Imagine this scenario, Trump acolytes......

[nat4900]

Simply imagine if a foreign ambassador from an allied nation contacted the FBI and stated that there may be a Chinese plot to dig dirt on Trump and trying to openly give that "dirt" to the Clinton campaign throughout the 2016 race.

Now, imagine if the FBI would choose to NOT investigate WHAT and the WHO, within the Clinton campaign, was collaborating with the Chinese.

Would not starting a COUNTER-intelligence investigation by the FBI be interpreted as "dereliction" of what the FBI is mandated to do???

 

[Cellblock2429]

Simply imagine if a foreign ambassador from an allied nation contacted the FBI and stated that there may be a Chinese plot to dig dirt on Trump and trying to openly give that "dirt" to the Clinton campaign throughout the 2016 race.

Now, imagine if the FBI would choose to NOT investigate WHAT and the WHO, within the Clinton campaign, was collaborating with the Chinese.

Would not starting a COUNTER-intelligence investigation by the FBI be interpreted as "dereliction" of what the FBI is mandated to do???

/----/ Go peddle you hypothetical questions somewhere else. They are pointless and designed to obfuscate.

 

[nat4900]

Go peddle you hypothetical questions somewhere else. They are pointless and designed to obfuscate.

Thank you for faithfully doing the ONLY valuable contribution you can make on this forum, Celly......and THAT is, bumping a thread......lol

 

[Cellblock2429]

Go peddle you hypothetical questions somewhere else. They are pointless and designed to obfuscate.

Thank you for faithfully doing the ONLY valuable contribution you can make on this forum, Celly......and THAT is, bumping a thread......lol

/----/ Is Nat still beating his wife? Let me state that I have no proof that NAt is even married, and if so has ever or still is beating his wife. But the seriousness of the charges of assault and battery are so compelling we need to launch a full scale investigation. Let the discussion begin.

 

[Frankeneinstein]

Simply imagine if a foreign ambassador from an allied nation contacted the FBI and stated that there may be a Chinese plot to dig dirt on Trump and trying to openly give that "dirt" to the Clinton campaign throughout the 2016 race.

Now, imagine if the FBI would choose to NOT investigate WHAT and the WHO, within the Clinton campaign, was collaborating with the Chinese.

Would not starting a COUNTER-intelligence investigation by the FBI be interpreted as "dereliction" of what the FBI is mandated to do???

Try imagining a girl instead

 

[nat4900]

Try imagining a girl instead

Above, an example of right wing "intelligentsia."

 

[Frankeneinstein]

Above, an example of right wing "intelligentsia."

There is no left wing example

 

[Camp]

Simply imagine if a foreign ambassador from an allied nation contacted the FBI and stated that there may be a Chinese plot to dig dirt on Trump and trying to openly give that "dirt" to the Clinton campaign throughout the 2016 race.

Now, imagine if the FBI would choose to NOT investigate WHAT and the WHO, within the Clinton campaign, was collaborating with the Chinese.

Would not starting a COUNTER-intelligence investigation by the FBI be interpreted as "dereliction" of what the FBI is mandated to do???

/----/ Go peddle you hypothetical questions somewhere else. They are pointless and designed to obfuscate.
View attachment 194662

You are posting on a political message board and so is he. Where else do you think it would be appropriate to "peddle" hypothetical questions if not on a random political message room open for chatting about random political topics?

 

[CrusaderFrank]

Simply imagine if a foreign ambassador from an allied nation contacted the FBI and stated that there may be a Chinese plot to dig dirt on Trump and trying to openly give that "dirt" to the Clinton campaign throughout the 2016 race.

Now, imagine if the FBI would choose to NOT investigate WHAT and the WHO, within the Clinton campaign, was collaborating with the Chinese.

Would not starting a COUNTER-intelligence investigation by the FBI be interpreted as "dereliction" of what the FBI is mandated to do???

Imagine Trump implementing the Starkey Standard for sedition

 

[BuckToothMoron]

Simply imagine if a foreign ambassador from an allied nation contacted the FBI and stated that there may be a Chinese plot to dig dirt on Trump and trying to openly give that "dirt" to the Clinton campaign throughout the 2016 race.

Now, imagine if the FBI would choose to NOT investigate WHAT and the WHO, within the Clinton campaign, was collaborating with the Chinese.

Would not starting a COUNTER-intelligence investigation by the FBI be interpreted as "dereliction" of what the FBI is mandated to do???

/----/ Go peddle you hypothetical questions somewhere else. They are pointless and designed to obfuscate.
View attachment 194662

Dude, it’s nate the brainless. Most of his post are either imaginary or what he thinks are clever jabs at people who point out his obsession with Trump. Don’t worry, he’ll likely kill himself if Mueller can’t get Trump to resign.

 

[Camp]

Simply imagine if a foreign ambassador from an allied nation contacted the FBI and stated that there may be a Chinese plot to dig dirt on Trump and trying to openly give that "dirt" to the Clinton campaign throughout the 2016 race.

Now, imagine if the FBI would choose to NOT investigate WHAT and the WHO, within the Clinton campaign, was collaborating with the Chinese.

