Immigration LAW 1907. TITLE 8, U.S.C. 1324

[TheGreatSatan]

Democrats are above the laws

 

[danielpalos]

That power has to be delegated somewhere or it is unConstitutional and null and void, from Inception if we have to quibble about it in Any serious venue.

The Power to regulate Immigration was always assumed to exist since the inception of America. It was further defined in The 14th Amendment.

The 14th Amendment discusses persons who already have legal status in The US, and whom The United States has Jurisdiction over.

The United States does not have Jurisdiction over Foreign Nationals, so therefore, the 14th Amendment only applies to legal residents with legal status in The US who The US has Jurisdiction over, therefore making them subject to US law, and afforded the rights persons of Legal Status are guaranteed.

Illegal Aliens have No Legal Status so this is why they can be removed from The US and deported back to their country of Origin.

You cannot do that to a US Citizen.

Also The Anchor Baby Scenario is a Myth, and is nothing but a political football. Eventually that myth will be shattered by SCOTUS when the right case is brought before it.

DACA is also illegal and is not lawful.

You miss the point. There is no implied right wing fantasy that is more supreme than any given Thing, expressed in our supreme law of the land.

I did not miss the point at all. DACA is Unconstitutional, and so is the mythological Anchor Baby status. The United States does not have legal jurisdiction over Foreign Nationals in this country illegally. Illegal Aliens by definition have NO LEGAL STATUS and the US has no Jurisdiction over them, so they HAVE TO DEPORT THEM.

This includes Illegal Aliens who have children born in The US, since The US has No Jurisdiction over the parents. Now if someone on a legal Work Visa, or Student Visa has a child here, they can be declared a Natural Born Citizen, but NOT the Children of Illegal Aliens as they do not have legal status.

You have no idea what you are talking about. The express power delegated is for naturalization not immigration.

 

[gallantwarrior]

The left screams first and loudest about disenfranchising legitimate voters by requiring they identify themselves as qualified to vote. How about all of the legal, legitimate voters whose votes are nullified every time one of these illegals cast a vote. Are we not among the disenfranchised? Why does the left/lib/prog base not howl about that?

 

[danielpalos]

Democrats are above the laws

the right wing only knows how to appeal to ignorance of the laws.

 

[The Original Tree]

AMENDMENT XIV

SECTION 1
All persons born or naturalized in the United States and subject to the jurisdiction thereof, are citizens of the United States and of the State wherein they reside. No State shall make or enforce any law which shall abridge the privileges or immunities of citizens of the United States; nor shall any State deprive any person of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law; nor deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal protection of the laws.

SECTION 2
Representatives shall be apportioned among the several States according to their respective numbers, counting the whole number of persons in each State, excluding Indians not taxed. But when the right to vote at any election for the choice of electors for President and Vice President of the United States, Representatives in Congress, the Executive and Judicial officers of a State, or the members of the Legislature thereof, is denied to any of the male inhabitants of such State, being twenty-one years of age, and citizens of the United States, or in any way abridged, except for participation in rebellion, or other crime, the basis of representation therein shall be reduced in the proportion which the number of such male citizens shall bear to the whole number of male citizens twenty-one years of age in such State.

SECTION 3
No person shall be a Senator or Representative in Congress, or elector of President and Vice President, or hold any office, civil or military, under the United States, or under any State, who, having previously taken an oath, as a member of Congress, or as an officer of the United States, or as a member of any State legislature, or as an executive or judicial officer of any State, to support the Constitution of the United States, shall have engaged in insurrection or rebellion against the same, or given aid or comfort to the enemies thereof. But Congress may by a vote of two-thirds of each House, remove such disability.

SECTION 4
The validity of the public debt of the United States, authorized by law, including debts incurred for payment of pensions and bounties for services in suppressing insurrection or rebellion, shall not be questioned. But neither the United States nor any State shall assume or pay any debt or obligation incurred in aid of insurrection or rebellion against the United States, or any claim for the loss or emancipation of any slave; but all such debts, obligations and claims shall be held illegal and void.

