switzerland?

Why New York City and NOT in Geneva, Switzerland?

In 1949 Harry S Truman stole Palestine from the Palestinians, gave it to the Zionists thereby dispossessing 1.3 million Muslims of their homeland.

What motivated the 9/11 hijackers? See testimony most didn't



.

After Truman disenfranchised 1.3 million Muslim the US has given $125 BBBBillion to Israel in order to murder and disappear the Palestinians by any means necessary.

 

[Katzndogz]

Why Paris and not San Francisco? Why Brussels and not Chicago? Why Bali, Mumbai and Berlin?

 

[Contumacious]

In 1996 powerful American Likudnicks decided to defend and protect Israel by destroying Iraq and Syria.

By destroying Syria and Iraq Israel would become a powerhouse in the middle east.


.

 

[Contumacious]

In 1996 powerful American Likudnicks decided to make Israel a powerhouse in the middle east by detroying Iraq and Syria.

 

[Contumacious]

Why Paris and not San Francisco? Why Brussels and not Chicago? Why Bali, Mumbai and Berlin?

France has also been fucking around in the middle east.


Belgium decided to arrest those who perpetrated the attack in Paris even though they had committed no crime in Bellgium.


.

 

[Blackrook]

There is terrorism everywhere and the vast majority of it has nothing to do with Israel.

 

[Contumacious]

There is terrorism everywhere and the vast majority of it has nothing to do with Israel.

You are free to ignore the pachyderm in the room as well as the FBI's testimony at the 09/11 Commission.


.

 

[flacaltenn]

Oh so destroying Iraq, Afghanistan, libya, and Somalia wasn't enough? Had to toss in Syria to see if Democracy would bloom like a rose there huh?

We did not HAVE a "Libya policy" or a "Syria policy".. THAT'S the reality. This Admin has been winging it from day one. In fact PUTIN had to back the spinaless duo of Obama/Kerry from the bombing the shit out of Syria for "WMDs".. How ironic was that?

You got nothing really.. Just an intense hatred of Israel's existence.

 

[Contumacious]

Oh so destroying Iraq, Afghanistan, libya, and Somalia wasn't enough? Had to toss in Syria to see if Democracy would bloom like a rose there huh?

We did not HAVE a "Libya policy" or a "Syria policy".. THAT'S the reality. This Admin has been winging it from day one. In fact PUTIN had to back the spinaless duo of Obama/Kerry from the bombing the shit out of Syria for "WMDs".. How ironic was that?

You got nothing really.. Just an intense hatred of Israel's existence.

Oh but powerful American Likudnicks did develop a Syria policy back in 1996.


"This doctrine was prefigured in a 1996 paper prepared for then Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu by a working group consisting of several individuals who are now in top spots in the Bush administration. "A Clean Break: A New Strategy for Securing the Realm" recommended that Israel set itself free from its embarrassing and debilitating dependence on U.S. military and diplomatic support: no matter how unconditional, this support constrained Israel and prevented it from pursuing its true interests. The paper, co-authored by Richard Perle, James Colbert,Charles Fairbanks, Jr., Douglas Feith, Robert Loewenberg, David Wurmser, and Meyrav Wurmser, portrayed Syria as the main enemy of Israel, but maintained the road to Damascus had to first pass through Baghdad:

"Israel can shape its strategic environment, in cooperation with Turkey and Jordan, by weakening, containing, and even rolling back Syria. This effort can focus on removing Saddam Hussein from power in Iraq – an important Israeli strategic objective in its own right – as a means of foiling Syria's regional ambitions. Jordan has challenged Syria's regional ambitions recently by suggesting the restoration of the Hashemites in Iraq."

 

[Contumacious]

Complying with the Syria Policy developed in 1996 "A Clean Break: A New Strategy for Securing the Realm". The US invaded Iraq in 1990 and remained there for 18 years. Bush II murdered millions of Iraqis while the US was there.


IRAQ: War Launched to Protect Israel – Bush Adviser

Emad Mekay

WASHINGTON, Mar 29 2004 (IPS) - Iraq under Saddam Hussein did not pose a threat to the United States but it did to Israel, which is one reason why Washington invaded the Arab country, according to a speech made by a member of a top-level White House intelligence grou

 

[flacaltenn]

Oh so destroying Iraq, Afghanistan, libya, and Somalia wasn't enough? Had to toss in Syria to see if Democracy would bloom like a rose there huh?

