businessman1927
Rookie
- Aug 17, 2010
- 2
- 0
- 0
- Banned
- #1
Insurance is important for business?
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Then why would the feds try to force that difficulty of access and lack of efficiency upon everyone?The question is, what value or services does insurance really offer anymore? It's a middleman for the sake of the middleman. One who is actually making the access to healthcare more difficult instead of more efficient.
Insurance is important for business?
Insurance is important for business?
Then why would the feds try to force that difficulty of access and lack of efficiency upon everyone?The question is, what value or services does insurance really offer anymore? It's a middleman for the sake of the middleman. One who is actually making the access to healthcare more difficult instead of more efficient.
What you really mean is that there's no better option that you will accept as better.Then why would the feds try to force that difficulty of access and lack of efficiency upon everyone?The question is, what value or services does insurance really offer anymore? It's a middleman for the sake of the middleman. One who is actually making the access to healthcare more difficult instead of more efficient.
Really? I know you're not asking for intelligent discussion Dude, but rather to start an argument. But I'll humor you anyway.....
Because there is no better option at this point. No public option, no single payer, so to ensure that all americans can get access they had to promise the insurance companies, who are unfortunately very much in control of healthcare still, that if they are to cover preexisting conditions then all people must have insurance in order to help alleviate some of the costs (ie. reduced profits) the insurance companies will have to take on.
What you really mean is that there's no better option that you will accept as better.Then why would the feds try to force that difficulty of access and lack of efficiency upon everyone?
Really? I know you're not asking for intelligent discussion Dude, but rather to start an argument. But I'll humor you anyway.....
Because there is no better option at this point. No public option, no single payer, so to ensure that all americans can get access they had to promise the insurance companies, who are unfortunately very much in control of healthcare still, that if they are to cover preexisting conditions then all people must have insurance in order to help alleviate some of the costs (ie. reduced profits) the insurance companies will have to take on.
You're the one who has accepted the premise that a third-party payer is the best way to pay for medical expenses, not me...That's your problem.
What's the rational argument, that you're entitled to have a third party pick up the costs for your medical expenses?
You complain about lack of efficiency and force being in the marketplace, yet your only "answer" is to impose more inefficiency and force into that marketplace.
Doing more of the same thing over and over and over again, while expecting a better result.....
What's the rational argument, that you're entitled to have a third party pick up the costs for your medical expenses?
You complain about lack of efficiency and force being in the marketplace, yet your only "answer" is to impose more inefficiency and force into that marketplace.
Doing more of the same thing over and over and over again, while expecting a better result.....
Like I already said, doing the same thing over and over and over and over again, while expecting better results....
Like I already said, doing the same thing over and over and over and over again, while expecting better results....
Doing the same thing over and over again....or in other words the republicans approach to health care reform.
Now, back to my original question.....what value do healthcare insurance companies provide?
One of the republican approaches was to end in-state quasi-monopolies, that have left residents unable to shop for better rates, rather than to consolidate even more power into the hands of those insurance companies you claim to detest so much.Like I already said, doing the same thing over and over and over and over again, while expecting better results....
Doing the same thing over and over again....or in other words the republicans approach to health care reform.
Now, back to my original question.....what value do healthcare insurance companies provide?
Like I already said, doing the same thing over and over and over and over again, while expecting better results....
Doing the same thing over and over again....or in other words the republicans approach to health care reform.
Now, back to my original question.....what value do healthcare insurance companies provide?
What value insurance companies provide to those who choose to purchase their services is up to the subjective opinions of their customers, which isn't for me to speculate.
What business do you or I have in trying to speak for what someone else values and why?
Well, I mean unless one has a vested interest in imposing his own subjective values upon everyone else, at their expense, at gunpoint if necessary.