SECTION 5
The Congress shall have power to enforce, by appropriate legislation, the provisions of this article.

That is about citizenship not immigration.

Wrong. Illegal Immigrants are Not Citizens. Therefore because The US does not have Jurisdiction over them, their country where their citizenship resides does, The Myth of Anchor Babies never was. You cannot illegally immigrate in to The US, have a child and declare it a citizen. DACA by the same legal reasoning is also Unconstitutional. It is also not law, but is nothing but "Delayed Action" and even within the DACA EO itself it is recognized that these people are here illegally and subject to the enforcement of immigration law, but for the EO Delaying that Enforcement.....DACA.

 

[TheGreatSatan]

Democrats are above the laws

the right wing only knows how to appeal to ignorance of the laws.

Educate me then. I love dumb ass fairy tales.

How is aiding and abetting foreign nationals who come and go unchecked and unregulated at will, not illegal?

 

[danielpalos]

AMENDMENT XIV

SECTION 1
All persons born or naturalized in the United States and subject to the jurisdiction thereof, are citizens of the United States and of the State wherein they reside. No State shall make or enforce any law which shall abridge the privileges or immunities of citizens of the United States; nor shall any State deprive any person of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law; nor deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal protection of the laws.

SECTION 2
Representatives shall be apportioned among the several States according to their respective numbers, counting the whole number of persons in each State, excluding Indians not taxed. But when the right to vote at any election for the choice of electors for President and Vice President of the United States, Representatives in Congress, the Executive and Judicial officers of a State, or the members of the Legislature thereof, is denied to any of the male inhabitants of such State, being twenty-one years of age, and citizens of the United States, or in any way abridged, except for participation in rebellion, or other crime, the basis of representation therein shall be reduced in the proportion which the number of such male citizens shall bear to the whole number of male citizens twenty-one years of age in such State.

SECTION 3
No person shall be a Senator or Representative in Congress, or elector of President and Vice President, or hold any office, civil or military, under the United States, or under any State, who, having previously taken an oath, as a member of Congress, or as an officer of the United States, or as a member of any State legislature, or as an executive or judicial officer of any State, to support the Constitution of the United States, shall have engaged in insurrection or rebellion against the same, or given aid or comfort to the enemies thereof. But Congress may by a vote of two-thirds of each House, remove such disability.

SECTION 4
The validity of the public debt of the United States, authorized by law, including debts incurred for payment of pensions and bounties for services in suppressing insurrection or rebellion, shall not be questioned. But neither the United States nor any State shall assume or pay any debt or obligation incurred in aid of insurrection or rebellion against the United States, or any claim for the loss or emancipation of any slave; but all such debts, obligations and claims shall be held illegal and void.

SECTION 5
The Congress shall have power to enforce, by appropriate legislation, the provisions of this article.

That is about citizenship not immigration.

Wrong. Illegal Immigrants are Not Citizens. Therefore because The US does not have Jurisdiction over them, their country where their citizenship resides does, The Myth of Anchor Babies never was. You cannot illegally immigrate in to The US, have a child and declare it a citizen. DACA by the same legal reasoning is also Unconstitutional. It is also not law, but is nothing but "Delayed Action" and even within the DACA EO itself it is recognized that these people are here illegally and subject to the enforcement of immigration law, but for the EO Delaying that Enforcement.....DACA.

The US has jurisdiction once on US soil.

nor shall any State deprive any person of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law; nor deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal protection of the laws.

 

[danielpalos]

Democrats are above the laws

the right wing only knows how to appeal to ignorance of the laws.

Educate me then. I love dumb ass fairy tales.

How is aiding and abetting foreign nationals who come and go unchecked and unregulated at will, not illegal?

Upgrade Ellis Island so they have some place to go instead of our southern border.

 

[The Original Tree]

AMENDMENT XIV

SECTION 1
All persons born or naturalized in the United States and subject to the jurisdiction thereof, are citizens of the United States and of the State wherein they reside. No State shall make or enforce any law which shall abridge the privileges or immunities of citizens of the United States; nor shall any State deprive any person of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law; nor deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal protection of the laws.