We did not HAVE a "Libya policy" or a "Syria policy".. THAT'S the reality. This Admin has been winging it from day one. In fact PUTIN had to back the spinaless duo of Obama/Kerry from the bombing the shit out of Syria for "WMDs".. How ironic was that?

You got nothing really.. Just an intense hatred of Israel's existence.

Oh but powerful American Likudnicks did develop a Syria policy back in 1996.


"This doctrine was prefigured in a 1996 paper prepared for then Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu by a working group consisting of several individuals who are now in top spots in the Bush administration. "A Clean Break: A New Strategy for Securing the Realm" recommended that Israel set itself free from its embarrassing and debilitating dependence on U.S. military and diplomatic support: no matter how unconditional, this support constrained Israel and prevented it from pursuing its true interests. The paper, co-authored by Richard Perle, James Colbert,Charles Fairbanks, Jr., Douglas Feith, Robert Loewenberg, David Wurmser, and Meyrav Wurmser, portrayed Syria as the main enemy of Israel, but maintained the road to Damascus had to first pass through Baghdad:

"Israel can shape its strategic environment, in cooperation with Turkey and Jordan, by weakening, containing, and even rolling back Syria. This effort can focus on removing Saddam Hussein from power in Iraq – an important Israeli strategic objective in its own right – as a means of foiling Syria's regional ambitions. Jordan has challenged Syria's regional ambitions recently by suggesting the restoration of the Hashemites in Iraq."

You do know that Perle and crew simply VANISHED out of humiliation along with their PNAC org right? They wrote LOTS of papers and Benny Netanyahu gets a lot of fan mail..

You got nothing.. EXCEPT a bunch of disgraced advisors who got Bush into trouble...

 

[Contumacious]

Oh so destroying Iraq, Afghanistan, libya, and Somalia wasn't enough? Had to toss in Syria to see if Democracy would bloom like a rose there huh?

We did not HAVE a "Libya policy" or a "Syria policy".. THAT'S the reality. This Admin has been winging it from day one. In fact PUTIN had to back the spinaless duo of Obama/Kerry from the bombing the shit out of Syria for "WMDs".. How ironic was that?

You got nothing really.. Just an intense hatred of Israel's existence.

Oh but powerful American Likudnicks did develop a Syria policy back in 1996.


"This doctrine was prefigured in a 1996 paper prepared for then Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu by a working group consisting of several individuals who are now in top spots in the Bush administration. "A Clean Break: A New Strategy for Securing the Realm" recommended that Israel set itself free from its embarrassing and debilitating dependence on U.S. military and diplomatic support: no matter how unconditional, this support constrained Israel and prevented it from pursuing its true interests. The paper, co-authored by Richard Perle, James Colbert,Charles Fairbanks, Jr., Douglas Feith, Robert Loewenberg, David Wurmser, and Meyrav Wurmser, portrayed Syria as the main enemy of Israel, but maintained the road to Damascus had to first pass through Baghdad:

"Israel can shape its strategic environment, in cooperation with Turkey and Jordan, by weakening, containing, and even rolling back Syria. This effort can focus on removing Saddam Hussein from power in Iraq – an important Israeli strategic objective in its own right – as a means of foiling Syria's regional ambitions. Jordan has challenged Syria's regional ambitions recently by suggesting the restoration of the Hashemites in Iraq."

You do know that Perle and crew simply VANISHED out of humiliation along with their PNAC org right? They wrote LOTS of papers and Benny Netanyahu gets a lot of fan mail..

You got nothing.. EXCEPT a bunch of disgraced advisors who got Bush into trouble...

A newly-released Hilary Clinton email confirmed that the Obama administration has deliberately provoked the civil war in Syria as the “best way to help Israel.”


.

 

[Contumacious]

Those who want to ignore the elephant in the room maintain that Truman was right to dispossess 1.5 Muslims from their homeland, that ALL presidents (democrats and republicans) since t1949) had the right to give Israel 12 billion dollars per year in foreign aid . , That the US has the right to destroy Iraq and Syria but the Muslims have no right to retaliate.

 

[flacaltenn]

I hope you realize how ill-conceived this little conspiracy is and why I'm laughing so hard.