Would not starting a COUNTER-intelligence investigation by the FBI be interpreted as "dereliction" of what the FBI is mandated to do???

It is easy to imagine. The trombots would be pooping in their pants and whining like trumpflakes.

 

[Toddsterpatriot]

Simply imagine if a foreign ambassador from an allied nation contacted the FBI and stated that there may be a Chinese plot to dig dirt on Trump and trying to openly give that "dirt" to the Clinton campaign throughout the 2016 race.

Now, imagine if the FBI would choose to NOT investigate WHAT and the WHO, within the Clinton campaign, was collaborating with the Chinese.

Would not starting a COUNTER-intelligence investigation by the FBI be interpreted as "dereliction" of what the FBI is mandated to do???

Simply imagine if a foreign ambassador from an allied nation contacted the FBI and stated that there may be a Chinese plot to dig dirt on Trump and trying to openly give that "dirt" to the Clinton campaign throughout the 2016 race....

Would not starting a COUNTER-intelligence investigation by the FBI be interpreted as "dereliction" of what the FBI is mandated to do???

Depends on how much money the ambassador arranged to be donated to the Trump Foundation.
Was it $20 million? $25 million? More?

 

[Cellblock2429]

Simply imagine if a foreign ambassador from an allied nation contacted the FBI and stated that there may be a Chinese plot to dig dirt on Trump and trying to openly give that "dirt" to the Clinton campaign throughout the 2016 race.

Now, imagine if the FBI would choose to NOT investigate WHAT and the WHO, within the Clinton campaign, was collaborating with the Chinese.

Would not starting a COUNTER-intelligence investigation by the FBI be interpreted as "dereliction" of what the FBI is mandated to do???

/----/ Go peddle you hypothetical questions somewhere else. They are pointless and designed to obfuscate.
View attachment 194662

You are posting on a political message board and so is he. Where else do you think it would be appropriate to "peddle" hypothetical questions if not on a random political message room open for chatting about random political topics?

/----/ Hypothetical question: A question based on certain proven or assumed facts, and formulated to arrive at a generalized answer applicable in most such situations in the absence of dependable data. A debate tactic to divert attention away from the hard facts of a case.

 

[Geaux4it]

Simply imagine if a foreign ambassador from an allied nation contacted the FBI and stated that there may be a Chinese plot to dig dirt on Trump and trying to openly give that "dirt" to the Clinton campaign throughout the 2016 race.

Now, imagine if the FBI would choose to NOT investigate WHAT and the WHO, within the Clinton campaign, was collaborating with the Chinese.

Would not starting a COUNTER-intelligence investigation by the FBI be interpreted as "dereliction" of what the FBI is mandated to do???

This thread should me moved to the Conspiracy Forum

-Geaux

 

[Frankeneinstein]

It is easy to imagine. The trombots would be pooping in their pants and whining like trumpflakes.

and the climax

 

[tycho1572]

I thought you said you were going to get help for your TDS, nat4900? What happened?

 

[Billy_Kinetta]

Simply imagine if a foreign ambassador from an allied nation contacted the FBI and stated that there may be a Chinese plot to dig dirt on Trump and trying to openly give that "dirt" to the Clinton campaign throughout the 2016 race.

Now, imagine if the FBI would choose to NOT investigate WHAT and the WHO, within the Clinton campaign, was collaborating with the Chinese.

Would not starting a COUNTER-intelligence investigation by the FBI be interpreted as "dereliction" of what the FBI is mandated to do???

The Clintons and their minions are a protected class.

"All's fair in love and war." And this is war, recognize it or not.

 

[Camp]

Simply imagine if a foreign ambassador from an allied nation contacted the FBI and stated that there may be a Chinese plot to dig dirt on Trump and trying to openly give that "dirt" to the Clinton campaign throughout the 2016 race.

Now, imagine if the FBI would choose to NOT investigate WHAT and the WHO, within the Clinton campaign, was collaborating with the Chinese.

Would not starting a COUNTER-intelligence investigation by the FBI be interpreted as "dereliction" of what the FBI is mandated to do???

/----/ Go peddle you hypothetical questions somewhere else. They are pointless and designed to obfuscate.
View attachment 194662

You are posting on a political message board and so is he. Where else do you think it would be appropriate to "peddle" hypothetical questions if not on a random political message room open for chatting about random political topics?

/----/ Hypothetical question: A question based on certain proven or assumed facts, and formulated to arrive at a generalized answer applicable in most such situations in the absence of dependable data. A debate tactic to divert attention away from the hard facts of a case.

You're an idiot. The data you are calling a tactic to divert was made by the person starting the debate in the opening statement.

 

[Pete7469]

Imagine if you walked in front of a speeding train and fed the bugs and worms, plus stopped stealing our oxygen.

The world would be a cooler place because your carbon footprint would be neutralized and the collective intellect of mankind would bump up a degree.

Imbecile.


.

 

[Pete7469]

Dude, it’s nate the brainless. Most of his post are either imaginary or what he thinks are clever jabs at people who point out his obsession with Trump. Don’t worry, he’ll likely kill himself if Mueller can’t get Trump to resign.

That really is the only way that piece of shit will ever contribute anything to the planet.

Self conversion to fertilizer.


.