SECTION 2
Representatives shall be apportioned among the several States according to their respective numbers, counting the whole number of persons in each State, excluding Indians not taxed. But when the right to vote at any election for the choice of electors for President and Vice President of the United States, Representatives in Congress, the Executive and Judicial officers of a State, or the members of the Legislature thereof, is denied to any of the male inhabitants of such State, being twenty-one years of age, and citizens of the United States, or in any way abridged, except for participation in rebellion, or other crime, the basis of representation therein shall be reduced in the proportion which the number of such male citizens shall bear to the whole number of male citizens twenty-one years of age in such State.

SECTION 3
No person shall be a Senator or Representative in Congress, or elector of President and Vice President, or hold any office, civil or military, under the United States, or under any State, who, having previously taken an oath, as a member of Congress, or as an officer of the United States, or as a member of any State legislature, or as an executive or judicial officer of any State, to support the Constitution of the United States, shall have engaged in insurrection or rebellion against the same, or given aid or comfort to the enemies thereof. But Congress may by a vote of two-thirds of each House, remove such disability.

SECTION 4
The validity of the public debt of the United States, authorized by law, including debts incurred for payment of pensions and bounties for services in suppressing insurrection or rebellion, shall not be questioned. But neither the United States nor any State shall assume or pay any debt or obligation incurred in aid of insurrection or rebellion against the United States, or any claim for the loss or emancipation of any slave; but all such debts, obligations and claims shall be held illegal and void.

SECTION 5
The Congress shall have power to enforce, by appropriate legislation, the provisions of this article.

That is about citizenship not immigration.

Wrong. Illegal Immigrants are Not Citizens. Therefore because The US does not have Jurisdiction over them, their country where their citizenship resides does, The Myth of Anchor Babies never was. You cannot illegally immigrate in to The US, have a child and declare it a citizen. DACA by the same legal reasoning is also Unconstitutional. It is also not law, but is nothing but "Delayed Action" and even within the DACA EO itself it is recognized that these people are here illegally and subject to the enforcement of immigration law, but for the EO Delaying that Enforcement.....DACA.

The US has jurisdiction once on US soil.

nor shall any State deprive any person of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law; nor deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal protection of the laws.

No they do not. That has been proven over and over again with each Deportation. If the US had legal jurisdiction over Illegal Aliens, then they could not detain them without a trial, and they could not deport them either back to their country of origin which does have legal jurisdiction over them simply for being here illegally.

Jurisdiction is a broader legal term than you realize. It not only refers to a government's authority in a particular area of the law, but it also refers to your legal representation and rights in that area.

Illegal Aliens have No Jurisdiction in The US, and The US has no Jurisdiction over Illegal Aliens. This is why you can deport illegal Aliens simply for being here, but you cannot deport a US Citizen.

An Illegal Alien cannot go to a US Embassy in a Foreign Country and ask The United States for assistance. They have no Congressman or Senator, or State Rep to represent them. They have no voice, nor should they in the affairs of The United States Government, Local or State Government.

They have No Legal Status.

 

[TheGreatSatan]

AMENDMENT XIV

SECTION 1
All persons born or naturalized in the United States and subject to the jurisdiction thereof, are citizens of the United States and of the State wherein they reside. No State shall make or enforce any law which shall abridge the privileges or immunities of citizens of the United States; nor shall any State deprive any person of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law; nor deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal protection of the laws.

SECTION 2
Representatives shall be apportioned among the several States according to their respective numbers, counting the whole number of persons in each State, excluding Indians not taxed. But when the right to vote at any election for the choice of electors for President and Vice President of the United States, Representatives in Congress, the Executive and Judicial officers of a State, or the members of the Legislature thereof, is denied to any of the male inhabitants of such State, being twenty-one years of age, and citizens of the United States, or in any way abridged, except for participation in rebellion, or other crime, the basis of representation therein shall be reduced in the proportion which the number of such male citizens shall bear to the whole number of male citizens twenty-one years of age in such State.