If PNAC and Perle were a Zionist puppet master operation -- WHY would they have to pitch ANYTHING to Netanyahu and the Israelis??

They were a bunch of turn-coat Dems with awful ideas about sprouting "democracy in the Mid East" that got both Clinton and Bush in deep shit to the point where even EXPERTS can't tell the diff in US Mid East policy between the 2 presidents.

Netanyahu was in TALKS with Assad prior to his insurrection about backing away from Iran in exchange for a steadier peace arrangement. Fact ...............................

 

[flacaltenn]

In fact --- the Israelis were TOO SMART to listen to PNAC. Unfortunately, Clinton/Bush were not.

You really should just stick to the chronic shitty US decisions that were made for decades on Mid-East policy. A guy like you shouldn't have ANY problem realizes how inept OUR leadership has been...............

 

[Contumacious]

I hope you realize how ill-conceived this little conspiracy is and why I'm laughing so hard.

If PNAC and Perle were a Zionist puppet master operation -- WHY would they have to pitch ANYTHING to Netanyahu and the Israelis??
Israel Is the Problem, by Justin Raimondo
They were a bunch of turn-coat Dems with awful ideas about sprouting "democracy in the Mid East" that got both Clinton and Bush in deep shit to the point where even EXPERTS can't tell the diff in US Mid East policy between the 2 presidents.

Netanyahu was in TALKS with Assad prior to his insurrection about backing away from Iran in exchange for a steadier peace arrangement. Fact ...............................

David Wurmser is chief aide to Undersecretary of Defense John Bolton, who, before a single shot was fired against Iraq, was already promising Sharon that Syria would be next. AsHa'aretz reported at the time (

"U.S. Undersecretary of State John Bolton said in meetings with Israeli officials on Monday that he has no doubt America will attack Iraq, and that it will be necessary to deal with threats from Syria, Iran and North Korea afterwards."


In February, Prime Minister Ariel Sharon was already demanding action against Syria. At a meeting with a delegation of U.S. congressmen, Sharon handed the Americans their marching orders:

"Prime Minister Ariel Sharon said yesterday that Iran, Libya and Syria should be stripped of weapons of mass destruction after Iraq. 'These are irresponsible states, which must be disarmed of weapons of mass destruction, and a successful American move in Iraq as a model will make that easier to achieve,' Sharon said to a visiting delegation of American congressmen. Sharon told the congressmen that Israel was not involved in the war with Iraq 'but the American action is of vital importance.'"

 

[Contumacious]

In fact --- the Israelis were TOO SMART to listen to PNAC. Unfortunately, Clinton/Bush were not.

You really should just stick to the chronic shitty US decisions that were made for decades on Mid-East policy. A guy like you shouldn't have ANY problem realizes how inept OUR leadership has been...............

Obama wants to destroy Syria for Israel .

But he does NOT want to send ground troops to fight there, So contrary to his assertions he needs ISIS.ISIS is doing the dirty bloody work there

https://www.lewrockwell.com/lrc-blog/syrian-oppositions-amazing-cia-credentials/
Syrian Opposition’s Amazing CIA Credentials

.

 

[Contumacious]

Flacaltenn

I really appreciate it you letting me broadcast this urgent message. We must protect AMERICAN LIVES FIRST. WE MUST EXPOSE OFFICIAL CORRUPTION.

 

[MikeK]

Those who want to ignore the elephant in the room maintain that Truman was right to dispossess 1.5 Muslims from their homeland, that ALL presidents (democrats and republicans) since t1949) had the right to give Israel 12 billion dollars per year in foreign aid . , That the US has the right to destroy Iraq and Syria but the Muslims have no right to retaliate.

Those of us who were vocally opposed to our government's actions in the Middle East, with emphasis on Bush's criminal invasion of Iraq, are in the difficult position of being targets of retaliatory Muslim terrorists. We have no choice but to assume a defensive position toward an increasingly aggressive and committed enemy. We've been handed a kill-or-be-killed situation.

It's an enemy we didn't want but are burdened with. Too bad we can't just give them Bush's, Cheney's, Rumsfeld's, Powell's home addresses, along with some others, and put an end to what surely will become perpetual terrorism -- or eventually the Tenth Crusade.