SECTION 3
No person shall be a Senator or Representative in Congress, or elector of President and Vice President, or hold any office, civil or military, under the United States, or under any State, who, having previously taken an oath, as a member of Congress, or as an officer of the United States, or as a member of any State legislature, or as an executive or judicial officer of any State, to support the Constitution of the United States, shall have engaged in insurrection or rebellion against the same, or given aid or comfort to the enemies thereof. But Congress may by a vote of two-thirds of each House, remove such disability.

SECTION 4
The validity of the public debt of the United States, authorized by law, including debts incurred for payment of pensions and bounties for services in suppressing insurrection or rebellion, shall not be questioned. But neither the United States nor any State shall assume or pay any debt or obligation incurred in aid of insurrection or rebellion against the United States, or any claim for the loss or emancipation of any slave; but all such debts, obligations and claims shall be held illegal and void.

SECTION 5
The Congress shall have power to enforce, by appropriate legislation, the provisions of this article.

That is about citizenship not immigration.

Wrong. Illegal Immigrants are Not Citizens. Therefore because The US does not have Jurisdiction over them, their country where their citizenship resides does, The Myth of Anchor Babies never was. You cannot illegally immigrate in to The US, have a child and declare it a citizen. DACA by the same legal reasoning is also Unconstitutional. It is also not law, but is nothing but "Delayed Action" and even within the DACA EO itself it is recognized that these people are here illegally and subject to the enforcement of immigration law, but for the EO Delaying that Enforcement.....DACA.

The US has jurisdiction once on US soil.

nor shall any State deprive any person of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law; nor deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal protection of the laws.

No they do not. That has been proven over and over again with each Deportation. If the US had legal jurisdiction over Illegal Aliens, then they could not detain them without a trial, and they could not deport them either back to their country of origin which does have legal jurisdiction over them. Jurisdiction is a broader legal term than you realize. It not only refers to a government's authority in a particular area of the law, but it also refers to your legal representation and rights in that area.

Illegal Aliens have No Jurisdiction in The US, and The US has no Jurisdiction over Illegal Aliens. This is why you can deport illegal Aliens simply for being here, but you cannot deport a US Citizen.

They are making a new class. Globalist. Global laws transcend national laws.

 

[The Original Tree]

AMENDMENT XIV

SECTION 1
All persons born or naturalized in the United States and subject to the jurisdiction thereof, are citizens of the United States and of the State wherein they reside. No State shall make or enforce any law which shall abridge the privileges or immunities of citizens of the United States; nor shall any State deprive any person of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law; nor deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal protection of the laws.

SECTION 2
Representatives shall be apportioned among the several States according to their respective numbers, counting the whole number of persons in each State, excluding Indians not taxed. But when the right to vote at any election for the choice of electors for President and Vice President of the United States, Representatives in Congress, the Executive and Judicial officers of a State, or the members of the Legislature thereof, is denied to any of the male inhabitants of such State, being twenty-one years of age, and citizens of the United States, or in any way abridged, except for participation in rebellion, or other crime, the basis of representation therein shall be reduced in the proportion which the number of such male citizens shall bear to the whole number of male citizens twenty-one years of age in such State.

SECTION 3
No person shall be a Senator or Representative in Congress, or elector of President and Vice President, or hold any office, civil or military, under the United States, or under any State, who, having previously taken an oath, as a member of Congress, or as an officer of the United States, or as a member of any State legislature, or as an executive or judicial officer of any State, to support the Constitution of the United States, shall have engaged in insurrection or rebellion against the same, or given aid or comfort to the enemies thereof. But Congress may by a vote of two-thirds of each House, remove such disability.

SECTION 4
The validity of the public debt of the United States, authorized by law, including debts incurred for payment of pensions and bounties for services in suppressing insurrection or rebellion, shall not be questioned. But neither the United States nor any State shall assume or pay any debt or obligation incurred in aid of insurrection or rebellion against the United States, or any claim for the loss or emancipation of any slave; but all such debts, obligations and claims shall be held illegal and void.

SECTION 5
The Congress shall have power to enforce, by appropriate legislation, the provisions of this article.

That is about citizenship not immigration.

Wrong. Illegal Immigrants are Not Citizens. Therefore because The US does not have Jurisdiction over them, their country where their citizenship resides does, The Myth of Anchor Babies never was. You cannot illegally immigrate in to The US, have a child and declare it a citizen. DACA by the same legal reasoning is also Unconstitutional. It is also not law, but is nothing but "Delayed Action" and even within the DACA EO itself it is recognized that these people are here illegally and subject to the enforcement of immigration law, but for the EO Delaying that Enforcement.....DACA.

The US has jurisdiction once on US soil.

nor shall any State deprive any person of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law; nor deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal protection of the laws.

No they do not. That has been proven over and over again with each Deportation. If the US had legal jurisdiction over Illegal Aliens, then they could not detain them without a trial, and they could not deport them either back to their country of origin which does have legal jurisdiction over them. Jurisdiction is a broader legal term than you realize. It not only refers to a government's authority in a particular area of the law, but it also refers to your legal representation and rights in that area.

Illegal Aliens have No Jurisdiction in The US, and The US has no Jurisdiction over Illegal Aliens. This is why you can deport illegal Aliens simply for being here, but you cannot deport a US Citizen.

They are making a new class. Globalist. Global laws transcend national laws.

That is what they are trying to do, and that is exactly what Globalist Government is. Once you allow Globalist Doctrines, Policies, and Laws to have Jurisdiction over your Country, your Sovereign Rights No Longer Exist.

Democrats do not believe in The Rule of Law, American Law, they believe in UN Resolutions, Agenda 21 and Agenda 2030, and any other Globalist Doctrines and Law that tries to Subvert the Rights of National Sovereignty.

 

[danielpalos]

AMENDMENT XIV

SECTION 1
All persons born or naturalized in the United States and subject to the jurisdiction thereof, are citizens of the United States and of the State wherein they reside. No State shall make or enforce any law which shall abridge the privileges or immunities of citizens of the United States; nor shall any State deprive any person of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law; nor deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal protection of the laws.

SECTION 2
Representatives shall be apportioned among the several States according to their respective numbers, counting the whole number of persons in each State, excluding Indians not taxed. But when the right to vote at any election for the choice of electors for President and Vice President of the United States, Representatives in Congress, the Executive and Judicial officers of a State, or the members of the Legislature thereof, is denied to any of the male inhabitants of such State, being twenty-one years of age, and citizens of the United States, or in any way abridged, except for participation in rebellion, or other crime, the basis of representation therein shall be reduced in the proportion which the number of such male citizens shall bear to the whole number of male citizens twenty-one years of age in such State.

SECTION 3
No person shall be a Senator or Representative in Congress, or elector of President and Vice President, or hold any office, civil or military, under the United States, or under any State, who, having previously taken an oath, as a member of Congress, or as an officer of the United States, or as a member of any State legislature, or as an executive or judicial officer of any State, to support the Constitution of the United States, shall have engaged in insurrection or rebellion against the same, or given aid or comfort to the enemies thereof. But Congress may by a vote of two-thirds of each House, remove such disability.

SECTION 4
The validity of the public debt of the United States, authorized by law, including debts incurred for payment of pensions and bounties for services in suppressing insurrection or rebellion, shall not be questioned. But neither the United States nor any State shall assume or pay any debt or obligation incurred in aid of insurrection or rebellion against the United States, or any claim for the loss or emancipation of any slave; but all such debts, obligations and claims shall be held illegal and void.

SECTION 5
The Congress shall have power to enforce, by appropriate legislation, the provisions of this article.

That is about citizenship not immigration.

Wrong. Illegal Immigrants are Not Citizens. Therefore because The US does not have Jurisdiction over them, their country where their citizenship resides does, The Myth of Anchor Babies never was. You cannot illegally immigrate in to The US, have a child and declare it a citizen. DACA by the same legal reasoning is also Unconstitutional. It is also not law, but is nothing but "Delayed Action" and even within the DACA EO itself it is recognized that these people are here illegally and subject to the enforcement of immigration law, but for the EO Delaying that Enforcement.....DACA.

The US has jurisdiction once on US soil.

nor shall any State deprive any person of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law; nor deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal protection of the laws.

No they do not. That has been proven over and over again with each Deportation. If the US had legal jurisdiction over Illegal Aliens, then they could not detain them without a trial, and they could not deport them either back to their country of origin which does have legal jurisdiction over them simply for being here illegally.

Jurisdiction is a broader legal term than you realize. It not only refers to a government's authority in a particular area of the law, but it also refers to your legal representation and rights in that area.

Illegal Aliens have No Jurisdiction in The US, and The US has no Jurisdiction over Illegal Aliens. This is why you can deport illegal Aliens simply for being here, but you cannot deport a US Citizen.

An Illegal Alien cannot go to a US Embassy in a Foreign Country and ask The United States for assistance. They have no Congressman or Senator, or State Rep to represent them. They have no voice, nor should they in the affairs of The United States Government, Local or State Government.

They have No Legal Status.

lol. the right wing really does, only believe in natural in abortion threads.

 

[The Original Tree]

How True is this?

DACA recipient: The Democratic Party would rather create more chaos than govern this country

 

[The Original Tree]

AMENDMENT XIV

SECTION 1
All persons born or naturalized in the United States and subject to the jurisdiction thereof, are citizens of the United States and of the State wherein they reside. No State shall make or enforce any law which shall abridge the privileges or immunities of citizens of the United States; nor shall any State deprive any person of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law; nor deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal protection of the laws.

SECTION 2
Representatives shall be apportioned among the several States according to their respective numbers, counting the whole number of persons in each State, excluding Indians not taxed. But when the right to vote at any election for the choice of electors for President and Vice President of the United States, Representatives in Congress, the Executive and Judicial officers of a State, or the members of the Legislature thereof, is denied to any of the male inhabitants of such State, being twenty-one years of age, and citizens of the United States, or in any way abridged, except for participation in rebellion, or other crime, the basis of representation therein shall be reduced in the proportion which the number of such male citizens shall bear to the whole number of male citizens twenty-one years of age in such State.

SECTION 3
No person shall be a Senator or Representative in Congress, or elector of President and Vice President, or hold any office, civil or military, under the United States, or under any State, who, having previously taken an oath, as a member of Congress, or as an officer of the United States, or as a member of any State legislature, or as an executive or judicial officer of any State, to support the Constitution of the United States, shall have engaged in insurrection or rebellion against the same, or given aid or comfort to the enemies thereof. But Congress may by a vote of two-thirds of each House, remove such disability.

SECTION 4
The validity of the public debt of the United States, authorized by law, including debts incurred for payment of pensions and bounties for services in suppressing insurrection or rebellion, shall not be questioned. But neither the United States nor any State shall assume or pay any debt or obligation incurred in aid of insurrection or rebellion against the United States, or any claim for the loss or emancipation of any slave; but all such debts, obligations and claims shall be held illegal and void.

SECTION 5
The Congress shall have power to enforce, by appropriate legislation, the provisions of this article.

That is about citizenship not immigration.

Wrong. Illegal Immigrants are Not Citizens. Therefore because The US does not have Jurisdiction over them, their country where their citizenship resides does, The Myth of Anchor Babies never was. You cannot illegally immigrate in to The US, have a child and declare it a citizen. DACA by the same legal reasoning is also Unconstitutional. It is also not law, but is nothing but "Delayed Action" and even within the DACA EO itself it is recognized that these people are here illegally and subject to the enforcement of immigration law, but for the EO Delaying that Enforcement.....DACA.

The US has jurisdiction once on US soil.

nor shall any State deprive any person of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law; nor deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal protection of the laws.

No they do not. That has been proven over and over again with each Deportation. If the US had legal jurisdiction over Illegal Aliens, then they could not detain them without a trial, and they could not deport them either back to their country of origin which does have legal jurisdiction over them simply for being here illegally.

Jurisdiction is a broader legal term than you realize. It not only refers to a government's authority in a particular area of the law, but it also refers to your legal representation and rights in that area.

Illegal Aliens have No Jurisdiction in The US, and The US has no Jurisdiction over Illegal Aliens. This is why you can deport illegal Aliens simply for being here, but you cannot deport a US Citizen.

An Illegal Alien cannot go to a US Embassy in a Foreign Country and ask The United States for assistance. They have no Congressman or Senator, or State Rep to represent them. They have no voice, nor should they in the affairs of The United States Government, Local or State Government.

They have No Legal Status.

lol. the right wing really does, only believe in natural in abortion threads.

You make no sense at all.

 

[busybee01]

You are a lying weasel. Law enforcement does NOT have to cooperate with ICE. Local law enforcement can be deputized only with that agency's permission.

But if any government official deliberately attempts to conceal, harbor, or shield from detection, any illegal alien, they could be imprisoned for 5 years, in a federal prison, FOR EACH ALIEN in respect to whom such a violation occurs.

So you conceal, harbor, or shield from detection (as in passing sanctuary law), 1000 illegal aliens in your town, you get sentenced to 5,000 years in federal prison. Enforce the law, AG Barr. LOCK THEM UP!

Sanctuary laws by themselves are not illegal. Telling local law enforcement to not ask people about their immigration status is not illegal. There is no law requiring local governments or law enforcement to enforce immigration law.

 

[busybee01]

That power has to be delegated somewhere or it is unConstitutional and null and void, from Inception if we have to quibble about it in Any serious venue.

The Power to regulate Immigration was always assumed to exist since the inception of America. It was further defined in The 14th Amendment.

The 14th Amendment discusses persons who already have legal status in The US, and whom The United States has Jurisdiction over.

The United States does not have Jurisdiction over Foreign Nationals, so therefore, the 14th Amendment only applies to legal residents with legal status in The US who The US has Jurisdiction over, therefore making them subject to US law, and afforded the rights and protections persons of Legal Status are guaranteed.

Illegal Aliens have No Legal Status in The United States so this is why they can be removed from The US and deported back to their country of Origin. Their country of origin is who has legal jurisdiction on them.

You cannot deport a US Citizen, like you can a Foreign National or Illegal Alien.

Also The Anchor Baby Scenario is a Myth, and is nothing but a political football. Eventually that myth will be shattered by SCOTUS when the right case is brought before it.

DACA is also illegal and is not lawful.

This too at some point will be shot down.

The United States does have jurisdiction over anyone on US soil with the exception of foreign diplomats. Illegals have the right to petition the US courts in regards to immigration laws. They also have the same rights as any US citizen in any court in the land.

The Anchor baby scenario is enshrined in the 14th Amendment. You don't have to be a lawyer to understand what it means. What you want is the Supreme Court to ignore the Constitution and substitute their political judgment.

DACA is legal at the very least under contract law. Obama agreed to defer any deportation as long as they met the requirement of undergoing training or have a job. That is a very Republican idea. I have no doubt that Ronald Reagan would have supported it.

 

[protectionist]

Sanctuary laws by themselves are not illegal. Telling local law enforcement to not ask people about their immigration status is not illegal. There is no law requiring local governments or law enforcement to enforce immigration law.

BUT there IS A LAW (US Code 8, Section 1324, (A) (i) banning them from >> "brings to or attempts to bring to the United States in any manner whatsoever such person at a place other than a designated port of entry or place other than as designated by the Commissioner, regardless of whether such alien has received prior official authorization to come to, enter, or reside in the United States and regardless of any future official action which may be taken with respect to such alien; "

George Soros and his funded groups, Pueblos Sin Fronteras have been guilty of violating this law, and some leaders of PSF have already been arrested for it, and are in jail right now. (In Mexico)

Then there's US Code 8, Section 1324 (A) (iii) >> banning them from >> "knowing or in reckless disregard of the fact that an alien has come to, entered, or remains in the United States in violation of law, conceals, harbors, or shields from detection, or attempts to conceal, harbor, or shield from detection, such alien in any place, including any building or any means of transportation;

 

[The Original Tree]

That power has to be delegated somewhere or it is unConstitutional and null and void, from Inception if we have to quibble about it in Any serious venue.

The Power to regulate Immigration was always assumed to exist since the inception of America. It was further defined in The 14th Amendment.

The 14th Amendment discusses persons who already have legal status in The US, and whom The United States has Jurisdiction over.

The United States does not have Jurisdiction over Foreign Nationals, so therefore, the 14th Amendment only applies to legal residents with legal status in The US who The US has Jurisdiction over, therefore making them subject to US law, and afforded the rights and protections persons of Legal Status are guaranteed.

Illegal Aliens have No Legal Status in The United States so this is why they can be removed from The US and deported back to their country of Origin. Their country of origin is who has legal jurisdiction on them.

You cannot deport a US Citizen, like you can a Foreign National or Illegal Alien.

Also The Anchor Baby Scenario is a Myth, and is nothing but a political football. Eventually that myth will be shattered by SCOTUS when the right case is brought before it.

DACA is also illegal and is not lawful.

This too at some point will be shot down.

The United States does have jurisdiction over anyone on US soil with the exception of foreign diplomats. Illegals have the right to petition the US courts in regards to immigration laws. They also have the same rights as any US citizen in any court in the land.

The Anchor baby scenario is enshrined in the 14th Amendment. You don't have to be a lawyer to understand what it means. What you want is the Supreme Court to ignore the Constitution and substitute their political judgment.

DACA is legal at the very least under contract law. Obama agreed to defer any deportation as long as they met the requirement of undergoing training or have a job. That is a very Republican idea. I have no doubt that Ronald Reagan would have supported it.

Just Wrong. Jurisdiction refers to country of origin in which one is a citizen and has the rights and responsibilities granted that citizen in that country.

The Jurisdiction which presides over an Illegal Alien is Their Country of Origin in which they have citizenship. This is why they are deported back to the country which has Jurisdiction over them.

They are remanded over via deportation to the proper jurisdiction, and that is their country of origin.

 

[busybee01]

If they would start with a flagrant lawbreaker like Libby Schaaf in Oakland and give her a long sentence for defying federal law, it might get the attention of some other lawbreakers. A couple 100 year sentences would do wonders for compliance.

I just saw on the news last night, some Democrat Representative actually helping a pregnant illegal immigrant sneak in to the country so she could drop her baby on this side of the border.

Now, that is illegal to do, so why isn't this Congressman being brought up on charges. The whole reason a lot of this is happening is that these people are politically insulated from being prosecuted. That needs to stop.

What ever happened to "No One Is Above The Law?"

This is a felony to do this.

Democratic senator intervenes to help pregnant Mexican woman make asylum claim

You are a lying little weasel. The woman had health issues which had to be looked at. It is called compassion.

 

[The Original Tree]

You are a lying weasel. Law enforcement does NOT have to cooperate with ICE. Local law enforcement can be deputized only with that agency's permission.

But if any government official deliberately attempts to conceal, harbor, or shield from detection, any illegal alien, they could be imprisoned for 5 years, in a federal prison, FOR EACH ALIEN in respect to whom such a violation occurs.

So you conceal, harbor, or shield from detection (as in passing sanctuary law), 1000 illegal aliens in your town, you get sentenced to 5,000 years in federal prison. Enforce the law, AG Barr. LOCK THEM UP!

Sanctuary laws by themselves are not illegal. Telling local law enforcement to not ask people about their immigration status is not illegal. There is no law requiring local governments or law enforcement to enforce immigration law.

Yes they are illegal. You cannot knowingly harbor an Illegal alien and help them avoid apprehension by Law Enforcement.
People need to be prosecuted for this.